Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:08:25.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wheat cultivars affecting life history and digestive amylolytic activity of Sitotroga cerealella Olivier (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2016

E. Borzoui  and
B. Naseri
E. Borzoui
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
B. Naseri*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +98 9142857597 Fax: +98 4533512204 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The life history and digestive α-amylase activity of the Angoumois grain moth, Sitotroga cerealella Olivier (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) were studied on six wheat cultivars (Arg, Bam, Nai 60, Pishtaz, Sepahan and Shanghai) at 25 ± 1°C, relative humidity of 65 ± 5% and a photoperiod of 16:8 (L:D) h. A delay in the developmental time of S. cerealella immature stages was detected when larvae were fed on cultivar Sepahan. The maximum survival rate of immature stages was seen on cultivar Bam (93.33 ± 2.10%), and the minimum rates were on cultivars Nai 60 (54.66 ± 2.49%) and Sepahan (49.33 ± 4.52%). The highest realized fecundity and fertility were recorded for females which came from larvae fed on cultivar Bam (93.30 ± 2.10 eggs/female and 91.90 ± 3.10%, respectively); and the lowest ones were observed for females which came from larvae fed on cultivar Sepahan (49.30 ± 4.50 eggs/female and 67.4 ± 11.1%, respectively). The heaviest male and female weights of S. cerealella were observed on cultivar Bam (2.97 ± 0.02 and 4.80 ± 0.01 mg, respectively). The highest amylolytic activity of the fourth instar was detected on cultivar Bam (0.89 ± 0.04 mg maltose min−1), which had the maximum mean hundred-wheat weight (5.92 ± 0.19 g). One α-amylase isozyme was detected in the midgut extracts from the fourth instar larvae fed on different wheat cultivars, and the highest intensity was found in larvae fed on cultivar Bam. Correlation analyses showed that very high correlations existed between the immature period, fecundity and fertility on one side and inhibition of α-amylase, soluble starch content and hundred-wheat weight on the other. According to the obtained results, cultivar Sepahan is an unfavorable host for the feeding and development of S. cerealella.

Keywords

Angoumois grain mothlife spansurvival ratenutritional physiology
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 106 , Issue 4 , August 2016 , pp. 464 - 473
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, S. & Raza, A. (2010) Role of physical properties of maize grains towards resistance to Sitotroga cerealella (oliv.) (Gelechiidae: Lepidoptera) in no choice test. Pakistan Entomologist 32, 37–42.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S., Ul-Hasan, M. & Hussain, S. (2002) Studies on the relative susceptibility of wheat varieties to Sitotroga cerealella (Oliv.). Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 39, 47–49.Google Scholar
A.O.A.C. (1984) Official Methods of Analysis. 14th edn. Washington, DC, Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Ashamo, M.O. (2010) Relative resistance of paddy varieties to Sitotroga cerealella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Biologia 65(2), 333–337.Google Scholar
Awmack, C.S. & Leather, S.R. (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 47, 817–844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babic, B., Poisson, A., Darwish, S., Lacasse, J., Merkx-Jacques, M., Despland, E. & Bede, J.C. (2008) Influence of dietary nutritional composition on caterpillar salivary enzyme activity. Journal of Insect Physiology 54, 286–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, J.E. (1987) Purification of isoamylases from the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae L. by HPLC and their interaction with partially purified amylase inhibitor from wheat. Insect Biochemistry 17, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behmer, S.T. (2009) Insect herbivore nutrient regulation. Annual Review of Entomology 54, 165–187.Google Scholar
Bentancourt, C.M., Scatoni, I.B., Gonzalez, A. & Franco, J. (2003) Effects of larval diet on the development and reproduction of Argyrotaenia sphaleropa (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Neotropical Entomology 32(4), 551–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernfeld, P. (1955) Amylases, α and β. Methods in Enzymology 1, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bong, C.F.J., Er, C.C., Yiu, P.H. & Rajan, A. (2008) Growth performance of the red-stripe weevil Rhynchophorus schach Oliv. (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on meridic diets. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3(1), 403–409.Google Scholar
Borzoui, E. & Bandani, A.R. (2013) Wheat and triticale proteinaceous seed extracts inhibit gut α-amylase and protease of the carob moth, Ectomyelois ceratoniae . Molecular Entomology 4(3), 13–21.Google Scholar
Borzoui, E., Naseri, B. & Namin, F.R. (2015) Different diets affecting biology and digestive physiology of the Khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium Everts (Coleoptera: Dermestidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 62, 1–7.Google Scholar
Bouayad, N., Rharrabe, K., Ghailani, N. & Sayah, F. (2008) Effects of different food commodities on larval development and α-amylase activity of Plodia interpunctella (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 44, 373–378.Google Scholar
Bown, D.P., Wilkinson, H.S. & Gatehouse, J.A. (1997) Differentially regulated inhibitor-sensitive and insensitive protease genes from the phytophagous insect pest, Helicoverpa armigera, are members of complex multigene families. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 27, 625–638.Google Scholar
Bradford, M.M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72, 248–254.Google Scholar
Cinco-Moroyoqui, F.J., Rosas-Burgos, E.C., Barboa-Flores, J. & Cortez-Rocha, M.O. (2006) Alpha-amylase activity of Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) reared on several wheat varieties and its inhibition with kernel extracts. Journal of Economic Entomology 99, 2146–2150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Consoli, F.L. & Filho, B.F.A. (1995) Biology of Sitotroga cerealella (Oliv.) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) reared on five corn (maize) genotypes. Journal of Stored Products Research 31(2), 139–143.Google Scholar
Dastranj, M., Bandani, A.R. & Mehrabadi, M. (2013) Age-specific digestion of Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and inhibition of proteolytic and amylolytic activity by plant proteinaceous seed extracts. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 16, 309–315.Google Scholar
Dunse, K.M., Kaas, Q., Guarino, R.F., Barton, P.A., Craik, D.J. & Anderson, M.A. (2010) Molecular basis for the resistance of an insect chymotrypsin to a potato type II proteinase inhibitor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 15016–15021.Google Scholar
El Atta, H.A. (2000) Effect of diet and seed pretreatment on the biology of Bruchidius uberatus (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Silva Fennica 34(4), 431–435.Google Scholar
Ellington, G.W. (1930) A method for securing eggs of the Angoumois grain moth. Journal of Economic Perspectives 23, 237–238.Google Scholar
Fouad, H.A., Faroni, L.R.D., de Lima, E.R. & Vilela, E.F. (2013) Relationship between physical-chemical characteristics of corn kernels and susceptibility to Sitotroga cerealella . Maydica 58, 169–172.Google Scholar
Franco, O.L., Rigden, D.J., Melo, F.L., Bloch, C. Jr., Silva, C.P. & Grossi de Sa, M.F. (2000) Activity of wheat α-amylase inhibitors towards bruchid α-amylases and structural explanation of observed specificities. European Journal of Biochemistry 267, 2166–2173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gatehouse, A.M.R. & Boulter, D. (1983) Assessment of the antimetabolic effects of trypsin inhibitors from cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and other legumes on development of the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus . Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 345–350.Google Scholar
Giri, A.P., Harsulkar, A.M., Deshpande, V.V., Sainani, M.N., Gupta, V.S. & Ranjekar, P.K. (1998) Chickpea defensive proteinase inhibitors can be inactivated by podborer gut proteinases. Plant Physiology 116, 393–401.Google Scholar
Hagstrum, D.W. & Subramanyam, B. (1996) Integrated Management of Insects in Stored Products. New York, Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
Hanks, L.M., McElfresh, J.S., Millar, J.G. & Paine, T.D. (1993) Phoracantha semipunctata (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae), a serious pest of Eucalyptus in California: biology and laboratory-rearing procedures. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 86(1), 96–102.Google Scholar
Harsulkar, A.M., Giri, A.P., Patankar, A.G., Gupta, V.S., Sainani, M.N., Ranjekar, P.K. & Deshpande, V.V. (1999) Successive use of non-host plant proteinase inhibitors required for effective inhibition of Helicoverpa armigera gut proteinases and larval growth. Plant Physiology 121, 497–506.Google Scholar
Hashem, M.Y., Risha, E.S.M., El-Sherif, S.I. & Ahmed, S.S. (2012) The effect of modified atmospheres, an alternative to methyl bromide, on the susceptibility of immature stages of angoumois grain moth Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 50, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosseininaveh, V., Bandani, A.R., Azmayeshfard, P., Hosseinkhani, S. & Kazzazi, M. (2007) Digestive proteolytic and amylolytic activities in Trogoderma granarium Everts (Dermestidae: Coleoptera). Journal of Stored Products Research 43, 515–522.Google Scholar
Hosseinkhani, S. & Nemat-Gorgani, M. (2003) Partial unfolding of carbonic anhydrase provides a method for its immobilization on hydrophobic adsorbents and protects it against irreversible thermoinactivation. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 33, 179–184.Google Scholar
Jayas, D.S. & Jeyamkondan, S. (2002) Modified atmosphere storage of grains, meat, fruits and vegetables. Biosystems Engineering 82, 235–251.Google Scholar
Karasov, W.H., Martinez del Rio, C. & Caviedes-Vidal, E. (2011) Ecological physiology of diet and digestive systems. Annual Review of Physiology 73, 69–93.Google Scholar
Kazzazi, M., Bandani, A.R. & Hosseibkhani, S. (2005) Biochemical characterization of α-amylase of Sunn pest Eurygaster integriceps . Entomological Science 8, 371–377.Google Scholar
Khan, I., Afsheen, S., Din, N., Khattak, S.U.K., Khalil, S.K., Hayat, Y. & Lou, Y. (2010) Appraisal of different wheat genotypes against Angoumois grain moth, Sitotroga cerealella (Oliv.). Pakistan Journal of Zoology 42(2), 161–168.Google Scholar
Khattak, S.U., Munaf, A., Khalil, S.K., Hussain, A. & Hussain, N. (1996) Relative susceptibility of wheat cultivars to Sitotroga cerealella (Oliv.). Pakistan Journal of Zoology 28(2), 115–118.Google Scholar
Kotkar, H.M., Sarate, P.J., Tamhane, V.A., Gupta, V.S. & Giri, A.P. (2009) Responses of midgut amylases of Helicoverpa armigera to feeding on various host plants. Journal of Insect Physiology 55, 663–670.Google Scholar
Lomate, P.R. & Hivrale, V.K. (2011) Differential responses of midgut soluble aminopeptidases of Helicoverpa armigera to feeding on various host and non-host plant diets. Arthropod–Plant Interactions 5, 359–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melo, F.R., Sales, M.P., Silva, L.S., Franco, O.L., Bloch, J.R.C. & Ary, M.B. (1999) α-Amylase inhibitors from cowpea seeds. Protein and Peptide Letter 6, 387–392.Google Scholar
Mendiola-Olaya, E., Valencia-Jimenez, A., Valdes-Rodriguez, S., Delano-Frier, J. & Blanco-Labra, A. (2000) Digestive amylase from the larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus Horn. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B 126, 425–433.Google Scholar
Nay, J.E. & Perring, T.M. (2008) Influence of host plant stages on carob moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) development and fitness. Environmental Entomology 37(2), 568–574.Google Scholar
Ohmart, C.P. (1991) Role of food quality in the population dynamics of chrysomelid beetles feeding on Eucalyptus. pp. 35–46, vol. 39 in Raske, A.G. & Wickman, B.E. (Eds) Proceedings of a Symposium, Towards Integrated Pest Management of Forest Defoliators, Held at the 18th International Congress of Entomology. Vancouver, Canada, Forest Ecology and Management.Google Scholar
Pashley, D.P., Ardí, T.N. & Hammond, A.M. (1995) Host effects on developmental and reproductive traits in fall armyworm strains (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 88, 748–755.Google Scholar
Pytelkova, J., Hubert, J., Lepsik, M., Sobotnik, J., Sindelka, R., Krizkova, I., Horn, M. & Mares, M. (2009) Digestive α-amylases of the flour moth Ephestia kuehniella-adaptation to alkaline environment and plant inhibitors. FEBS Journal 276, 3531–3546.Google Scholar
Saikia, J., Goswami, M.M. & Bhattacharyya, B. (2014) Biology and detection technique of Angoumois grain moth, Sitotroga cerealella Olivier (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on stored rice and maize grains. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2(6), 9–11.Google Scholar
Sarate, P.J., Tamhane, V.A., Kotkar, H.M., Ratnakaran, N., Susan, N., Gupta, V.S. & Giri, A.P. (2012) Developmental and digestive flexibilities in the midgut of a polyphagous pest, the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera . Journal of Insect Science 12, 42. Available online at http://insectscience.org/12.42 Google Scholar
SAS (2003) A Guide to Statistical and Data Analysis. Version 9.1. Cary, SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Shafique, M., Ahmad, M. & Chaudry, M.A. (2006) Evaluation of wheat varieties for resistance to Angoumois grain moth, Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Pakistan Journal of Zoology 38(1), 7–10.Google Scholar
Shazali, M.E.H. (1987) Weight loss caused by development of Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and Sitotroga cerealella (Oliv.) in sorghum grains of two size classes. Journal of Stored Products Research 23(4), 233–238.Google Scholar
Shobana, K., Murugan, K. & Kumar, A.N. (2010) Influence of host plants on feeding, growth and reproduction of Papilio polytes (the common mormon). Journal of Insect Physiology 56, 1065–1070.Google Scholar
Shukle, R.H. & Wu, L. (2003) The role of protease inhibitors and parasitoids on the population dynamics of Sitotroga cerealella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Environmental Entomology 32(3), 488–498.Google Scholar
Silva, C.P., Terra, W.R., Xavier-Filho, J., Grossi de Sa, M.F., Isejima, E.M., DaMatta, R.A., Miguens, F.C. & Bifano, T.D. (2001) Digestion of legume starch granules by larvae of Zabrotes subfasciatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) and the induction of α-amylases in response to different diets. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 31, 41–50.Google Scholar
Simpson, S.J., Sibly, R.M., Lee, K.P., Behmer, S.T. & Raubenheimer, D. (2004) Optimal foraging when regulating intake of multiple nutrients. Animal Behavior 68, 1299–1311.Google Scholar
Tabatabaei, P.R., Hosseininaveh, V., Goldansaz, S.H. & Talebi, K. (2011) Biochemical characterization of digestive proteases and carbohydrases of the carob moth, Ectomyelois ceratoniae (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 14, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terashima, M. & Katoh, S. (1996) Modification of α-amylase function by protein engineering. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 799, 65–69.Google Scholar
Throne, J.E. & Weaver, D.K. (2013) Impact of temperature and relative humidity on life history parameters of adult Sitotroga cerealella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 55, 128–133.Google Scholar
Weston, P.A. & Rattlingourd, P.L. (1999) Ovipositional stimuli of Angoumois grain moth (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), a primary pest of stored grains. Journal of Entomological Science 34, 445–451.Google Scholar