Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T15:19:21.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The summer foraging ranges of adult spectacled petrels Procellaria conspicillata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2013

Tim A. Reid ,
Robert A. Ronconi ,
Richard J. Cuthbert  and
Peter G. Ryan
Tim A. Reid
Affiliation:
Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
Robert A. Ronconi
Affiliation:
Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford St, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Richard J. Cuthbert
Affiliation:
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire, UK
Peter G. Ryan*
Affiliation:
Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Satellite transmitters were attached to eight adult spectacled petrels Procellaria conspicillata Gould captured during the early incubation period at their breeding grounds on Inaccessible Island, one of the Tristan da Cunha Islands in the central South Atlantic Ocean. Data on their at-sea distribution was obtained for up to six months. All birds remained within the South Atlantic from 24–44°S, with most between 25 and 40°S. Breeding birds mainly foraged in oceanic waters, but failed breeders or non-breeders concentrated their foraging activity over the Rio Grande Rise and the Walvis Ridge and along the shelf break off the east coast of South America. Little foraging occurred along the Benguela shelf break off southern Africa. Non-breeders favoured relatively warm water with low chlorophyll concentrations, reducing the risk of bycatch in fisheries. Tracked birds spent 16% of their time in areas with high levels of tuna longline fishing activity, with overlap greater for non-breeding birds (22%) than breeding birds (3%). Birds in this study foraged in shallower waters along the continental shelf edge off South America than spectacled petrels tracked in this area in winter, potentially increasing their risk of exposure to demersal longline fisheries in this area in summer.

Keywords

breedingdistributionfishery overlapSouth Atlantic Ocean
Type
Biological Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 23 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarts, G., MacKenzie, M., McConnell, B., Fedak, M. Mathiopoulus, J. 2008. Estimating space-use and habitat preference from telemetry data. Ecography, 31, 140–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alerstam, T. 1991. Bird migration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 420 pp.Google Scholar
BirdLife International. 2004. Threatened birds of the world. Cambridge: BirdLife International (CD ROM).Google Scholar
BirdLife International. 2010. Species factsheet: spectacled petrel Procellaria conspicillata. http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/speciesfactsheet.php?id=30027, accessed April 2010.Google Scholar
Bolker, B.M. 2008. Ecological models and data in R. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 408 pp.Google Scholar
Bugoni, L. Furness, R.W. 2009. Age composition and sexual size dimorphism of albatrosses and petrels off Brazil. Marine Ornithology, 37, 253–260.Google Scholar
Bugoni, L., D'Alba, L. Furness, R.W. 2009. Marine habitat use of wintering spectacled petrels Procellaria conspicillata, and overlap with longline fishery. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 374, 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugoni, L., Mancini, P.L., Monteiro, D.S., Nascimento, L. Neves, T.S. 2008a. Seabird bycatch in the Brazilian pelagic longline fishery and a review of the capture rates in the southwestern Atlantic Ocean. Endangered Species Research, 5, 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugoni, L., Neves, T.S., Leite, N.O., Carvalho, D., Sales, G., Furness, R.W., Stein, C.E., Peppes, F.V., Giffoni, B.B. Monteiro, D.S. 2008b. Potential bycatch of seabirds and turtles in hook-and-line fisheries of the Itaipava Fleet, Brazil. Fisheries Research, 90, 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camphuysen, C.J. van der Meer, J. 2000. Notes on the distribution of the spectacled petrel Procellaria conspicillata in the South Atlantic Ocean. Atlantic Seabirds, 2, 13–18.Google Scholar
Croxall, J.P., Butchart, S.H.M., Lascelles, B., Stattersfield, A.J., Sullivan, B., Symes, A. Taylor, P. 2012. Seabird conservation status, threats and priority actions: a global assessment. Bird Conservation International, 22, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enticott, J.W. O'Connell, M. 1985. The distribution of the spectacled form of the white-chinned petrel (Procellaria aequinoctialis conspicillata) in the South Atlantic Ocean. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, No. 66, 83–86.Google Scholar
Hockey, P.A.R., Dean, W.R.J. Ryan, P.G. eds. 2005. Roberts’ birds of southern Africa (7th ed.). Cape Town: The Trustees of the John Voelcker Bird Book Fund, 1296 pp.Google Scholar
Jiménez, S., Domingo, A., Abreu, M. Braziero, A. 2011. Structure of the seabird assemblages associated with pelagic longline vessels in the southwestern Atlantic: implications for bycatch. Endangered Species Research, 15, 241–254.Google Scholar
Jiménez, S., Abreu, M., Pons, M., Ortiz, M. Domingo, A. 2010. Assessing the impact of the pelagic longline fishery on albatrosses and petrels in the southwest Atlantic. Aquatic Living Resources, 23, 49–64.Google Scholar
Jonsen, I.D., Myers, R.A. James, M.C. 2007. Identifying leatherback turtle foraging behaviour from satellite telemetry using a switching state-space model. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 337, 255–264.Google Scholar
Jonsen, I.D., Mills, I.D., Flemming, J.M. Myers, R.A. 2005. Robust state-space modelling of animal movement data. Ecology, 86, 2874–2880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsen, I.D., Basson, M., Bestley, S., Bravington, M.V., Patterson, T.A., Pedersen, M.W., Thomson, R., Thygeson, U.H. Wotherspoon, S.J. 2012. State-space models for bio-loggers: a methodological road-map. Deep-Sea Research II, 88–89, 34–46.Google Scholar
MacLeod, C.J., Adams, J. Lyver, P. 2008. At-sea distribution of satellite-tracked grey-faced petrels, Pterodroma macroptera gouldi, captured on the Ruamaahua (Alderman) Islands, New Zealand. Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 142, 73–88.Google Scholar
Marchant, S. Higgins, P.J. 1990. Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds. Vol. 1. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 735 pp.Google Scholar
Patterson, T.A., Thomas, L., Wilcox, C., Ovaskainen, O. Mathiopoulos, J. 2008. State-space models of individual animal movements. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R.A., Silk, J.R.D., Croxall, J.P. Afanasyev, V. 2006. Year-round distribution of white-chinned petrels from South Georgia: relationships with oceanography and fisheries. Biological Conservation, 129, 336–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, T.A., Hindell, M.A. Wilcox, C. 2012. Environmental determinants of the at-sea distribution of encounters between flesh-footed shearwaters Puffinus carneipes and fishing vessels. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 447, 231–242.Google Scholar
Ronconi, R.A., Ryan, P.G. Ropert-Coudert, R. 2010. Diving of great shearwaters (Puffinus gravis) in cold and warm water regions of the South Atlantic Ocean. Plos One, 5, e15508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowan, A.N., Elliott, H.F.I. Rowan, M.K. 1951. The “spectacled” form of the shoemaker Procellaria aequinoctialis in the Tristan da Cunha group. Ibis, 93, 169–174.Google Scholar
Ryan, P.G. 1998. The taxonomic and conservation status of the spectacled petrel Procellaria conspicillata . Bird Conservation International, 8, 223–235.Google Scholar
Ryan, P.G. 2007. Field guide to the animals and plants of Tristan da Cunha and Gough Island. Newbury: Pisces Publications, 162 pp.Google Scholar
Ryan, P.G. Moloney, C.L. 2000. The status of spectacled petrels Procellaria conspicillata and other seabirds at Inaccessible Island. Marine Ornithology, 28, 93–100.Google Scholar
Ryan, P.G. Ronconi, R.A. 2011. Continued increase in numbers of spectacled petrels Procellaria conspicillata . Antarctic Science, 23, 332–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, P.G., Dorse, C. Hilton, G.M. 2006. The conservation status of the spectacled petrel Procellaria conspicillata . Biological Conservation, 131, 575–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirihai, H. 2007. A complete guide to Antarctic wildlife. London: A&C Black, 544 pp.Google Scholar
Stramma, L. England, M. 1999. On the water masses and circulation of the South Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104, 20 863–20 883.Google Scholar
Stramma, L. Peterson, R.G. 1990. The South Atlantic current. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 20, 846–859.Google Scholar
Tomczak, M. Godfrey, J.S. 2003. Regional oceanography: an introduction, 2nd ed. New Delhi: Daya Publishing House, 390 pp.Google Scholar
Torres, L.G., Sagar, P.M., Thompson, D.R. Phillips, R.A. 2013. Scaling down the analysis of seabird-fishery interactions. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 473, 275–289.Google Scholar
Wainer, I., Gent, P. Goni, G. 2000. Annual cycle of the Brazil-Malvinas confluence region in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Climate System Model. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105, 26 167–26 177.Google Scholar
Wakefield, E.D., Phillips, R.P., Trathan, P.N., Arata, J., Gales, R., Huin, N., Robertson, G., Waugh, S.M., Weimerskirch, H. Mathiopoulus, J. 2011. Habitat preference, accessibility, and competition limit the global distribution of black-browed albatrosses. Ecological Monographs, 81, 141–167.Google Scholar
Warham, J. 1990. The petrels: their ecology and breeding systems. London: Academic Press, 440 pp.Google Scholar
Weimerskirch, H., Catard, A., Prince, P.A., Cherel, Y. Croxall, J.P. 1999. Foraging white-chinned petrels Procellaria aequinoctialis at risk: from the tropics to Antarctica. Biological Conservation, 87, 273–275.Google Scholar
Wisz, M.A. Guisan, A. 2009. Do pseudo-absence selection strategies influence species distribution models and their predictions? An information-theoretic approach based on simulated data. BMC Ecology, 9, 8.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Reid Supplementary Material

Tables S1-S3

Download Reid Supplementary Material(File)
File 38.9 KB