Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:45:21.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Reexamination of Labor Investments at Tikal: Reply to Haviland, and Folan, Kintz, Fletcher and Hyde

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Anabel Ford  and
Jeanne E. Arnold
Anabel Ford
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Jeanne E. Arnold
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There are two basic concerns expressed in the comments by Haviland and Folan et al.: the possible exclusion from consideration of specific residential unit areas and the method for calculating labor investments. Although all the issues expressed may be legitimate, most have been explicitly addressed in our original article (Arnold and Ford 1980), and none alter our conclusions.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , April 1982 , pp. 436 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)