Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:14:41.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Catholic Exorcism in Early Modern England: Polemic, Propaganda and Folklore

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2015

Francis Young
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Exorcism was an integral part of the post-Reformation Catholic mission in England and, from the late sixteenth century, an ideological battleground between Catholic and Protestant. As in the Gospels, the obedience of demons was seen as the ultimate sign and supernatural seal of religious authority. Exorcism, unlike other aspects of Catholic mission, often brought recusant priests into direct contact with non-catholics and provided an unparalleled opportunity for conversions.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Catholic History , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , October 2009 , pp. 487 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © Catholic Record Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Kittredge, G. L., Witchcraft in Old and New England, Russell and Russell, New York, 1956, n. p. 552.Google Scholar

2 Scot, R., The Discoverie of Witchcraft, London, 1584, p. 106 Google Scholar (reprinted by Elliot and Stock, London, 1886).

3 Ibidem, p. 101.

4 According to Reginald Scot this was also the title of the 1572 pamphlet recording the activities of Van der Schuere and Stikelbow, A verie wonderfull and strange miracle of God, which was presumably intentional on the part of the author of the 1574 pamphlet. See Scot, Discoverie (1584), p. 106.

5 Freeman, T. S., ‘Foxe, John’ in DNB, 20, pp. 703–4.Google Scholar

6 L’Estrange Ewen, C., Witchcraft and Demonianism, Heath Cranton, London, 1933, p. 108 Google Scholar gives the date as 1572/3 and claims that Nyndge was assisted by seven ministers.

7 Freeman, T. S., ‘Nyndge, Alexander’ in DNB, 41, p. 309.Google Scholar

8 Wootton, D., ‘Scot, Reginald’ in DNB, 49, pp. 454–5.Google Scholar

9 Scot (1584), pp. 375–6.

10 James, King VI, Daemonologie, Bodley, London, 1924, p. 18.Google Scholar

11 Foley, p. 445.

12 Freeman, T. S., ‘Darrell, John’ in DNB, 15, p. 166 Google Scholar. For an account of Darrell’s career see also Brownlow, pp. 53–62.

13 Freeman, p. 167.

14 Cranfield, N. W. S., ‘Harsnett, Samuel’ in DNB, 25, p. 554.Google Scholar

15 Brownlow, p. 63.

16 Thomas, K., Religion and the Decline of Magic, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1971, p. 134.Google Scholar

17 Kittredge, n. p. 572.

18 Constitutions and Canons Ecclesiastical, 1678, op. cit. in Thomas, p. 579.

19 Kittredge, p. 319.

20 Harmsen, T., ‘Weston, William’ in DNB, 58, p. 314.Google Scholar

21 Brownlow, p. 22.

22 Weston, W. (trans. P. Caraman), William Weston: The Autobiography of an Elizabethan, Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1955, p. 24.Google Scholar

23 For the influence of Harsnett’s book on King Lear, see Brownlow, pp. 107–31.

24 Harsnett, p. 1.

25 Brownlow, p. 21.

26 Ibidem, p. 22.

27 Ibidem.

28 Harmsen, p. 314.

29 Brownlow, p. 12.

30 According to Brownlow, Friswood was ‘a government informer who must always be suspected of lying’, Brownlow, p. 75.

31 Harsnett, pp. 6–7.

32 Ibidem, p. 11.

33 Harmsen, p. 314.

34 Brownlow, p. 28.

35 Weston, p. 26.

36 Ibidem, pp. 26–7.

37 Brownlow, p. 27.

38 Weston, p. 27.

39 Ibidem, p. 2.

40 John Cornelius (1554–94). See Bellenger, p. 51.

41 Robert Dibdale (ord. 1584). See Bellenger, p. 54.

42 Probably Christopher Thompson (ord. 1577). See Bellenger, p. 114.

43 Probably Thomas Stamp (ord. 1575). See Bellenger, p. 110.

44 Anthony Tyrrell (1552–1615), whose testimony was the source of much of Harsnett’s book. See Bellenger, p. 117.

45 Christopher Dryland, S.J. (ord. 1582). See Bellenger, p. 55.

46 Tulice is called Thulys by Brown, p. 24 and could be Christopher Thules (ord. 1584), Bellenger, p. 115, but this identification is tenuous.

47 This could be John (ord. 1583), Phillip (ord. 1570) or Richard Sherwood (ord. 1584). See

Bellenger, p. 107.

48 Bellenger has no record of this priest.

49 Bellenger has no record of this priest.

50 Edward Dakins (b. 1554). See Bellenger, p. 53.

51 John Ballard (ord. 1581). See Bellenger, p. 36. Brownlow thinks Ballard a later addition by Tyrrell. See Brownlow, pp. 79–80 on the accuracy of the list of exorcists.

52 Harsnett, p. 113.

53 Harsnett, p. 39. See also L’Estrange Ewen, p. 109.

54 Harsnett, p. 286. See also Brownlow, n. p. 29.

55 See Thomas, n. p. 583. In 1599, as part of Bancroft’s campaign against exorcism, Abraham Hartwell published an account of the violent exorcism of Marthe Brossier in France. See Brownlow, p. 63.

56 Harsnett, p. 14.

57 See for instance Hutchinson, F., An Essay Concerning Witchcraft, London, 1720, pp. 301–4.Google Scholar

58 For an abbreviated account of the ‘Boy of Bilson’ see Baxter, R., Jesuit Juggling: Forty Popish Frauds Detected and Disclosed, London, 1659, pp. 184–7Google Scholar (reprinted by Craighead and Allen, New York, 1835).

59 ‘H. W.’ is named as Wheeler by Harsnett but Bellenger has no record of a priest of this name.

60 L’Estrange Ewen, p. 236.

61 Erasmus (trans. C. R. Thompson), Colloquies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1965, pp. 231–37.

62 Davies, O., The Haunted: A Social History of Ghosts, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2007, p. 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

63 Harsnett, p. 135.

64 Harmsden, T., ‘Gee, John’ in DNB, 21, p. 715.Google Scholar

65 Bellenger has no record of this priest.

66 George (ord. 1606), Ralph (ord. 1598) or Thomas Fisher (ord. 1603), all seculars. See Bellenger, p. 59.

67 The Jesuit John Sweet (1570–1632). See Bellenger, p. 112.

68 Bellenger has no record of this priest.

69 Perhaps the secular priest Christopher Wainman. See Bellenger, p. 118.

70 Bellenger has no record of this priest.

71 Perhaps the Benedictine John Richardson (prof. 1618). See Bellenger, p. 101.

72 Bellenger has no record of this priest.

73 Gee, J., The Foot Out of the Snare with a Detection of Sundry Late Practices and Impostures of the Priests and Jesuits in England, London, 1624, p. 102.Google Scholar

74 Ibidem, p. 109.

75 Scot, R., The Discoverie of Witchcraft, London, 1651, p. 113.Google Scholar

76 Davies, , The Haunted, p. 167.Google Scholar

77 Taylor, Z., The Devil Turn’d Casuist, London, 1696, p. 5.Google Scholar

78 For a contemporary discussion of the opinions on this issue, see Burton, R., Anatomy of Melancholy, Chatto and Windus, London, 1881, p. 125.Google Scholar

79 Zimmerman, B., Carmel in England, Burns and Oates, London, 1899, p. 256.Google Scholar

80 Davies, , The Haunted, p. 167.Google Scholar

81 Taylor, p. 2.

82 Brooks was probably Robert Brooke, S.J. (1663–1714), Bellenger, p. 43. Two of the other priests are named as Skinner and Kennel; these were probably John Skinner, S.J. (1662–1708), Bellenger, p. 108 and the secular John Baines alias Kendall (1653–1727), Bellenger, p. 35.

83 The placing of part of the stole on the neck of the possessed was part of the Rite of Exorcism of 1614 but seems to have been misinterpreted as a violent act by Protestant authors. See Rituale Romanum, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Rome, 2004 (facsimile of 1614 edition), p. 203.

84 Taylor, p. 2.

85 Ibidem, pp. 7–8.

86 Ibidem, pp. 9–10.

87 Ibidem, p. 1.

88 Ibidem, p. 14.

89 Potts, T., The Wonderfull Discoverie of Witches in the Countie of Lancaster, London, 1613, p. 87.Google Scholar

90 Ibidem, p. 88. See also L’Estrange Ewen, p. 227.

91 Bellenger, p. 110.

92 Kittredge, p. 300.

93 Foley 3, p. 445.

94 Ibidem, p. 446.

95 Ibidem.

96 Foley 2, p. 571.

97 Foley 5, p. 993.

98 Harsnett, p. 15.

99 Thyraeus, P., Benedictio domus novae aut daemonibus infestae in Daemoniaci cum Locis Infestis et Terriculamentis Nocturnis, Cologne, 1604, pp. 242–54.Google Scholar

100 Foley 3, pp. 22–23.

101 Ibidem.

102 Foley 4, p. 500.

103 The autobiography of Fr. Bede of St. Simon Stock is included in Zimmerman, Carmel in England, p. 254.

104 Ibidem, pp. 254–55.

105 Ibidem, p. 257.

106 Foley 4, p. 448.

107 Foley 7(2), p. 1141.

108 Foley 2, p. 6.

109 Foley 2, p. 20.

110 Rituale Romanum, p. 201.

111 Foley 7(2), p. 1133.

112 Foley 2, p. 22.

113 Foley 2, pp. 20–21.

114 Rituale Romanum, p. 199.

115 Foley 7(2), p. 1200.

116 Thyraeus, pp. 55–8.

117 Foley 3, p. 123.

118 Foley 7(2), p. 1098.

119 Wheeler, H., A Faithful Relation of the Proceedings of the Catholicke Gentlemen with the Boy of Bilson, London, 1620 Google Scholar, op. cit. in L’Estrange Ewen, p. 237.

120 Foley 7(2), p. 1121.

121 Foley 7(2), pp. 1137–8.

122 Foley 2, p. 21.

123 Foley 5, p. 993.

124 See M. Gaskill, Witchfinders, John Murray, London, 2005, p. 4.

125 Foley 2, p. 21.

126 Foley 7(1), p. xxvi.

127 Foley 7(2), p. 1145.

128 Foley 4, p. 448.

129 Zimmerman, p. 258.

130 Ibidem, p. 260.

131 Foley 2, p. 569.

132 Taylor, p. 15.

133 Thomas, p. 587.

134 Kent Clark, J., Goodwin Wharton, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1984, p. 27.Google Scholar

135 Ibidem, pp. 97–99.

136 Zimmerman, p. 260.

137 Davies, O., Popular Magic: Cunning-folk in English History, Hambledon Continuum, London, 2007, p. 36.Google Scholar

138 Hutchinson, F., An Essay Concerning Witchcraft, London, 1720, pp. 274–5Google Scholar (an account of Darrell’s exorcisms derived from Harsnett), p. 301–4 (an account of the ‘Boy of Bilson’ derived from Baddeley).

139 Bourne, H., Antiquitates Vulgares, London, 1725, p. 90.Google Scholar

140 Ady, T., A Perfect Discovery of Witches, London, 1661, p. 59.Google Scholar

141 Atkinson, J., Forty Years in a Moorland Parish, London, 1840, p. 59.Google Scholar

142 For an official Jesuit view of superstition, see Martin del Rio (trans. P. G. Maxwell-Stuart), Investigations into Magic, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2000 (originally published 1599–1600), p. 1.

143 Davies, , Popular Magic, p. 36.Google Scholar