Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:05:06.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The universal basis of local linguistic exceptionality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

Daniel Harbour
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, United Kingdom. [email protected]://webspace.qmul.ac.uk/dharbour

Abstract

Evans & Levinson (E&L) claim Kiowa number as a prime example of the semantically unexpected, threatening both Universal Grammar and Linguistic Universals. This commentary, besides correcting factual errors, shows that the primitives required for Kiowa also explain two unrelated semantically unexpected patterns and derive two robust Linguistic Universals. Consequently, such apparent exceptionality argues strongly for Universal Grammar and against E&L.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Corbett, G. (2000) Number. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, K. L. (1997) Some observations on the contribution of local languages to linguistic science. Lingua 100:7189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbour, D. (2006) Valence and atomic number. Unpublished manuscript, Queen Mary, London. Available at:http://webspace.qmul.ac.uk/dharbour/Harbour%20Valence%20Revised.pdf.Google Scholar
Harbour, D. (2007) Morphosemantic number: From Kiowa noun classes to UG number features. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbour, D.(in press)Descriptive and explanatory markedness. Morphology.Google Scholar
Lipkind, W. (1945) Winnebago grammar. King's Crown.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyer, R. (1992) Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. (1955) Three analyses of the Ilocano pronoun system. Word 11:204208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar