Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:01:02.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crypt archaeology after Spitalfields: dealing with our recent dead

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Margaret Cox
Margaret Cox*
Affiliation:
School of Conservation Sciences, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole BH12 5BB, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A decade ago, the crammed burial-vaults under Christ Church, Spitalfields, a fine English Baroque church in east-central London designed by Hawksmoor, were archaeologically excavated. This pioneering work in the post-medieval archaeology of our own culture's burial practice has not been followed up. Why?

Type
Reports
Information
Antiquity , Volume 71 , Issue 271 , March 1997 , pp. 8 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addyman, P. 1995. Circumstances of excavation and research, in Lilley, J.M., Stroud, G., Brothwell, D.R. & Williams, M.H. (ed.), The archaeology of York 12: The medieval cemeteries. Fascicule 3: The Jewish burial ground at Jewbury. 298–301. York: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Archaeology South-East. In preparation.Google Scholar
Bray, T.L. 1996. Repatriation, power relations and the politics of the past Antiquity 70: 440–44.Google Scholar
Bray, T.L. & Killion, T.W. (ed.). 1994. Reckoning with the dead: the Larson Bay Repatriation and the Smithsonian Institute. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Clark, D. (ed.). 1993. The sociology of death. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cox, M. 1994. On excavating the recent dead, British Archaeological News 18 (November): 8.Google Scholar
Cox, M. 1995. ‘Crime scene archaeology is one of the most frightening areas of archaeology in which to operate’, Field Archaeologist 23: 14–16.Google Scholar
Cox, M. 1996. Life and death in Spitalfields 1700 to 1850. York: CBA.Google Scholar
Cox, M. & Stock, G.. 1996. Nineteenth century Bath-stone walled graves at St Nicholas' Church, Bathampton, Somerset Archaeology and Natural History 138: 131–50.Google Scholar
Garratt-Frost, S.J., Harrison, G. & Logie, J.G.. 1992. The law and burial archaeology. Birmingham: Institute of Field Archaeologists. Technical Paper 12.Google Scholar
Historic Scotland. 1996. The treatment of human remains in archaeology. Unpublished consultation document. Version 1.1.Google Scholar
Huggins, P. 1994. Opening lead coffins, British Archaeological News 17 (October): 8.Google Scholar
Jupp, P. 1990. From dust to ashes: replacement of burial by cremation in England 1840-1967. London: Congregational Hall Trust.Google Scholar
Klesert, A.L. & Powell, S.. 1993. A perspective on ethics and the reburial controversy, American Antiquity 58(2): 348–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, E. & Sillen, A.. 1996. Rights of passage, New Scientist (22 June): 31–3.Google Scholar
Molleson, T. & Cox, M.. 1993. The Spitalfields Project 2: The anthropology: the middling sort. London: Council for British Archaeology. Research Report 86.Google Scholar
Morris, R. 1994. Examine the dead gently, British Archaeological News 17 (October): 9.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M. 1995. Ethics and the dead in British archaeology, Field Archaeologist 23: 17–18.Google Scholar
Reeve, J. & Adams, M.. 1993. The Spitalfields Project 1: The archaeology: across the Styx. London: Council for British Archaeology. Research Report 85.Google Scholar
Roberts, D.G. & McCarthy, J.P.. 1995. Descendant community partnering in the archaeological and bioanthropoiogical investigation of African-American skeletal populations: two interrelated case studies from Philadelphia, in Grauer, A.L. (ed.), Bodies of evidence: reconstructing history through skeletal analysis: 19–36. New York (NY): Wiley-Liss.Google Scholar
Rose, D. 1996. Jewish bones of contention laid to rest, Observer (16 June).Google Scholar
Thompson, J. 1991. Theoretical issues in response to disasters, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 84: 19–22.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. 1993. Psychological impact of body recovery duties, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 86: 628–9.Google Scholar
Thompson, J., Chung, M.C. & Rosser, R.. 1994. The Marchioness disaster: preliminary report on psychological effects, British Journal of Clinical Psychology 33: 75–7.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. & Solomon, M.. 1991. Body recovery teams at disasters: trauma or challenge?, Anxiety Research 4: 235–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, C. 1989. Archaeology as socio-political action in the present, in Pinsky, V. & Wylio, A. (ed.), Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: essays in the philosophy, history and socin-politics of archaeology: 104–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar