Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:05:52.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Statehood of Palestine: International Law in the Middle East Conflict. By John Quigley. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Pp. xix, 326. Index. $95, cloth; $27.99, paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Victor Kattan
Victor Kattan*
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Books on International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 105 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 407 - 415
Copyright
Copyright ©by the American Society of International Law,2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* [Editor’s note: Maureen Williams is currently the chair of the Space Law Committee of the International Law Association (London).]

1 Elior, Levy, PA: 150 States to Recognize Palestine by Sept., Ynet News, Mar. 3, 2011, available at http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4036984,00.html.Google Scholar

2 Report of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict on Human Rights in Palestine and Other Occupied Arab Territories, para. 1970, UN Doc. A/HRC/12.48 (Sept. 25, 2009).

3 See John, Quigley, Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice (1990)Google Scholar ; John, Quigley, The Case For Palestine: An International Law Perspective (2005).Google Scholar

4 See also Mutaz M., Qafisheh, The International Law Foundations of Palestinian Nationality: A Legal Examination of Nationality In Palestine Under Britain’s Rule (2008).Google Scholar

5 Ottoman Public Debt, 1 R.I.A.A. 529, 609–10 (Perm. Ct. Arb. 1925). (The arbitrator in this case was Professor Eugène Borel of the University of Geneva.)

6 Mavrommatis Jerusalem Concessions (UK v. Greece), 1925 PCIJ (ser. A) No. 5, at 31–32 (Mar. 26).

7 Palestine is also a member of the Non-Aligned Movement, the Group of 77, the International Federation of the Red Cross and the Red Crescent Societies, and the International Trade Union Confederation.

8 Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, Dec. 26, 1933, 165 LNTS 19, reprinted in 28 AJIL. Supp. 75 (1934).

9 Id., Art. 3 (emphasis added).

10 James, Crawford, Israel (1948–1949) and Palestine (1998–1999): Two Studies in the Creation of States , in The Reality of International Law: Essays In Honour of Ian Brownlie 95 (Guy S., Goodwin-Gill and Stefan, Talmon eds., 1999).Google Scholar

11 See James, Crawford, The Creation of States in International Law 421–48 (2d ed. 2006).Google Scholar

12 on the criterion of independence, see id. at 62–89, 437–38.

13 Id. at 437.

14 Ungar v. Palestine Liberation Organization, 402 F.3d 274 (1st Cir. 2005).

15 Island of Palmas (Neth./U.S.), 2 R.I.A.A. 829 (Perm. Ct. Arb. 1928).

16 Report of the International Committee of Jurists Entrusted by the Council of the League of Nations with the Task of Giving an Advisory Opinion upon the Legal Aspects of the Aaland Islands Question, League of Nations O.J. Spec. Supp. 3, 8–9 (1920).

17 See Crawford, supra note 11, at 291–92

18 Quigley is correct to conclude that Article 80 covered mandates, although it might have been prudent for him to refer to the travaux préparatoires to buttress his argument. See 10 UNCIO Docs. 477 (1945).

19 See, e.g., Eugene V. Rostow, “Palestinian Self-Determination “: Possible Futures for Unallocated Territories of the Palestine Mandate, 5 Yale Stud. World Pub. Ord. 147, 154–62 (1979).

20 See Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, GA Res. 1514 (XV) (Dec. 14, 1960).

21 See Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, 2004 ICJ Rep. 136, 184, para. 121 (July 9).

22 Id. at 184, para. 122.

23 Id. at 199, paras. 155–56.

24 See Victor, Kattan, From Coexistence to Conquest: International Law and the Origins of the Arab-Israeli Conflict 1891–1949 (2009).Google Scholar

25 For the political debate surrounding the trusteeship decision see Michael J., Cohen, Palestine and the Great Powers 1945–1948 Google Scholar , at 345–90 (1982). The U.S. Trusteeship Plan for Palestine was drafted by Philip Jessup. See Philip C., Jessup, The Birth of Nations 268–72 (1974).Google Scholar

26 UN Charter Art. 80(1) (emphasis added).

27 See UN Palestine Commission: Restricted Communication Received from the UK Delegation (J. Fletcher-Cooke) Concerning the Date of the Termination of the Mandate, UN Doc. A/AC.21/UK. 142 (May 12, 1948).

28 2 The Charter of The United Nations: a Commentary 1121 (Bruno Simma ed., 2002).

29 UN Doc. A/C.1/277 (Apr. 20, 1948).

30 See Council of the European Union Press Release No. 17835/10, at 14, para. 5 (Dec. 13, 2010), at http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/EN/foraff/118456.pdf.

31 European Community Declaration on Yugoslavia and on the Guidelines on the Recognition of New States, Opinion No. 1, 92 ILR 162 (1991), 31 ILM 1494, 1495 (1992).

32 An updated list is available online at http://www.kosovothanksyou.com/.

33 The United States, the European Union, the United Nations, and Russia comprise the “Quartet.”

34 SC Res. 1515, para. 1 (Nov. 19, 2003).

35 See U.S. Dep’t of State Press Release, Roadmap to Solution of Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (Apr. 30, 2003), at http://www.america.gov/st/washfile-english/2003/April/20030430134837relhcie0.3930475.html.

36 Id.

37 See Natasha, Mozgovaya, U.S. House Opposes Unilateral Declaration of Palestinian State, Haaretz, Dec. 8, 2010, available at http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/u-s-house-opposes-unilateral-declaration-of-palestinian-state-1.330922.Google Scholar