Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T08:50:55.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Middle Palaeolithic stone tool technology in the Kortallayar Basin, South India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Shanti Pappu
Shanti Pappu*
Affiliation:
Sharma Centre for Heritage Education, Flat No.2, Vasundhara Apartments, Kasturba Housing Society, Vishrantwadi, Pune 411015, Maharashtra, India.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A study of the Middle Palaeolithic stone tool technology from assemblages in South India reveals diverse reduction strategies, including preferences exercised in the choice of row material and blanks for tool manufacture. Various behaviour patterns are identified which have significant implications for the relatively little known Indian Middle Palaeolithic

Keywords

IndiaKortallayar basinMiddle Palaeolithiclithics
Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 75 , Issue 287 , March 2001 , pp. 107 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alam, M.S. 1990. A morphometric study of the Palaeolithic cultures of Bhimbetka, Central India. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, University of Poona.Google Scholar
Allchin, B., Goudie, A. & Hegde, K.T.M.. 1978. The prehistory and palaeogeography of the Great Indian Desert. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O. & Meignen, L.. 1992. Insights into the Levantine Middle Palaeolithic cultural variability, in Dibble, H.L. & Mellars, Paul (ed.), The Middle Palaeolithic: adaptation, behaviour and variability: 163–82. Philadelphia (PA): University Museum Publications. University Museum Monograph 78.Google Scholar
Close, A.E. & Wendorf, F.. 1993. E-88–1: The archaeology of the sandsheet, in Wendorf, F., Schild, R., Close, A.E. & Associates, (ed.), Egypt during the last Interglacial. The Middle Palaeolithic of Bir Tarfawi and Bir Sahara East: 473–87. New York (NY): Plenum.Google Scholar
Corvinus, G. Von. 1983. A Survey of the Pravara River system in Western Maharashtra, India 2: The excavations of the Acheulian site ofChirki-on-Pravara, India. Tübingen: H. Müller-Beck.Google Scholar
Fisi I, P. 1981. Beyond tools. Middle Palaeolithic debitage analysis and cultural inference, Journal of Archaeological Research 38: 374–86.Google Scholar
Jayswal, V. 1978. Pulaeohistory of India. New Delhi: Agam Kala Prakashan.Google Scholar
Jayswal, V. & Pant, PC.. 1977–78. Jamalpur: a typological variant within the Middle Palaeolithic culture-complex of India, Purattatva 9: 15–34.Google Scholar
Jones, P.R. 1994. Results of experimental work in relation to the stone implements of Olduvai Gorge, in Leakey, M.D. & Roe, D.A. (ed.), Olduvai Gorge 5: Excavations in Beds III, IV and the MasekBeds, 196–1971: 254–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joshi, R.V. & Sali, S.A.. 1969. Middle Stone Age factory sites in Western India, Anihropos 63/64: 818–27.Google Scholar
Misra, V.N. 1972. Evolution of Palaeolithic cultures in India, in Bordes, F. (ed.). The origin of Homo sapiens: 116–20. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Misra, V.N. 1989. Stone Age India: an ecological perspective, Man and Environment XIV(I): 17–64.Google Scholar
Misra, V.N., Rajaguru, S.N., Ganido, R.K. & Korisettar, R.. 1990. Geoarchaeology of the Palaeolithic site at Samnapur in the Central Narmada Valley, Man and Environment XV(1): 107–16.Google Scholar
Muralidharan, P.K., Prabhakar, A. & Kumaraguru, P.. 1993. Geomorphology and evolution of the Palar Basin. Abstract of Papers, Workshop on Evolution of East Coast of India, April 18–20. Tanjore: Tamil University.Google Scholar
Murty, M.L.K. 1981. Hunter-gatherer ecosystems and archaeological patterns of subsistence behavior on the Southeast Coast of India: an ethnographic model, World Archaeology 13(1): 47–58.Google Scholar
Paddayya, K. 1982. The Acheulian culture of the Hunsgi Valley (Peninsular India): A settlement system perspective. Pune: Deccan College.Google Scholar
Pappu, S. 1996. Reinvestigation of the Prehistoric Archaeological Record in the Kortallayar Basin, Tamil Nadu, Man and Environment XXI: 1–23.Google Scholar
Pappu, S. 1997. Pleistocene environments and Stone Age adaptations in the Kortallayar Basin, Tamil Nadu. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, University of Poona.Google Scholar
Pappu, S. 1999. A study of natural site formation processes in the Kortallayar Basin, Tamil Nadu, South India, Geoarchaeology 14(2): 127–50.Google Scholar
Petraglia, M.D. 1995. Pursuing site formation research in India, in Wadia, S., Korisettar, R. & Kale, V.S. (ed.), Quaternary environments and geoarchaeology of India: 446–65. Bangalore: Geological Society of India.Google Scholar
Petraglia, M.D., Korisettar, R., Laporta, P. & Schuldenrein, I.. In preparation. Acheulian and Middle Palaeolithic Record of Lakhmapur Locality, Malaprabha Valley, South India.Google Scholar
Rolland, N. 1988. Observations on some Middle Palaeolithic time series in southern France, in Dibble, H.L. & Montet-White, A. (ed.), Upper Pleistocene prehistory of Western Eurasia: 161–80. Philadelphia (PA): University Museum Publications. University Museum Monograph 54, Symposium series 1.Google Scholar
Sankalia, H.D. 1974. Prehistory and protohistory of India and Pakistan. Pune: Deccan College.Google Scholar
Sharma, G.R., & Clark, J.D. (ed.). 1983. Prehistory and palaeo-environments in the Middle Son Valley. Allahabad: Avinash Publications.Google Scholar