Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- Introduction
- 1 Against bill-of-rights exceptionalism
- 2 The common law, judging, and three bills of rights
- 3 Judicial review of legislation before bills of rights
- 4 Bills of rights and other means of accessing judgment
- 5 Putting the strike-down in its place
- 6 Remedies from text to practice
- 7 Improving the system and engaging the legislature
- 8 Rethinking remedies and constitutional supremacy
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- Introduction
- 1 Against bill-of-rights exceptionalism
- 2 The common law, judging, and three bills of rights
- 3 Judicial review of legislation before bills of rights
- 4 Bills of rights and other means of accessing judgment
- 5 Putting the strike-down in its place
- 6 Remedies from text to practice
- 7 Improving the system and engaging the legislature
- 8 Rethinking remedies and constitutional supremacy
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Bills of Rights in the Common Law , pp. 199 - 220Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
‘Building a Law of Human Rights: Roncarelli v. Duplessis in Canadian Constitutional Culture’. McGill Law Journal 55, no. 3 (2010): 437–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Rights against Rules: The Moral Structure of American Constitutional Law’. Michigan Law Review 97, no. 1 (1998): 1–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . ‘Legal Realism, Transformation and the Legacy of Dugard’. South African Journal on Human Rights 26, no. 2 (2010): 188–216.Google Scholar
. ‘Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing’. Yale Law Journal 96, no. 5 (1987): 943–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. A Theory of Constitutional Rights. Translated by . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
. ‘Statutory Bills of Rights: You Read Words in, You Read Words out, You Take Parliament's Clear Intentions and You Shake It All About – Doin’ the Sankey Hanky Panky’. In The Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays, edited by , , and , 108–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
‘Democracy, Legality, and Proportionality’. In Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, edited by , , and , 205–33. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution, and Common Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The New Borders of the Constitutional’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 50, no. 3 (2013): 737–62.Google Scholar
, and , eds. The Post-Apartheid Constitutions: Perspectives on South Africa's Basic Law. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
. Commonwealth Caribbean Law and Legal Systems. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge-Cavendish, 2008.Google Scholar
. ‘The Courts in Canada’. In The Political Role of Law Courts in Modern Democracies, edited by and , 53–82. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1988.Google Scholar
, and . ‘Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court’. American Political Science Review 102, no. 3 (2008): 369–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. Not Quite Supreme: The Courts and Coordinate Constitutional Interpretation. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
. ‘The New Brunswick Origin of Canadian Judicial Review’. University of New Brunswick Law Journal 40 (1991): 100–129.Google Scholar
. ‘Proportionality (2)’. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by and , 738–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
‘The Afterlife of Parliamentary Sovereignty’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 9, no. 1 (2011): 144–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘The Post-Apartheid Legal Order’. In Introduction to Law and Legal Skills in South Africa: Jurisprudence, edited by , , and , 11–44. Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
‘British Sovereignty and the European Court of Human Rights’. Law Quarterly Review 128, no. 3 (2012): 382–411.Google Scholar
. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
. ‘The Colonialist Heritage’. In Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions, edited by and , 46–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
, , , , and . Human Rights: Judicial Protection in the United Kingdom. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2008.Google Scholar
. ‘Political Constitutionalism and the Human Rights Act’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 9, no. 1 (2011): 86–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Abiding Presence of Conscience: Criminal Justice against the Law and the Modern Constitutional Imagination’. University of Toronto Law Journal 61, no. 4 (2011): 579–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Children of Two Logics: A Way into Canadian Constitutional Culture’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 11, no. 2 (2013): 319–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reform and Continuity: The Electoral College, the Convention, and the Party System. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.Google Scholar
The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. 2nd edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
. Poverty and Fundamental Rights: The Justification and Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
. ‘The Corporate Origins of Judicial Review’. Yale Law Journal 116, no. 3 (2006): 502–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Remedies’. In Constitutional Law of South Africa, edited by , , and , 2nd edn, vol. 1, 9-i to 9–199. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.Google Scholar
. Balancing Constitutional Rights: The Origins and Meanings of Postwar Legal Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Lon Fuller's Theory of Adjudication and the False Dichotomy between Dispute Resolution and Public Law Models of Litigation’. Boston University Law Review 75, no. 5 (1995): 1273–324.Google Scholar
, , and . ‘Judicial Approaches to the Human Rights Act’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 52, no. 3 (2003): 549–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Conflicts’. In Constitutional Law of South Africa, edited by , , and , 2nd edn, vol. 1, 16-i to 16-28. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.Google Scholar
. ‘A Bill of Rights for the United Kingdom – the Case Against’. Texas International Law Journal 32, no. 3 (1997): 435–40.Google Scholar
, and . The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act: A Commentary. Wellington: LexisNexis NZ, 2005.Google Scholar
. ‘Incorporation through Interpretation’. In Sceptical Essays on Human Rights, edited by , , and , 79–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘A Post-Calvinist Catechism or a Post-Communist Manifesto? Intersecting Narratives in the South African Bill of Rights Debate’. In Promoting Human Rights through Bills of Rights: Comparative Perspectives, edited by , 392–428. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
. ‘The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation’. Harvard Law Review 89, no. 7 (1976): 1281–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Migration as a New Metaphor in Comparative Constitutional Law’. In The Migration of Constitutional Ideas, edited by , 1–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
, and . ‘Measuring Judicial Activism on the Supreme Court of Canada: A Comment on Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. NAPE’. McGill Law Journal 48, no. 3 (2003): 525–64.Google Scholar
, and . ‘Putting the Past behind Us? Prospective Judicial and Legislative Constitutional Remedies’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 21 (2003): 205–66.Google Scholar
. ‘Transformative Constitutionalism in South Africa: Creative Uses of Constitutional Court Authority to Advance Substantive Justice’. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice 13, no. 3 (2010): 575–614.Google Scholar
. ‘Adjudicating Non-Justiciable Rights: Socio-Economic Rights and the South African Constitutional Court’. Columbia Human Rights Law Review 38, no. 2 (2007): 321–86.Google Scholar
, and . Proportionality and Constitutional Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘South Africa's First Bill of Rights: Random Recollections of One of Its Drafters’. International Journal of Legal Information 32, no. 2 (2004): 313–21.Google Scholar
. ‘Grootboom, the Right of Access to Housing and Substantive Equality as Contextual Fairness’. South African Journal on Human Rights 17, no. 2 (2001): 258–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘The Impact of the New Constitution upon Civil Procedure’. Stellenbosch Law Review 6, no. 1 (1995): 34–53.Google Scholar
. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. 10th edn. London: Macmillan, 1965.Google Scholar
. ‘The Supreme Court of Canada, Charter Dialogue, and Deference’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 47, no. 2 (2009): 235–86.Google Scholar
. ‘A Tale of Two Maps: The Limits of Universalism in Comparative Judicial Review’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 47, no. 2 (2009): 287–316.Google Scholar
‘Dicta and Article III’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142, no. 6 (1994): 1997–2069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Facial Challenges to State and Federal Statutes’. Stanford Law Review 46, no. 2 (1994): 235–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . ‘Laws, Engagements and Legacies: The Legal Histories of the British Empire – an Introduction’. In Legal Histories of the British Empire: Laws, Engagements and Legacies, edited by and , 1–11. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
. ‘Court of First Instance? Towards a Pro-Poor Jurisdiction for the South African Constitutional Court’. South African Journal on Human Rights 22, no. 2 (2006): 261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Courts and Structural Poverty in South Africa: To What Extent Has the Constitutional Court Expanded Access and Remedies to the Poor?’ In Constitutionalism of the Global South: The Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa, and Colombia, edited by , 293–327. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
. Droit constitutionnel: Principes fondamentaux. 5th edn. Montreal, QC: Wilson et Lafleur, 2011.Google Scholar
, and . Traité de droit administratif. 2nd edn. 3 vols. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, 1984.Google Scholar
. ‘Rights as Trumps’. In Theories of Rights, edited by , 153–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
. ‘Constitutionalism in an Old Key: Legality and Constituent Power’. Global Constitutionalism 1, no. 2 (2012): 229–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Disobeying Parliament? Privative Clauses and the Rule of Law’. In The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State, edited by and , 499–518. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
. ‘The Unwritten Constitution and the Rule of Law’. In Constitutionalism in the Charter Era, edited by and , 383–412. Markham, ON: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2004.Google Scholar
, and . ‘Reasoned Decisions and Legal Theory’. In Common Law Theory, edited by , 134–67. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
. ‘A Critique of Radical Approaches to Rights-Consistent Statutory Interpretation’. European Human Rights Law Review, no. 6 (2003): 641–50.Google Scholar
. ‘Rights, Interpretation and the Rule of Law’. In Modern Challenges to the Rule of Law, edited by , 165–87. Wellington: LexisNexis, 2011.Google Scholar
. ‘The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Standard of Substantive Review’. Cambridge Law Journal 60, no. 2 (2001): 301–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘External Pressure and the Supreme Court's Agenda’. In Supreme Court Decision-Making, edited by and , 255–79. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
. Delegating Rights Protection: The Rise of Bills of Rights in the Westminster World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary Democracy’. Modern Law Review 62, no. 1 (1999): 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. Implementing the Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . ‘New Law, Non-Retroactivity, and Constitutional Remedies’. Harvard Law Review 104, no. 8 (1991): 1731–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Institutional Roles and Meanings of “Compatibility” under the Human Rights Act 1998’. In Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act, edited by , , and , 87–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
. ‘The Nature and Significance of “Constitutional” Legislation’. Law Quarterly Review 129, no. 3 (2013): 343–58.Google Scholar
. ‘Public Interest Litigation and Constitutional Theory in Comparative Perspective’. Modern Law Review 55, no. 1 (1992): 44–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Rule of Law or the Rule of Politics? Harmonizing the Internal and External Views of Supreme Court Decision Making’. Law and Social Inquiry 30, no. 1 (2005): 89–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and . Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tournament of Appeals: Granting Judicial Review in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2004.Google Scholar
. ‘Docket Control and the Success of Constitutional Courts’. In Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by and , 624–41. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2011.Google Scholar
. ‘Comparative Constitutional Law’. In The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Law, edited by and , 171–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
‘Prospective and Retrospective Judicial Lawmaking’. University of Toronto Law Journal 24, no. 2 (1974): 170–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. Cheshire, Fifoot and Furmston's Law of Contract. 16th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , eds. Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘A Comparative Perspective on Reforming the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act’. Policy Quarterly 10, no. 4 (2014): 33–38.Google Scholar
. ‘The “Horizontal Effect” of Constitutional Rights’. Michigan Law Review 102, no. 3 (2003): 387–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘How Successful and Distinctive Is the Human Rights Act? An Expatriate Comparatist's Assessment’. Modern Law Review 74, no. 2 (2011): 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism’. American Journal of Comparative Law 49, no. 4 (2001): 707–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
. ‘Enforcement of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’. In Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 4th edn, edited by and , 1321–98. Markham, ON: LexisNexis Canada, 2005.Google Scholar
, and . ‘Defenders of Democracy? Legitimacy, Popular Acceptance, and the South African Constitutional Court’. Journal of Politics 65, no. 1 (2003): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘What's Law Got to Do with It? Judicial Behavioralists Test the “Legal Model” of Judicial Decision Making’. Law and Social Inquiry 26, no. 2 (2001): 465–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. Comparative Constitutional Design. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Imperial Legacies: Chartered Enterprises in Northern British America’. In Legal Histories of the British Empire: Laws, Engagements and Legacies, edited by and , 127–40. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
. ‘The Vice of Judicial Activism’. In Judicial Power, Democracy and Legal Positivism, edited by and , 355–69. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2000.Google Scholar
. Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Judicial Review, Legislative Override, and Democracy’. In Protecting Human Rights: Instruments and Institutions, edited by , , and , 263–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
. Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary Debates. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Questioning the Migration of Constitutional Ideas: Rights, Constitutionalism and the Limits of Convergence’. In The Migration of Constitutional Ideas, edited by , 115–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
‘Hislop v. Canada – A Retroactive Look’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 42 (2008): 547–66.Google Scholar
, and . ‘Does the Observer Have an Effect? An Analysis of the Use of the Dialogue Metaphor in Canada's Courts’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 45, no. 1 (2007): 67–90.Google Scholar
‘Why the Legal Complex Is Integral to Theories of Consequential Courts’. In Consequential Courts: Judicial Roles in Global Perspective, edited by , , and , 337–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
, and . ‘Comparative Law in Constitutional Contexts’. In Comparative Law: A Handbook, edited by and , 313–38. Oxford: Hart, 2007.Google Scholar
, and . Law and Administration. 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Thinking Institutionally’. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by , , and , 731–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
. ‘Courts as Public Authorities, Private Law as Instrument of Government’. In Private Law: Key Encounters with Public Law, edited by and , 89–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
‘Are Bills of Rights Necessary in Common Law Systems?’ Law Quarterly Review 130, no. 3 (2014): 392–412.Google Scholar
. ‘Bill of Rights Reform and the Case for Going beyond the Declaration of Incompatibility Model’. New Zealand Law Review (forthcoming).
. ‘Negotiable Rights, What Rights?’ Modern Law Review 75, no. 3 (2012): 437–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Governing Like Judges?’ In The Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays, edited by , , and , 40–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
‘New Constitutional Ideas: Can New Parliamentary Models Resist Judicial Dominance When Interpreting Rights?’ Texas Law Review 82, no. 7 (2004): 1963–87.Google Scholar
‘Parliament and the Human Rights Act: Can the JCHR Help Facilitate a Culture of Rights?’ International Journal of Constitutional Law 4, no. 1 (2006): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . Parliamentary Bills of Rights: The Experiences of New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
. ‘Beyond Manicheanism: Assessing the New Constitutionalism’. Maryland Law Review 65, no. 1 (2006): 15–31.Google Scholar
. Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
. ‘From Comparative Constitutional Law to Comparative Constitutional Studies’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 11, no. 1 (2013): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . Human Rights in the UK: An Introduction to the Human Rights Act 1998. 3rd edn. Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman, 2010.Google Scholar
. ‘A Central-Case Analysis of Constitutional Remedial Power’. South African Law Journal 125, no. 3 (2008): 521–52.Google Scholar
, and . J. M. Kelly: The Irish Constitution. 4th edn. Dublin: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2003.Google Scholar
Constitutional Law of Canada. 5th edn. 2 vols. Scarborough, ON: Thomson/Carswell, 2007.Google Scholar
. ‘The Human Rights Act and Legal Culture: The Judiciary and the Legal Profession’. Journal of Law and Society 26, no. 1 (1999): 86–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Proportionality and the Relevance of Interpretation’. In Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, edited by , , and , 186–202. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Rationalizing Judicial Power: The Mischief of Dialogue Theory’. In Contested Constitutionalism: Reflections on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, edited by and , 50–65. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2009.Google Scholar
, , and . Introduction to Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, edited by , , and , 1–17. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Asserting Judicial Sovereignty: The Debate over the Abolition of Privy Council Jurisdiction in British Africa’. In Legal Histories of the British Empire: Laws, Engagements and Legacies, edited by and , 30–44. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
, and . L'action gouvernementale: Précis de droit des institutions administratives. 3rd edn. Cowansville, QC: Yvon Blais, 2009.Google Scholar
‘Comparative Constitutional Law: Methodologies’. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by and , 54–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Constitutional Engagement in a Transnational Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
‘The Citizen as Litigant in Public Actions: The Non-Hohfeldian or Ideological Plaintiff’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 116, no. 6 (1968): 1033–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , eds. Democratising Development: The Politics of Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa. Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005.Google Scholar
. ‘Questioning Prospective Overruling’. New Zealand Law Review, no. 3 (2007): 393–416.Google Scholar
. ‘Choosing between Sections 3 and 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998: Judicial Reasoning after Ghaidan v. Mendoza’. In Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act, edited by , , and , 114–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
. Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
. ‘Judging the Judges under the Human Rights Act: Deference, Disillusionment and the “War on Terror”’. Public Law, no. 2 (2009): 287–304.Google Scholar
. ‘Special Advocates, Control Orders and the Right to a Fair Trial’. Modern Law Review 73, no. 5 (2010): 836–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘What's So Weak about “Weak-Form Review”? The Case of the UK Human Rights Act 1998’. International Journal of Constitutional Law (forthcoming).
Principles of Legal Interpretation of Statutes, Contracts and Wills. Durban, South Africa: Butterworths, 1995.Google Scholar
‘Institutional Approaches to Judicial Restraint’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28, no. 3 (2008): 409–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Parliament's Role Following Declarations of Incompatibility under the Human Rights Act’. In Parliaments and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit, edited by , , and , 165–92. Oxford: Hart, 2015.Google Scholar
‘Legal Culture and Transformative Constitutionalism’. South African Journal on Human Rights 14, no. 1 (1998): 146–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Constitutional Authority and Judicial Pragmatism: Politics and Law in the Evolution of South Africa's Constitutional Court’. In Consequential Courts: Judicial Roles in Global Perspective, edited by , , and , 93–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
‘Toward a Theorization of Craft’. Social and Legal Studies 16, no. 3 (2007): 321–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Alexander Bickel's Philosophy of Prudence’. Yale Law Journal 94, no. 7 (1985): 1567–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Constitutional Rights as Principles: On the Structure and Domain of Constitutional Justice’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 2, no. 3 (2004): 574–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Political Liberalism and the Structure of Rights: On the Place and Limits of the Proportionality Requirement’. In Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy, edited by , 131–66. Oxford: Hart, 2007.Google Scholar
. ‘Principles, Policies and the Power of Courts’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20, no. 2 (2007): 379–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘The Reality of Social Rights Enforcement’. Harvard International Law Journal 53, no. 1 (2012): 402–59.Google Scholar
. ‘Limitation of the Temporal Effects of Judgments of the ECJ’. Intertax 35, no. 4 (2007): 230–45.Google Scholar
‘Constitutions’. In The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, edited by and , 376–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
. ‘A New Subtlety in Judicial Supremacy: Review of the 2003–2004 Constitutional Cases’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 26 (2004): 77–146.Google Scholar
. ‘Complexifying Roncarelli's Rule of Law’. McGill Law Journal 55, no. 3 (2010): 721–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Réflexions critiques au sujet de la métaphore du dialogue en droit constitutionnel canadien’. Revue du Barreau 63, special issue (2003): 377–420.Google Scholar
, and . ‘L'indépendance judiciaire et la Cour suprême: Reconstruction historique douteuse et théorie constitutionnelle de complaisance’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 36, no. 3 (1998): 485–514.Google Scholar
. ‘In Defense of the Constitutional Court: Litigating Socio-Economic Rights and the Myth of the Minimum Core’. American University International Law Review 22, no. 1 (2007): 163–97.Google Scholar
, and . ‘Making Rights Real: The Courts, Remedies, and the Human Rights Act’. Cambridge Law Journal 58, no. 3 (1999): 509–45.Google Scholar
, and . Making Rights Real: The Human Rights Act in Its First Decade. Oxford: Hart, 2008.Google Scholar
. ‘Comparative Law as an Act of Modesty: A Pragmatic and Realistic Approach to Comparative Legal Scholarship’. In Practice and Theory in Comparative Law, edited by and , 302–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
‘Rights Essentialism and Remedial Equilibration’. Columbia Law Review 99, no. 4 (1999): 857–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘The Constitutional Court of South Africa: An Evaluation’. Law Quarterly Review 125, no. 3 (2009): 440–67.Google Scholar
. The Constitution of the United Kingdom: A Contextual Analysis. 2nd edn. Oxford: Hart, 2012.Google Scholar
. Socio-Economic Rights: Adjudication under a Transformative Constitution. Claremont, South Africa: Juta, 2010.Google Scholar
, and . ‘Access to the Court under the Human Rights Act: Standing, Third Party Intervenors and Legal Assistance’. In Delivering Rights: How the Human Rights Act Is Working, edited by and , 115–46. Oxford: Hart, 2003.Google Scholar
. ‘Invalidity, Disapplication and the Construction of Acts of Parliament: Their Relationship with Parliamentary Sovereignty in the Light of the European Communities Act and the Human Rights Act’. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 2 (2000): 399–415.Google Scholar
. Honest Counsel: Institutional Dialogue and the Canadian Rule of Law. PhD Thesis, University of Toronto, 2007.Google Scholar
. ‘Standing to Enforce Fundamental Rights’. South African Journal on Human Rights 10, no. 1 (1994): 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Standing, Ripeness and Mootness’. In Constitutional Law of South Africa, edited by , , and , 2nd edn, vol. 1, 7-i to 7-23. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.Google Scholar
. Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction. 6th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘From Now On: Temporal Issues in Constitutional Adjudication’. National Journal of Constitutional Law 18, no. 1 (2005): 17–43.Google Scholar
‘Book Review: A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review’. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 22, no. 1 (2007): 141–43.Google Scholar
. ‘Conceptual Precision and Parliamentary Systems of Rights: Disambiguating “Dialogue”’. Review of Constitutional Studies 17, no. 2 (2012): 73–100.Google Scholar
. ‘Dialogue or Compliance? Measuring Legislatures’ Policy Responses to Court Rulings on Rights’. International Political Science Review 34, no. 1 (2013): 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. Governing from the Bench: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Judicial Role. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2013.Google Scholar
. ‘Entrenching Bills of Rights’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (2006): 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘“We've Had to Raise Our Game”: Liberty's Litigation Strategy under the Human Rights Act 1998’. In Human Rights Brought Home: Socio-Legal Perspectives on Human Rights in the National Context, edited by and , 87–109. Oxford: Hart, 2004.Google Scholar
. Judicial Decision-Making in a Globalised World: A Comparative Analysis of the Changing Practices of Western Highest Courts. Oxford: Hart, 2013.Google Scholar
, ed. Constitutionalism of the Global South: The Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa, and Colombia. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Introduction: Toward a Constitutionalism of the Global South’. In Constitutionalism of the Global South: The Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa, and Colombia, edited by , 1–37. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Life of a Metaphor: Dialogue in the Supreme Court, 1998–2003’. In Constitutionalism in the Charter Era, edited by and , 105–31. Markham, ON: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2004.Google Scholar
‘Strategic Behaviour and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’. In The Myth of the Sacred: The Charter, the Courts, and the Politics of the Constitution in Canada, edited by , , and , 147–67. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
, and . ‘Dialogue, Deference and Restraint: Judicial Independence and Trial Procedures’. Saskatchewan Law Review 64, no. 2 (2001): 323–46.Google Scholar
. Litigating Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa: A Choice between Corrective and Distributive Justice. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press, 2009.Google Scholar
. ‘Litigation and Legal Mobilization’. In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by , , and , 522–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
‘“Was It Something I Said?” Losing the Majority on the Modern Supreme Court of Canada, 1984–2011’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 50, no. 1 (2012): 93–128.Google Scholar
. ‘A Common Law of Human Rights? Transnational Judicial Conversations on Constitutional Rights’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20, no. 4 (2000): 499–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. Dewigged, Bothered, and Bewildered: British Colonial Judges on Trial, 1800–1900. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. Constitutional Deference, Courts and Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press, 2009.Google Scholar
. Human Rights Controversies: The Impact of Legal Form. Abingdon, UK: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007.Google Scholar
, and , eds. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 5th edn. Markham, ON: LexisNexis, 2013.Google Scholar
, and . ‘Quantitative Methods for Comparative Constitutional Law’. In Practice and Theory in Comparative Law, edited by and , 230–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
‘The Rule of Law, Legality and the Supremacy of the Constitution’. In Constitutional Law of South Africa, edited by , , and , 2nd edn, vol. 1, 11-i to 11-44. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.
. ‘Standing under the Human Rights Act 1998: Theories of Rights Enforcement and the Nature of Public Law Adjudication’. Cambridge Law Journal 59, no. 1 (2000): 133–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘A British Empire Court – a Brief Appraisal of the History of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council’. In Power in History: From Medieval to the Post-Modern World, edited by , , , and , 125–42. Dublin: Irish Academic Press, 2011.Google Scholar
. ‘British Imperial Statutes and Irish Law: Imperial Statutes Passed before the Creation of the Irish Free State’. Journal of Legal History 31, no. 3 (2010): 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. The Global Model of Constitutional Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Protection of Human Rights in South Africa: A Legal and Practical Guide. Lansdowne, South Africa: Juta, 2004.Google Scholar
‘Dodging the Issue: Activism in the Supreme Court of Canada’. University of New Brunswick Law Journal 54, no. 1 (2005): 101–13.Google Scholar
. ‘The Human Rights Act: Procedure, Standing and Remedies’. In Human Rights for the New Millennium, edited by , 65–84. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000.Google Scholar
National Council of Welfare. Justice and the Poor. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2000.
‘Pleading Guilty for Considerations: A Study of Bargain Justice’. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 46, no. 6 (1956): 780–90.Google Scholar
. ‘South Africa's Transformative Constitution: Towards an Appropriate Doctrine of Separation of Powers’. Stellenbosch Law Review 22, no. 1 (2011): 37–49.Google Scholar
. ‘The Evolution of Standing Rules in South Africa and Their Significance in Promoting Social Justice’. South African Journal on Human Rights 18, no. 4 (2002): 590–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . ‘The Human Rights Act, Representative Standing and the Victim Culture’. European Human Rights Law Review, no. 6 (1998): 730–41.Google Scholar
. Vindicating Socio-Economic Rights: International Standards and Comparative Experiences. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
. ‘Text Matters: Some Reflections on the Forging of a New Constitutional Jurisprudence in South Africa’. Modern Law Review 75, no. 1 (2012): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. Bills of Rights and Decolonization: The Emergence of Domestic Human Rights Instruments in Britain's Overseas Territories. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
. ‘Legalize This: The Chartering of Canadian Politics’. In Contested Constitutionalism: Reflections on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, edited by and , 211–31. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2009.Google Scholar
. ‘Deference, Discretion, and Democracy in the Human Rights Act Era’. Current Legal Problems 60, no. 1 (2007): 40–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . ‘Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science’. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by and , 693–721. New York: W. W. Norton, 2002.Google Scholar
. ‘A Plea for Conceptual Consistency in Constitutional Remedies’. National Journal of Constitutional Law 18, no. 2 (2006): 105–68.Google Scholar
. ‘Constitutional Exceptionalism and the Common Law’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 7, no. 2 (2009): 247–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Dogmatic Liberalism? T. R. S. Allan and the Common Law Constitution’. Modern Law Review 65, no. 3 (2002): 463–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Questioning Common Law Constitutionalism’. Legal Studies 25, no. 1 (2005): 142–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘South African Common and Customary Law on Intestate Succession: A Question of Harmonisation, Integration or Abolition’. Journal of Comparative Law 3, no. 1 (2008): 119–32.Google Scholar
. ‘A New Agenda for the Cultural Study of Law: Taking on the Technicalities’. Buffalo Law Review 53, no. 3 (2005): 973–1033.Google Scholar
, and . Damages in International Investment Law. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2008.Google Scholar
. ‘The Challenges of Crafting Remedies for Violations of Socio-Economic Rights’. In Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law, edited by , 46–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
. ‘Common Law Bills of Rights as Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures’. University of Toronto Law Journal 55, no. 3 (2005): 733–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Constitutional and Common Law Dialogues between the Supreme Court and Canadian Legislatures’. Canadian Bar Review 80, nos 1–2 (2001): 481–533.Google Scholar
. ‘Dialogic Judicial Review and Its Critics’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 23 (2004): 49–104.Google Scholar
. ‘Enforcement of the Charter – Subsections 24(1) and 52(1)’. In Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 5th edn, edited by and , 1123–87. Markham, ON: LexisNexis, 2013.Google Scholar
. ‘Principled Remedial Discretion under the Charter’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 25 (2004): 101–50.Google Scholar
. ‘Remedial Consensus and Dialogue under the Charter: General Declarations and Delayed Declarations of Invalidity’. University of British Columbia Law Review 35, no. 2 (2002): 211–70.Google Scholar
. ‘Sharpening the Dialogue Debate: The Next Decade of Scholarship’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 45, no. 1 (2007): 169–92.Google Scholar
. The Supreme Court on Trial: Judicial Activism or Democratic Dialogue. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law, 2001.Google Scholar
, and . ‘Mandatory Relief and Supervisory Jurisdiction: When Is It Appropriate, Just and Equitable?’ South African Law Journal 122, no. 2 (2005): 325–51.Google Scholar
. ‘Gender, Nation and the Common Law Constitution’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28, no. 4 (2008): 735–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Legislative–Judicial Interaction’. American Journal of Political Science 45, no. 1 (2001): 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. The Politics of Principle: The First South African Constitutional Court, 1995–2005. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Judiciary in Canada: The Third Branch of Government. Toronto, ON: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1987.Google Scholar
. ‘Judicial Review and the Protection of Constitutional Rights’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22, no. 2 (2002): 275–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . ‘Rights-Consistent Interpretation and the Human Rights Act 1998’. Law Quarterly Review 127, no. 2 (2011): 217–38.Google Scholar
. ‘Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law’. Journal of Law and Society 14, no. 3 (1987): 279–302.Google Scholar
. Beyond Disagreement: Open Remedies in Human Rights Adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Refining the Lawmaking Function of the Supreme Court’. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 17, no. 1 (1983): 1–24.Google Scholar
, and . ‘Introduction: Socio-Legal Perspectives on Human Rights in the National Context’. In Human Rights Brought Home: Socio-Legal Perspectives on Human Rights in the National Context, edited by and , 1–21. Oxford: Hart, 2004.Google Scholar
. ‘Banging Constitutional Bibles: Observing Constitutional Culture in Transition’. University of Toronto Law Journal 55, no. 3 (2005): 833–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Judging in Secular Times: Max Weber and the Rise of Proportionality’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 63 (2013): 557–77.Google Scholar
, and . ‘Separation of Powers’. In Constitutional Law of South Africa, edited by , , and , 2nd edn, vol. 1, 12-i to 12-98. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.Google Scholar
, and . The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . ‘Profession, Science, and Culture: An Emergent Canon of Law and Society Research’. In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, edited by , 30–59. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar
. ‘Charter Remedies in 2001: Proceeding Cautiously’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 16 (2002): 405–19.Google Scholar
, and . ‘The Impact of the Human Rights Act on the House of Lords’. Public Law, no. 2 (2009): 347–71.Google Scholar
, , and . ‘Rights, Interveners and the Law Lords’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34, no. 2 (2014): 295–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Law and Politics: The Problem of Boundaries’. In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by , , and , 767–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
. ‘The Impact of a Bill of Rights on the Role of the Judiciary: A Canadian Perspective’. In Promoting Human Rights through Bills of Rights: Comparative Perspectives, edited by , 431–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
‘Mootness, Abstract Questions and Alternative Grounds: Deciding Whether to Decide’. In Charter Litigation, edited by , 327–56. Toronto, ON: Butterworths, 1987.Google Scholar
‘Constitutional Culture, Social Movement Conflict and Constitutional Change: The Case of the De Facto Era’. California Law Review 94, no. 5 (2006): 1323–419.Google Scholar
. ‘The Pluralism of the Charter: Revisiting the Oakes Test’. In The Limitation of Charter Rights: Critical Essays on R. v. Oakes, edited by and , 13–35. Montreal, QC: Thémis, 2009.Google Scholar
‘Historical Institutionalism and the Study of Law’. In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by , , and , 46–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
. Boundaries of Judicial Review: The Law of Justiciability in Canada. 2nd edn. Toronto, ON: Carswell, 2012.Google Scholar
The Canadian Constitution and the Courts: The Function and Scope of Judicial Review. 3rd edn. Toronto, ON: Butterworths, 1988.Google Scholar
Judicial Review of Legislation in Canada. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 1968.Google Scholar
‘Politicians, Judges, and the Charter’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 21, no. 1 (2008): 227–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Judicial Review’. In The New Oxford Companion to Law, edited by and , 653–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
. ‘Left out in the Cold? Crafting Constitutional Remedies for the Poorest of the Poor’. South African Journal on Human Rights 21, no. 2 (2005): 215–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imperial Appeal: The Debate on the Appeal to the Privy Council, 1833–1986. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Imperial Control of Colonial Legislation, 1813–1865: A Study of British Policy towards Colonial Legislative Powers. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Beyond the Formalist–Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
‘The Internal/External Distinction and the Notion of a “Practice” in Legal Theory and Sociolegal Studies’. Law and Society Review 30, no. 1 (1996): 163–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Sentencing as Craftwork and the Binary Epistemologies of the Discretionary Decision Process’. Social and Legal Studies 16, no. 3 (2007): 425–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Beyond the Privacy Principle’. Columbia Law Review 92, no. 6 (1992): 1431–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘The Role of the Courts in the Political Constitution’. University of Toronto Law Journal 60, no. 1 (2010): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Marbury v. Madison and Canadian Constitutionalism: Rhetoric and Practice’. George Washington International Law Review 36, no. 3 (2004): 515–41.Google Scholar
. ‘Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?’ International Journal of Constitutional Law 7, no. 3 (2009): 468–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘The Rise of Weak-Form Judicial Review’. In Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by and , 321–33. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2011.Google Scholar
. ‘Some Reflections on Method in Comparative Constitutional Law’. In The Migration of Constitutional Ideas, edited by , 67–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
. Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
. ‘Fundamental Common Law Principles as Limitations upon Legislative Power’. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 9, no. 1 (2009): 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Birth of the English Common Law. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and . ‘The Republic of South Africa’. In Mixed Jurisdictions Worldwide: The Third Legal Family, edited by , 95–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
, , , and . Contract: General Principles. 3rd edn. Lansdowne, South Africa: Juta, 2007.Google Scholar
. ‘The Atrophy of Constitutional Powers’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32, no. 3 (2012): 421–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Human Rights Act and the British Constitution’. Texas International Law Journal 37, no. 2 (2002): 329–72.Google Scholar
. Legal Identity: The Coming of Age of Public Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
, , , and . Blackstone's Guide to the Human Rights Act 1998. 6th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
. ‘Compared to What? Judicial Activism and New Zealand's Parliament’. New Zealand Law Journal, no. 11 (2005): 441–45.Google Scholar
. ‘The Core of the Case against Judicial Review’. Yale Law Journal 115, no. 6 (2006): 1346–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Common Law Constitution in Canada: Return of Lex non scripta as Fundamental Law’. University of Toronto Law Journal 51, no. 2 (2001): 91–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Common Law Constitution and Legal Cosmopolitanism’. In The Unity of Public Law, edited by , 431–54. Oxford: Hart, 2004.Google Scholar
Introduction to The Political Role of Law Courts in Modern Democracies, edited by and , 1–5. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review: The Living Tree. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
. ‘Comparison as Deep Appreciation’. In Methods of Comparative Law, edited by , 82–103. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar
. ‘On the Loss of Rights’. In Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, edited by , , and , 123–54. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
‘Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23, no. 1 (2010): 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Unfulfilled Potential of the Court and Legislature Dialogue’. Canadian Journal of Political Science 42, no. 2 (2009): 443–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
‘Once More unto the Breach: Postbehavioralist Approaches to Judicial Politics’. Law and Social Inquiry 25, no. 2 (2000): 601–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . ‘Taking Poverty Seriously: The South African Constitutional Court and Socio-Economic Rights’. Stellenbosch Law Review 22, no. 3 (2011): 664–82.Google Scholar
, and . De Smith, Woolf and Jowell: Judicial Review of Administrative Action. 5th edn. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1995.Google Scholar
. ‘The Amazing, Vanishing Bill of Rights’. South African Law Journal 124, no. 4 (2007): 762–94.Google Scholar
, , and , eds. Constitutional Law of South Africa. 2nd edn. 4 vols. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.Google Scholar
‘Judicial Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act 1998’. Cambridge Law Journal 61, no. 1 (2002): 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Proportionality Is Dead: Long Live Proportionality!’ In Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, edited by , , and , 43–66. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
‘Will You, Won't You, Will You Join the Deference Dance?’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34, no. 2 (2014): 375–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar