Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:34:34.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experience, attention, and mental representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2002

Justin Broackes
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912 [email protected]

Abstract

O'Regan & Noë make plausible that perception involves mastery of sensory-motor dependencies. Their rejection of qualia, however, is less persuasive; as is their view that we see only what we are attending to. At times they seem to oppose “internal representation” in general; I argue that they should in fact only be rejecting crude conceptions of brain picturing.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)