Element contents
The Post-Partisans
Anti-Partisans, Anti-Establishment Identifiers, and Apartisans in Latin America
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 August 2022
Summary
Where party identification is in decay or in flux, alternative political identifications have gained centrality. In this Element, the author develops a typology of post-partisan political identities: alternative ways in which rejection of or the absence of partisan politics are defining political identifiers or non-identifiers. Based on original evidence collected through opinion polls in different Latin American countries, as well as applying an innovative measurement, the author shows the respective magnitudes and ideological composition of anti-partisans (individuals who hold negative partisanships: strong identities based on predispositions against a specific political party or movement), anti-establishment identifiers (individuals who hold many negative partisanships simultaneously), and apartisans (individuals who lack any positive or negative partisanships). This Element demonstrates the usefulness of employing these categories in order to better understand different levels of party system institutionalization, party-building, and partisan polarization in the region.
Keywords
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108694308Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 08 September 2022
References
Abedi, A. (2004). Anti-Political Establishment Parties: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, A. (2010). The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, A. & Webster, S. (2018). Negative Partisanship: Why Americans Dislike Parties but Behave Like Rabid Partisans. Advances in Political Psychology. 39, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abranches, S. (2018). Presidencialismo de coalizão: Raízes e evoluçao do modelo politico brasileiro. São Paulo: Companhia Das Letras.Google Scholar
Ajenjo Fresno, N. (2007). Honduras: Un Nuevo gobierno liberal con la misma agenda política. Revista de Ciencia Política. 27, 165–181.Google Scholar
Ames, B. (1995). Electoral Rules, Constituency Pressures, and Pork Barrel: Bases of Voting in the Brazilian Congress. The Journal of Politics. 57 (2), 324–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angell, A. (2007). The Durability of the Party System in Chile. In Webb, P. & White, S., eds., Party Politics in New Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 275–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arancibia Córdova, J. (1991). Honduras: ¿Un Estado Nacional? Tegucigalpa: Editorial Guaymuras.Google Scholar
Baker, A. & Dalton, D. (2019). Mass Partisanship in Three Latin American Democracies. In Lupu, N., Oliveros, V. & Schimerini, L., eds., Campaigns and Voters in Developing Democracies: Argentina in Comparative Perspective. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 89–113.Google Scholar
Baker, A., Sokhey, A., Ames, B. & Rennó, L. (2016). The Dynamics of Partisan Identification When Party Brands Change: The Case of the Workers Party in Brazil. The Journal of Politics. 78 (1), 197–213.Google Scholar
Baker, A., & Dorr, D. (2019). Mass Partisanship in Three. Campaigns and Voters in Developing Democracies: Argentina in Comparative Perspective, 89.Google Scholar
Bankert, A. (2021). Negative and Positive Partisanship in the 2016 US Presidential Elections. Political Behavior. 43(4), 1467–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargsted, M. A. & Somma, N. M. (2016). Social Cleavages and Political Dealignment in Contemporary Chile, 1995–2009. Party Politics. 22 (1), 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W. E. & Donald, E. (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bargsted, M. A., & Maldonado, L. (2018). Party identification in an encapsulated party system: The case of postauthoritarian Chile. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 10(1), 29–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carazza, B. (2018). Dinheiro, eleiçoes e poder: as engrenagens do sistema politico brasileiro. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
Carothers, T. & O’Donohue, A., eds. (2019). Democracies Divided: The Global Challenge of Political Polarization. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Carrión, J. (2006). The Fujimori Legacy: the rise of electoral authoritarianism in Peru. Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Caruana, N. J., McGregor, R. M. & Stephenson, L. (2015). The Power of the Dark Side: Negative Partisanship and Political Behaviour in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science. 48 (4), 771–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castiglioni, R. & Rovira, C. (2017). Challenges to Political Representation in Contemporary Chile. Journal of Politics in Latin America. 8 (3), 3–24.Google Scholar
Centro de Estudios Públicos, CEP. Estudio Nacional de Opinión Pública. Number 84, December 2019Google Scholar
Contreras, G. & Navia, P. (2013). Diferencias generacionales en la participación electoral en Chile, 1988–2010. Revista de Ciencia Política. 33 (2), 419–441.Google Scholar
Converse, P., Miller, W., Rusk, J. & Wolfe, A. (1969). Continuity and Change in American Politics: Parties and Issues in the 1968 Election. The American Political Science Review. 63 (4), 1083–1105.Google Scholar
Corrales, J. (2005). In Search of a Theory of Polarization: Lessons from Venezuela, 1999–2005. Revista Europea de Estudio Latinoamericanos y del Caribe. 79, 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotler, J. & Grompone, R. (2000). Fujimorismo: ascenso y caída de un regimen autoritario. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Cruz, F. (2019). Socios pero no tanto: Partidos y coaliciones en la Argentina. 2003–2015. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.Google Scholar
Cyr, J. (2017). The Fates of Political Parties: Crisis, Continuity, and Change in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyr, J. & Meléndez, C. (2016). Anti-Identities in Latin America: Chavismo, Fujimorismo, and Uribismo in Comparative Perspective. Paper presented at the 74th Annual Midwest Political Science Association Conference, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Cyr, J. & Meléndez, C. (2021). Overlapping Political Identities in Latin America: The Case of Kirchnerismo and Peronismo in Argentina. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Dallagnol, D. (2017). A luta contra a corrupçao: A Lava Jato eo future de um pais marcado pela impunidade. São Paulo: Sextante.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. (2013). The Apartisan American: Dealignment and Changing Electoral Politics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. & Wattenberg, M. (2002). Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. & Weldon, S. (2007). Partisanship and Party System Institutionalization. Party Politics. 13 (2), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, M. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fuks, M., Ribeiro, E. & Borba, J. (2021). From Antipetismo to Generalized Antipartisanship: The Impact of Rejection of Political Parties on the 2018 Vote for Bolsonaro. Brazilian Political Science Review. 15 (1), e0005.Google Scholar
Gervasoni, C. (2018). Argentina’s Declining Party System: Fragmentation, Denationalization, Factionalization, Personalization, and Increasing Fluidity. In Mainwaring, S., ed., Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 134–156.Google Scholar
Gonzáles-Ocantos, E., de Jonge, Kiwiet, C. & Nickerson, D. (2015). Legitimacy Buying: The Dynamics of Clientelism in the Face of Legitimacy Challenges. Comparative Political Studies. 48 (9), 1127–1158.Google Scholar
Green, D., Palmsquist, B. & Schickler, E. (2006). Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, S. (2004). Social Identity Theory and Party Identification. Social Science Quarterly. 85 (1), 136–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimson, A. (2019). ¿Qué es el Peronismo? De Perón a los Kirchner, el movimiento que no deja de conmover la política Argentina. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Grompone, R. & Degregori, C. (1990). Elecciones 1990: demonios y redentores en el nuevo Perú, una tragedia en dos vueltas. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Haime, A., & Cantú, F. (2022). Negative Partisanship in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 64(1), 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, K. & Rovira, C. (2017). What the (Ideational) Study of Populism Can Teach Us, and What It Can’t. Swiss Political Science Review. 23 (4), 526–542.Google Scholar
Heneus, C. (2005). Las coaliciones de partidos: ¿un uevo scenario para el sistema partidista chileno? Política: Revista de Ciencia Política. 45, 67–68.Google Scholar
Huddy, L. (2001). From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory. Political Psychology. 22 (1), 127–156.Google Scholar
IUDPAS (Instituto Universitario en Democracia Paz y Seguridad). (2020). Percepción Ciudadana sobre Inseguridad y Victimización en Honduras. Tegucigalpa: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H., Hawkins, K., Luna, J. P., Rosas, G. & Zechmeister, E. (2010). Latin American Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klar, S. & Krupnikov, Y. (2016). Independent Politics: How American Disdain for Parties Leads to Political Inaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, S. (2003). Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, S., Loxton, J., Van Dyck, B. & Domínguez, J. (2016). Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, S. & Roberts, K., eds. (2011). The Resurgence of the Latin American Left. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, J. (2016). Delegative Democracy Revisited: Chile’s Crisis of Representation. Journal of Democracy. 27 (3), 129–138.Google Scholar
Luna, J. & Altman, D. (2011). Uprooted but Stable: Chilean Parties and the Concept of Party System Institutionalization. Latin American Politics and Society. 53 (2), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, N. (2015a). Partisanship in Latin America. In Carlin, R., Singer, M. & Zechmeister, E., eds., The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 226–245.Google Scholar
Lupu, N. (2015b). Party Polarization and Mass Partisanship: A Comparative Perspective. Political Behavior. 37, 331–356.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S. (1999). Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S., Bizzarro, F. & Petrova, A. (2018). Party System Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse. In Mainwaring, S., ed., Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 218–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, S. & Scully, T., eds. (1995). Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Manrique, N. (2009). Usted fue Aprista: Bases para una historia crítica del Apra. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Mauro, S. (2018). Coalition Politics in Federalized Party System: The Case of Argentina. In Albala, A. & Reniu, J. M., eds., Coalition Politics and Federalism. New York: Springer, 113–128.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. (1995). Political Parties and Democracy in Argentina. In Mainwaring, S. & Scully, T., eds., Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 200–248.Google Scholar
Medeiros, M. & Noel, A. (2013). The Forgotten Side of Partisanship: Negative Party Identification in Four Anglo-American Democracies. Comparative Political Studies. 47 (7), 1022–1046.Google Scholar
Meléndez, C. (2019). El Mal Menor: Vínculos Políticos en el Perú posterior al Colapso del Sistema de Partidos. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Meléndez, C. & Rovira, C. (2019). Political Identities: The Missing Link in the Study of Populism. Party Politics. 25 (4), 520–533.Google Scholar
Meléndez, C. & Rovira, C. (2021). Negative Partisanship Towards the Populist Radical Right and Democratic Resilience in Western Europe. Democratization. 28(5), 949–969Google Scholar
Meléndez, C. & Umpiérrez, de Reguero, S. (2021). Party Members and Activists in Latin America. In Vanden, H. E. and Prevost, G., eds., Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meza, V. (2015). Diario de la conflictividad en Honduras, 2009–2015: Del golpe de Estado a las marchas de las antorchas. Tegucigalpa: CEDOH.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. (2011). Bankrupt Representation and Party System Collapse. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. & Meléndez, C. (2016). Parties under Stress: Using a Linkage Decay Framework to Analyze the Chilean Party System. Journal of Politics in Latin America. 8 (3), 25–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, J. (1984). Honduras: Caudillo Politics and Military Rulers. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Murakami, Y. (2007). El Perú en la era del Chino: La política no institucionalizada y el pueblo en busca de un salvador. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Nállim, J. (2014). Las raíces del antiperonismo: Orígenes históricos e ideológicos. Buenos Aires: Capital Intelectual.Google Scholar
Ostiguy, P. (2009). The High and the Low in Politics: A Two-Dimensional Political Space for Comparative Analysis and Electoral Studies. Kellogg Institute Working Paper, No. 360.Google Scholar
Otero-Felipe, P. (2013). El sistema de partidos de Honduras tras la crisis política de 2009: ¿El fin del bipartidismo? Colombia Internacional. 79, 249–287.Google Scholar
Otero-Felipe, P. & Rodríguez-Zepeda, J. (2016). Honduras: Continuidad en la agenda de gobierno en un nuevo contexto partidista. Revista de Ciencia Política. 36 (1), 195–217.Google Scholar
Palacios-Valladares, I. & Ondetti, G. (2018). Student Protests and the Nueva Mayoría Reforms in Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research. 38 (5), 638–653.Google Scholar
Pappas, T. (2014). Populism and Crisis Politics in Greece. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pavao, N. (2015). The Failures of Electoral Accountability for Corruption: Brazil and Beyond. PhD Dissertation, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Pereira, C., Power, T. & Raile, E. (2008). Coalitional Presidentialism and Side Payments: Explaining the Mensalao Scandal in Brazil. Occasional paper, No. BSP-03.Google Scholar
Rennó, L. (2020). The Bolsonaro Voter: Issue Positions and Vote Choice in the 2018 Brazilian Presidential Elections. Latin American Politics and Society. 62 (4), 1–23.Google Scholar
Roberts, K. (2015). Changing Course in Latin America: Party Systems in the Neoliberal Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, G. & González, L. (2020). Honduras 2019: persistente inestabilidad económica y social y debilidad institucional. Revista de Ciencia Política. 40 (2), 379–400.Google Scholar
Romero, S. (2019). Democracia bajo tensión, elecciones cuestionadas y quiebre del bipartidismo: Honduras (1980–2019). In Castellano, J. & Romero, S., eds., Encrucijadas de la Democracia en Honduras y América Central. Tegucigalpa: IUDPAS, 205–250.Google Scholar
Rose, R. & Mishler, W. (1998). Negative and Positive Party Identification in Post-Communist Countries. Electoral Studies. 17 (2), 217–234.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, F. (2018). Party Vibrancy and Democracy in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2019). La (sobre) adaptación programática de la derecha chilena y la irrupción de la derecha populista radical. Colombia Internacional. (99), 29–61.Google Scholar
Samuels, D. & Zucco, C. (2014a). Crafting Mass Partisanship at the Grass Roots. British Journal of Political Science. 45 (4), 755–775.Google Scholar
Samuels, D. & Zucco, C. (2014b). Lulismo, Petismo, and the Future of Brazilian Politics. Journal of Politics in Latin America. 6 (3), 129–158.Google Scholar
Samuels, D. & Zucco, C. (2018). Partisans, Antipartisans, and Nonpartisans: Voting Behavior in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (2005). Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Schedler, A. (1996). Anti-Political Establishment Parties. Party Politics. 2 (3), 291–312.Google Scholar
Scully, T. (1992). Rethinking the Center: Party Politics in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Chile. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Seawright, J. (2012). Party-System Collapse: The Roots of Crisis en Peru and Venezuela. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Segovia, C. (2009). ¿Crisis de la política en Chile? Percepciones y valoraciones sobre los partidos. In La Sociedad de la Opinión: Reflexiones sobre encuestas y cambio politico en democracia. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales, 197–224.Google Scholar
Silva, E. & Rossi, F. (2018). Reshaping the Political Arena in Latin America: From Resisting Neoliberalism to the Second Incorporation. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Somma, N., Bargsted, M., Disi, R. & Medel, R. (2020). No Water in the Oasis: The Chilean Spring of 2019–2020. Social Movement Studies. 20(4), 495–502.Google Scholar
Tanaka, M. (1998). Los espejismos de la democracia: el colapso de un sistema de partidos en el Perú, 1980–1995, en perspectiva comparada. Lima.Google Scholar
Tanaka, M. (2005). Democracia sin partidos: Perú 2000–2005. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. (1996). When Electoral and Party Institutions Interact to Produce Caudillo Politics: The Case of Honduras. Electoral Studies. 15 (3), 327–337.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. (2006). La política hondureña y las elecciones de 2005. Revista de Ciencia Política. 26 (1), 114–124.Google Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, M. (2009). Honduras: Una Mezcla de Cambio y Continuidad. Revista de Ciencia Política. 29 (2), 471–489.Google Scholar
Tironi, E. & Agüero, F. (1999). ¿Sobrevivirá el Nuevo Paisaje Político Chileno? Estudios Públicos. 74, 151–168.Google Scholar
Torcal, M. & Mainwaring, S. (2003). The Political Recrafting of Social Bases of Party Competition: Chile, 1973–95. British Journal of Political Science. 33 (1), 55–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torcal, M. & Montero, J. R., eds. (2006). Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies: Social Capital, Institutions, and Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Torre, J. C. (2003). Los huérfanos de la política de partidos. Sobre los alcances y la naturaleza de la crisis de representación partidaria. Desarrollo Económico. 42 (168), 647–665.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, S., Scully, T. & Somman, N. (2007). The Enduring Presence of Religion in Chilean Ideological Positionings and Voter Options. Comparative Politics. 40 (1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Vommaro, G. (2017). La larga marcha de Cambiemos: La construcción silenciosa de un proyecto de poder. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Weisberg, H. (1980). A Multidimensional Conceptualization of Party Identification. Political Behavior. 2, 33–60.Google Scholar
Winters, M. & Weitz-Shapiro, R. (2014). Partisan Protesters and Nonpartisan Protests in Brazil. Journal of Politics in Latin America. 6 (1), 137–150.Google Scholar
Zanotti, L. (2019). Populist Polarization in Italian Politics, 1994–2016: An Assessment from a Latin American Anaylitical Perspective. PhD Dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Zechmeister, E. & Corral, M. (2013). Individual and Contextual Constraints on Ideological Labels in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies. 46 (6), 675–701.Google Scholar
Zucco, C. (2015). Estabilidad Sin Raíces: La Institucionalización del Sistema de Partidos Brasileño. In Torcal, M., ed., Sistemas de Partidos en América Latina: Causas y Consecuencias de su Equilibrio Iestable. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI, 78–107.Google Scholar