Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T23:15:24.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of pylon geometry on mixing enhancement in a scramjet pylon-cavity flameholder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

A. Oamjee*
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, India
R. Sadanandan
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, India

Abstract

Numerical investigation of the effect of pylon geometry within a pylon-cavity aided Supersonic Combustion Ramjet (SCRAMJET) combustor on mixing enhancement, flame-holding capability, fuel jet penetration and total pressure loss are conducted in the current study. RANS equations for compressed real gas are solved by coupled, implicit, second-order upwind solver. A two-equation SST model is used for turbulence modelling. Validation of the computational model is performed with the help of experimental data collected using surface pressure taps, Schlieren flow visualisation and particle image velocimetry (PIV). The study uses four distinct pylon geometry cases, which include the baseline geometry. Sonic injection of hydrogen fuel through a 1mm diameter hole at 2mm downstream of the pylon rear face along the axis of the test section floor is performed for every case. A crossflow of Mach number 2.2 at four bar absolute pressure and standard atmospheric temperature is maintained. A comparative study of mixing efficiency, total pressure loss, fuel jet penetration and fuel plume area fraction for the different cases evaluate the mixing performance. The simulations show that the Pylon 2 case gives a significant improvement in the performance parameters compared to the other geometries. It is observed that mixing efficiency and fuel jet penetration capability of the system are highly dependent on the streamwise vortex within the flameholder.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gerlinger, P., Stoll, P., Kindler, M., Schneider, F. and Aigner, M.Numerical investigation of mixing and combustion enhancement in supersonic combustors by strut induced streamwise vorticity, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2008, 12, (02), pp 159168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ukai, T., Zare-Behtash, H., Erdem, E., Lo, K.H., Kontis, K. and Obayashi, S.Effectiveness of jet location on mixing characteristics inside a cavity in supersonic flow, Exp Therm Fluid Sci, 2014, 52, pp 5967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L., Huang, W., Yan, L., Du, Z. and Fang, M.Numerical investigation and optimization on the micro-ramp vortex generator within scramjet combustors with the transverse hydrogen jet, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2019, 84, pp 570584.10.1016/j.ast.2018.11.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W.Mixing enhancement strategies and their mechanisms in supersonic flows: a brief review, Acta Astronaut, 2018, 145, pp 492500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdanoff, D.W.Advanced injection and mixing techniques for scramjet combustors, J Propuls Power, 1994, 10, (02), pp 183190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Z., Sun, M., Wang, Z. and Bai, X.Effect of cavity geometry on fuel transport and mixing processes in a scramjet combustor, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2018, 1, pp 16.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. and Song, W.Experimental investigation of influence factors on flame holding in a supersonic combustor, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2019, 85, pp 180186.10.1016/j.ast.2018.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quan Li, L., Huang, W., Yan, L., Tao Zhao, Z. and Liao, L.Mixing enhancement and penetration improvement induced by pulsed gaseous jet and a vortex generator in supersonic flows, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42, (30), pp 1931819330.Google Scholar
Huang, W.et al. Overview of fuel injection techniques for scramjet engines, in Proceedings of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Turbo Expo, 2011, pp 1724.Google Scholar
Gruber, M.R., Donbar, J.M., Carter, C.D. and Hsu, K.-Y.Mixing and combustion studies using cavity-based flameholders in a supersonic flow, J Propuls Power, 2004, 20, (05), pp 769778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeborn, A.B., King, P.I. and Gruber, M.R. Leading-edge pylon effects on a scramjet pylon-cavity flameholder flowfield, in 44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 2008, no. July.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bao, H., Zhou, J. and Pan, Y.Effect of cavity configuration on kerosene spark ignition in a scramjet combustor at ma 4.5 flight condition, Acta Astronaut, 2015, 117, pp 368375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doster, J.C. Hypermixer Pylon Fuel Injection for Scramjet Combustors, Doctoral dissertation, Airforce Institute of Technology, Ohio, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeborn, A.B.Pylon Effects on a Scramjet Cavity, Air University, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 2008, Ohio.Google Scholar
Ren, Z., Wang, B., Hu, B. and Zheng, L.Numerical analysis of supersonic flows over an aft-ramped open-mode cavity, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2018, 78, pp 427437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X., Rona, A. and Edwards, J.A.The effect of trailing-edge geometry on cavity flow oscillation driven by a supersonic shear layer, Aeronaut J R Aeronaut Soc, 1998, 102, (1013), pp 129135.Google Scholar
Zhang, X. and Edwards, J.A.An investigation of supersonic oscillatory cavity flows driven by thick shear layers, Aeronaut J R Aeronaut Soc, 1990, 94, (940), pp 355364.Google Scholar
Lazar, E., Deblauw, B., Glumac, N., Dutton, C. and Elliott, G. A practical approach to piv uncertainty analysis, in 27th AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, 2010, no. July, pp 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melling, A.Tracer particles and seeding for particle image velocimetry, Meas Sci Technol, 1997, 8, pp 14061416.10.1088/0957-0233/8/12/005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W., Li, M. and Yan, L.Mixing augmentation mechanism induced by the pseudo shock wave in transverse gaseous injection flow fields, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41, (25), pp 1096110968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W.Transverse jet in supersonic crossflows, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2016, 50, pp 183195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, K.K.Principles of Combustion, John Wiley & Sons, 2005, US.Google Scholar
Hyslop, P. CFD modelling os supersonic combustion in a scramjet engine, 1998.Google Scholar
Menter, F.R., Kuntz, M. and Langtry, R.Ten years of industrial experience with the sst turbulence model, in Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer 4, Begell House, 2003, New York, Wallingford, pp 625632.Google Scholar
Zhang, S. et al. Thermal behavior in the cracking reaction zone of scramjet cooling channels at different channel aspect ratios, Acta Astronaut, 2016, 127, pp 4156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallah, K.The influence of micro air jets on mixing augmentation of fuel in cavity flameholder at supersonic flow, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2018, 1, pp 17.Google Scholar
Huang, W., Liu, W., Li, S., Xia, Z., Liu, J. and Wang, Z.Influences of the turbulence model and the slot width on the transverse slot injection flow field in supersonic flows, Acta Astronaut, 2012, 73, pp 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oamjee, A. and Sadanandan, R.Fuel injection location studies on pylon-cavity aided jet in supersonic crossflow, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2019, 92, pp 869880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, R.P., Wu, P.-K., Nejad, A.S. and Schetz, J.A.Comparison of physical and aerodynamic ramps as fuel injectors in supersonic flow, J Propuls Power, 1998, 14, (02), pp 135145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turns, S.R.An Introduction to Combustion Concepts and Applications, 3rd ed. McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited, 2012, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar