Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:15:18.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is there room for simple links in a propositional mind?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2009

Evan J. Livesey  and
Justin A. Harris
Evan J. Livesey
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. [email protected]://www.psych.usyd.edu.au/staff/[email protected]://www.psych.usyd.edu.au/staff/justinh
Justin A. Harris
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. [email protected]://www.psych.usyd.edu.au/staff/[email protected]://www.psych.usyd.edu.au/staff/justinh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Against Mitchell et al.'s assertions, we argue that (1) the concordance between learning and awareness does not support any particular learning theory, (2) their propositional approach is at odds with examples of learned behaviours that contradict beliefs about causation, and (3) the relative virtues of the two approaches in terms of parsimony is more ambiguous than Mitchell et al. suggest.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 212 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernstein, I. L. & Webster, M. M. (1980) Learned taste aversions in humans. Physiology and Behavior 25:363–66.Google Scholar
Carey, M. P. & Burish, T. G. (1988) Etiology and treatment of the psychological side effects associated with cancer chemotherapy: A critical review and discussion. Psychological Bulletin 104:307–25.Google Scholar
Jenkins, H. M. & Moore, B. R. (1973) The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 20:163–81.Google Scholar
Lovibond, P. F. & Shanks, D. R. (2002) The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 28:3–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Perruchet, P. (1985) A pitfall for the expectancy theory of human eyelid conditioning. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Sciences 20:163–70.Google Scholar