Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T07:19:27.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geographic information systems for selection of CRP tracts to meet different management goals after contract expiration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

D.H. Rickerl ,
J.H. Gritzner ,
P.K. Wieland  and
G. Rial
D.H. Rickerl*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007.
J.H. Gritzner
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Geography, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007.
P.K. Wieland
Affiliation:
Senior Agricultural Research Technician, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007.
G. Rial
Affiliation:
Graduate Assistant, Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007.
*
Corresponding author is D.H. Rickerl ([email protected]).
Get access

Abstract

Land use decisions, following expiration of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) contracts, can be aided by Geographical Information System (GIS) analysis. We utilized a GIS to overlay maps of CRP tracts including wetlands, a surficial aquifer, lakes, rivers and other landscape features in a small watershed in eastern South Dakota. Attribute data including the percentage of highly erodible land, soil type, vegetation, and land capability class were also integrated with the maps. Lake County, South Dakota was used to test the GIS selection model. Criteria were developed for the selection of tracts suitable for various management goals including: protection of surface and groundwater resources, wildlife enhancement, and row-crop or grassland agriculture. The maximum percentage of tract hectares selected for each goal was 17 for groundwater protection, 22 for surface water protection, 18 for wildlife enhancement, 30 for rowcrop production, and 38 for pasture or rangeland. All CRP tracts were selected at least once. The GIS provides a mechanism for selecting CRP tracts to meet several management goals.

Keywords

wetlandswater qualitywildlife habitatrow-crop productiongrassland Production
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 78 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Allen, A.W. 1993. Wildlife habitat criteria in relation to future use of CRP lands. Proc. Great Plains Ag. Council. Rapid City, SD. 06 2–4. 88 p.Google Scholar
2.Barari, A., Cowman, T.C., and Iles, D.L.. 1988. Evaluation of data on nitrate concentrations in the Big Sioux Aquifer. Open-file Report 54UR. DWNR-SDGS. 29 p.Google Scholar
3.Barker, W.T., Sedives, K.K., Messner, T.A., Higgins, K.F., and Hertel, D.R.. 1990. Effects of specialized grazing systems on waterfowl production in southcentral North Dakota. Trans. 55th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conf. p. 462–474.Google Scholar
4.Berthelsen, P.S., Smith, L.M., and Coffman, C.L.. 1989. CRP land and game bird production in the Texas High Plains. J. Soil and Water Conservation. 44:504–507.Google Scholar
5.Bultsma, P.M. 1996. Guidelines for DU grass seedings. Ducks Unlimited, Inc. Factsheet.Google Scholar
6.Burger, L.W. Jr., Kurejeski, E.W., Dailey, T.V., and Ryan, M.R.. 1990. Structural characteristics of vegetation in CRP fields in northern Missouri and their suitability as bobwhite habitat. Trans. 55th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conf. p. 74–83.Google Scholar
7.Chescheir, G.M., Gilliam, J.W., Skaggs, R.W., and Broadhead, R.G.. 1987. The hydrology and nutrient removal effectiveness of wetland buffer areas receiving pumped agricultural drainage water. Report No. 231. North Carolina Water Resources Institute, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.Google Scholar
8.Chescheir, G.M., Skaggs, R.W., and Gilliam, J.W.. 1992. Evaluation of wetland buffer areas for treatment of pumped agricultural drainage water. Trans. Amer. Soc. Agric. Engineers. 35:175–182.Google Scholar
9.Dillaha, T.A., Reneau, R.B., S. Mostaghimi, and D. Lee. 1989. Vegetative filter strips for agricultural nonpoint source pollution control. Trans. Amer. Soc. Agric. Engineers 32:513–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Dobbs, T.L., and Bischoff, J.H.. 1996. Are there tradeoffs between farm profitability and environmental quality in South Dakota's Big Sioux Aquifer area? Economics Commentator 360:1–3.Google Scholar
11.Duebbert, H.F., and Lokemoen, J.T.. 1980. High duck nesting success in a predator-reduced environment. J. Wildlife Management 44:428–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Hays, R. L., and Farmer, A.H.. 1990. Effects of CRP on wildlife habitat: Emergency haying in the Midwest and pine plantings in the Southeast. Trans. 55th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conf. p. 30–39.Google Scholar
13.He, C., Riggs, J.F., and Kang, Y.-T.. 1993. Integration of geographic information systems and a computer model to evaluate impacts of agricultural runoff on water quality. Water Resources Bulletin 29:891–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Hubbard, D.E. 1988. Forage potential of seasonal wetlands. Ph.D. diss. South Dakota State University, Brookings. 165 p.Google Scholar
15.Janssen, L.L., Rickerl, D.H., Stebbins, E., Machacek, T.A., and Kringen, D.E.. 1995. Economics and Environmental Contributions of Wetlands in Agricultural Landscapes. Economics Staff Paper 95–3. South Dakota State University, Brookings. 35 p.Google Scholar
16.Jordan, T.E., Corell, D.L., and Weller, D.E.. 1993. Nutrient interception by a riparian forest receiving inputs from adjacent cropland. J. Environ. Quality 22:467–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Kantrud, H.A. 1993. Duck nest success on Conservation Reserve Program land in the Prairie Pothole Region. J. Soil and Water Conservation 48:238–242.Google Scholar
18.Lant, C.L., Kraft, S.E., and Gillman, K.R.. 1995. Enrollment of filter strips and recharge areas in the CRP and USDA easement programs. J. Soil and Water Conservation 50:193–200.Google Scholar
19.Malo, D.D. 1975. Geomorphic, pedologic, and hydrologic interactions in a closed drainage system. Ph.D diss. North Dakota State University, Fargo.Google Scholar
20.Neckles, H.A., Nelson, J.W., and Pederson, R.L.. 1985. Management of whitetop marshes for livestock forage and wildlife. Delta Waterfowl and Wetlands Res. Sta. Tech. Bull. 1. 12 p.Google Scholar
21.Nowak, P., Schnepf, M., and Barnes, R.. 1992. When CRP Contracts Expire. A National Survey. Soil Conservation Soc. Amer., Ankeny, IA.Google Scholar
22.Patterson, M.P., and Best, L. B.. 1996. Bird abundance and nesting success in Iowa CRP fields: The importance of vegetation structure and composition. American Midland Naturalist 135:153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Poiani, K.A., and Bedford, B.L.. 1995. GIS-based nonpoint source pollution modeling: Considerations for wetlands. J. of Soil and Water Conservation 50:613–619.Google Scholar
24.Richardson, J.L., Wilding, L.P., and Daniels, R.B.. 1992. Recharge and discharge of groundwater in aquic conditions illustrated with flownet analysis. Geoderma 53:65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Robinson, C.A., Ghaffarzadeh, M., and Cruse, R.M.. 1996. Vegetative filter strip effects on sediment concentration in cropland runoff. J. Soil and Water Conservation 51:227–230.Google Scholar
26.Sather, J.H., and Smith, R.D.. 1984. An overview of major wetland functions and values. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Biological Service 84:18.Google Scholar
27.Schultz, B.D., Hubbard, D.E., Jenks, J.A., and Higgins, K.F.. 1994. Plant and waterfowl responses to cattle grazing in two South Dakota semipermanent wetlands. Proc. South Dakota Acad. Sci. 73:121–134.Google Scholar
28.Tim, U.S., and Jolly, R.. 1994. Evaluating agricultural nonpoint-source pollution using integrated geographic information systems and hydrologic/ water quality model. J. Environ. Quality 23:25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.USDA. 1959. Soil Survey, Brookings County, South Dakota. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. Series No. 3. p. 65–67.Google Scholar
30.Whitworth, M.R. and Martin, D.C.. 1990. Instream benefits of CRP filter strips. Trans. 55th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conf. p. 40–45.Google Scholar
31.Winter, T.C., and Rosenberry, D.O.. 1995. The interactions of groundwater with Prairie Pothole Wetlands in the Cottonwood Lake area, east-central North Dakota, 1979–1990. Wetlands 15:193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar