Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:42:03.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Politico-Economic Theory of Income Redistribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1985

Robert D. Plotnick
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Richard F. Winters
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College

Abstract

This study integrates models of income redistribution developed by economists, who suggest that citizens voluntarily redistribute because of interdependent preferences and rely on the state for implementation owing to the public-good nature of redistribution, and political scientists, who focus on conditions that lead to demands that the state intervene to assist the poor and on the development of institutions that facilitate such demands. We propose a testable theory of redistribution and apply it to data from the American states.

The empirical analysis addresses determinants of the Aid to Families with Dependent Children guarantee, adjusted for Medicaid and food stamps to which a family receiving the guarantee would be entitled. We posit significant links between the guarantee and both observable explanatory variables, such as per-capita income, and latent constructs, such as liberal party control. We specify observable indicators for the latent constructs and use the LISREL method to estimate parameters for the indicators and structural coefficients. The findings show that both political and economic variables significantly affect the level of the guarantee.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albin, P., & Stein, B. Determinants of relief policy at the sub-federal level. Southern Economic Journal, 1971, 37, 445457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albritton, R. The politics of welfare. In Gray, V., Jacob, H., & Vines, K. (Eds.). Politics in the American states (4th ed.). Boston: Little Brown, 1983, pp. 373414.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. Where the vote comes from: An analysis of electoral coalitions. American Political Science Review, 1972, 67, 1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, P. The sociology of democratic politics and government. In Annual Review of Sociology, 1981, 1, 291319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, E., & McIver, J. An introduction to the analysis of models with unobserved variables. Political Methodology, 1983, 9, 51102.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. Who governs? New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Dahl, R., & Tufte, E. Size and democracy. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Dawson, R., & Gray, V. The politics of welfare. In Jacob, H. & Vines, K. (Eds.). Politics in the American states (2nd ed.). Boston: Little Brown, 1971.Google Scholar
Dawson, R., & Robinson, J. Inter-party competition, economic variables and welfare policies in the American states. Journal of Politics, 1963, 25, 265289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, A. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper, 1957.Google Scholar
Dye, T. Politics, economics and the public: Policy outcomes in the American states. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.Google Scholar
Eulau, H., & Prewitt, K. Labyrinths of democracy: Adaptations, linkages, representation, and policies in urban areas. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1973.Google Scholar
Fry, B., & Winters, R. F. The politics of redistribution. American Political Science Review, 1970, 64, 508522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gary, L. E. Policy decisions in the aid to families with dependent children program: A comparative state analysis. Journal of Politics, 1973, 35, 886923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, R. K., & Shepard, W. B. Political process and public expenditures. American Political Science Review, 1976, 70, 11271135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramlich, E. M. An econometric examination of the new federalism. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1982, 2, 327360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, V. Models of comparative state politics: Comparing cross-sectional and time series analyses. American Journal of Political Science, 1976, 20, 235256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronbjerg, K. Mass society and the extension of welfare, 1960–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Hochman, H., & Rodgers, J. Pareto optimal redistribution. American Economic Review, 1969, 59, 542557.Google Scholar
Hofferbert, R. State and community policy studies: A review of comparative input-output analyses. In Robinson, J. A. (Ed.). Political science annual (vol. 3). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1972.Google Scholar
Hofferbert, R. The study of public policy. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1974.Google Scholar
Hulten, C. R., & McCallum, J. A model of state determination of AFDC benefits. Unpublished. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute, 1982.Google Scholar
Isaac, L., & Kelly, W. Racial insurgency, the state, and welfare expansion: Local and national level evidence from the postwar United States. American Journal of Sociology, 1981, 87, 13481386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, J., & Lipsky, M. Outputs, structure, and power: An assessment of changes in the study of state and local politics. Journal of Politics, 1968, 30, 510538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, E. T. Competition, constituencies, and welfare policies in American states. American Political Science Review, 1979, 73, 414429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. State and local public policy analysis: A review of progress. In Political science and state and local government. Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association, 1973.Google Scholar
Jones, E. Political change and spending shifts in the American states. American Politics Quarterly, 1974, 2, 159178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joreskog, K. A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In Goldberger, A. & Duncan, O. (Eds.). Structural equation models in the social sciences. New York: Seminar Press, 1973, pp. 85112.Google Scholar
Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. LISREL V: User's guide. Chicago: National Educational Resources, 1981.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Southern politics in the state and nation. New York: Knopf, 1949.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M. The relative importance of socioeconomic and political variables for public policy. American Political Science Review, 1977, 71, 559565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsky, M. Protest as a political resource. American Political Science Review, 1968, 62, 11441158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockard, D. New England state politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, G. Private power and American democracy. New York: Knopf, 1966.Google Scholar
Moffitt, R. The effects of grants-in-aid on state and local expenditures: The case of AFDC. Discussion Paper 729–83. Madison, Wis.: Institute for Research on Poverty, 1983.Google Scholar
Moynihan, D. P. The politics of a guaranteed income. New York: Vintage Books, 1973.Google Scholar
Mueller, D. Public choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Olson, M. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Olson, M. The rise and decline of nations. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Orr, L. Food stamps for AFDC families: Income supplementation or fiscal relief? Unpublished, 1979.Google Scholar
Orr, L. Income transfers as a public good: An application to AFDC. American Economic Review, 1976, 66, 359371.Google Scholar
Orr, L. Reply. American Economic Review, 1978, 68, 990994.Google Scholar
Parsons, D. Demographic effects on public charity to the aged. Journal of Human Resources, 1982, 17, 144152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peltzman, S. Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 1976, 19, 211240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, H. D. Rise and decline of one-party systems in the Anglo-American experience. In Huntington, S. (Ed.). Authoritarian politics in modern society. New York: Basic Books, 1970, pp. 7598.Google Scholar
Ranney, A. Parties in the American states. In Jacob, H. & Vines, K. (Eds.), Politics in the American states (3rd ed.). Boston: Little Brown, 1976, pp. 5192.Google Scholar
Rodgers, J. Explaining income redistribution. In Hochman, H. & Peterson, G. (Eds.). Redistribution through public choice. New York: Columbia University Press, 1974, pp. 165205.Google Scholar
Schiller, B. Income transfers as a public good: Comment. American Economic Review, 1978, 68, 982984.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper, 1947.Google Scholar
Spall, H. Income transfers as a public good: Comment. American Economic Review, 1978, 68, 985989. (a)Google Scholar
Spall, H. State tax structure and the supply of AFDC assistance. Public Choice, 1978, 33, 8596. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management, 1971, 2, 221.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. L. Political correlates of social, economic, and religious diversity in the American states. Journal of Politics, 1973, 35, 7084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompkins, G. L. A causal model of state welfare expenditures. Journal of Politics, 1975, 37, 392416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tresch, R. State governments and the welfare system. Southern Economic Journal, 1975, 42, 3343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uslaner, E. M. Comparative state policy formation, interparty competition, and malapportionment: A new look at “V. O. Key's Hypothesis.” Journal of Politics, 1978, 40, 409432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uslaner, E., & Weber, R. Politics of redistribution: Towards a model of policy making in the American states. American Politics Quarterly, 1975, 3, 130170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. Q., & Banfield, E. Public-regardingness as a value premise in voting behavior. American Political Science Review, 1964, 58, 876887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, R. F. Party control and policy change. American Journal of Political Science, 1976, 20, 597636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.