Background: The epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is complex, and the COVID-19 pandemic has had extreme impacts on known risk factors such as comorbidity burden and antibiotic prescribing. However, whether these changes have affected the incidence of hospital-associated CDI (HA-CDI) remains unknown. We compared incidence and trends of HA-CDI before and after the pandemic onset, and we assessed the impact of changes in key CDI-related risk factors. Methods: We conducted an interrupted time-series study (March 2018–March 2021) of adult inpatients hospitalized 4 or more days with no known CDI on admission at a 576-bed academic medical center. Our primary outcome was monthly HA-CDI per 10,000 patient days. We performed segmented linear regression to compare the preinterruption trend in HA-CDI rate to the postinterruption slope and level change. We established a series of 30-day intervals before and after the interruption timepoint of March 23, 2020, which corresponds with the Oregon stay-at-home executive order. The data included 24 preinterruption time points and 12 postinterruption time points. We also assessed changes in slope and trend for known HA-CDI risk factors. Results: We included 34,592 inpatient encounters in our prepandemic period and 10,932 encounters in our postinterruption period. The mean prepandemic HA-CDI rate was 4.07 cases per 10,000 patient days. After the pandemic onset, the rate was 3.6 per 10,000 patient days. However, the observed differences in rate (both in terms of slope and level) were not statistically significant (P = .90 for level; P = .60 for slope change). We observed a significant decrease in admissions per 30 days (1,441 vs 911; level-change P < .0001) and a slight increase in the mean number of Elixhauser comorbidities (1.96 vs 2.07; level-change P = .05). We also observed significant increases in both frequency and intensity of antibiotic use, with an increase average days of therapy per encounter (5.8 vs 7.2; level-change P = .01; slope-change P < .0001) and in antibiotic spectrum index (ASI) points per antibiotic day (4.4 vs 4.9; P < .0001). We observed a consistent downward trend for case days of CDI colonization pressure per hospital day (preinterruption slope P < .0001), which remained consistent after the pandemic onset (P = 0.5 for postinterruption slope change) (Fig. 1). Conclusions: Despite significant increases in high-intensity antibiotic use and comorbidity burden, we did not observe significant differences in HA-CDI after the pandemic onset. This may be due to the significant decrease in colonization pressure in the postpandemic period. Further research is required to fully understand the impact of the pandemic-related changes on

Disclosures: None

Objectives: Patients undergoing hemodialysis using a catheter are at significant risk of developing central venous catheter–related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs), especially with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), resulting in increased morbidity, mortality, and cost. In our 1,000-bed regional hospital, the average CRBSI (any bacteria) rate in patients dialyzing via dialysis catheters was 1.44 per 1,000 catheter days, and the average CRBSI (MRSA) rate was 0.56 per 1,000 catheter days. A quality improvement project was initiated to reduce the overall dialysis CRBSI and CRBSI-MRSA by 50%. Methods: Following the formation of a multidisciplinary team, the catheter-insertion protocols and catheter-care protocols were standardized throughout the hospital. We adopted a well-established scientific quality improvement method, plan–do–study–act (PDSA) cycle model for all interventions that were implemented. The patients and general ward nursing staff were provided education and training in dialysis catheter care. Results: The project was initiated in January 2016, and the initial improvement was seen from July 2017 onward. Analysis of the data since 2016 showed a steady improvement in the overall CRBSI rates, as well as CRBSI-MRSA rates. The average CRBSI rate improved to 0.76 per 1,000 catheter days, and the average CRBSI-MRSA rates improved to 0.15 per 100 catheter days in the calendar year 2021. Conclusions: Because the causes of these infections are multifactorial, emphasis should be placed on improving care processes from the patient preparation phase prior to catheter insertion to regular catheter care in the inpatient wards and dialysis units. We attribute the success of our project to involving all stakeholders and obtaining constant feedback from the staff. We successfully applied PDSA cycles to make relevant incremental changes.

We describe the association between job roles and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among healthcare personnel. A wide range of hazard ratios were observed across job roles. Medical assistants had higher hazard ratios than nurses, while attending physicians, food service workers, laboratory technicians, pharmacists, residents and fellows, and temporary workers had lower hazard ratios.

Antibiotic overuse is high in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) despite a low documented prevalence of bacterial infections in many studies. In this study evaluating 65 COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit, empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics were often overutilized with an inertia to de-escalate despite negative culture results.

Objectives: Sharp injuries are frequent occurrences in healthcare settings. According to the World Health Organization, >2 million occupational exposures to sharp injuries occur among 35 million healthcare workers (HCWs) annually. We report the 5-year incidence and trends of sharp injuries in an acute-care hospital. We compared the rates of injury, the distribution of injuries, and the type of exposure of HCWs during the prepandemic and pandemic eras. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a 5-year surveillance on self-reported sharp injuries in Changi General Hospital, a 1,000-bed acute-care hospital. The occupational groups, the type of sharps, and the incident activity involved were reviewed. The bloodborne pathogen statuses of the identified source patients were studied. Results: In total, 441 sharp injuries were reported from 2017 to 2021. Among the occupational groups, doctors reported the highest number of sharp injuries (N = 272, 61.7%), followed by nurses (N = 129, 29.3%) and other allied health professionals (N = 29, 6.4%). An increasing proportion of doctors reported sharp injuries from 2017 to 2019 (prepandemic era) and the proportion declined from 2020 to 2021 (pandemic era); 52 doctors (58.4%) reported sharp injuries in 2017, 61 (61.1%) in 2018, 72 (67.9%) in 2019, 47 (61%) in 2020, and 40 (57.1%) in 2021. Most sharp injuries were caused by solid sharps (212 of 441, 48.1%) and hollow-bore needles (205 of 441, 46.5%). Source patients were identified in 407 sharp injuries. From the known sources, 51 were seropositive: 20 for hepatitis B (HBV), 27 for hepatitis C (HCV), and 4 for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). No seroconversion occurred. Overall, 198 sharp injuries (44.9%) were sustained during surgical procedures, 83 (18.8%) occurred during blood taking, and 44 (9.9%) occurred during injection administration. Also, 37.5% of sharp injuries among doctors occurred during surgical procedures, and 69.6% of sharp injuries in OT occurred among junior surgical doctors. Conclusions: The overall incidence of sharp injuries has decreased during the pandemic. Fewer elective surgical procedures were performed during the pandemic period. OT suturing training workshops and awareness programs on strategies for preventing sharps injuries in the operating theatre, targeted at surgical residents during the past 2 years, could have contributed to the decrease in the incidence of sharp injuries in our hospital. Sharp injuries pose a significant exposure to blood and body fluids and should be subject to continued epidemiological surveillance.

Background: Hand hygiene (HH) remains arguably the most effective way to prevent healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and ultimately improve the prospect of patient safety. Studies have shown that as many as 50%–70% of infections are transmitted through hands due to poor HH practices. HH with use of alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) is preferred over handwashing with soap and water because of its wide microbial efficacy, time efficiency, and improved skin tolerance. It is also well known that ABHR can be used as an effective prevention measure during disease outbreaks. Before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, health facilities in Sierra Leone have been challenged with HH infrastructural problems such as lack of sinks with constant running water. Before Sierra Leone recorded its first case of COVID-19 in March 2020, the consumption of ABHR in the health facilities was estimated to be 24,000 L per year, which doubled during the COVID-19 pandemic. The demand for commercially available ABHR increased, leading to acute shortages. The estimated cost of the locally produced ABHR ~$2–3 per 500 mL, although it may cost up to $10 for 500 mL when buying imported ABHR products from the local market. Methods: All ingredients were procured locally, and ABHR production was based on WHO formula 1. The production was set for 12 months to cover the estimated annual consumption of ABHR, with periodic monitoring to ensure effective distribution and availability at the point of care. Analysis of assessment results in 12 hospitals from the pre-COVID-19 era (2019) to the COVID-19 era (2021) was performed based on the WHO IPC Assessment Framework (IPCAF) indicator. Results: With an average monthly production of 3,482 L, a total of 41,780 L ABHR was produced and packaged in branded 500-mL containers for distribution to healthcare facilities. This quantity exceeded the estimated demand for ABHR during the COVID-19 pandemic. The data show a considerable increase (from 25% to 44%) in the number of available and functioning HH stations with mainly locally produced ABHR. Results from the monitoring of 575 peripheral health units (PHUs) in 2021 also showed that >67% of PHUs had HH facilities in all clinical areas and that the locally produced ABHR was used in 79% of these HH stations. Conclusions: Locally produced ABHR has shown to be a cost-effective and evidence-based intervention to optimize HH at the point of care. Therefore, localities are encouraged to undertake this realistic and sustainable approach to address issues of acute shortage of ABHR, especially during a global pandemic.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

We assessed breakpoint changes of 13,101 Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from the past decade. All β-lactams and fluoroquinolones demonstrated decreased susceptibilities following breakpoint changes. Enterobacter cloacae experienced the largest average decrease in susceptibility amongst the Enterobacterales at 5.3% and P. aeruginosa experienced an average decrease in susceptibility of 9.3%.