Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:18:52.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deficient syntactic control in poor readers: Is a weak phonetic memory code responsible?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Brian Byrne
Brian Byrne*
Affiliation:
University of New England
*
Brian Byrne Department of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, 2351, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Groups of good and poor readers at second-grade level were tested for comprehension of adjectival constructions of the John is eager/easy to please types and of center-embedded relative clause constructions. The poor readers were inferior to good readers in understanding O-type adjectives (easy) but not S-type (eager). As well, they were poorer at comprehending embedded sentences, but only when the sentences described improbable events, ones which reversed the normal subject/object roles. When either noun could, on pragmatic grounds, assume either role, both groups fared equally well. The results are interpreted as casting doubt on recent assertions that deficient use of a phonetic memory code underlies the syntactic inferiority often seen in poor readers. A more pervasive linguistic immaturity is suggested as being involved.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , August 1981 , pp. 201 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, R. J.St. Lucia graded word reading test. Brisbane: Teaching and Testing Resources, 1967.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J. R. (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1970.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, A. L., & Boakes, R.Prompted recall of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1967, 6, 674–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B.Learning to read: A discontinuous imposition upon language development. Paper presented to the Fifth Biennial Conference, International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Lund, Sweden, 1979. ERIC Document ED 176–215.Google Scholar
Byrne, B.Reading disability, linguistic access and short-term memory: Comments prompted by Jorm's review of developmental dyslexia. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1981, 33, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B., and Arnold, L. Dissociation of the recency effect and immediate memory span: Evidence from beginning readers. British Journal of Psychology, in press.Google Scholar
Byrne, B., & Shea, P.Semantic and phonetic memory codes in beginning readers. Memory & Cognition, 1979, 7, 333–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B.Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 1976, 3, 572–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, C. S.The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Cromer, R. F.‘Children are nice to understand’: Surface structure clues for the recovery of a deep structure. British Journal of Psychology, 1970, 61, 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumas, M. R. An investigation of the relationship between reading disabilities and oral syntax and the temporal aspects of that relationship (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana State University, 1976). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1976, 37, 3549A (University Microfilms No. 76–28, 304).Google Scholar
Firth, I. Components of reading disability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, 1972.Google Scholar
Fox, B., & Routh, D. K.Phonemic analysis and severe reading disability in children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1980, 9, 115–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaer, E. P.Children's understanding and production of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1969, 8, 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, K. S.Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 1967, 6, 126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, J. T.Reading comprehension and syntactic responses in good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973, 65, 294–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jorm, A.The cognitive and neurological basis of developmental dyslexia: A theoretical framework and review. Cognition, 1979, 7, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karmiloff-Smith, A. Language development after five. In Fletcher, P. and Garman, M. (Eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Mann, V. A., Liberman, I. Y., & Shankweiler, D.Children's memory for sentences and word Strings in relation to reading ability. Memory & Cognition, 1980, 8, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mark, L. S., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., & Fowler, C. A.Phonetic recoding and reading difficulty in beginning readers. Memory & Cognition, 1977, 5, 623–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattingly, I. G.Reading, linguistic awareness and language acquisition. Paper presented to the International Reading Research Seminar on Linguistic Awareness and Learning to Read, Victoria, Canada, 1979.Google Scholar
Miller, G.Some psychological studies of grammar. American Psychologist 1962, 17, 748–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosner, J.Phonic analysis training and beginning reading skills. Proceedings of the 79th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1971, 6, 533–534.Google Scholar
Rozin, P. The evolution of intelligence and access to the cognitive unconscious. In Sprague, J. M. & Epstein, A. N. (Eds.), Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology. Vol. 6. New York: Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., and Glcitman, L. R. The structure and acquisition of reading II: The reading process and the acquisition of the alphabetic principle. In Reber, A. S. & Scarborough, D. L. (Eds.), Toward a psychology of reading: The proceedings of the CUNY conferences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. S.Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception and Psychophysics, 1967, 2, 437–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., Mark, L. S., Fowler, C. A., & Fischer, F. W.The speech code and learning to read. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1979, 5, 531–545.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A.The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of yerbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974, 13, 272–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowling, M. J.The development of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in normal and dyslexic readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1980, 29, 294–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stolz, W. S.A study of the ability to decode grammatically novel sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1967, 6, 867–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vellutino, F. R.Alternative conceptualizations of dyslexia: Evidence in support of a verbal-deficit hypothesis. Harvard Educational Review, 1977, 47, 334–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, S. A.Syntactic abilities in normal and dyslexic children. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Weaver, P. A.Syntactic differences in good and poor readers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, 1978 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 151 769).Google Scholar