Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:43:12.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Desert labyrinth: lines, landscape and meaning at Nazca, Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Clive Ruggles
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology and Ancient History, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
Nicholas J. Saunders
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Bristol, 43 Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UU, UK

Extract

The shapes drawn out by the famous Nazca lines in the Peruvian desert are at their most evident from the air—giving rise to some famously fantastic theories about their origin. The new understanding offered here is the result of a piece of straightforward brilliance on the part of our authors: get down on the ground, where the original users were, and see where your feet lead you. Using stratigraphic and taphonomic reasoning to decide which lines were contemporary, they discover an itinerary so complex they can justify calling it a labyrinth, and see it as serving ceremonial progressions.

Type
Research article
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, V. 2009. Interactive map over Nazca geoglyphs (Peru, 200 BC-AD 600). Available at: http://www.museum-albersdorf.de/nazca/enazcakarte.htm (accessed 21 March 2012).Google Scholar
Aveni, A.F. 1990. Order in the Nazca lines, in Aveni, A.F. (ed.) The lines of Nazca: 43113. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Aveni, A.F. 2000. Between the lines: the mystery of the giant ground drawings of ancient Nasca, Peru. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Clarkson, P.B. 1990. The archaeology of the Nazca pampa: environmental and cultural parameters, in Aveni, A.F. (ed.) The lines of Nazca: 117-72. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Díaz Arriola, L. 2000. Plan de manejo de las líneas de Nasca. Lima: UNESCO/INC.Google Scholar
Hyslop, J. 1984. The Inka road system. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2004. Culture on the ground: the world perceived through the feet. Journal of Material Culture 9(3): 315-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. 2007. Lines: a brief history. London & New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D.W., Proulx, D.A. & Mabee, S.B.. 2002. The correlation between geoglyphs and subterranean water resources in the Rio Grande de Nazca drainage, in Silverman, H. & Isbell, W.H. (ed.) Andean archaeology II: art, landscape, and society: 307-32. New York: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, H. 1982. Labyrinthe. München: Prestel.Google Scholar
Lambers, K. 2006. The geoglyphs of Palpa, Peru: documentation, analysis, and interpretation. Aichwald: Linden Soft.Google Scholar
Orefici, G. (ed.) 2009a. Nasca: el desierto de los dioses de Cahuachi. Lima: Graph Ediciones.Google Scholar
Orefici, G. 2009b. Los geoglifos: espacios abiertos y ceremonias colectivas, in Orefici, G. (ed.) Nasca: el desierto de los dioses de Cahuachi: 92111. Lima: Graph Ediciones.Google Scholar
Proulx, D.A. 2006. A sourcebook of Nasca ceramic iconography. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
Reiche, M. 1968. Mystery on the desert. Stuttgart: Offizindruck AG.Google Scholar
Reindel, M. & Wagner, G.A. (ed.). 2009. New technologies for archaeology: multidisciplinary investigations in Palpa and Nasca, Peru. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reindel, M., Isla, J. & Lambers, K.. 2006. Altares en el desierto: las estructuras de piedra sobre los geoglifos Nasca en Palpa. Arqueologia y Sociedad 17: 179222.Google Scholar
Reinhard, J. 1987. The Nazca lines: a new perspective on their origin and meaning. Lima: Los Pinos.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, R.A. 1999. Los campos de geoglifos en la costa central del Perú (Cuadernos de Investigacion 2/1997). Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Instituto Riva Agüero.Google Scholar
Ruggles, C. 1990. A statistical examination of the radial line azimuths at Nazca, in Aveni, A.F. (ed.) The lines of Nazca: 245-69. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Sauerbier, M. 2009. GIS-based management and analysis of the geoglyphs in the Palpa region (IGP Mitteilungen 104). Zurich: Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Institut für Geodäsie und Photogrammetrie.Google Scholar
Silverman, H. 1990a. Beyond the pampa: the geoglyphs in the valleys of Nazca. National Geographic Research 6(4): 435-56.Google Scholar
Silverman, H. 1990b. The early Nazca pilgrimage center of Cahuachi and the Nazca lines: anthropological and archaeological perspectives, in Aveni, A.F. (ed.) The lines of Nazca: 207-44. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Silverman, H. 1993. Cahuachi in the ancient Nasca world. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, H. & Browne, D.M.. 1991. New evidence for the data of the Nazca lines. Antiquity 65: 208-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, H. & Proulx, D.A.. 2002. The Nasca. Malden (MA) & Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, C. 1994. A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths and monuments. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Urton, G. 1990. Andean social organization and the maintenance of the Nazca lines, in Aveni, A.F. (ed.) The lines of Nazca: 173206. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Von Däniken, E. 1969. Chariots of the gods? London: Souvenir Press.Google Scholar
Ziólkowski, M. 2009. En busca de la astronomía de los Nascas, in Orefici, G. (ed.) Nasca: el desierto de los dioses de Cahuachi: 232-49. Lima: Graph Ediciones.Google Scholar