Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:26:06.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Relative Humidity on the Activity of the Tropical Rat Flea Xenopsylla cheopis (Roths.) (Siphonaptera)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Alec Smith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The reactions of Xenopsylla cheopis Roths, to uniform and alternative relative humidities have been investigated.

2. X. cheopis aggregates in the dry side of the alternative chamber. There is an indication that the intensity of aggregation increases with increase in percentage difference between the alternatives and that it is also high when the alternatives are high in the scale.

3. Locomotor activity and speed of movement increase with rise in relative humidity.

4. Males kept at 90 per cent. relative humidity for five days aggregate intensely in the drier of the alternatives 65 and 85 per cent. R.H. Similar fleas kept five days at 70 per cent. relative humidity react weakly.

5. There is greater activity after five days' exposure to 90 per cent. relative humidity than after exposure to 70 per cent. R.H. for fhe same duration.

6. One concludes that high activity in wet air contributes towards aggregation in the dry side and that the intensity of aggregation is affected by the difference in activity which occurs in the fleas at different relative humidities.

7. The intensity of aggregation to the alternatives 80 and 90 per cent. relative humidity is unaffected by sex, or by the remains of a blood meal.

8. A high klino-kinesis may occur in X. cheopis.

9. Nosopsyllus fasciatus reacts in the same way as X. cheopis to uniform and alternative humidities, but there is no evidence of a high klino-kinesis.

10. When a roll of lint is dropped into a vessel infested with X. cheopis the number which jump on to it increases with relative humidity. The number which jumped on to a month-old rat did not show a clear relationship to humidity. Relatively more females than males jumped on to the roll of lint and rat.

11. A colony of 25 buck rats was infested with X. cheopis. In relation to size of flea population the flea index increases with rise in relative humidity. The proportion of each sex on a rat, to its respective number in the bedding material, does not appear to bear a simple relationship to humidity.

12. Humidity receptors are not confined to the distal three segments of the maxillary palps if indeed there are any there.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , November 1951 , pp. 585 - 599
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacot, A. W. (1914). A study of the bionomics of the common rat fleas and other species associated with human habitations, with special reference to the influence of temperature and humidity at various periods of the life-history of the insect.—J. Hyg., Plague Suppl., 3, pp. 447–654.Google Scholar
Bacot, A. W. & Martin, C. J. (1914). Observations on the mechanism of the transmission of plague by fleas.—J. Hyg., Plague Suppl., 3, pp. 423–439.Google Scholar
Bentley, E. W. (1944). The biology and behaviour of Ptinus tectus Boie. (Coleoptera, Ptinidae), a pest of stored products. V. Humidity reactions.—J. exp. Biol., 20, pp. 152–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, E. W., Gunn, D. L. & Ewer, D. W. (1941). The biology and behaviour of Ptinus tectus Boie. (Coleoptera, Ptinidae), a pest of stored products. I. The daily rhythm of locomotory activity especially in relation to light and temperature.—J. exp. Biol., 18, pp. 182–195.Google Scholar
Brownlee, J. (1918). Certain aspects of the theory of epidemiology in special relation to plague.—Proc. R. Soc. Med., 11, pp. 85–132.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1932). The climate in which the rat flea lives.—Indian J. med. Res., 20, pp. 281–297.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1938). Quantitative studies on the biology of Xenopsylla cheopis (Siphonaptera).—Indian J. med. Res., 26, pp. 505–530.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1941). The recorded distribution of certain fleas.—Bull. ent. Res., 32, pp. 119–122.Google Scholar
De Meillon, B. (1937). Some reactions of Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus to environmental factors.—Publ. S. Afr. Inst. med. Res., no. 40, pp. 313–327.Google Scholar
Edney, E. B. (1947 a). Laboratory studies on the bionomics of the rat fleas, Xenopsylla brasiliensis, Baker, and X. cheopis, Roths. II. Water relations during the cocoon period.—Bull. ent. Res., 38, pp. 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edney, E. B. (1947 b). III. Further factors affecting adult longevity.—Bull. ent. Res., 38, pp. 389–404.Google Scholar
Gill, C. A. (1921). The influence of humidity on the life history of mosquitoes and on their power to transmit infection.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 14, pp. 77–87.Google Scholar
Gunn, D. L. (1940). The daily rhythm of activity of the cockroach, Blatta orientalis L. I. Aktograph experiments especially in relation to light.—J. exp. Biol., 17, pp. 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, D. L. & Cosway, C. A. (1938). The temperature and humidity relations of the cockroach. V. Humidity preference.—J. exp. Biol., 15, pp. 555–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, D. L. & Kennedy, J. S. (1936). Apparatus for investigating the reactions of land arthropods to humidity.—J. exp. Biol., 13, pp. 450–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, M. A. C. (1931). Rats and mice as enemies of mankind.—Econ. Ser. Brit. Mus. (nat. Hist.), no. 8.Google Scholar
Hirst, L. F. (1927). Researches on the parasitology of plague.—Ceylon J. Sci., (D) 1, pp. 155–455.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. G. (1940). The maintenance of high atmospheric humidities for entomological work with glycerol-water mixtures.—Ann. appl. Biol., 27, pp. 295–299.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. S. (1937). The humidity reactions of the African migratory locust, Locusta migratoria migratorioides R. & F., gregarious phase.—J. exp. Biol., 14, pp. 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, K. H. L. (1936). Experimental studies on locomotor activity in Locusta migratoria migratorioides, R. & F.—Bull. ent. Res., 27, pp. 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, A. D. (1948). The sensory physiology of the sheep tick, Ixodes ricinus L.—J. exp. Biol., 25, pp. 145–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, H. S. (1932 a). Methods of rearing and maintaining large stocks of fleas and mosquitos for experimental purposes.—Bull. ent. Res., 23, pp. 25–31.Google Scholar
Leeson, H. S. (1932 b). The effect of temperature and humidity upon the survival of certain unfed rat fleas.—Parasitology, 24, pp. 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, H. S. (1936). Further experiments upon the longevity of Xenopsylla cheopis Roths. (Siphonaptera).—Parasitology, 28, pp. 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. J. (1933). Observations on Aëdes aegypti, L. (Dipt., Culic.) under controlled atmospheric conditions.—Bull. ent. Res., 24, pp. 363–372.Google Scholar
Lumsden, W. H. R. (1947). Observations on the effect of microclimate on biting by Aëdes aegypti (L.) (Dipt. Culicid.).—J. exp. Biol., 24, pp. 361–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellanby, K. (1933). A simple hygrometer for use in small spaces.—J. sci. Instrum., 10, pp. 349–351.Google Scholar
Petrie, G. F. & Todd, R. E. (1923). Reports and notes of the Public Health Laboratories, Cairo. Plague report.—114 pp. Cairo, Dep. publ. Hlth.Google Scholar
Pielou, D. P. (1940). The humidity behaviour of the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor L. II. The humidity receptors.—J. exp. Biol., 17, pp. 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, D. P. & Gunn, D. L. (1940). The humidity behaviour of the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor L. The reaction to differences of humidity.—J. exp. Biol., 17, pp. 286–294.Google Scholar
Plague Commission. (1908). Reports on plague investigations in India. On the seasonal prevalence of plague in India.—J. Hyg., 8, no. 2, Plague no. 31, p. 266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plague Commission. (1910 a). Observations on plague in Belgaum.—J. Hyg., 10, no. 3, Plague no. 36, p. 446.Google Scholar
Plague Commission. (1910 b). Observations on plague in Poona.—J. Hyg., 10, no. 3, Plague no. 37, p. 483.Google Scholar
Rudolphs, W. (1925). Relation between temperature, humidity and activity of house mosquitoes.—J. N. Y. ent. Soc., 33, pp. 163–169.Google Scholar
Sgonina, K. (1935). Die Reizphysiologie des Ingelflohes (Archaeopsylla erinacei Bouché) und seiner Larve.—Z. Parasitenk., 7, pp. 539–571.Google Scholar
Sharif, M. (1948). Effects of constant temperature and humidity on the development of the larvae and pupae of the three Indian species of Xenopsylla (Insecta, Siphonaptera).—Philos. Trans., (B) 233, pp. 581–633.Google Scholar
Sikes, E. K. (1931). Notes on breeding fleas, with reference to humidity and feeding.—Parasitology, 23, pp. 243–249.Google Scholar
Thomson, R. C. M. (1938). The reactions of mosquitoes to temperature and humidity.—Bull. ent. Res., 29, pp. 125–140.Google Scholar
Ullyott, P. (1936). The behaviour of Dendrocoelum lacteum.—J. exp. Biol., 13, pp. 253–278.Google Scholar
Webster, W. J. & Chitre, G. D. (1930). Observations on rat-fleas and the transmission of plague. Part IV.—Indian J. med. Res., 18, pp. 407–425.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1932). On the function of the so-called “ rectal glands ” of insects.—Quart. J. micr. Sci., 75, pp. 131–150.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1941). The sensory physiology of the human louse Pediculus humanus corporis De Geer (Anoplura).—Parasitology, 33, pp. 67–109.Google Scholar