Element contents
Series: Elements in Ancient Philosophy
Plato's Ion
Poetry, Expertise, and Inspiration
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2020
Summary
This Element defends an interpretation of Plato's Ion on which its primary concern is with audience reception of poetry. The dialogue countenances and rejects two models of poetic reception, the expertise model and the inspiration model, both of which make the audience entirely passive in relation to poetry; and it presents the character of Ion as a comedic figure, a self-ignorant fool whose foolishness is a function of his passive relation to Homer. In the end, this Element argues that, for Plato, critical engagement is the proper way for audiences to treat poetry. This view holds open the possibility that poetry may express some truths without thereby endorsing the idea that poets are experts who have authoritative knowledge.
Keywords
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Ancient PhilosophyOnline ISBN: 9781108581875Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 29 October 2020
References
Brickhouse, Thomas and Smith, Nicholas (1994). Plato’s Socrates. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diggle, James (2004). Theophrastus: Characters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dorter, Kenneth (1973). “The Ion: Plato’s Characterization of Art,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 32, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, Giovanni R. F. (2008). “Socratic Irony as Pretence.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34, 1–33.Google Scholar
Flashar, Helmus (1958). Der Dialog Ion als Zeugnis platonischer Philosophie. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Greene, William (1918). “Plato’s View of Poetry.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 19, 1–75.Google Scholar
Grene, David and Lattimore, Richard (1959). Euripides V: Electra; The Phoenician Women; The Bacchae. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halliwell, Stephen (2000). “The Subjection of Muthos to Logos: Plato’s Citations of the Poets,” Classical Quarterly 50, 94–112.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher (1995). Images of Excellence: Plato’s Critique of the Arts. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
LaDrière, Craig (1951). “The Problem of Plato’s Ion,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 10, 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Melissa (2006). “The Evolution of Eironeia in Classical Greek Texts: Why Socratic Eironeia is Not Irony.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 31, 49–83.Google Scholar
Lear, Gabriel Richardson (2006). “Plato on Learning to Love Beauty,” in Santas, Gerasimos (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Blackwell 104–24.Google Scholar
MacDowell, Douglas (1990). “The Meaning of Alazon,” in Craik, E. M. (ed.), Owls to Athens. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 287−292.Google Scholar
Moore, John (1974). “The Dating of Plato’s Ion,” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 15, 421–440.Google Scholar
Moss, Jessica (2012). “Art and Ethical Perspective: Notes on the Kalon in Plato’s Laws,” in Denham, Alison (ed.), Plato on Art and Beauty. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Penelope (1992). “Inspiration and Mimesis in Plato,” in Barker, Andrew and Warner, Martin (eds.), The Language of the Cave. Edmonton: Academic Printing & Publishing, 27–46.Google Scholar
Nightingale, Andrea (1995). Genres in Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappas, Nicholas (1989). “Plato’s ‘Ion’: The Problem of the Author,” Philosophy 64, 381–389.Google Scholar
Radford, Colin (1975). “How Can We Be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 49, 67–80.Google Scholar
Ranta, Jerrald (1967). “The Drama of Plato’s ‘Ion,’” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26, 219–229.Google Scholar
Richardson, Nicholas J. (2006). “Homeric Professors in the Age of the Sophists,” in Laird, Andrew (ed.), Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Ancient Literary Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 62–86.Google Scholar
Stern-Gillet, Suzanne (2004). “On (mis)interpreting Plato’s Ion.” Phronesis 49, 169–201.Google Scholar
Tarrant, Dorothy (1951). “Plato’s Use of Quotations and Other Illustrative Material,” Classical Quarterly 45, 59–67.Google Scholar
Tigerstedt, E. N. (1969). Plato’s Idea of Poetical Inspiration. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Trivigno, Franco V. (2009a). “The Rhetoric of Parody in Plato’s Menexenus,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 42, 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivigno, Franco V. (2009b). “Putting Unity in Its Place: Organic Unity in Plato’s Phaedrus,” Literature and Aesthetics 19: 153–182.Google Scholar
Trivigno, Franco V. (2011a). “Philosophy and the Ordinary: On the Setting of Plato’s Lysis,” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 51, 61–85.Google Scholar
Trivigno, Franco V. (2011b). “Is Good Tragedy Possible? The Argument of Gorgias 502b–503b,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 41, 115–138.Google Scholar
Trivigno, Franco V. (2012a). “Technê, Inspiration and Comedy in Plato’s Ion,” Apeiron 45, 283–313.Google Scholar
Trivigno, Franco V. (2012b). “Etymology and the Power of Names in Plato’s Cratylus,” Ancient Philosophy 32, 35–75.Google Scholar
Trivigno, Franco V. (2013). “Childish Nonsense? The Value of Interpretation in Plato’s Protagoras,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 51, 509–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivigno, Franco V. (2016). “The Moral and the Literary Character of Hippias in the Hippias Major,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 50, 31–65.Google Scholar
Trivigno, Franco V. (2017). “A Doctor’s Folly: Diagnosing the Speech of Eryximachus,” in Destrée, Pierre and Giannopoulou, Zina (eds.), Plato’s Symposium: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 48–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urmson, J. O. (1982). “Plato and the Poets,” in Moravcsik, Julius and Temko, Philip (eds.), Plato on Beauty, Wisdom and the Arts. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 125–136.Google Scholar
Vasiliou, Iakovos (1999). “Conditional Irony in the Socratic Dialogues,” Classical Quarterly 49, 456–472.Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory (1991). Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, David (2007). “The Irony of Socrates,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65, 176–187.Google Scholar
Woodruff, Paul (1982). “What Could Go Wrong with Inspiration? Why Plato’s Poets Fail,” in Moravcsik, Julius and Temko, Philip (eds.), Plato on Beauty, Wisdom and the Arts. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 137–150.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by