Element contents
Vietnam
A Pathway from State Socialism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 February 2019
Summary
This is a study of Vietnam's socialist transition and state transformation, generally known as đổi mới. It examines the drivers of socialist-regime change, the nature of the đổi mới state, and the basis of regime legitimacy in Vietnam. The Element argues that despite its 'one-party rule' label, the party-state apparatus that channels said rule has become fragmented. State-building during the đổi mới period involved negotiations and bargaining that redefine authority and power relations within the state apparatus. The party-state's accountability projects are designed to target the specific self-aggrandizing tendencies of the state apparatus, its policies, and abuse of state power. At the leadership level, patterns of resource allocation underlying the đổi mới growth model as well as the VCP's cadre rotation approach have accommodated central and sub-national state elites across sectors and levels, helping shore up the legitimacy of the đổi mới state in the eyes of the state elite. The combination of sustained economic growth, expansion of political space, accountability, and tolerance of small-scale public protests have been factors in strengthening regime-society legitimization.
Keywords
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108608312Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 07 February 2019
References
“Bí thư Tỉnh ủy Kim Ngọc – Một con người đổi mới và sáng tạo” [Party Secretary Kim Ngoc – A Reformist and Innovative Figure], Nhân Dân Điện Tử (October 3, 2018).Google Scholar
“Biển miền Trung đã trở lại bình thường sau sự cố Formosa” [Central Vietnam’s Coast Returns to Normal after the Formosa Disaster], Người Lao Động (May 17, 2018).Google Scholar
“Chuyện ‘khoán chui’ ở Vĩnh Phúc thời Bí thư Kim Ngọc” [The Story about ‘Hidden Sub-Contracting’ in Vinh Phuc under Party Secretary Kim Ngọc’s Time], Dân Việt (September 15, 2017).Google Scholar
“Đầu tư công – thực trạng và giải pháp” [Public Investment: Situation and Solutions], Kiểm toán Nhà nước Việt Nam (August 8, 2012).Google Scholar
“Đây là lý do 13 tỉnh thành này, đặc biệt là TPHCM phải ‘gánh hộ’ ngân sách cho các địa phương còn lại” [These Are Reasons Why 13 Provinces, Especially Ho Chi Minh City, Have to Bear the Budget Burden for the Remaining Provinces!], CAFEF (October 14, 2016).Google Scholar
“Dự án Sào Khê đội vốn 36 lần: Đã yêu cầu lãnh đạo tỉnh Ninh Bình báo cáo” [The Sao Khe Project Raised Capital 36 Times: Ninh Binh Leadership Asked to Report the Situation], Báo Mới (June 3, 2018).Google Scholar
“Dự án Sào Khê từ 72 tỷ “vọt” lên 2,595 tỷ đồng: Bí thư Tỉnh ủy Ninh Bình nói gì?” [The Sao Khe Project from VND 72 billion to 2,595 billion: What Did Ninh Binh Party Secretary Say?], VTC News (May 23, 2018).Google Scholar
“Giảm đầu mối nhưng thực chất lại tăng số Cục, Vụ thuộc Bộ” [Reduced Number of Contact Points, but a Larger Number of Bureaus and Departments within Ministries], VOV (August 7, 2017).Google Scholar
“Hành trình tách nhập tỉnh, thành” [Roadmap for the Split and Merger of Provinces and Cities], Vietnamnet (September 7, 2017).Google Scholar
“Lại bàn về đầu tư công” [Re-Discuss Public Investment], Kinh tế Sài Gòn Online (August 12, 2011).Google Scholar
“Nhiều bộ có số lượng thứ trưởng vượt tiêu chuẩn” [Many Ministries Have More Deputy Ministers Than Standardized], Báo Đất Việt (October 17, 2017).Google Scholar
“Nhìn lại việc ‘trải thảm đỏ đón nhà đầu tư’” [Reviewing the ‘Rolling out the Red Carpet to Welcome Investors’ Practice], Tin tức (January 31, 2013).Google Scholar
“Thanh tra kết luận nhiều dự án ‘đội vốn’ở Hải Phòng” [The Inspectorate Concluded that Many Projects in Hai Phong Had Raised Capital], VNExpress (July 17, 2018).Google Scholar
“UBND TP.HCM đã điều chỉnh quy hoạch Thủ Thiêm như thế nào?” [How Did the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Committee Adjust the Thu Thiem Project’s Spatial Plan?], Thanh Niên (May 4, 2018).Google Scholar
“Vietnam Energy Executives Stand Trial on Corruption Charges,” BBC News (January 8, 2018).Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict R. O’G. (1983). Old State, New Society: Indonesia’s New Order in Comparative Historical Perspective. Journal of Asian Studies, 42 (3), 477–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beresford, Melanie & Fforde, Adam (1997). A Methodology for Analysing the Process of Economic Reform in Vietnam: The Case of Domestic Trade. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 13(4), 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beresford, Melanie & Ngoc, Tran, Angie, , eds. (2004). Reaching for the Dream: Challenges of Sustainable Development in Vietnam. Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
Beresford, Melanie (1988). Vietnam: Politics, Economics and Society. London and New York: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
Beresford, Melanie (1989). National Unification and Economic Development in Vietnam. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bland, Ben. “Vinashin Executives Go on Trial in Vietnam.” Financial Times (March 27, 2012).Google Scholar
Bộ Nội Vụ (2018). Báo cáo chỉ số Cải cách Hành chính – PAR Index 2017 [Report on Indicators on Public Administration Reform – PAR Index 2017].Google Scholar
Bộ Nội Vụ, Mặt trận Tổ quốc Việt Nam, Hội Cựu chiến bình Việt Nam (2018). Báo cáo chỉ số hài lòng của người dân, tổ chức đối với sự phục vụ của cơ quan hành chính nhà nước năm 2017 [Report on Indicators on Satisfaction of Citizens and Organizations Regarding the Services of State Management Agencies in 2017 – SIPAS 2017].Google Scholar
Tin, Bui (1995). Following Ho Chi Minh: The Memoirs of a North Vietnamese Colonel. Trans. Judy Stowe and Do Van. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Chan, Anita & Norlund, Irene (1999). Vietnamese and Chinese Labor Regimes: On the Road to Divergence. In Chan, Anita, Benedict, J. Kerkvliet, Tria, and Unger, Jonathan, eds., Transforming Asian Socialism: China and Vietnam Compared. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 204–29.Google Scholar
Châu Hoàng Thân. “Đặc điểm, yêu cầu và thực trạng phân cấp quản lý đất đai hiện nay” [Features, Needs, and Current Situations of Land Management Decentralization]. 26 April 2018. Available at: http://tuphaptamky.gov.vn/2014/news/sua-luat-dat-dai-2013/Dac-diem-yeu-cau-va-thuc-trang-phan-cap-quan-ly-dat-dai-hien-nay-3700.htmlGoogle Scholar
Chiến lược ổn định và phát triển kinh tế xã hội đến năm 2000 [Strategy for Socio-Economic Stability and Development to 2000].Google Scholar
Văn Lâm, Chử (1990). 45 năm nông nghiệp Việt Nam [45 Years of Vietnamese Agriculture]. In Viện Kinh tế học, 45 năm kinh tế Việt Nam (1945–1990) [45 Years of the Vietnamese Economy (1945–1990)]. Hà Nội: Khoa học Xã hội, pp. 94–115.Google Scholar
CODE & PPWG (2008). Tài liệu hội thảo sự tham gia của tổ chức phi chính phủ và tổ chức cộng đồng trong vận động chính sách: Kinh nghiệm thực tiễn và khuôn khổ pháp luật [Materials on Cooperation]. Hà Nội: SDC.Google Scholar
CODE (2008). Vận động chính sách: Thực tiễn và pháp luật [Policy Advocacy: Practice and Laws]. Hà Nội: Lao Động – Xã hội.Google Scholar
Cương lĩnh xây dựng đất nước trong thời kỳ quá độ lên chủ nghĩa xã hội [Program on the Building of the Country during the Transition to Socialism].Google Scholar
Cộng, Đảng Việt Nam, sản (2016). Văn kiện Đại hội Đại biểu toàn quốc lần thứ XII [Documents from the Twelfth National Party Congress]. Hà Nội: VP Trung ương Đảng.Google Scholar
Hùng Võ, Đặng (2012). Phân cấp quyền của Nhà nước đối với đất đai, quản lý đất đai và việc giám sát – đánh giá cần thiết ở Việt Nam [Decentralization of the State Regarding Land, Land Management, and Necessary Monitoring and Supervision in Vietnam]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2012 [Proceedings from the Fall 2012 Economic Forum], Vũng Tàu, September 28–29, 2012.Google Scholar
Phong, Dang & Beresford, Melanie (1998). Authority Relations and Economic Decision-Making in Vietnam: A Historical Perspective. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.Google Scholar
Phong, Đặng (2009a). “Phá rào” trong kinh tế vào đêm trước đổi mới [“Fence-Breaking” in the Economy the Night before Đổi Mới]. Hà Nội: Tri thức.Google Scholar
Phong, Đặng (2009b). Tư duy kinh tế Việt Nam 1975–1989 (Nhật ký thời bao cấp) [Vietnamese Economic Thinking 1975–1989 (A Memoir from the State Subsidy Era)]. Hà Nội: Tri thức.Google Scholar
Dapice, David (2008). Choosing Success: The Lessons of East and Southeast Asia and Vietnam’s Future: A Policy Framework for Vietnam’s Socioeconomic Development, 2011–2020. Asia Programs, John. F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Davidsen, Søren et al. (2007). Implementation Assessment of the Anti-Corruption Law: How Far Has Vietnam Come? Report prepared for the First Anti-Corruption Dialogue, Hanoi, Vietnam.Google Scholar
Thế Huynh, Đinh et al. (2015). 30 năm đổi mới và phát triển ở Việt Nam [30 Years of Renewal and Development]. Hà Nội: Chính trị Quốc gia.Google Scholar
Chung, Do Kim, Le, Nguyen Phuong, & Van Duy, Luu (2015). Implementation of Poverty Reduction Policies: An Analysis of National Targeted Program for Poverty Reduction in the Northwest Region of Vietnam. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 9(1), 76–86.Google Scholar
Duiker, William J. (1989). Vietnam Since the Fall of Saigon (Updated Edition). Athens, OH: Ohio University Center for International Studies.Google Scholar
Fforde, Adam & Homutova, Lada (2017). Political Authority in Vietnam: Is the VCP a Paper Leviathan? Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 36 (3), 91–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fforde, Adam & Paine, Susanne (1987). The Limits of National Liberation: Problems of Economic Management in the Democratic Republic of Vietnam. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Fforde, Adam (2004). State Owned Enterprises, Law, and a Decade of Market-Oriented Socialist Development in Vietnam. SEARC Working Paper Series, Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Fforde, Adam, & de Vylder, Stefan (1996). From Plan to Market: The Economic Transition in Vietnam. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Fforde, Adam & Goldstone, Anthony (1995). Vietnam to 2005: Advancing on All Fronts. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit.Google Scholar
Gainsborough, Martin (2010). Vietnam: Rethinking the State. London: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, Gerard (1994). The Development of Capitalism in Vietnam. In Ralph Miliband, ed., Socialist Register 30, 204–34.Google Scholar
Hansen, Henrik, Rand, John, & Tarp, Finn (2009). Enterprise Growth and Survival in Vietnam: Does Government Support Matter? The Journal of Development Studies, 45(7), 1048–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoan, Hoàng Văn (1986). Giọt nước trong biển cả [Drops of Water in the Ocean]. Available at: http://lmvn.com/truyen/?func=viewpost&id=diQBlL91SLDTD6TrnXr8pqPRahWde4k9Google Scholar
Houtart, Francois & Lemercinier, Genevieve (1984). Hai Van: Life in a Vietnamese Commune. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Đức, Huy (2012). Bên thắng cuộc, quyền I và II [The Winning Side, 2 vols.] Available at: www.vinadia.org/ben-thang-cuoc-huy-duc-quyen-i-giai-phong/; and www.vinadia.org/ben-thang-cuoc-huy-duc-quyen-ii-quyen-binh/Google Scholar
Khanh, Huynh Kim (1982). Vietnamese Communism 1925–1945. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
IFC et al. (2011). Cải cách quy trình và thủ tục hành chính và đầu tư, đất đai và xây dựng [Reform of the Process and Administrative Procedures for Investment, Land, and Construction]. Hà Nội: Lao Động.Google Scholar
Kahin, George (1986). Intervention: How America Became Involved in Vietnam. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Kerkvliet, Ben, Heng, Russell, & Koh, David, eds. (2003). Getting Organized in Vietnam: Moving in and around the Socialist State. Singapore: ISEAS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerkvliet, Benedict & Marr, David G, eds. (2004). Beyond Hanoi: Local Government in Vietnam. Singapore: ISEAS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerkvliet, Benedict (2001). An Approach for Analyzing State-Society Relations in Vietnam. Sojourn, 16(2), 238–78.Google Scholar
Kerkvliet, Benedict (2014). Government Repression and Toleration of Dissidents in Contemporary Vietnam. In London, Jonathan, ed., Politics in Contemporary Vietnam: Party, State, and Authority Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 100–34.Google Scholar
Kornai, Janos (1992). The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thinh, Le Duc & Chinh, Dao Trung (2010). The Crafting of Land Tenure Policies – The Nature and Dynamic of the Actors’ Interplay in the Red River Delta. Report from the Institute of Policy and Strategy for Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi.Google Scholar
Thinh, Le Duc (2010). Corruption in Land Administration in Vietnam. Report from the Institute of Policy and Strategy for Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi.Google Scholar
Thái, Lê Viết (2012). Phân cấp trong lĩnh vực quy hoạch và kế hoạch ở Việt Nam: Thực trạng và giải pháp [Decentralization in Spatial Planning and Development Planning in Vietnam: Situation and Solutions]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2012 [Proceedings from the Fall 2012 Economic Forum], Vũng Tàu, September 28–29, 2012.Google Scholar
Malesky, E. J. & Taussig, M. (2008). Where Is Credit Due? Legal Institutions, Connections, and the Efficiency of Bank Lending in Vietnam. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 25 (June 20), 1–43.Google Scholar
Mody, Ashoka, ed. (1997). Infrastructure Strategies in East Asia: The Untold Story. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Moise, Edwin (1993). Land Reform in Vietnam and China: Consolidating the Revolution at the Village Level. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
MOLISA & UNDP (2004). Taking Stock, Planning Ahead: Evaluation of the National Targeted Program on Hunger Eradication and Poverty Reduction and Program 135. UNDP: Hanoi.Google Scholar
Ngân hàng Thế giới (2012). Sửa đổi Luật Đất đai để thúc đầy phát triển bền vững ở Việt Nam [Revision of the Land Law to Promote Sustainable Development in Vietnam], Hà Nội: Ngân hàng Thế giới. Mại, Nguyễn (2012). Phân cấp quản lý Kinh tế và FDI [Decentralization of Economic and FDI Management]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2012 [Proceedings from the Fall 2012 Economic Forum], Vũng Tàu, September 28–29, 2012.Google Scholar
Thuy, Nguyen Thi (2016). Fiscal Decentralization Trends in Vietnam: Developments and Reforms. Public Administration and Policy, 19(2), 31–41.Google Scholar
Paine, Suzy (1988). The Limits of Planning and the Case for Economic Reform. In Marr, David and White, Christian Pelzer, eds. Postwar Vietnam: Dilemmas in Socialist Development. Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program, pp. 91–5.Google Scholar
Nghĩa, Phạm Duy (2012). Phân cấp quản lý Nhà nước trong lĩnh vực Kinh tế – Cơ sở lý luận, Thực trạng và Giải pháp [Decentralization of State Management in Economic Areas: Theoretical Basis, Situation, and Solutions]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2012 [Proceedings from the Fall 2012 Economic Forum], Vũng Tàu, September 28–29, 2012.Google Scholar
Phạm Thị Thu Hằng (2014). Một số vấn đề về phát triển khu vực tư nhân [Some Problems in Private Sector Development]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2014 [Proceedings from the Fall 2014 Economic Forum], Ninh Binh, September 27–29, 2014.Google Scholar
Porter, Gareth (1993). Vietnam: The Politics of Bureaucratic Socialism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Riedel, James & Turley, William S. (1999). The Politics and Economics of Transition to an Open Market Economy in Vietnam. OECD Development Center, Working Paper no. 152.Google Scholar
SRV Government web portal. http://chinhphu.vn/portal/page/portal/chinhphu/thanhvienchinhphuquacacthoikyGoogle Scholar
Tenev, Stoyan et al. (2003). Informality and the Playing Field in Vietnam’s Business Sector. Washington, DC: World Bank and the International Finance Corporation.Google Scholar
Thayer, Carlyle (2014). The Apparatus of Authoritarian Rule in Vietnam. In London, Jonathan, ed., Politics in Contemporary Vietnam: Party, State, and Authority Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 135–61.Google Scholar
Thayer, Carlyle (1988). The Regularization of Politics: Continuity and Change in the Party’s Central Committee 1951–1986. In Marr, David G. & White, Christine P., eds., Postwar Vietnam: Dilemmas in Socialist Development. Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program, pp. 177–93.Google Scholar
Thayer, Carlyle (1994). The Vietnam People’s Army under Doi Moi. Singapore: ISEAS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Therborn, Goran (1978). What Does the Ruling Class Do When It Rules? State Apparatuses and State Power under Feudalism, Capitalism and Socialism. London: NLB.Google Scholar
Thông báo 1483/TB-TTCP của Thanh tra Chính phủ ngày 4 tháng 9 năm 2018 về kết quả kiểm tra một số nội dung chủ yếu liên quan đến việc khiếu nại của công dân về khu đô thị mới Thủ Thiêm, thành phố Hồ Chí Minh [Government Inspectorate Report 1483/TB-TTCP dated 4 September 2018 on the results of a review of key issues related to citizen petitioning of the Thu Thiem New Urban Area in City, HCM].Google Scholar
Trần Du Lịch (2014). Tái Cơ cấu Đầu tư công: Vấn đề và Giải pháp [Restructuring of Public Investment: Problems and Solutions]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2014 [Proceedings from the Fall 2014 Economic Forum], Ninh Binh, September 27–29, 2014.Google Scholar
Cường, Trần Tiến (2012). Phân công, phân cấp quản lý doanh nghiệp nhà nước: Thực trạng, nguyên nhân, và một số gợi ý đổi mới [Division of Work and Management Decentralization of SOEs: Situations, Causes, and Suggestions on How to Change]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2012 [Proceedings from the Fall 2012 Economic Forum], Vũng Tàu, September 28–29, 2012.Google Scholar
Chinh, Truong (1959). Resolutely Taking the North Vietnamese Countryside to Socialism through Agricultural Co-Operation. Hanoi: FLPH.Google Scholar
Van Arkadie, Brian & Mallon, Raymond (2003). Vietnam: A Transition Tiger? Canberra: Asia Pacific Press at the Australian National University.Google Scholar
Văn phòng, Quốc hội (2016). Lịch sử Quốc hội Việt Nam, Tập IV (1992–2011) [History of Vietnam’s National Assembly, Vol. IV (1992–2011)], Hà Nội: Chính trị Quốc gia Sự thật.Google Scholar
Thu, Văn Tất (2007). Một số giải pháp kỹ thuật để tổ chức bộ đa ngành đa lĩnh vực [A Number of Technical Solutions for the Organization of Multi-Sectoral and Multi-Functional Ministries]. Tổ Chức Nhà Nước [State Management], (17)12, 24–7.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn & Cuong, Bui The (2008). Report on the Study on Support for an Official Mechanism for Dialogue between Vietnamese Government Agencies/ the National Assembly and Civil Society Organizations in Vietnam, A Report Prepared for the SDC, Hanoi.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn & Van, Nguyen Thai (2006). Collaboration Groups in Rural Vietnam: A Background Paper. A Report Prepared for Oxfam-Vietnam.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (1995). Vietnam: The Changing Model of Political Legitimation. In Alagappa, Muthiah, ed., Political Legitimacy in Southeast Asia. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 257–87.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (1996). Politics of Administrative Reform in Post-Socialist Vietnam. In Leung, Suiwah, ed., Vietnam Assessment: Creating a Sound Investment Climate. Singapore: ISEAS, pp. 42–68.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (1997). Sectoral Politics and Strategies for State and Party Building from the VII to the VIII Congress of the Vietnamese Communist Party (1991–1996). In Fforde, Adam, ed., Doi Moi: Ten Years after the 1986 Party Congress. Canberra: Department of Political and Social Change Monograph Series no. 24, pp. 81–135.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (1999). Rethinking the Philosophy of Central-Local Relations in Post-Central Planning Vietnam. In Turner, Mark, ed., Central-Local Government Relations in the Asia-Pacific Region. London: Macmillan, pp. 166–95.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (1999a). Vietnam: Sectors, Classes, and the Transformation of a Leninist State. In Morley, James W., ed., Driven by Growth: Political Change in the Asia-Pacific Region (revised edition). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 58–82.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2000). Ý thức dân tộc Việt Nam trong cách nhìn so sánh [Vietnamese Nationalism from a Comparative Perspective]. In Việt Nam học: Kỷ yếu Hội thảo Quốc tế lần thứ nhất, Hà Nội, 15–17/7/1998. Hà Nội: Thế Giới, pp. 400–8.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2002). Rebuilding Authority Relations: Public Administration Reform in the Era of Doi Moi. A Report Prepared for the Asian Development Bank, Hanoi.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2003a). From Fence Breaking to Networking: Popular Organisations and Policy Influence in Post-Socialist Vietnam. In Kerkvliet, Benedict, Heng, Russell and Koh, David, eds., Getting Organised in Vietnam: Moving in and Around the Socialist State. Singapore: ISEAS, pp. 25–61.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2003b). Mapping Vietnam’s Legal Cultures: Reflections on Corruption, Organized Crime, and State Building in the Post-Socialist Era. Paper presented at the “Vietnam Legal Culture Symposium,” University of Victoria, Canada from March 27–29, 2003.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2006). Public Administration Reform and Practices of Co-Governance: Towards a Change in Governance and Governance Cultures in Vietnam. In Foundation, Heinrich Böll, ed., Active Citizens under Political Wraps: Experiences from Myanmar/Burma and Vietnam. Chiang Mai: Santipab Pack Print, pp. 143–65.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2008). Recrafting State Identity: Corruption and Anti-Corruption in Doi Moi Vietnam from a Comparative Perspective. Paper prepared for the workshop “Remaking the State,” organized by Jonathan London, City University of Hong Kong, August 21–22, 2008.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2012). Governance Arrangements in Vietnam’s Provinces: Pathways toward Inclusive Growth and Poverty Reduction. A Report Prepared for the Embassy of Norway, Hanoi.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2013). Beyond the Vietnam War: Vietnamese Socialism Today. In Brincat, Shannon, ed. Communism in the 21st Century: Whither Communism (Vol. 2). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, pp. 135–59.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2014). Authoritarianism Reconfigured: Evolving Accountability Relations within Vietnam’s One-Party Rule. In London, Jonathan, ed., Politics in Contemporary Vietnam: Party, State, and Authority Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 42–63.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn et al. (2009a). Analysis of Vietnam’s Current Legal Framework on People’s Councils: A Perspective from Ninh Thuan. A Report Prepared for Oxfam-Vietnam.Google Scholar
Vasavakul, Thaveeporn, Viet Thai, Le, & Phi Van, Le Thi (2009). Public Administration and Economic Development in Vietnam: Remaking the Public Administration for the 21st Century, UNDP’s Public Administration Reform and Anti-Corruption: A Series of Policy Discussion Papers.Google Scholar
Vickerman, Andrew (1986). The Fate of the Peasantry: Premature Transition to Socialism in the Democratic Republic of Vietnam. New Haven: Yale Southeast Asian Studies Monographs Series 24.Google Scholar
Vietnam Executive Leadership Program (2012). Structural Reform for Growth, Equity, and National Sovereignty. Asia Programs, John F. Kennedy School of Government.Google Scholar
Vietnam Executive Leadership Program (2013). Unplugging Institutional Bottlenecks to Restore Growth. Asia Programs, John F. Kennedy School of Government.Google Scholar
Vietnam Executive Leadership Program (2015). Institutional Reform: From Vision to Reality. A Policy Discussion Paper Prepared for the Vietnam Executive Leadership Program, Harvard Kennedy School.Google Scholar
Cường, Vũ Sỹ (2012). Phân cấp quản lý Ngân sách nhà nước ở Việt Nam và định hướng Đổi Mới [Decentralization of the State Budget Management in Vietnam and Directions for Change]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2012 [Proceedings from the Fall 2012 Economic Forum], Vũng Tàu, September 28–29, 2012.Google Scholar
Cường, Vũ Sỹ et al. (2014). Cơ chế phân bố vốn đầu tư nhà nước: Thực trạng và giải pháp thể chế [Mechanisms in Allocating Investment Capital: Situations and Institutional Solutions]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2014 [Proceedings from the Fall 2014 Economic Forum], Ninh Binh, September 27–29, 2014.Google Scholar
Tu Anh, Vu Thanh (2016). Vietnam Decentralization amidst Fragmentation. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 33(2), 188–208.Google Scholar
Tu Anh, Vu Thanh (2017). Does WTO Accession Help Domestic Reform?: The Political Economy of SOE Reform Backsliding in Vietnam. World Trade Review, 16(1), 85–109.Google Scholar
Tu Anh, Vu Thanh, Viet Thai, Le, Tat Thang, Vo (2007). Provincial Extra-legal Investment Incentives in the Context of Decentralisation in Vietnam: Mutually Beneficial or a Race to the Bottom? Hanoi: UNDP.Google Scholar
Wells-Dang, Andrew (2012). Civil Society Networks in China and Vietnam: Informal Pathbreakers in Health and the Environment. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, Jayne (1988). “The Problem of District in Vietnam’s Development Policy.” In Marr, David and White, Christian Pelzer, eds. Postwar Vietnam: Dilemmas in Socialist Development. Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program, pp. 147–62.Google Scholar
White, Christine (1981). Agrarian Reform and National Liberation in the Vietnamese Revolution: 1920–1957. Ph.D. dissertation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
White, Christine (1985). Agricultural Planning, Pricing Policy, and Co-operatives in Vietnam. World Development, 13(1), 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2008). Vietnam Development Report 2009: Capital Matters. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
- 39
- Cited by