Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:41:54.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alignments in two-dimensional random sets of points

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

David G. Kendall*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Wilfrid S. Kendall*
Affiliation:
University of Hull
*
Postal address: Statistical Laboratory, 16 Mill Lane, Cambridge CB2 1SB, U.K.
∗∗Postal address: Department of Mathematical Statistics, The University, Hull HU6 7RX, U.K.

Abstract

Let n points in the plane be generated by some specified random mechanism and suppose that N(∊) of the resulting triads form triangles with largest angle ≧ π – ∊. The main object of the paper is to obtain asymptotic formulae for and Var (N(∊)) when ∊ ↓ 0, and to solve the associated data-analytic problem of testing whether an empirical set of n points should be considered to contain too many such ∊-blunt triads in the situation where the generating mechanism is unknown and where all that can be said about the tolerance ∊ is that it must be allowed to take values anywhere in a given interval (T0, T1) (0 < T0 < T1). This problem is solved by the introduction of a plot to be called the pontogram and by the introduction of simulation-based significance tests constructed by random lateral perturbations of the data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1980 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broadbent, S. R. (1980) Simulating the ley hunter. J. R. Statist. Soc. A 143,.Google Scholar
Gadsby, P. and Hutton-Squire, C. (1976) A computer study of megalithic alignments. Undercurrents, 17, 1417.Google Scholar
Heaton, N. (née Lavery) (1976) Ley Lines. M.Sc. Dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
Kendall, D. G. (1974–77) Hunting quanta. In Proc. Symp. J. Neyman, Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw, 111159. (This replaces the earlier version published in Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London A276 (1974), 231–266.) Google Scholar
Kendall, D. G. (1977) The diffusion of shape (abstract). Adv. Appl. Prob. 9, 428430.Google Scholar
Kendall, D. G. (1980) Shape-manifolds, procrustean metrics, and complex projective spaces. To be submitted to Ann. Prob. Google Scholar
Mandl, P. (1962) Über die Verteilung der Zeit welche der Uhlenbecksche Prozess zur Überschreitung einer Grenze braucht. Apl. Mat. 7, 141148.Google Scholar
Page, E. S. (1955) A test for a change in a parameter occurring at an unknown point. Biometrika 42, 523527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripley, B. D. and Rasson, J-P. (1977) Finding the edge of a Poisson forest. J. Appl. Prob. 14, 483491.Google Scholar
Ross, A. S. C. (1950) Philological probability problems. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 12, 1959. (See also the contribution by D. G. Champernowne, pp. 44–45.) Google Scholar
Routh, E. J. (1860) Elementary Rigid Dynamics. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Santaló, L. A. (1976) Integral Geometry and Geometrical Probability. Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
Silverman, B. W. (1976) Limit theorems for dissociated random variables. Adv. Appl. Prob. 8, 806819.Google Scholar
Silverman, B. W. and Brown, T. C. (1978) Short distances, flat triangles and Poisson limits. J. Appl. Prob. 15, 815825.Google Scholar
Stewart, P. A. A., Wylie, D., Bestley, P. and Hodgson, P. D. (1976) A search for ley lines in Cumbria. Submission for Young Scientists of the Year Competition, 1976.Google Scholar
Thom, A. (1971) Megalithic Lunar Observatories. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar