Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:57:49.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Yeghegis-1 rockshelter site: new investigations into the late Chalcolithic of Armenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2024

Mariya Antonosyan*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Geoanthropology, Archaeology, Jena, Germany
Mariam Saribekyan
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography NAS RA, Yerevan, Armenia
Satenik Mkrtchyan
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biology, NAS RA, Yerevan, Armenia
Anahit Hovhannisyan
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biology, NAS RA, Yerevan, Armenia Trinity College Dublin School of Genetics and Microbiology, Dublin, Ireland
Ellery Frahm
Affiliation:
Yale University Department of Anthropology, Council on Archaeological Studies, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
Roberts Patrick
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Geoanthropology, Archaeology, Jena, Germany
Arsen Bobokhyan
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography NAS RA, Yerevan, Armenia
Karen Azatyan
Affiliation:
Yeghegnadzor Regional Museum, Yeghegnadzor, Armenia
Levon Yepiskoposyan
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biology, NAS RA, Yerevan, Armenia
Noel Amano
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Geoanthropology, Archaeology, Jena, Germany
*
*Author for correspondence ✉ [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Excavations at Yeghegis-1, a rockshelter in southern Armenia, reveal long-term human habitation from the late fifth to mid-fourth millennia BC. Here, the authors present a preliminary overview of the materials recovered from the site and highlight the potential of ongoing research to shed light on Chalcolithic human lifeways in the region.

Type
Project Gallery
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd

Introduction

The Chalcolithic, also known as the Copper Age, is characterised by a move towards early extractive copper metallurgy, a technological revolution that prompted increased productivity, growth of social stratification and functional differentiation of societies and the development of long-distance trade. In the Lesser Caucasus the Chalcolithic covers the period c. 5200–3500 BC, prior to the appearance of the Kura-Araxes cultural complex (Bobokhyan et al. Reference Bobokhyan, Meliksetian, Gasparyan, Avetisyan, Chataigner, Pernicka, Gasparyan and Arimura2014; Sagona Reference Sagona2018). Recently intensified research in this region has shed light on the subsistence and economic strategies of Chalcolithic pastoral farming communities who specialised in domestic sheep, goat and cattle herding (Berthon et al. Reference Berthon, Decaix, Kovács, van Neer, Tengberg, Willcox and Cucchi2013, Reference Berthon, Giblin, Balasse, Fiorillo and Bellefroid2021; Samei Reference Samei2019; Chataigner et al. Reference Chataigner2020; Samei et al. Reference Samei, Hovhannisyan and Gasparyan2020; Palumbi et al. Reference Palumbi, Marro and Stöllner2021) with evidence of prevalent seasonal upland mobility as early as the sixth millennium BC (Berthon et al. Reference Berthon, Giblin, Balasse, Fiorillo and Bellefroid2021; Hirose et al. Reference Hirose, Naito, Kadowaki, Arai, Guliyev and Nishiaki2021; Janzen et al. Reference Janzen, Martirosyan-Olshansky and Bălăşescu2023).

Despite growing research efforts in the region, questions related to subsistence dynamics, herding strategies, animal exploitation practices and adaptation to various environmental conditions during the Chalcolithic still remain to be fully elucidated. To complement existing knowledge and expand our understanding of lifeways during this key period of human history, we initiated the archaeological exploration of Yeghegis-1 rockshelter. Here, we provide an overview of the site and the results of the first field season.

Yeghegis-1

Yeghegis-1 (39051′52.72″N, 45020′41.52″E) rockshelter is situated on a slope in the Yeghegis Valley, Vayots Dzor Province, Armenia, discovered in 2020. Abundant stone tools were found scattered along the slope in front of the entrance (Figure 1). Additionally, a wall-like construction was identified in the western area of the rock shelter. The construction technique hinted at the antiquity of the wall, which we decided warranted further examination.

Figure 1. Yeghegis-1 rockshelter: A) geographic location; B) view of the rockshelter; C) excavated trench (2022); and D) surface finds (figure by authors).

Two areas were targeted for test excavations in 2021: inside the shelter and near the entrance. Initial excavations were, however, unsuccessful and were terminated upon encountering massive (about 1–3m deep) basalt stone blocks that were part of the rockshelter's collapsed roof. In 2022, a trench (2 × 2m) situated on a relatively flat area near the entrance of the shelter was excavated to a depth of 2m. The excavations revealed a sequence of distinct, undisturbed occupational layers. Hearths with burnt animal bones, charcoal and ash were also recorded.

Animal bones from four occupational horizons were sent for radiocarbon dating (Figure 2) and returned dates of 5008±27 BP for Horizon 3 (sheep/goat phalanx, GU61230: 3814–3704 cal BC at 61%), 5138±27 BP for Horizon 4 (sheep/goat occipital, GU62951: 3991–3934 cal BC at 64%), 5190±27 BP for Horizon 5’ (sheep/goat occipital, GU62953: 4047-3958 cal BC at 95.4%) and 5354±27 for Horizon 5 (sheep/goat phalanx, GU61231: 4136–4054 cal BC at 31.1%). The dates, modelled in OxCal v.4.4 and using the IntCal20 calibration curve (Bronk Ramsey Reference Bronk Ramsey2009; Reimer et al. Reference Reimer2020), suggest at least 300 years of occupation.

Figure 2. Chronostratigraphy of the site and radiocarbon dating of the four samples (figure by authors).

Recovered material

The excavations in 2021 and 2022 yielded abundant animal bones (approx. 8000), lithic artefacts (approx. 2000), and earthenware sherds (approx. 700). Copper artefacts and slag were also recovered along with artefacts manufactured from animal bones, including bone points and beads (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Selected artefacts: A–M) obsidian tools; N–O) flint tools; P) hammerstone; Q–S) bone artefacts; T) copper smelting slags; U) copper pin (inset: viewed in situ); V–Z) pottery (figure by authors).

The ceramic assemblage from the site belongs to two categories of pottery: Sioni ware and Chaff Faced ware. Ongoing analysis will allow an in-depth study of the pottery and existing parallels.

Lithic blades, scrapers, burins and borers were recorded, along with flakes and irregularly shaped tools manufactured mostly from obsidian. X-ray fluorescence analysis is ongoing to identify the source of the obsidian, which is not known to occur naturally in the Vayots Dzor Province.

Almost 80 per cent of the animal-bone assemblage is highly fragmented and not morphologically identifiable. The remainder is dominated by sheep/goat (Figure 4). Other ungulates, including cattle, pig/boar and deer, are less common and a small portion of carnivore taxa is identifiable, represented by bears and canids. A substantial proportion (>20%) of bones are burnt/calcined or bear cut marks, suggesting an anthropogenic accumulation. These results are comparable with contemporaneous faunal material recovered from nearby Areni-1 cave, where zooarchaeological investigation revealed a predominance of goats over sheep (Samei et al. Reference Samei2019, Reference Samei, Hovhannisyan and Gasparyan2020).

Figure 4. Faunal assemblage: A) taxonomic composition; B) anatomical representation of capraovids; C) examples of identifiable bones; D) example ZooMS spectra identified as sheep (Ovis) and goat (Capra) (figure by authors).

To complement the morphological identification, increase taxonomic resolution and effectively distinguish ovine from caprine remains to reveal the relative proportions of each, Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry (ZooMS) analysis was conducted on selected bone fragments. Preliminary ZooMS analysis of ungulate bones (n =  40), performed following established protocols (Buckley et al. Reference Buckley, Collins, Thomas-Oates and Wilson2009; Brown et al. Reference Brown, Hebestreit, Wang, Boivin, Douka and Richter2020), had an 85 per cent success rate, adroitly allowing the separation of sheep from goats, with sheep dominating the record (Figure 4) and highlighting the potential for large-scale ZooMS investigation.

Future perspectives

Preliminary results from the Yeghegis-1 rockshelter underscore the potential of this site to provide important insights into human lifeways during the Chalcolithic. Further excavation seasons are planned to fully explore the archaeology of the site, and studies of the lithic and ceramic artefacts will elucidate trade and exchange networks, craft specialisation and manufacturing techniques. Ongoing analyses of the rich faunal remains are expected to contribute to knowledge of human subsistence economies, with ZooMS contributing high-resolution data on taxonomic composition. The application of bulk and sequential stable carbon and oxygen isotope analyses to faunal tooth enamel will additionally allow insights into local environmental conditions and herd management strategies, particularly regarding mobility and seasonality. Future work on archaeobotany is also expected to provide information on ancient flora utilised by the inhabitants of the site. Our ongoing and planned multidisciplinary research will thus investigate how shifts in modes of occupation and economic strategies, expansion of external networks and advancement of metallurgy affected human-environment interactions during the late Chalcolithic.

Funding statement

The project is funded by the Max Planck Society, Science Committee of Armenia (20TTSH-006). The materials recovered from the excavations are currently housed at Yeghegnadzor Regional Museum.

References

Berthon, R., Decaix, A., Kovács, Z.E., van Neer, W., Tengberg, M., Willcox, G. & Cucchi, T.. 2013. A bioarchaeological investigation of three late Chalcolithic pits at Ovçular Tepesi (Nakhchivan, Azerbaijan). Environmental Archaeology 18: 191200. https://doi.org/10.1179/1749631413Y.0000000005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthon, R., Giblin, J., Balasse, M., Fiorillo, D. & Bellefroid, É.. 2021. The role of herding strategies in the exploitation of natural resources by early mining communities in the Caucasus: 263–84. Lyon: MOM Editions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobokhyan, A., Meliksetian, K., Gasparyan, B., Avetisyan, P., Chataigner, C. & Pernicka, E.. 2014. Transition to extractive metallurgy and social transformation in Armenia at the end of the Stone Age, in Gasparyan, B. & Arimura, M. (ed.) Stone Age of Armenia: 283314. Japan: Kanazawa University.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51: 337–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200033865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S., Hebestreit, S., Wang, N., Boivin, N., Douka, K. & Richter, K.. 2020. Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry (ZooMS) for bone material-AmBiC protocol. Protocols.io. https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bffdjji6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, M., Collins, M., Thomas-Oates, J. & Wilson, J.C.. 2009. Species identification by analysis of bone collagen using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 23: 3843–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.4316CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chataigner, C. et al. 2020. Diachronic variability in obsidian procurement patterns and the role of the cave-sheepfold of Getahovit-2 (NE Armenia) during the Chalcolithic period. Quaternary International 550: 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirose, M., Naito, Y., Kadowaki, S., Arai, S., Guliyev, F. & Nishiaki, Y.. 2021. Investigating early husbandry strategies in the southern Caucasus: intra-tooth sequential carbon and oxygen isotope analysis of Neolithic goats, sheep, and cattle from Göytepe and Hacı Elamxanlı Tepe. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102869Google Scholar
Janzen, A., Martirosyan-Olshansky, K. & Bălăşescu, A.. 2023. Neolithic herding practices in the Southern Caucasus: animal management in the early 6th millennium BCE at Masis Blur in Armenia's Ararat Valley. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2023.104084Google Scholar
Palumbi, G. et al. 2021. Early pastoralism and natural resource management: recent research at Godedzor, in Marro, C. & Stöllner, T. (ed.) On salt, copper and gold: the origins of early mining and metallurgy in the Caucasus: 285324. Lyon: MOM Editions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, P.J. et al. 2020. The IntCal20 northern hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 62: 725–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2020.41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagona, A. 2018. The archaeology of the Caucasus: from earliest settlements to the Iron Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Samei, S. 2019. Herding in the highlands: pastoralism and the making of the Kura-Araxes cultural tradition. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Samei, S., Hovhannisyan, N. & Gasparyan, B.. 2020. Economic and symbolic role of animals during the Late Chalcolithic period of Areni-1 Cave, Armenia. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102524Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Yeghegis-1 rockshelter: A) geographic location; B) view of the rockshelter; C) excavated trench (2022); and D) surface finds (figure by authors).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Chronostratigraphy of the site and radiocarbon dating of the four samples (figure by authors).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Selected artefacts: A–M) obsidian tools; N–O) flint tools; P) hammerstone; Q–S) bone artefacts; T) copper smelting slags; U) copper pin (inset: viewed in situ); V–Z) pottery (figure by authors).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Faunal assemblage: A) taxonomic composition; B) anatomical representation of capraovids; C) examples of identifiable bones; D) example ZooMS spectra identified as sheep (Ovis) and goat (Capra) (figure by authors).