Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:46:08.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fungal and Corrosion Resistance of Several Integral Tank Lining Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

C. F. Hazzard,
Affiliation:
Defence Standards Laboratories, Australia
E. C. Kuster,
Affiliation:
Defence Standards Laboratories, Australia

Extract

Ample evidence(1, 2, 3) exists to indicate that, in the presence of contaminated water and microbiological growths, the present widely used nitrile rubber compositions for lining integral fuel tanks of aircraft do not always offer satisfactory protection against corrosion. Failure of the lining sometimes occurs, which leads subsequently to pitting and inter-crystalline corrosion of the underlying aluminium alloy, resulting in structural weakening of the affected members, and in some instances actual perforation of the aircraft skin. In the majority of observed instances, the corrosion occurs beneath a section of the lining which has become deteriorated. This deterioration occurs in areas where water lies in contact with the nitrile rubber lining, especially where micro-biological slimes have developed at the interface of water, fuel and tank lining. Our evidence in kerosine systems indicates that these slimes are essentially fungal in nature, the predominant fungus being Cladosporium resinae (Lindau) de Vries, and that the associated water may range from low levels of electrolyte contamination to about 3500 ppm of salinity. We are not unmindful of the fact that numerous bacterial species have been found in such slimes, and may well contribute to the mechanism of deterioration of the lining, and the subsequent corrosion of the metal.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Lockheed California Division, Field Service Digest, Vol. 7, No. 5, March-April 1961.Google Scholar
2.Lockheed Georgia Division, Service News, No. 29, July-August 1961.Google Scholar
3.Digman, W. J. Effects of Fuel Contamination on Corrosion of Aircraft Fuel Systems. Society of Automotive Engineers, Paper 757A, October 1962.Google Scholar
4.Wormwell, F. and Brasher, D. M.J. Iron and Steel Inst., Vol. 164, No. 1, pp. 141148, 1950.Google Scholar
5.Koenecke, D. F.Offic. Dig. Federation Soc. Paint Technol, Vol. 32, No. 420, pp. 7179, 1960.Google Scholar
6.Hazzard, G. F., Kuster, E. C. and Lamborn, I. R. Defence Standards Laboratories, Australia, Report 252 (5 parts), 1961-4.Google Scholar