Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:01:09.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Domestic Hens Have Declarative Representations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

B Forkman
B Forkman*
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute, Scotland
*
Address for correspondence: Department of Zoology, University of Stockholm, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 10 , Issue S1: Consciousness, Cognition and Animal Welfare: Proceedings of the UFAW Symposium, Zoological Society of London, 11-12 May 2000 , February 2001 , pp. S235
Copyright
© 2001 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Adams, C D and Dickinson, A 1981 Instrumental responding following reinforcer devaluation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33B: 109–11Google Scholar
Dennet, D 1988 The intentional stance in theory and practice. In: Byrne, R W and Whitten, A (eds) Machiavellian Intelligence. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Etienne, A S 1984 The meaning of object permanence at different zoological levels. Human Development Π: 309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, P C and Straub, J J 1979 Differential effects of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after Pavlovian appetitive conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Proceedings 5: 65–78Google ScholarPubMed
McFarland, D 1989 Problems of Animal Behaviour. Longman: Harlow, UKGoogle Scholar
Regolin, L, Vallortigara, G and Zanforlin, M 1995 Detour behaviour in the domestic chick: searching for a disappearing prey or a disappearing social partner. Animal Behaviour 50: 203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar