Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T15:14:43.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2001

Esther Thelen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 [email protected] www.php.indiana.edu/~gormleyf
Gregor Schöner
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences Cognitives, C.N.R.S., Marseille, Cedex 20, [email protected]
Christian Scheier
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 [email protected]
Linda B. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 [email protected]

Abstract

The overall goal of this target article is to demonstrate a mechanism for an embodied cognition. The particular vehicle is a much-studied, but still widely debated phenomenon seen in 7–12 month-old-infants. In Piaget's classic “A-not-B error,” infants who have successfully uncovered a toy at location “A” continue to reach to that location even after they watch the toy hidden in a nearby location “B.” Here, we question the traditional explanations of the error as an indicator of infants' concepts of objects or other static mental structures. Instead, we demonstrate that the A-not-B error and its previously puzzling contextual variations can be understood by the coupled dynamics of the ordinary processes of goal-directed actions: looking, planning, reaching, and remembering. We offer a formal dynamic theory and model based on cognitive embodiment that both simulates the known A-not-B effects and offers novel predictions that match new experimental results. The demonstration supports an embodied view by casting the mental events involved in perception, planning, deciding, and remembering in the same analogic dynamic language as that used to describe bodily movement, so that they may be continuously meshed. We maintain that this mesh is a pre-eminently cognitive act of “knowing” not only in infancy but also in everyday activities throughout the life span.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)