Element contents
Series: Elements in Leadership
Leading the Future of Technology
The Vital Role of Accessible Technologies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 November 2020
Summary
There is presently a view that accessible technologies offer an inclusive and humanistic expression of technology. They do. But that is not all. Accessible technologies offer more than this: they contain within them lessons on transformational leadership. Through examining six case studies the reader will begin to interpret these accessible technologies as expressions of leadership. The risk inherent in the current view is that to view accessible technologies only as examples of humanism, or the good, is to risk underselling them. In fact, accessible technologies (which are being created across international society) represent a powerful leadership approach to technology itself. Through their leadership, these accessible technologies demand and create new and original thinking by society. The reader will benefit from this Element by learning to identify transformational leadership within accessible technological creations and consequently gaining a capacity to apply this leadership to the very purposes of technology itself.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in LeadershipOnline ISBN: 9781108751223Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 04 February 2021
References
Accessible Books Consortium. (n.d.a). Accessible Books Consortium Home Page. www.accessiblebooksconsortium.org/portal/en/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Accessible Books Consortium. (n.d.b). Accessible Publishing. www.accessiblebooksconsortium.org/publishing/en/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Accessible Books Consortium. (n.d.c). Capacity Building. www.accessiblebooksconsortium.org/capacity_building/enGoogle Scholar
Accessible Books Consortium. (2018, 24 September). Accessible Books Consortium: Assemblies 2018 Praised by WIPO DG. https://www.accessiblebooksconsortium.org/news/en/2018/news_0004.htmlGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (1996). Critical theory and postmodernism approaches to organization studies. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C. & Nord, W., eds., Handbook of Organization Studies, London, United Kingdom: SAGE, pp. 191–217.Google Scholar
Anisman-Razin, M. & Kark, R. (2012). The apple does not fall far from the tree: Steve Jobs’s leadership as simultaneously distant and close. In Bligh, M. C. & Riggio, R., eds., When Near is Far and Far is Near: Exploring Distance in Leader–Follower Relationships. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 241–73.Google Scholar
Antonakis, J. (2017). “On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications.” The Leadership Quarterly 28(1): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonakis, J. (2018). Charisma and the ‘new leadership’. In Antonakis, J. & Day, D. V., eds., The Nature of Leadership, 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, pp. 56–81.Google Scholar
Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N., Jacquart, P. & Sharmir, B. (2016). “Charisma: An ill-defined and ill-measured gift.” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 3(1): 293–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations, New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bass, B. M. & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory Research and Managerial Implications, 4th ed. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bass, B. M. & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bass, B. M. & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). “Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behaviour.”The Leadership Quarterly 10(2): 181–217.)Google Scholar
Bligh, M. C. & Riggio, R. (eds.) (2012). When Near is Far and Far is Near: Exploring Distance in Leader–Follower Relationships, New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boal, K. B. & Schultz, P. L. (2007). “Storytelling, time, and evolution: The role of strategic leadership in complex adaptive systems.” The Leadership Quarterly 18: 411–28.Google Scholar
Boswell, S. (2010). The Expanding World of Sigrid Cerf. https://leader.pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/leader.FTR5.15082010.4Google Scholar
Cancer, M. A., Manzoli, S. & Antonietti, A. (2016). “The alleged link between creativity and dyslexia: Identifying the specific process in which dyslexic students excel.” Cogent Psychology 3 (1). https://www.cogentoa.com/article/10.1080/23311908.2016.1190309Google Scholar
Cappetta, R. & Gioia, D. (2006). Fine fashion: Using symbolic artifacts, sensemaking and sensegiving to construct identity and image. In Rafaeli, A. and Pratt, M. G., eds., Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 129–219.Google Scholar
Casey, S. & Davies, G. (2017). Drawn away from vision: Encounters with the unseen. In Heywood, I., ed., Sensory Arts and Design. London, United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Chamayou, G. (2013). A Theory of the Drone, trans. J. Lloyd, New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, P. J. & Bowen, S. J. (2006). Designers’ use of the artefact in human-centred design. In Clarkson, J., Langdon, P. and Robinson, P., eds., Designing Accessible Technology. London, United Kingdom: Springer, pp. 65–74.Google Scholar
Clarkson, J., Langdon, P. & Robinson, P. (eds) (2006). Designing Accessible Technology. London, United Kingdom: Springer.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. (2016). “New Israeli tech sees machines leading the blind”. Jerusalem Post, 26 September. www.jpost.com/Business-and-Innovation/Tech/Machines-leading-the-blind-468689Google Scholar
Collins, K. (2015). Vodafone instant classroom is digital school in a box for refugees. Wired. www.wired.co.uk/article/vodafone-instant-classroomGoogle Scholar
Cottier, T. (2007). “Preparing for structural reform in the WTO.” Journal of International Economic Law 10: 497–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottier, T. (2010). A two-tier approach to WTO decision-making. In Steger, D. P., ed., Redesigning the World Trade Organization for the Twenty-First Century. Ottawa, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, pp. 43–67.Google Scholar
Dijkshoorn, C., ter Weele, W., Jongma, L. & Aroyo, L. (2014). “The Rijksmuseum collection as linked data.” Semantic Web Journal 1: 7.Google Scholar
Dillet, R. (2017). The OrCam MyEye helps visually impaired people read and identify things. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/12/the-orcam-myeye-helps-visually-impaired-people-read-and-identify-things/Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. (2016). “When passionate advocates meet research on diversity: Does the honest broker stand a chance?” Journal of Social Issues 72(1): 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, G. (2016). Impairment and disability: Challenging concepts of ‘normality’. In Matamala, A. & Orero, P., eds., Researching Audio Description: New Approaches, London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35–45, doi 10.1057/978-1-137-56917-2_3.Google Scholar
Flanagan, M., Howe, D. & Nissenbaum, H. (2008). Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice. In Van den Hoven, J. and Weckert, J., eds., Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, pp. 322–53. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511498725.017.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, P. (1992). Symbols and artefacts: Views of the corporate landscape. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Garbutt, L. (2019). “How Tennessee Tech improved academic outcomes for students ‘at risk of failure’”. Sonocent Blog, 1 March. https://blog.sonocent.com/2019/03/01/how-tennessee-tech-improved-academic-outcomes-for-students-at-risk-of-failure/2019/Google Scholar
Gaver, B. & Martin, H. (2000) Exploring Information Appliances through Conceptual Design Proposals. In Proceedings of CHI 2000, ACM Press.Google Scholar
Ghobash, O. S. (2017b), Letters to a Young Muslim. Talks at Google. www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BuGDOblyxkGoogle Scholar
Gladwell, M. (n.d.) Holding Readers: Tools for Engagement, Masterclass, vodcast, viewed 12 September 2020, https://www.masterclass.com/classes/malcolm-gladwell-teaches-writing/chapters/holding-readers-tools-for-engagement#transcriptGoogle Scholar
Greco, G. M. (2016). On accessibility as a human right, with an application to media accessibility. In Matamala, A. & Orero, P., eds., Researching Audio Description: New Approaches. London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 11–3. doi 10.1057/978-1-137-56917-2_3.Google Scholar
Handler, J., Lobel, O., Mertz, E., Rubin, E. & Simon, W. (2005). “A roundtable on new legal realism, microanalysis of institutions and the new governance: Exploring convergences in differences.” Wisconsin Law Review 479: 483–4.Google Scholar
Hirsch, M. (2008). “The sociology of international economic law: Sociological analysis of the regulation of regional agreements in the world trading system.” European Journal of International Law 19, pp. 277–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohmann, J. & Joyce, D. (eds.) (2018). International Law’s Objects, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, E. P. (2012). American presidential leadership: Leader credit, follower inclusion, and Obama’s turn. In Bligh, M. C. & Riggio, R., eds., When Near is Far and Far is Near: Exploring Distance in Leader–Follower Relationships. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 274–313.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. (2012). The Shock of the New Art and the Century of Change, London, United Kingdom: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Hughes, T. (2004). Human-Built World: How to Think about Technology and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kalpouzos, I. (2018). Armed Drone. In J. Hohmann and D. Joyce, eds., International Law’s Objects, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 118–129.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2001). The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LaForgia, R. (2015). “Public participation in the environmental undertaking in the Trans Pacific Partnership a listening approach.” Participatory Educational Research, Special Issue 2015-1, pp. 145–54.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Bijker, W. and Law, J., eds., Shaping Technology/Building Society, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 225–58.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. & Wajcman, J. (1985). The Social Shaping of Technology, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom: Open University Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, S. B. (2003). “The dangers of poor construct conceptualization.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 31: 323–26.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Brown, R. P. et al. (2008). “A sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness.” Ethics & Behavior 18: 315–39.Google Scholar
Nadella, S., Shaw, G. & Nichols, J. T. (2017). Hit Refresh: The Quest to Rediscover Microsoft’s Soul and Imagine a Better Future for Everyone. London, United Kingdom: William Collins.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, T. (2017). WTF? What’s the Future and Why It’s Up to Us. London, United Kingdom: Random House.Google Scholar
Parry, K. W. & Hansen, H. (2007). “The organizational story as leadership.” Leadership 3(3): 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1742715007079309Google Scholar
Pekel, J. (2014). Democratising the Rijksmuseum: Why did the Rijksmuseum make available their highest quality material without restrictions, and what are the results? Europeana Foundation. https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Publications/Democratising%20the%20Rijksmuseum.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pratt, M. G. & Rafaeli, A. (2001). “Symbols as a language of organizational relationships.” Research in Organizational Behavior 23: 93–132.Google Scholar
Qizilbash, M. (2009). “Identity, community and justice: Locating Amartya Sen’s work on identity in politics.” Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8(3): pp. 251–66).Google Scholar
Rafaeli, A. & Pratt, M. G. (2006). Introduction: Artifacts and organizations: More than the tip of the cultural iceberg. In Rafaeli, A. and Pratt, M. G., eds., Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Reha, M., Sloan, D. & Horton, S. (2017). “Accessibility research study: Humanising the need for inclusive design.” Journal of Digital and Social Media Marketing 5(3): 246–54.Google Scholar
Sanderhoff, M. (2017). Open access can never be bad news. SMK Open, 6 March. https://medium.com/smk-open/open-access-can-never-be-bad-news-d33336aad382Google Scholar
Schein, C. H. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership, Vol. 2, San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Shane, S. & Wakabayashi, D. (2018). “‘The business of war’: Google employees protest work for the Pentagon.” The New York Times, 4 April. www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/technology/google-letter-ceo-pentagon-project.htmlGoogle Scholar
Sekiguchiand, K. & Hori, K. (2018). “Organic and dynamic tool for use with knowledge base of AI ethics for promoting engineers’ practice of ethical AI design. AI and Society (16 October): 1–21.Google Scholar
Solsman, J. E. (2017). Internet inventor: Make tech accessibility better already. CNET, www.cnet.com/news/internet-inventor-vint-cerf-accessibility-disability-deaf-hearingGoogle Scholar
Steinfeld, E. & Maisel, J. (2012). Universal Design: Creating Inclusive Environments. Milton, QLD: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Thiel, C. E., Bagdasarov, Z., Harkrider, L., Johnson, J. F. & Mumford, M. D. (2012). “Leader ethical decision-making in organizations: Strategies for sensemaking.” Journal of Business Ethics 107: 49–64.Google Scholar
Tucker, D. (2015). “Modern technology and software is helping to empower students with dyslexia, 3 ways how.” The Independent, 30 December. www.independent.co.uk/student/student-life/Studies/modern-technology-and-software-is-helping-to-empower-students-with-dyslexia-3-ways-how-a6791131.htmlGoogle Scholar
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R. & McKelvey, B. (2007). “Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era.” The Leadership Quarterly 18: 298–318.Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2017). The Gender Dimension of E-commerce, meeting, 27 April, Room XXVI, Palais des Nations, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2006). www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.htmlGoogle Scholar
van Knippenberg, D. & Sitkin, S. B. (2013). “A critical assessment of charismatic-transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?” The Academy of Management Annals 7(1): 1–60.Google Scholar
Vodafone Group. (2016). Vodafone Foundation launches ‘Instant Schools for Africa’ to bring advanced educational resources to millions of young Africans. https://www.vodafone.com/news-and-media/vodafone-group-releases/news/instantschools-forafricaGoogle Scholar
Wakabayashi, D. & Shane, S. (2018). “Google will not renew contract that upset employees.” The New York Times, 18 June. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/01/technology/google-pentagon-project-maven.htmlGoogle Scholar
Watts, L. I., Ness, A. M., Steele, M. L. & Mumford, M. D. (2018). “Learning from stories of leadership: How reading about personalized and socialized politicians impacts performance on an ethical decision-making simulation.“The Leadership Quarterly 29: 276–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. J. (2004). Leadership in the digital age. In Goethals, G. R., Sorenson, G. & MacGregor Burns, J., eds., The Encyclopedia of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Winner, L. (1980). “Do artifacts have politics?” Daedalus, 109, (1) (Modern Technology: Problem or Opportunity?), 121–36.Google Scholar
Winner, L. (1986). Do artifacts have politics? In Winner, L., ed., The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 19–39.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2019). Disability and Rehabilitation: Global Cooperation on Assistive Technology. www.who.int/disabilities/technology/gate/en/Google Scholar
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2016). Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled. www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/marrakeshGoogle Scholar
Yukl, G. (1989). “Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research.” Journal of Management 15(2): 251–89.Google Scholar
- 8
- Cited by