Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:56:10.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further notes on the archaeological object

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2018

Matt Edgeworth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Assaf Nativ argues that it is time to deepen and broaden our understanding of the archaeological object, and to make it more explicit. I find the general argument of the paper compelling. Following on from the insights contained therein, it seems to me that there are three principal aspects of the archaeological object that urgently need to be reappraised: (1) temporal range, (2) spatial scale and (3) ecological effectivity.

Type
Discussion
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , June 2018 , pp. 25 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Capelotti, P.J., 2010: The human archaeology of space. Lunar, planetary and interstellar relics of exploration, Jefferson, NC.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, M., 2014b: The relationship between archaeological stratigraphy and artificial ground and its significance in the Anthropocene, in Waters, C.N., Zalasiewicz, J.A., Williams, M., Ellis, M. and Snelling, A. (eds), A stratigraphical basis for the Anthropocene, London (Geological Society Special Publication 395), 91–108.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, M., de B. Richter, D., Waters, C., Haff, P., Neal, C. and Price, S.J., 2015: Diachronous beginnings of the Anthropocene. The lower bounding surface of anthropogenic deposits, Anthropocene review 2 (1), 33–58.Google Scholar
Harris, E.C. 2014. Archaeological stratigraphy: a paradigm for the Anthropocene. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 1:1, 105–109.Google Scholar
Rathje, W., 1992: Rubbish! The archaeology of garbage, New York.Google Scholar