Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T21:50:40.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Consideration of “Folsom and Yuma Culture Finds”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

John L. Cotter
John L. Cotter*
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , October 1939 , pp. 152 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

303 Dr. Roberts advises me that no Yuma specimens have been found in the lowest stratum at Lindenmeier, below the black zone, althpugh Folsom points have been noted in the lowest reaches of artifact occurrence.

304 Dr. Frank H. H. Roberts informs me by correspondence that in 1938 the party under his direction recovered five feet of a mammoth tusk, some splinters of bone and considerable charcoal in the same horizon as the Folsom material about half a mile east of the Lindenmeier site. No implements or flakes were found with it, and it does not constitute a definite association with the Folsom complex. Although it cannot be concluded that the Lindenmeier Folsom people killed mammoth, Roberts is of the opinion that these mammoth bones are approximately contemporaneous with the occupancy of the Lindenmeier site.