Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:01:12.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An enquiry into my use of supervised clinical assessments in the supervision of junior trainees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Yuan Choo*
Affiliation:
Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

As a particular example of action research, to enquire into my use of Assessments of Clinical Expertise in my supervision of junior trainees, with the intention of further developing my own practice as an educator.

Background

Work-Place Based Assessments (WPBAs) play an established role currently in the assessment of trainee doctors(tenCate, 2017). In psychiatry, supervised clinical assessments(ACE/mini-ACE) assess a trainee's proficiency in various areas. As part of my PGCert in Medical Education, I was inspired to examine how I conduct and utilise this form of assessment, and indeed the underpinning values and beliefs, about learning, and developing professional wisdom.

Method

This enquiry was situated within the interpretivist tradition. I interrogated my views about the epistemology of knowledge, and how they had changed from pre-university. I made clear my influences from Coles (Fish & Coles, 1998) on professional practice. I investigated my values in performing an assessment, comparing them to those of the wider community. I examined the literature on the validity of this as a tool. I then performed an assessment of a junior, with a consultant observing, before interviewing them separately.

Result

There has been a paradigm shift in how I view assessments, from pre-university in Singapore, to medical training in the UK. The history of WPBAs and the values espoused is intriguing. Consultants and experts may view assessments differently from trainees, but a core value of developing professional judgement is common.

In my interview with the consultant, there were themes around having a clear focus for an assessment, and provision of feedback; the rating scales and how they used them to stimulate feedback; and our shared values in performing an assessment. With the junior, the themes were around the delivery of feedback (including non-verbal), an appreciation of my encouraging self-reflection and understanding, and the observable values in my carrying out of the assessment, which could be compared to those of other assessors.

Conclusion

WPBAs have their merits, and shortfalls. I am aware of my values and beliefs when utilising them, and have identified a plan to further develop my own practice. This case study is particular, but possibly not unique, in how WPBAs are used in medical education.

Type
Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.