Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:01:52.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Monozygotic Cotwin Control Study of a Treatment for Myopia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

J. Theodore Schwartz
J. Theodore Schwartz*
Affiliation:
National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
*
18000 Marden Lane, Sandy Spring, Maryland 20860, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Myopia is the world's most common cause of defective vision. The role of controlled accommodation on the progress of myopia is unsettled. This cotwin control study is designed to provide a careful appraisal of the effectiveness of a clinically acceptable method of controlling accommodation. There are no previous reports of similar prospective studies among MZ twins. Expansion of such studies would be aided by collaboration among interested investigators.

Type
4. The Cotwin Method and Experimental Science
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 1976 , pp. 133 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1976

References

REFERENCES

Abraham, S.V. 1964. A preliminary report on the use of « bis-tropicamide » in the control of myopia. Journ. Ped. Ophthalmol., 1: 39–48.Google Scholar
Abraham, S.V. 1966. Control of myopia with tropicamide. Journ. Ped. Ophthalmol., 3: 10–22.Google Scholar
Bedrossian, R.H. 1971. The effect of atropine on myopia. Annal of Ophthalmology, 3: 981–897.Google ScholarPubMed
Betz, J.N. 1949. Letter to Editor. Opt. J. and Rev. Optom., 86: 21–42.Google Scholar
Cochran, W.G., Cox, G.M. 1950. Experimental Designs. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Donders, F.C. 1864. On the Anomalies of Accommodation and Refraction of the Eye. London: The New Sydenham Society.Google Scholar
Duke-Elder, W.S. 1949. Textbook of Ophthalmology [vol. 4]. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Co. Google Scholar
Eggers, H. 1953. The cause and treatment of school myopia. EENT Monthly, 42: 50–55.Google Scholar
Gamble, J.D. 1949. Considerations in myopia. Opt. J. and Rev. Optom., 86: 18–37.Google Scholar
Gostin, S.B. 1962. Prophylactic management of progressive myopia. South Med. J., 55: 916–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husen, T. 1959. Psychological Twin Research. A Methodological Study. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Lancaster, W.B. 1953. Refraction and Motility [p. 152] Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Leudde, W.H. 1932. Monocular cycloplegia for the control of myopia. Am. J. Ophthalmol., 15: 603–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, P.W. 1957. Children with increasing myopia treated with bifocal lenses. Missouri Med., 54: 1152–1155.Google ScholarPubMed
Miles, P.W. 1962. A study of heterophoria and myopia in children (some of whom wore bifocal lenses). Am. J. Ophthalmol., 54: 111–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakajima, A., Kimura, T., Kazua, K., Uesugi Yoritosho, H. 1966. Heritability study on metric traits of the eye and the body by family and twin study. 3rd Int. Congr. Human Genetics, Chicago.Google Scholar
Otsuka, J. 1967. Research on the etiology and treatment of mvopia. ACTA Soc. Ophthalmol. Jap., 71: 1–212.Google Scholar
Parker, M.W. 1958. Protective-corrective program for young myopes. Optom. Weekly, 49: 681–683.Google Scholar
Parsons, J. 1924. Diseases of the Eye [19th Ed., p. 479].Google Scholar
Pascal, J.I. 1952. Studies in Visual Optics [p. 287]. St. Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J.T. 1970. A twin register for eye studies and need for collaboration. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. (Roma), 19: 344–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, J.T., Feinleib, M. 1974. Twin heritability study. In Goldberg, M. F.: Genetic and Metabolic Eye Disease. Boston: Little, Brown and Co. Google Scholar
Sorsby, A. 1967. The nature of spherical refractive errors. In: Refractive Anomalies of the Eye. NINDB Monograph No. 5 [pp. 17–28]. PHS Publication No. 1687. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Stocks, P. 1930–1931. A biometric investigation of twins and their brothers and sisters. Ann. Eugen., 4: 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tait, E.F. 1951. Textbook of Refraction [pp. 60–61]. Philadelphia: W.S. Saunders.Google Scholar
Tokano, J. 1964. Treatment of myopia by the installation of tropicarnide. Jap. J. Clin. Ophthalmol., 18: 45–50.Google Scholar
Tokaro, T., Kabe, S. 1964. Treatment of myopia and changes in optical components. Report 1: Topical application of neosynephrine and tropicarnide. ACTA Soc. Ophthalmol. Jap., 68: 1958–1961.Google Scholar
Toki, T. 1960. Treatment of myopia with local use of neosynephrine hydrochloride. Jap. J. Ophthalmol. 4: 213–219.Google Scholar
von Bracken, H. 1934. Mutual intimacy in twins: types of social structure in pairs of identical and fraternal twins. Charact. Pers., 2: 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, G.T. 1955. Myopia control and abatement. Opt. J. and Rev. Optom., 92: 33–34.Google Scholar
Wilson, P.T. 1934. A study of twins with special reference to heredity as a factor determining differences in environment. Hum. Biol., 6: 324.Google Scholar
Young, F.A. 1967. Present state of knowledge regarding the mechanisms giving rise to refractive anomalies. In: Refractive Anomalies of the Eye. NINDB Monograph No. 5 [pp. 34–35]. PHS Publication No. 1687. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar