Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:55:07.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Flow Along Swept Leading Edges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

M. Gaster
M. Gaster*
Affiliation:
The College of Aeronautics, Cranfield*
Get access

Summary

Flight tests on the Handley Page suction wing showed that turbulence at the wing root can propagate along the leading edge and cause the whole flow to be turbulent. The flow on the attachment line of a swept wing was studied in a low speed wind tunnel with particular reference to this problem of turbulent contamination.

The critical Reynolds number, RθL, of the attachment-line boundary layer for the spanwise spread of turbulence was found to be about 100 for sweep angles in the range 40°–60°. A device was developed to act as a barrier to the turbulent root flow so that a clean laminar flow could exist outboard. This device was shown to be effective up to an Rθ of at least 170, so that experiments were possible on a laminar boundary layer at Reynolds numbers above the lower critical value. A spark was used to introduce spots of turbulence into the attachment-line boundary layer and the propagation speeds of the leading and trailing edges were measured. The spots expanded, the leading edge moving faster than the trailing edge, at high Reynolds numbers, and contracted at low values.

The behaviour of Tollmien-Schlichting waves was also investigated by exciting the flow with sound emanating from a small hole on the attachment line. Measurements of the perturbation phase and amplitude were made downstream of the source and, although accurate values of wave length and propagation speed could be found, difficulties were experienced in evaluating the amplification ratio. Nevertheless, all small disturbances decayed at a sufficient distance from the source hole up to the highest available Reynolds number of 170.

Type
Research Article
Information
Aeronautical Quarterly , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , May 1967 , pp. 165 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Pfenninger, W. About some flow problems in the leading edge region of swept laminar flow wings. Northrop Norair Report BLC-160, 1964.Google Scholar
2. Head, M. R. The boundary layer with distributed suction. R & M 2783, 1955.Google Scholar
3. Burrows, F. M. A theoretical and experimental study of the boundary layer flow on a 45° swept back wing. College of Aeronautics Report No. 109, 1956.Google Scholar
4. Gaster, M. The application of hot-film gauges to the detection of transition in flight. College of Aeronautics Report No. 189, 1965.Google Scholar
5. Pfenninoer, W. Preliminary note about an experimental verification of the turbulent spanwise contamination on a swept wing. Northrop Norair Memorandum 3850-362, 17th July 1963.Google Scholar
6. Gregory, N. Laminar flow on a swept leading edge. 2nd progress report. National Physical Laboratory Aero. Memo. No. 12, 1964.Google Scholar
7. Rosenhead, L. (Editor). Laminar boundary layers. Oxford University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
8. Gray, W. E. The nature of the boundary layer flow at the nose of a swept wing. RAE TM Aero. 256, ARC Report 15 021, 1952.Google Scholar
9. Gregory, N. and Walker, W. S. Brief wind tunnel tests on the effect of sweep on laminar flow. ARC Report 14 928, 1952.Google Scholar
10. Owen, P. R. and Randall, D. G. Boundary layer transition on a swept-back wing. RAE TM Aero. 277, ARC Report 15 022, 1952.Google Scholar
11. Stuart, J. T. The basic theory of the stability of a three-dimensional boundary layer. ARC Report 15 904, 1953.Google Scholar
12. Gregory, N., Stuart, J. T. and Walker, W. S. On the stability of three-dimensional boundary layers with application to the flow due to a rotating disc. Philosophical Transactions (A), Vol. 248 p. 155, 1955.Google Scholar
13. Gregory, N. Transition and spread of turbulence on a 60° swept-back wing. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 64 p. 562, September 1960.Google Scholar
14. Garner, H. C. See Wind tunnel technique by Pankhurst, R. C. and Holder, D. W.. Pitman, London, 1952.Google Scholar
15. Fage, A. The smallest size of spanwise surface corrugation which affects a boundary layer on an aerofoil. R & M 2120, 1943.Google Scholar
16. Gregory, N. and Love, E. M. Laminar flow on a swept leading edge. Final progress report. National Physical Laboratory Aero. Memo. No. 26, 1965.Google Scholar
17. Gaster, M. A simple device for preventing contamination on swept leading edges. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 69 p. 788, November 1965.Google Scholar
18. Schubauer, G. B. and Klebanoff, P. S. Contributions on the mechanism of boundary layer transition. Proceedings of the Symposium on Boundary Layer Effects in Aero-dynamics. National Physical Laboratory, 1955.Google Scholar
19. Lin, C. C. The theory of hydrodynamic stability. Cambridge University Press, 1955.Google Scholar
20. Schubauer, G. B. and Skramstad, H. K. Laminar boundary layer oscillations and transition on a flat plate. NACA Technical Report 909, 1947.Google Scholar
21. Schlichting, H. Zur Enstehung der Turbulenz bei der Plattenstromung Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften Göttingen, Maths- Phys. Klasse, 181-208, 1933.Google Scholar
22. Tollmien, W. Uber die Entstehung der Turbulenz. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften Göttingen, Maths- Phys. Klasse 21-44, 1929. (Translated as: The Production of Turbulence. NACA TM 609, 1931.)Google Scholar