Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:12:16.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Global De-colonial Praxis of Sustainability — Undoing Epistemic Violences between Indigenous peoples and those no longer Indigenous to Place

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2017

Lewis Williams ,
Tracey Bunda ,
Nick Claxton  and
Iain MacKinnon
Lewis Williams*
Affiliation:
Centre for Global Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada Adjunct Associate Professor, School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
Tracey Bunda
Affiliation:
College of Australian Indigenous Studies, Education and Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia
Nick Claxton
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
Iain MacKinnon
Affiliation:
Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
*
address for correspondence: Dr Lewis Williams, Centre for Global Studies, University of Victoria, 2100 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC V8N 5Z3, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Addressing our growing planetary crisis and attendant symptoms of human and human-ecological disconnect, requires a profound epistemological reorientation regarding how societal structures are conceived and articulated; named here as the collective work of decolonisation. While global dynamics are giving rise to vital transnational solidarities between Indigenous peoples, these same processes have also resulted in complex and often contradictory locations and histories of peoples at local levels which unsettle the Indigenous–non-Indigenous binary, providing new and necessary possibilities for the development of epistemological and relational solidarities aimed at increasing social–ecological resilience. The International Resilience Network is an emerging community of practice comprised of Indigenous and settler–migrant peoples aimed at increasing social–ecological resilience. This article narrates the story of the Network's inaugural summit, and provides an overview of contextual issues and analysis of particular pedagogical aspects of our approach; foregrounding ruptures between ontology and epistemology that inevitably occur when culturally and generationally diverse groups who are grounded in different daily realities and related agency imperatives come to share overlapping worldviews through learning ‘in place’ together. Developing pedagogical practices for naming and negotiating associated tensions within the collective work of decolonisation is, we argue, a critical step in enabling practices conducive towards the shared goal of increased human–ecological resilience.

Keywords

decolonisationIndigenousonto-epistemological rupturesinterculturalpedagogies
Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 47 , Special Issue 1: South-South Dialogues: Global Approaches to Decolonial Pedagogies , August 2018 , pp. 41 - 53
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more than human world. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Altman, J.C., & Hinkson, M. (Eds.). (2007). Coercive reconciliation: Stabilise, normalise, exit Aboriginal Australia. Melbourne: Arena Publications Association.Google Scholar
Battiste, M., Bell, L., Findlay, I., Findlay, L., & Henderson, S. (2005). Thinking place: Animating the Indigenous humanities in education. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 34, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behendt, L. (2003). Achieving social justice: Indigenous rights and Australia's future. Annadale: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
Broadhead, L., & Howard, S. (2011). Deepening the debate over ‘Sustainable Science’: Indigenous perspectives as a guide on the journey. Sustainable Development, 19 (5), 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookfield, S. (2012). Critical theory and transformative learning. In Taylor, E.W., Cranston, P. & Associates (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning (pp. 131–146). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bunda, T. (2014). The relationship between Indigenous peoples and the university: Solid or what! Unpublished PhD thesis, University of South Australia, Adelaide.Google Scholar
Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. New Mexico: Clear Light Publishers.Google Scholar
Calderon, D. (2014). Speaking back to manifest destinies: A land education-based approach to critical curriculum inquiry. Environmental Education Research, 20 (1), 24–36, Retrieved from https:doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.865114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corntassel, J. (2012). Re-envisioning re-surgence: Indigenous pathways to decolonization and sustainable self-determination. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education and Society, 1 (1), 86–101.Google Scholar
Davis, D., & Craven, C. (2016). Feminist ethnography. Thinking through methodologies, challenges and possibilities. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Donald, D. (2009). Forts, Curriculum and Indigenous Méttisage: Imaging decolonization of Aboriginal-Canadian relations in educational contexts. First Nations Perspectives, 2 (1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Edmonds, P. (2015). Canada and Australia: On Anglo-Saxon “Oceana”, transcolonial history and an interconnected Pacific world. In Dubinsky, K., Perry, A., & Yu, H. (Eds.), Within and without the nation. Canadian history as transnational history (pp. 115–144). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Edmonds, P. (2016). Settler colonialism and (re) conciliation. Frontier violence, affective performances and imaginative refoundings. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Fessenden, L. (2007). Towards a participatory worldview. The Journal of Pedagogy, Pluralism and Practice, 3 (4). Retrieved September 8, 2014 from http://www.lesley.edu/journal-pedagogy-pluralism-practice/lily-fessenden/participatory-worldview/.Google Scholar
Fixico, D. (2003). The American Indian mind in a linear world. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fredericks, B. (2013). We don't leave our identities at the city limits: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people living in urban localities. Australian Aboriginal Studies 1, 4–16.Google Scholar
Gaztambide-Fernandez, R. (2012). Decolonization and the pedagogy of solidarity. Decolonization, Indigeneity, Education and Society, 1 (1), 41–67.Google Scholar
Gunn, M. (2015). Common ground: A creative exploration of narratives of connection between people and land in Scotland and Aotearoa/New Zealand. Unpublished Master of Philosophy Thesis, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland.Google Scholar
Gunstone, A. (2009). ‘Reconciliation’ and the great Australian silence. Retrieved December 29, 2016 from http://www.auspsa.org.au/publications/apsa-conference-2012.Google Scholar
Hancock, T., Spady, D., & Soskolne, C. (Eds). (2015). Global change and public health: Addressing the ecological determinants of health. The report in brief. Working Group on the Ecological Determinants of Health. Retrieved January 1, 2017 from http://www.cpha.ca/uploads/policy/edh-brief.pdf.Google Scholar
Hanson, C. (2016). Gender, justice and the Indian residential schools claims process. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 7 (1). Retrieved December 16, 2016 from http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/iipj/vol7/iss1/3. doi:10.1854/iipj.2016.7.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinamaki, L. (2009). Protecting the rights of Indigenous peoples: Promoting the sustainability of the global environments? International Community Law Review 11 (1), 3–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horne, J. (2012). WSANEC emerging land or emerging people. Arbutus Review, 3 (2), 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Resilience Network. (2016). International resilience network: Indigenous social impact strategy. Unpublished Paper.Google Scholar
International Resilience Network. (2016a). Resilient places – resilient peoples: Elders’ voices summit videos. Retrieved January 5, 2017 from http://www.internationalresiliencenetwork.com.Google Scholar
Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Kraidy, M. (2002). Hybridity in cultural globalization. Communication Theory, 12 (3), 316–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, E. (2017). Riverspeaking: The spiral of restorative and transformative learning towards kinship ethics. In Corcoran, P., Weakland, J., & Wals, A. (Eds.), Envisioning futures for sustainability and environmental education (pp. 33–43). The Netherlands: Wageningan Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, I. (2017). Colonialism and the Highland Clearances. Northern Scotland, 8, 22–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahuika, R. (2008). Kaupapa Māori theory is critical and anti-colonial. MAI Review, 3 (4), 1–16.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception. Evanston: Northwestern University PressGoogle Scholar
Muehlebach, A. (2003). What self in self-determination? Notes from the frontiers of transnational Indigenous activism. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 10, 241–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Hara, M. (2006). In search of the next enlightenment? The challenge of education for uncertain times. Journal of Transformative Education, 4 (2), 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, E. (2008). Finding our way in the great work. Journal of Transformative Education, 6 (1), 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilger, J. (2015). Evicting Indigenous peoples from their homelands is a declaration of war. The Guardian, Wednesday, April 22, 2015. Retrieved January 8, 2017 from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/apr/22/by-evicting-the-homelands-australia-has-again-declared-war-on-indigenous-people.Google Scholar
Rose, D., & Robin, L. (2004). The ecological humanities in action: An invitation. Australian Humanities Review, issue 31–32. Retrieved September 4, 2011 from www.lib.latrobe.edu.au/AHR/archive/Issue-April-2004/rose.html.Google Scholar
Santos, B. (2012). Public sphere and epistemologies of the South. Africa Development, XXXVII (1), 43–67.Google Scholar
Shantz, S. (2015). “The whole of human relations”: Learning more than art, more than making. Building Engaged Scholarship in Canada, 1 (1), 184–189.Google Scholar
Short, D. (2005). Reconciliation and the problem of internal colonization. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 26 (3), 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerville, M. (2010). A place pedagogy for ‘Global Contemporaneity’. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42 (3), 326–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart-Harawira, M. (2005). The new imperial order. Indigenous response to globalization. Wellington: Huia Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, Z. (2015). Enacting solidarity between Indigenous and displaced peoples: Resistance through art in the Prairies. Decolonization, Indigeneity, Education and Society. Oct. Retrieved November 11, 2016 from https://decolonization.wordpress.com/2015/10/13/enacting-solidarity-between-displaced-and-dispossessed-peoples-resistance-through-art-in-the-prairies/able.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future: Summary of the final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Ottawa. Retrieved April 4, 2016 from http://www.trc.ca/websites/trcinstitution/File/.../Exec_Summary_2015_05_31_web_o.pdf.Google Scholar
Tuck, E., & Yang, W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization, Indigeneity and Society, 1 (1), 1–40.Google Scholar
United Nations Human Rights Commission. (2016). Global trends. Forced displacement in 2015. Geneva: UNHRC. Retrieved March 24, 2017 from http://www.unhcr.org/statistics/unhcrstats/576408cd7/unhcr-global-trends-2015.html.Google Scholar
Watts, V. (2013). Indigenous place-thought and agency amongst humans and non-humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education and Society, 2 (1), 20–34.Google Scholar
Whyte, K.P. (2014). Indigenous women, climate change impacts, and collective action. Hypatia, 29 (3), 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L., & Turner, N. (2015). Resilient places – resilient peoples: Elders voices summit 2015. Evaluation Report. International Resilience Network: Victoria. Retrieved September 8, 2016 from http://www.internationalresiliencenetwork.com.Google Scholar
Williams, L. (2016). The human ecologist as alchemist: An inquiry into Ngai Te Rāngi cosmology, human agency and well-being in a time of ecological peril. In Williams, L., Roberts, R. & McIntosh, A. (Eds.), Radical human ecology: Intercultural and Indigenous approaches (pp. 91–120). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, L. (2016a). Empowerment and the ecological determinants of health: Three critical capacities for practitioners. Health Promotion International. doi:10.1093/heapro/daw011 (Advanced Access online access March issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L., & Hall, L. (2014). Women, well-being and migration: Building epistemological resilience through ontologies of wholeness and relationship. Journal of Global Change, Peace and Security, 26 (2), 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L., Roberts, R., & McIntosh, A. (Eds). (2016). Radical human ecology: Intercultural and Indigenous approaches. London: Routledge. (Previously published by Ashgate Publishing Group, UK, 2012).Google Scholar