Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:25:13.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DNA analysis of bones from Grave Circle B at Mycenae: a first report1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2013

Terence A. Brown ,
Keri A. Brown ,
Christine E. Flaherty ,
Lisa M. Little  and
A.J.N.W. Prag
Terence A. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology
Keri A. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology
Christine E. Flaherty
Affiliation:
University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology andColumbia University
Lisa M. Little
Affiliation:
Indiana University
A.J.N.W. Prag
Affiliation:
The Manchester Museum
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Following the successful identification of at least two different family groups in Grave Circle B using facial reconstruction (BSA 90 [1995], 107–36), a pilot project was carried out at Manchester to identify, analyse and match 22 DNA samples from burials in the Grave Circle. The first step was to determine whether ancient DNA has survived, as proved to be the case; the next was to use this information to sex the individual by polymerase chain reactions (PCRs). In some cases the results provided information which the excavators had not been able to achieve because of the poor state of the skeletal remains; in one there was an apparent disagreement between the DNA result and the conclusion reached on archaeological and anatomical grounds. The overall results suggest that these methods have considerable potential for kinship studies in Aegean Bronze Age populations.

Type
Articles
Information
Annual of the British School at Athens , Volume 95 , November 2000 , pp. 115 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 e.g. J. L. Angel in Mylonas, Grave Circle B, 389–90; Dickinson, O. T. P. K., The Origins of Mycenaean Civilisation (SIMA 49, Göteborg, 1977), 40–49, 50–51Google Scholar; Kilian-Dirlmeier, I., ‘Beobachtungen zu der Schachtgräbern von Mykenai und zu der Schmuckbeigaben mykenischer Männergräber’, Jahrbuch des römisch-germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz, 33 (1986), 156–98Google Scholar.

3 Musgrave, J. H., Neave, R. A. H. and Prag, A. J. N. W., ‘Seven faces from Grave Circle B at Mycenae’, BSA 90 (1995), 107–35Google Scholar, especially 125–31; also Prag, John and Neave, Richard, Making Faces Using Forensic and Archaeological Evidence (London, 1997, rpr. 1999), ch. 6, especially 139–45Google Scholar.

4 Boom, R., Sol, C. J. A., Salimans, M. M. M., Jansen, C. L., Dillen, P. M. E. Wertheim-van, and van der Noordaa, J., ‘Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids’, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 28 (1990), 495–503Google ScholarPubMed; Höss, M. and Pääbo, S., ‘DNA extraction from Pleistocene bones by a silica-based purification method’, Nucleic Acids Research, 21 (1993), 3913–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. Full details of the DNA analysis methods, including the procedures used to avoid and monitor contamination with modern DNA, are available on request from TAB at the Department of Biomolecular Sciences, UMIST, Manchester M60 1QD, UK.

5 Brown, K. A., ‘Gender and sex: what can ancient DNA tell us?’, Ancient Biomolccules, 2 (1998), 3–15Google Scholar; Sullivan, K. M., Mannucci, A., Kimpton, C. P., and Gill, P., ‘A rapid and quantitative DNA sex test: fluorescence-based PCR analysis of X–Y homologous gene amelogenin’, Bio Techniques, 15 (1993), 636–41Google ScholarPubMed.

6 Lassen, C., Hummel, S., and Herrmann, B., ‘PCR-based sex identification oi ancient human bones by amplification of X- and Y-chromosomal sequences: a comparison’, Ancient Biomolecules, 1 (1996), 25–33Google Scholar.

7 The two loci are HUMTH01 and D5S818. Polymeropolous, M., Xiao, H., Rath, D. S., and Merril, C. R., ‘Tetranucleotide repeat polymorphism at the human tyrosine hydroxylase gene’, Nucleic Acids Research, 19 (1991), 3753CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jin, L., Underhill, P. A., Buoncristiani, M. R., and Robertson, J. M., ‘Defining microsatellite alleles by genotyping global indigenous human populations and non-human primates’, Journal of Forensic Science, 42 (1997), 496–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

8 Brown, K. A., ‘Ancient DNA applications in human osteoarchaeology: achievements, problems and potential’, in Cox, M. and Mays, S. (eds), New Perspectives on Human Osteoarchaeology (Greenwich Medical Media, London, in press)Google Scholar.

9 Mylonas, Grave Circle B, 34–5, 400 (Mylonas' internal cross-reference is wrong), pl. 23 α; Angel's report is on p. 379, with Table 1.

10 ibid., 46–7, 379–80; Dickinson (n. 2), 45–6; BSA 90 (1995), 119–21Google Scholar.

11 Mylonas, Grave Circle B, 185–6, 402, pl. 161, with Angel's report on p. 383.

12 ibid., 129–31, 401, with Angel's report on p. 382; Dickinson (n. 2), 43; Cavanagh, W. and Mee, C., A Private Place: Death in Prehistoric Greece (SIMA 125; Jonsered, 1998), 28Google Scholar; Dietz, S., The Argolid at the Transition to the Mycenaean Age (Copenhagen, 1991), 106–32Google Scholar. In 1997 the box of remains from tomb A contained (1) a small bag of bone fragments, including a male os pubis, on the outside of which was the crossed-out place-name ‘Berbati’; and (2) the commingled cranial and post-cranial remains of three individuals, two adult males and one adult female.

13 The Romanovs: Gill, P., Ivanov, P. L., Kimpton, C., Piercy, R., Benson, N., Tully, G., Evett, I., Hagelberg, E. and Sullivan, K., ‘Identification of the remains of the Romanov family by DNA analysis’, Nature Genetics, 6 (1994) 130–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. Microsateliite PCRs from archaeological remains: Kurosaki, K., Matsushita, T., and Ueda, S., ‘Individual DNA identifications from ancient human remains’, American Journal of Human Genetics, 53 (1993), 638–43Google Scholar.

14 On the ethnicity of the Argolid, e.g. Hall, Jonathan M., Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity (Cambridge, 1997), ch. 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar; more generally, Jones, Siân, The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present (London and New York, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.