Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T16:55:38.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Louis John Hois v. Austria and Wiener Bank-Verein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2017

Edwin B. Parker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions Involving Questions of International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 1929 , pp. 187 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Printed in this Journal, Vol. 21 (1927), p. 610.Google Scholar

1 Puerto Cabello & Valencia Railroad Co. (Venezuelan Arbitrations Mixed Claims Commission, Ralston's Report, Senate Document 316, 58th Congress, 2d Session, p. 455); Pacific Mail Steamship Company (Convention between the U. S. and New Granada), Moore's Arbitrations, p. 1412; Henry Woodruff v. Venezuela, Morris' Report, 1904, p. 321-3; “ Manoa Cases,” Morris' Report, 1904, p. 451; Henry Woodruff and Flannagan, Bradley, Clark & Co. (United States and Venezuelan Claims Commission, 1889-1890, p. 425).Google Scholar

2 Wolff v. Morley, 5 M. A. T. 670; Griffin Haeraeus v. 5 M. A. T. 675; Frankel Gruening v. Brothers before the Anglo-German Mixed Arbitral Tribunal (1 M. A. T. 726).Google Scholar

3 Savigny, System of the Present Roman Law, 8, 200 et seq.; Unger, System of Austrian General Civil Law, I, 179; Story, Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws, 7th edition, Section 342, p. 279; Wharton, Treatise on the Conflict of Laws, 3rd edition, Section 401, p. 862-3; Phillimore, Commentaries on International Law, etc., 3rd edition, p. 525; Westlake, Treatise on Private International Law, 7th edition, Section 212, p. 302; Foote, Concise Treatise on Private International Law, 5th edition, p. 429; Dicey, Conflict of Laws, 3rd edition, p. 602; Dernburg, The Civil Law of the German Empire, I, 103.Google Scholar

4 Zimmermann ' Wiener Bank-Verein Forshay v. 274 U. S. 253; London Assurance v. Companhia de Moagens, 167 U. S. 149; Austrian Supreme Court, S. Z. III No. 79, IX No. 56, No. 152 (Spr. Rep. No. 13); V No. 30, Slg XVI No. 6352 (Spr. Rep. No. 219).Google Scholar

5 Hasenoehrl, Austrian Law of Obligations, 2nd Vol., 1898, p. 498 and 510; Ehrenzweig,System of Austrian General Private Law, 2nd Vol., 1st half, 6th edition, 1920, section 347,p. 302.Google Scholar

6 Zimmermann ' Wiener Bank-Verein Forshay v. 274 U. S. 253; Bamberger v, Steinhauser, decided by the Supreme Court of Austria, December 14, 1927; Hasenoehrl, Austrian Law of Obligations, 2nd Edition, Section 94, p. 510; Schey, Concept and Substance of the Mora Creditoris in Austrian and in General Law (1884, p. 39); Frind, Austrian Court Journal for 1911, No. 8, p. 62; Decision of Supreme Court of Austria, June 28, 1921, Ob I I 425; Haas Marelli v. Italo-Austrian Mixed Arbitral Tribunal, 7 M. A. T. 249; Efisio Paris v. Impresa Auteried & Co., Italo-Austrian Mixed Arbitral Tribunal, 6 M. A. T. 436.Google Scholar

7 Hasenoehrl, Z, Sec. 94, p. 498; Krainz-Pfaff, System, 2nd Vol., 4th Ed., 1907, Sec. 344, p. 161; Ehrenzweig, System, 2nd Vol., 6th Ed., Sec. 347, p. 305; Czyhlarz, Gruenhut's Zeitschrift, 6 (1879), p. 669.Google Scholar

8 Tannenbaum v. The Prussian Treasury, 5 M. A. T. 632; Solomon & Co. v. Slaatsanwalt, etc., Anglo-German Mixed Arbitral Tribunal, case No. 2214, decided September 30, 1924.Google Scholar

9 Zimmermann & Wiener Bank-Verein Forshay v. 274 U. S. 253.Google Scholar

9 A precedent for such a stipulation is found in the last sentence of paragraph 1 of the Annex to Section IY of Part X of the treaty making void all exceptional war measures taken by Austria and Austrian authorities since November 3, 1918.Google Scholar

11 Steinhauser Bamberger v. decided by the Supreme Court of Austria, December 14,1927.Google Scholar