Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:53:52.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intrasite spatial organization of lithic production in the Middle Palaeolithic: the evidence of the Abric Romaní (Capellades, Spain)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Manuel Vaquero*
Affiliation:
Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Area de Prehistória, Pl. Imperial Tarraco 1, 43005 Tarragona, Spain [email protected]

Abstract

Spatial organization is a central issue in Palaeolithic archaeology, since it reflects the behavioural capabilities of human groups. We present an analysis of the lithic spatial distribution in a Middle Palaeolithic site, the Abric Romaní. Discussion of these data provides some insights on the variability of settlement patterns among the Neanderthals.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bar-Yosef, O., Vandermeersch, B., Arensburg, B., Belfer-Cohen, A., Goldberg, P., Laville, H., Meignen, L., Rak, Y., Speth, J.D., Tchernov, E., Tillier, A.-M. & Weiner, S.. 1992. The Excavations in Kebara Cave, Mt Carmel, Current Anthropology 33(5): 497550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L.R. 1983. In pursuit of the past. Decoding the archaeological record. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Bischoff, J.L., Julia, R. & Mora, R.. 1988. Uranium-series dating of the Mousterian occupation at Abric Romani, Spain, Nature 332: 6870.Google Scholar
Conard, N.J. & Adler, D.S.. 1997. Lithic reduction and hominid behavior in the Middle Paleolithic of the Rhineland, Journal of Anthropological Research 53: 14775.Google Scholar
Depaepe, P. 1997. Analyses spatiales par répartition proportionnelle des artefacts: Premiers résultats sur deux sites du paléolithique moyen (Lailly ‘Fond de Tournerie’ et Molinons ‘Grand Chanteloup’, Yonne), Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 94(4): 43541.Google Scholar
Farizy, C. 1994. Behavioural and cultural change at the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition in Western Europe, in Nitecki, M.H. & Nitecki, D.V. (ed.), Origin of anatomically modern humans: 93100. New York (NY): Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, L.G. 1992. Mousterian facies in space: new data from Morin Level 16, in Dibble, H. & Mellars, P. (ed.), The Middle Paleolithic: adaptation, behavior and variability: 11325. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Kintigh, K. & Ammerman, A.. 1982. Heuristic approaches to spatial analysis in archaeology, American Antiquity 47: 3163.Google Scholar
Meignen, L. (ed.). 1993. L’abri des Canalettes. Un habitat moustérien sur les grands Causses (Nant, Aveyron). Fouilles 1980–1986. Paris: CNRS. Monographie du CRA 10.Google Scholar
Mellars, P.A. 1996. The Neanderthal legacy. An archaeological perspective from western Europe. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Monnier, J-L. 1990. L’organisation spatiale de l’habitat au Paléolithique inférieur et moyen d’après les premiers résultats de la fouille de trois sites armoricains, Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 87(10/12): 3215.Google Scholar
O’Connell, J.F. 1987. Alyawara site structure and its archaeological implications, American Antiquity 52(1): 74108.Google Scholar
Pettitt, P.B. 1997. High resolution Neanderthals? Interpreting Middle Palaeolithic intrasite spatial data, World Archaeology 29(2): 20824.Google Scholar
Rigaud, J.-P. (ed.). 1988. La Grotte Vaufrey:Paléoenvironnement, Chronologie, Activités humaines. Paris: Société Préhistorique Française. Mémoire 19.Google Scholar
Simek, J.F. 1987. Spatial order and behavioural change in the French Palaeolithic, Antiquity 61: 2540.Google Scholar
Simek, J.F. 1988. Analyse spatiale de la distribution des objets de la couche VIII de la Grotte Vaufrey, in Rigaud, (ed.): 56992.Google Scholar