No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
What else should a neurobiological theory of language account for?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 April 1999
Abstract
We critique five points that impede the target article's far-reaching efforts toward formulating a neurobiological theory of language. Neurolinguistics amounts to no more than neurology in linguistics in this account, because it assumes “perceptual representational isomorphism,” processing autonomy and “meaning,” thereby aiming primarily at justifying modular concepts in terms of associative principles.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- © 1999 Cambridge University Press