Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:30:43.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Postcard Project: Improving Healthcare Staff's Knowledge of Good Quality Medical Care for Older Adults in Mental Health services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Lauren Franklin*
Affiliation:
Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
Rebecca Chubb
Affiliation:
North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
Rachel Mulroy
Affiliation:
Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
Louisa Mander
Affiliation:
North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
Nigel Katandawa
Affiliation:
North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
Camilla Howe
Affiliation:
North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Older adults in mental health services often have complex physical health needs, due to multimorbidity and frailty. Staff working in these services may not feel well-equipped to manage these needs, leading to symptoms being missed or unnecessary investigations. The authors designed written educational resources for healthcare professionals working across older adult services, both in hospital and the community. The Postcard Project aimed to improve staff knowledge of the physical health needs of older adults and encourage good quality, evidence-based care.

Methods

Twelve postcards were created focusing on twelve concepts of caring for the physical health needs of older adults within psychiatry services. These topics were highlighted as potential areas of staff weakness, the staff themselves, and a survey conducted prior to the project. The postcards contained key evidence-based information about the chosen topic, summarised in less than 7 bullet points, and provided links to relevant, digestible resources, such as up-to-date guideline summaries and podcasts. The postcards were released monthly and distributed via email and physical copies. A survey was carried out before the project via a Microsoft Form, where respondents ranked their confidence in their knowledge on different topics relating to the care of physical health in older patients, with 1 being not confident at all and 5 being very confident.

Results

57 people responded to this survey, including nurses, doctors, and other members of the multidisciplinary team. This survey showed a large discrepancy between different topics and staff's confidence. Staff were confident in identifying the symptoms of a UTI (83% confident) and fall prevention (79%). However, they were less confident with their understanding of CRP blood results (46%) and their ability to identify an Acute Kidney Injury (23%). Data are still being collected as to whether this project improved staff knowledge of these key concepts.

Conclusion

Staff in older adult mental health and community services were not confident with certain key aspects of good quality medical care of elderly patients before this project. The level of confidence varied between topic and profession. This project aimed to improve staff knowledge on the weaker topics, however, without the post-project survey data, it is not yet clear as to whether this project improved the knowledge of staff.

Type
Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.