Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T09:17:38.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Validation of a pencil-and-paper measure for depression in the cardiac population: the DMI-10 and DMI-18

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

T Hilton
Affiliation:
The Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia
G Parker
Affiliation:
The Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstracts from ‘Brainwaves’— The Australasian Society for Psychiatric Research Annual Meeting 2006, 6–8 December, Sydney, Australia
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Blackwell Munksgaard

Background:

Two issues arise in relation to depression in the cardiac population. The first is in relation to clinical practice, although depression is now recognized as a risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality in those with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and, to a lesser degree, heart failure (HF). It remains underdiagnosed and undertreated in clinical practice. The second issue is a measurement issue: much of the research on depression in the cardiac population relies on measurement of depression symptoms with psychiatric rating scales and applies cut-offs for these scales that were predetermined for use in psychiatric rather than medical setting. This may lead to measurement errors as many of these scales include somatic symptoms. A well-validated screening and measurement tool specifically validated for use in this population may speak to both these issues, aiding detection and treatment of this important risk factor, as well as measuring it more accurately for research purposes.

Methods:

A total of 322 patients with ACS or HF completed the DMI measures, psychosocial questionnaires and a semistructured clinical interview during the hospital stay.

Results:

Both measures showed good psychometric properties, with high sensitivity and specificity when evaluated against clinical judgment. Cut-off points of ≥6 and ≥14 were determined for the DMI-10 and DMI-14, respectively.

Conclusion:

The DMI-18 and DMI-10 are appropriate for use as screening instruments in cardiac patients.