Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:48:09.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The problem of content in embodied memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2004

Martin Kurthen*
Affiliation:
Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, D-53105Bonn, Germanyhttp//www.uni-bonn.de/epileptologie/index.html
Thomas Grunwald
Affiliation:
Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, D-53105Bonn, Germanyhttp//www.uni-bonn.de/epileptologie/index.html
Christoph Helmstaedter
Affiliation:
Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, D-53105Bonn, Germanyhttp//www.uni-bonn.de/epileptologie/index.html
Christian E. Elger
Affiliation:
Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, D-53105Bonn, Germanyhttp//www.uni-bonn.de/epileptologie/index.html

Abstract:

An action-oriented theory of embodied memory is favorable for many reasons, but it will not provide a quick yet clean solution to the grounding problem in the way Glenberg (1997t) envisages. Although structural mapping via analogical representations may be an adequate mechanism of cognitive representation, it will not suffice to explain representation as such.

Type
Continuing Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note

Commentary on Arthur M. Glenberg (1997). What memory is for. BBS 20(1):1–19.