No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Proust effect and the evolution of a dual learning system
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 April 2009
Abstract
Proust's madeleine illustrates the automatic nature of associative learning. Although we agree with Mitchell et al. that no compelling scientific proof for this effect has yet been reported in humans, evolutionary constraints suggest that it should not be discarded: There is no reason by which natural selection should favor individuals who lose a fast and automatic survival tool.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
References
Gallistel, C. R. (2000) The replacement of general-purpose learning models with adaptively specialized learning modules. In: The new cognitive neurosciences, ed. Gazzaniga, M. S., pp. 1179–91. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lovibond, P. F. & Shanks, D. R. (2002) The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 28:3–26.Google Scholar
Proust, M. (1913/1922) Remembrance of Things Past: Swann's Way, trans. Scott-Moncrieff, C. K., Holt, Henry. (Original work published 1913). Retrieved online November 11, 2008, from Project Gutenberg, http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/7178).Google Scholar
Shanks, D. R. & St. John, M. F. (1994) Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17:367–447; discussion pp. 447–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In: The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, ed. Barkow, J., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J., pp. 19–136. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (2005) Conceptual foundations of evolutionary psychology. In: The handbook of evolutionary psychology, ed. Buss, D. M., pp. 5–67. Wiley.Google Scholar