Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-16T08:03:40.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Amodal or perceptual symbol systems: A false dichotomy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2004

W. Martin Davies
W. Martin Davies*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics and Commerce, University of Melbourne, Victoria3010, Australia
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Although Barsalou is right in identifying the importance of perceptual symbols as a means of carrying certain kinds of content, he is wrong in playing down the inferential resources available to amodal symbols. I argue that the case for perceptual symbol systems amounts to a false dichotomy and that it is feasible to help oneself to both kinds of content as extreme ends on a content continuum. The continuum thesis I advance argues for the inferential content at one end and perceptual content at the other. In between the extremes, symbols might have aspects that are either perceptual or propositional-linguistic in character. I argue that this way of characterising the issue preserves the good sense of Barsalou's recognition of perceptual representations and yet avoids the tendency to minimise the gains won with symbolic representations vital to contemporary cognitive science.

Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , February 2004 , pp. 162 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, F. & Campbell, K. (1999) Modality and abstract concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(4):610. [MD]Google Scholar
Aydede, M. (1999) What makes perceptual symbols perceptual? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(4):610–11. [MD]Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. E. (1999t) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(4):577–609. [MD]Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. E. (1999r) Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(4):637–60. [MD]Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (1989) Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition 33: 25–62. [MD]Google Scholar
Davies, W. M. (1996) Experience and content: Consequences of a continuum theory, Avebury Series in Philosophy. Ashgate, Aldershot. [MD]Google Scholar
Harnad, S. (1990) The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42:335–46. [MD]Google Scholar
Kosslyn, S. M. (1994) Image and brain. MIT Press. [MD]Google Scholar
Lang, P. J. (1979) A bio-informational theory of emotional imagery. Psychophysiology 16:495–512. [MD]Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. & Metzler, J. (1971) Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171:701–703. [MD]Google Scholar
Zwann, R. A., Stanfield, R. A. & Madden, C. J. (1999) Perceptual symbols in language comprehension: Can an empirical case be made? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(4):636–37. [MD]Google Scholar