Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:11:36.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intake and growth of steers offered different allowances of autumn grass and concentrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

P. French ,
E. G. O’Riordan ,
P. O’Kiely ,
P. J. Caffrey  and
A. P. Moloney
P. French*
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Grange Research Centre, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland Faculty of Agriculture, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
E. G. O’Riordan
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Grange Research Centre, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland
P. O’Kiely
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Grange Research Centre, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland
P. J. Caffrey
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
A. P. Moloney
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Grange Research Centre, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland
*
†Address for correspondence.
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this experiment was to quantify the relationship between autumn grass supply and concentrate supplementation level on grass intake and animal performance. One hundred and ten continental steers (567 kg) were assigned to 10 treatments. The experimental design was a three grass allowances (6, 12 and 18 kg dry matter (DM) per head daily) by three concentrate levels: (0, 2·5 and 5 kg per head daily) factorial with a positive control group offered concentrates ad libitum and no grass. Grass allowance was offered daily and concentrates were given individually. The experiment began on 22 August and all animals were slaughtered after a mean experimental period of 95 days. Grass intake was calculated using the n-alkane technique and diet digestibility using ytterbium acetate as an indigestible marker. There was an interaction (P < 0·05) between grass allowance and concentrate level for grass intake. At the low grass allowance there was no effect of offering animals supplementary concentrates on grass intake, at the medium and high grass allowances, supplementary concentrates reduced grass intake by 0·43 and 0·81 kg DM respectively per kg DM concentrate offered. Increasing grass allowance increased (P < 0·001) complete diet organic matter (OM) digestibility at all concentrate levels and supplementary concentrates increased (P < 0·001) complete diet OM digestibility only at the low grass allowance. Both offering animals supplementary concentrates (P < 0·001) and increasing daily grass allowance (P < 0·001) increased their carcass growth rate. Relative to the animals offered the low grass allowance and no concentrate, supplementing with concentrate increased carcass growth by 116 g/kg concentrate DM eaten whereas increasing the grass allowance, increased carcass growth by 38 g/kg DM grass eaten. As a strategy for increasing the performance of cattle grazing autumn grass, offering supplementary concentrates offers more scope than altering grass allowance.

Keywords

autumnconcentratesgrass intakesteers
Type
Ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , February 2001 , pp. 129 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birch, G. G. and Mwangelwa, O. M. 1974. Calorimetric determination of sugars in sweetened condensed milk products. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 25: 1355–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brereton, A. J. 1995. Regional and year to year variation in production. In Irish grasslands their biology and management (ed. Jeffrey, D. W. Jones, B. M. and McAdam, J. H.), pp. 12–22. Royal Irish Academy, Dublin.Google Scholar
Chillard, Y., Doreau, M., Bocquier, F. and Lobley, G. E. 1995. Digestive and metabolic adaptations of ruminants to variations in food supply. In Recent developments in the nutrition of herbivores (ed. Journet, M. Grenet, E. Farce, M. H. Theriez, M. and Dermaquilly, C.). Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on the nutrition of herbivores, pp. 329–360.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities. 1982. European Communities beef carcass classification regulations. Council regulations 1358/80, 1208/81, 1202/82. Commission regulations 2930/81, 563/82, 1557/82. Brussels.Google Scholar
Conway, A. 1968. Grazing management in relation to beef production. V. Effect of feeding supplements to beef cattle on pasture at two intensities of stocking. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 7: 105–120.Google Scholar
Devaney, S., O’Riordan, E. G. and Caffrey, P. J. 1997. On farm monitoring of grassland management and animal performance on drystock farms. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 36: 92–93.Google Scholar
Dillon, P. and Stakelum, G. 1988. The use of n-alkanes and chromic oxide as markers for determining feed intake, faecal output and digestibility in dairy cows. Proceedings of the 12th general meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Dublin, pp. 154–158.Google Scholar
Dodsworth, T. L. and Ball, C. 1962. Studies on the feeding of supplements to beef cattle on grass. Animal Production 4: 221–226.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J. and Keane, M. G. 1987. Responses to supplementary concentrates for finishing steers fed silage. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 26: 115–127.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J., Moloney, A. P., O’Riordan, E. G. and McGee, M. 1997. Effects of supplementary concentrates on performance of finishing heifers at pasture in autumn. Proceedings of the 23rd annual research meeting of the Irish Grassland and Animal Production Association, pp. 261–262.Google Scholar
Enright, W. J., McArthur, A., Prendiville, D. J., Spicer, L. J., Campbell, R. and Murphy, M. G. 1992. Beef heifers gaining or losing bodyweight: plasma metabolite and hormone concentrations. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 31: 96-97 (abstr.).Google Scholar
European Communities (Marketing of Feedstuff) Regulations. 1984. Statutory instruments S. I. no. 200 of 1984.Google Scholar
French, P. 1998. The effects of concentrate level and systems of herbage allowance on beef production in the autumn. M.Agr.Sc. thesis, University College, Dublin.Google Scholar
French, P., Moloney, A. P., O’Kiely, P., O’Riordan, E. G. and Caffrey, P. J. 2001. Growth and rumen digestion characteristics of steers grazing autumn grass supplemented with concentrates based on different carbohydrate sources. Animal Science 72: 139–148.Google Scholar
Hawk, P. B. 1965. Hawk’s physiological chemistry, 14th edition (ed. Oser, B.). McGraw-Hill Book Company, NY.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. and Tayler, J. C. 1972. The effect of supplementary barley upon growth and efficiency of food conversion in calves kept at high grazing intensity. Journal of the British Grassland Society 27: 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kibon, A. and Holmes, W. 1987. The effect of height of pasture and concentrate composition on dairy cows grazed on continuously stocked pastures. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109: 293–301.Google Scholar
Lavery, N. P. and Steen, R. W. J. 1998. The effects of grazed grass or concentrate diets on performance and carcass composition of beef cattle. Proceedings of the 24th annual research meeting of the Irish Grassland and Animal Production Association, pp. 141–142 Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D. 1986. Effects of supplements on herbage intake and performance. In Grazing (ed. Frame, J.). Occasional symposium. no. 19, British Grassland Society, pp. 79–88.Google Scholar
McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A., Greenhalgh, J. F. D. and Morgan, C. A. 1995. Grass and forage crops. In Animal nutrition, fifth edition, pp. 434–450. Longman Publications, London.Google Scholar
Mayes, R. W., Lamb, C. S. and Colgrove, P. A. 1986. The use of dosed herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107: 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayne, C. S. 1991. Effects of supplementation on the performance of both growing and lactating cattle at pasture. In Management issues for the grassland farmer in the 1990s. (ed. Mayne, C. S.). Occasional symposium no. 25, British Grassland Society, pp. 55–71.Google Scholar
Munro, J. M. and Walters, R. J. K. 1986. The feeding value of grass. In Grazing (ed. Frame, J.). Occasional symposium no. 19, British Grassland Society, pp. 65–77.Google Scholar
O’Mara, F. 1996. A net energy system for cattle and sheep. Report submitted to the Department of Animal Science and Production, University College Dublin.Google Scholar
O’Riordan, E.G. 1996. Eaffects of herbage allowance on beef production from autumn-grazed pastures Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 35: 70–71 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Reed, K. F. M. 1978. The effect of season of growth on the feeding value of pasture. Journal of the British Grassland Society 33: 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, G. J. 1980. A review of the variations in the concentrations of metabolites in the blood of beef and dairy cattle associated with physiology, nutrition and disease, with particular reference to the interpretation of metabolic profiles. World Review of Nutrition and Diet 33: 172–235.Google Scholar
Sarker, A. B. and Holmes, W. 1974. The influence of supplementary feeding on the herbage intake and grazing behaviour of dry cows. Journal of the British Grassland Society 29: 141–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddons, R. C., Paradine, D. E., Beever, D. E. and Cornell, P. R. 1985. Ytterbium acetate as a particulate-phase digesta-flow marker. British Journal of Nutrition 54: 509–519.Google Scholar
Sinclair, K. D., Broadbent, P. J. and Hutchinson, J. S. M. 1994. The effect of pre- and post-partum energy and protein supply on the blood metabolites and reproductive performance of single- and twin-suckling beef cows. Animal Production 59: 391–400.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W.J. 1994. A comparison of pasture grazing and storage feeding, and the effects of sward surface height and concentrate supplementation from 5 to 10 months of age on the lifetime performance and carcass composition of bulls. Animal Production 58: 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. and Kilpatrick, D. J. 1998. Effects of pasture grazing or storage feeding and concentrate input between 5·5 and 11 months of age on the performance and carcass composition of bulls and on subsequent growth and carcass composition at 620 kg live weight. Animal Science 66: 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. and Robson, A. E. 1995. Effects of forage to concentrate ratio in the diet and protein intake on the performance and carcass composition of beef heifers Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 125: 125–135.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. and. Wilkinson J. M., 1972. The effect of level of concentrate feeding on the voluntary intake of grass and on live-weight gain by cattle. Animal Production 14: 85–96.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. G. and Morris, R. M. 1973. Seasonal paterns of digestible organic matter and protein production from grasses in the North Pennines. Journal of the British Grassland Society 29: 275–284.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 17: 104–111.Google Scholar
Umoh, J. E. and Holmes, W. 1974. The influence of type and level of supplementary feed on intake and performance of beef cattle on pasture. Journal of the British Grassland Society 29: 301–304.Google Scholar
Vadiveloo, J. and Holmes, W. 1979. The effects of forage digestibility and concentrate supplementation on the nutritive value of the diet and performance of finishing cattle. Animal Production 29: 121–129.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. 1963. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. III. A rapid method for the determination of fibre and lignin. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 46: 829–835.Google Scholar
Vulich, S. A., Hanrahan, J. P. and Crowley, B. A. 1995. Modification of the analytical procedure for the determination of herbage and faecal n-alkanes used in the estimation of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 124: 71–77.Google Scholar
Zinn, R. A., Adam, C. F. and Tamayo, M. S. 1995. Interaction of feed intake level on comparative ruminal and total tract digestion of dry-rolled and steam-flaked corn. Journal of Animal Science 73: 1239–1245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed