Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:19:56.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glucose and protein metabolism during late pregnancy in triplet-bearing ewes given fresh forages ad lib.

1. Voluntary intake and birth weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

T. N. Barry  and
T. R. Manley
T. N. Barry
Affiliation:
Invermay Agricultural Research Centre, Private Bay, Mosgiel, New Zealand
T. R. Manley
Affiliation:
Invermay Agricultural Research Centre, Private Bay, Mosgiel, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Ewes of the Booroola x Romney genotype carrying triplet lambs were given fresh forages ad lib. in late pregnancy. In Expt 1, groups of three ewes were given kale (Brassica oleracea), perennial ryegrass (Loliumperenne) or perennial ryegrass (0.75)–barley (0.25). In Expt 2, groups of two or three ewes were given fresh perennial ryegrass and infused into the abomasum with iso-energetic quantities of casein and glucose in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement. Post-lambing ewe live weights were 40–50 kg. Glucose irreversible loss (GIL) was determined from dilution of D-[U-14C]glucose.

2. For ewes given kale, perennial ryegrass and perennial ryegrass—barley in Expt 1, mean metabolizable energy (ME) intakes were 0.50, 0.82 and 0.83 MJ/kg live Weight0.75 per d, GIL was 112, 142 and 157 g/d, and mean birth weight 2.22, 3.05 and 2.95 kg/lamb.

3. In Expt 2, infusion of glucose, casein, and glucose+casein depressed herbage ME intake respectively by 1.6, 0.9 and 0.3 times the amount of ME infused. GIL (185–325 g/d) was increased by 800 and 350 g respectively for each kg of glucose or casein infused. Casein infusion increased calculated amino acid absorption from 0.18 to 0.36 of ME, increased wool growth and increased calculated maternal N balance. Birth weight was unaffected by nutritional treatment and averaged 3.29 kg/lamb.

4. When values from both experiments were combined, birth weight was related to GIL by a hyperbolic relation, with maximum predicted birth weight being 4.1 kg/lamb. It was postulated that this value was never attained in practice, due to uterine expansion being restricted by the low maternal body size. Marked decreases in birth weight occurred when GIL decreased below 173 g/d.

5. It was calculated that ewes in all treatment groups were in negative energy balance, and that glucose supplied by the kale and unsupplemented ryegrass diets were respectively below and equal to calculated conceptus uptakes of glucose necessary to maintain growth of triplet fetuses. It was further calculated that amino acid requirements of triplet-bearing ewes in late pregnancy were likely to exceed substantially net absorption from digestion of fresh forage diets, and that maternal tissues go into negative N balance to ensure fetal growth, thus explaining the lack of response to abomasal casein infusion.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , September 1985 , pp. 521 - 533
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1985

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirement of Ruminant Livestock, pp. 7–8. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council (1983). The Nutrient Requirement of Ruminant Livestock (Interim report). Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Austin, A. R. & Young, N. E. (1977). Veterinary Record 100, 527–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N. (1980). New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 427–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N. (1981). British Journal of Nutrition 46, 521–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N., Manley, T. R. & Duncan, S. J. (1984). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N., Manley, T. R., Redekopp, C. & Allsop, T. M. (1985). British Journal of Nutrition 54, 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N., Manley, T. R., Redekopp, C., Davis, S. R., Fairclough, R. J. & Lapwood, K. R. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 47, 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1962). Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. London: Hutchinsons.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1977). In Nutrition and the Climate Environment, pp. 1–16 [Haresign, W., Swan, H. and Lewis, D., editors]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Dalton, D. C., Knight, T. W. & Johnson, D. L. (1980). New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. H. & Hinch, G. N. (1984). In The Genetics of Reproduction in Sheep, pp. 139–149 [Land, R. B. and Robinson, D. W., editors]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Davis, G. H., Montgomery, G. W., Allison, A. J., Kelly, R. W. & Bray, A. R. (1982). New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 25, 525–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1981). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 6, 48–53.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1984). In Feed information and Animal Production, pp. 191–192 [Robarts, G. W., editor]. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Hay, W. W., Sparks, J. W., Quissell, B. J., Battaglia, F. C. & Meschia, G. (1981). American Journal of Physiology 240, E662–E668.Google Scholar
Hay, W. W., Sparks, J. W., Wilkening, R. B., Battaglia, F. C. & Meschia, G. (1984). American Journal of Physiology 246, E237–E242.Google Scholar
Hopkins, P. S. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 1–14. [McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Judson, G. J. & Leng, R. A. (1973). British Journal of Nutrition 29, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, H. A. (1964). In Mammalian Protein Metabolism, pp. 125–176 [Munro, H. N. and Allison, J. B., editors]. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, J. C. & Ulyatt, M. J. (1974). Journal of Argricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meschia, G., Battaglia, F. C., Hay, W. W. & Sparks, J. W. (1980). Federation Proceedings 39, 245–248.Google Scholar
Newton-Turner, H. (1982). The Booroola Merino, pp. 1–7 [Piper, L. R., Bindon, B. M. and Nethery, R. D., editors]. Sydney, Australia: CSIRO Division of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Oddy, V. H. & Annison, E. F. (1979). In Physiological and Environmental Limitations to Wool Growth, pp. 295–309 [Black, J. L. and Reis, R. J., editors]. Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Piper, L. R. & Bindon, B. M. (1982). In The Booroola Merino, pp. 9–19 [Piper, L. R., Bindon, B. M. and Nethery, R. D., editors]. Sydney, Australia: CSIRO Division of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Rattray, P. V., Garret, W. N., Wast, N. E. & Hinman, N. (1974). Journal of Animal Science 38, 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattray, P. V. & Joyce, J. P. (1976). New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 17, 401–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. J., McDonald, I., McHattie, I. & Pennie, K. (1978). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, S. P. & Keith, R. K. (1983). Journal of Nutrition 113, 2155–2163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storm, E., Ørskov, E. R. & Smart, R. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 50, 471–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J., Fennessy, P. F., Rattray, R. V. & Jagusch, K. T. (1980). In Supplementary Feeding, pp. 157–184 [Drew, K. R. and Fennessy, P. F., editors]. Invermay Research Centre, Mosgiel, New Zealand: New Zealand Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Waldo, D. R. (1985). In Forage Legumes for Energy-Eficient Animal Production, [Barnes, R. F., Minson, D. J. and Brougham, R. W., editors]. Sydney, Australia: USDA/CSIRO/DSIR (In the press).Google Scholar
Weston, R. H. (1979). In Physiological and Environmental Limitations to Wool Growth pp. 163–177 [Black, J. L. and Reis, P. J., editors]. Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Weston, R. H. (1983). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 8, 181–184.Google Scholar
Wilson, S., MacRae, J. C. & Buttery, P. J. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 50, 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar