Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:24:59.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Twin Studies and Behavior Genetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Lissy F. Jarvik
Lissy F. Jarvik*
Affiliation:
Psychogenetic Unit, Veterans Administration Hospital, Brentwood/Los Angeles, California, and, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
*
Psychogenetic Unit, Veterans Administration Hospital, Brentwood/Los Angeles, California 90024, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is observed that neither the methodology of twin studies nor that of behavior genetics in general has been adequately explored in most investigations of human behavior. General distrust of genetic methodologies as well as the belief that genie disorders are unalterable appear to be salient factors in explaining the neglect of those areas by social scientists. A plea is made for putting aside biased attitudes that prevent utilization of the best available techniques for the study of human beings as distinguished from all other animals.

Type
6. Twin Studies in Human Genetics
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 1976 , pp. 187 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1976

References

REFERENCES

Davis, B.D. 1975. Social determinism and behavior genetics. Science, 189: 1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fries, J.C., Vandenberg, S.G., McClearn, G.E., Kuse, A.R., Wilson, J.R. 1974. Near identity of cognitive structure in two ethnic groups. Science, 183: 338–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobzhansky, T. 1973. Genetic Diversity and Human Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarPubMed
Dunn, L.C. 1962. Cross currents in the history of human genetics. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 14: 1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. 1968. Studies on the offspring of two schizophrenic parents. In Rosenthal, D. and Kety, S.S. (eds.): The Transmission of Schizophrenia. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Gottesman, I.I. 1972. Testimony submitted to United States Senate Select Committee on Equal Educational Oppotrunity (U. of Minnesota).Google Scholar
Jarvik, L.F. 1975. Commentary II. Populations for the study of behavior traits. In Schaie, K.W., Anderson, V.E., McClearn, G.E., Money, J. (eds.): Developmental Human Behavior Genetics. Lexington, Mass.: Heath and Company.Google Scholar
Liston, E.H., Jarvik, L.F. 1976. The genetics of schizophrenia. In Sperber, M.A. and Jarvik, L.F. (eds.): Psychiatry and Genetics, Psychosocial, Ethical and Legal Considerations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mendlewicz, J., Fleiss, J.L., Fieve, R.R. 1972. Evidence for X-linkage in the transmission of manic-depressive illness. JAMA, 222: 1624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mednick, S.A. 1966. A longitudinal study of children with a high risk for schizophrenia. Ment. Hyg., 50: 522–535.Google ScholarPubMed
Mirsky, I.A. 1973. Insulin. Metabolism, 22: 973–977.Google Scholar
Money, J., Ehrhradt, A.A. 1972. Man, Woman, Boy and Girl. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar