Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:47:31.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The two modes of identifying objects: descriptive and holistic for concrete objects; recursive and ostensive for abstract objects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Miriam L. Yevick
Miriam L. Yevick
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College, Rutgers The State University, Hill Center, New Brunswick, N.J. 08903
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 1978 , pp. 253 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Freudenthal, H.Lincos. North Holland: Amsterdam, 1960.Google Scholar
Kleene, S. C.Introduction to Metamathematics. New York: Van Nostrand, 1970.Google Scholar
Mendelson, E.Introduction to Mathematical Logic. New York: Van Nostrand, 1964. Pred. 14 b.Google Scholar
Quine, W.Introduction to Mathematical Logic. London: Norton, 1950.Google Scholar
Shoenfield, J. R.Mathematical Logic. Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley, 1967.Google Scholar
van Heijenoort, J.Frege and Gödel. Cambridge, Mass.: University Press, 1970. Pred. 17.Google Scholar
von Neumann, J.Theory of Self Reproducing Automata (Burkes, A. W., ed.) Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press, 1966.Google Scholar