Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Crawford, Jarret T.
2014.
Ideological symmetries and asymmetries in political intolerance and prejudice toward political activist groups.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
Vol. 55,
Issue. ,
p.
284.
Kugler, Matthew
Jost, John T.
and
Noorbaloochi, Sharareh
2014.
Another Look at Moral Foundations Theory: Do Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Explain Liberal-Conservative Differences in “Moral” Intuitions?.
Social Justice Research,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 4,
p.
413.
Onraet, Emma
Van Hiel, Alain
Dhont, Kristof
Hodson, Gordon
Schittekatte, Mark
and
De Pauw, Sarah
2015.
The Association of Cognitive Ability with Right–Wing Ideological Attitudes and Prejudice: A Meta–Analytic Review.
European Journal of Personality,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 6,
p.
599.
van der Vossen, Bas
2015.
In defense of the ivory tower: Why philosophers should stay out of politics.
Philosophical Psychology,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 7,
p.
1045.
Back, Mitja D.
and
Vazire, Simine
2015.
The Social Consequences of Personality: Six Suggestions for Future Research.
European Journal of Personality,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 2,
p.
296.
Chilton, Adam S.
and
Posner, Eric A.
2015.
An Empirical Study of Political Bias in Legal Scholarship.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Carl, Noah
2015.
Can intelligence explain the overrepresentation of liberals and leftists in American academia?.
Intelligence,
Vol. 53,
Issue. ,
p.
181.
Schumm, Walter R.
2015.
Navigating Treacherous Waters—One Researcher's 40 Years of Experience with Controversial Scientific Research,.
Comprehensive Psychology,
Vol. 4,
Issue. ,
Carl, Noah
2015.
Does intelligence have a U-shaped relationship with leftism?.
Intelligence,
Vol. 49,
Issue. ,
p.
159.
Crawford, Jarret T.
Mallinas, Stephanie R.
and
Furman, Bryan J.
2015.
The Balanced Ideological Antipathy Model.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 12,
p.
1607.
Friedman, Hershey H.
2015.
How to Destroy a Good College: The Misuse of the Corporate Model in Academe.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Chilton, Adam S.
and
Posner, Eric A.
2015.
An Empirical Study of Political Bias in Legal Scholarship.
The Journal of Legal Studies,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 2,
p.
277.
Sommet, Nicolas
Quiamzade, Alain
Jury, Mickaël
and
Mugny, Gabriel
2015.
The student-institution fit at university: interactive effects of academic competition and social class on achievement goals.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Vol. 6,
Issue. ,
Osborne, Danny
Sibley, Chris G.
Huo, Yuen J.
and
Smith, Heather
2015.
Doubling‐down on deprivation: Using latent profile analysis to evaluate an age‐old assumption in relative deprivation theory.
European Journal of Social Psychology,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 4,
p.
482.
Korndörfer, Martin
Egloff, Boris
Schmukle, Stefan C.
and
Espinosa, MariaPaz
2015.
A Large Scale Test of the Effect of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior.
PLOS ONE,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 7,
p.
e0133193.
Charney, Evan
2015.
Liberal bias and the five-factor model – ERRATUM.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 38,
Issue. ,
Solon, Idan S.
2015.
Scholarly elites orient left, irrespective of academic affiliation.
Intelligence,
Vol. 51,
Issue. ,
p.
119.
Ludeke, Steven G.
and
Rasmussen, Stig Hebbelstrup Rye
2016.
Personality correlates of sociopolitical attitudes in the Big Five and Eysenckian models.
Personality and Individual Differences,
Vol. 98,
Issue. ,
p.
30.
Stanford, Joseph B.
2016.
Population, Reproductive, and Sexual Health: Data Are Essential Where Disciplines Meet and Ideologies Conflict.
Frontiers in Public Health,
Vol. 4,
Issue. ,
Dupuis, Darcy R.
Wohl, Michael J. A.
Packer, Dominic J.
and
Tabri, Nassim
2016.
To dissent and protect: Stronger collective identification increases willingness to dissent when group norms evoke collective angst.
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 5,
p.
694.
Target article
Political diversity will improve social psychological science1
Related commentaries (33)
A checklist to facilitate objective hypothesis testing in social psychology research
A conservative's social psychology
A predominance of self-identified Democrats is no evidence of a leftward bias
A “cohesive moral community” is already patrolling behavioral science1
Conservatism is not the missing viewpoint for true diversity
Diverse crowds using diverse methods improves the scientific dialectic
Diversity of depoliticization?
Increasing ideological tolerance in social psychology
Is liberal bias universal? An international perspective on social psychologists
Lack of political diversity and the framing of findings in personality and clinical psychology
Liberal bias and the five-factor model
Liberals and conservatives: Non-convertible currencies
Meta-ethical pluralism: A cautionary tale about cohesive moral communities
Method and matter in the social sciences: Umbilically tied to the Enlightenment
Mischaracterizing social psychology to support the laudable goal of increasing its political diversity
On the history of political diversity in social psychology
Political attitudes in social environments
Political bias is tenacious
Political bias, explanatory depth, and narratives of progress
Political diversity versus stimuli diversity: Alternative ways to improve social psychological science
Political homogeneity can nurture threats to research validity
Political orientations do not cancel out, and politics is not about truth
QTIPs: Questionable theoretical and interpretive practices in social psychology
Recognizing and coping with our own prejudices: Fighting liberal bias without conservative input
Should social psychologists create a disciplinary affirmative action program for political conservatives?
Sociopolitical insularity is psychology's Achilles heel
The psychology of psychology: A thought experiment
Too paranoid to see progress: Social psychology is probably liberal, but it doesn't believe in progress
Towards a de-biased social psychology: The effects of ideological perspective go beyond politics
Welcoming conservatives to the field
What kinds of conservatives does social psychology lack, and why?
When theory trumps ideology: Lessons from evolutionary psychology
“Wait – You're a conservative?” Political diversity and the dilemma of disclosure
Author response
It may be harder than we thought, but political diversity will (still) improve social psychological science1