Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:12:07.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2022

Paolo Squatriti
Paolo Squatriti
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Weeds and the Carolingians
Empire, Culture, and Nature in Frankish Europe, AD 750–900
 , pp. 200 - 219
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Adalhard, , “Brevis Quem ad Corbeiam Fieri Iussit,” ed. Semmler, J., Corpus Consuetudinum Monasticarum 1 (Siegburg, 1961), 365–408.Google Scholar
“Additamenta ad Capitularia Regum Franciae Orientalis,” ed. Boretius, A. and Krause, V, MGH Capitularia Regum Francorum 2 (Hanover, 1897).Google Scholar
Ravennatis, Agnellus, Liber Pontificalis Ecclesiae Ravennatis, ed. Deliyannis, D. (Turnhout, 2006).Google Scholar
Alcuin, , “Carmina,” ed. Dümmler, E., MGH Poetae 1 (Berlin, 1881), 160–351.Google Scholar
Alcuin, “Epistolae,” ed. Dümmler, E., MGH Epistolae 4 (Berlin, 1895), 1–481.Google Scholar
Alcuin, “Interrogationes et Responsiones in Genesin,” ed. Migne, J., PL 100 (Paris, 1863), 515–66.Google Scholar
Aldhelm, , “De Metribus et Enigmatibus ac Pedum Regulis,” ed. Ehwald, R., MGH Auctores Antiquissimi 15 (Berlin, 1919),Google Scholar
Das altenglische Martyrologium, ed. Kotzor, G. (Munich, 1981).Google Scholar
Die althochdeutschen Glossen 3, ed. Steinmeyer, E. and Sievers, E. (Berlin, 1895).Google Scholar
Ambrose, , “Exameron,” in Sancti Ambrosii Opera 1, ed. Schenkl, C. (Vienna, 1896), 1–261.Google Scholar
Anastasius, , “Epistolae sive Praefationes,” ed. Caspar, E. and Laehr, G., MGH Epistolae 7 (Berlin, 1928), 395–442.Google Scholar
Angelomus, , “Commentarius in Genesin,” ed. Migne, J., PL 115 (Paris, 1881), 107–243.Google Scholar
“Annales Mosellani,” ed. Lappenberg, V., in MGH Scriptores 16 (Hanover, 1859), 491–99.Google Scholar
Augustine, , De Genesi contra Manichaeos, ed. Weber, D. (Vienna, 1998).Google Scholar
Augustine, De Genesi ad Litteram, ed. Zycha, J. (Vienna, 1894).Google Scholar
of Caesarea, Basil, Homélies sur l’Hexaéméron, ed. Giet, S. (Paris, 1949).Google Scholar
Bede, , De Temporibus Ratione, ed. Jones, C. (Turnhout, 1977), 263–544.Google Scholar
Bede, “In Lucae Evangelium Expositio,” in Bedae Venerabilis Opera 2.3, ed. D. Hurst (Turnhout, 1960), 5–425.Google Scholar
Bede, “Libri Quatuor in Principium Genesis,” in Bedae Venerabilis Opera 2.1, ed. Jones, C. (Turnhout, 1960),Google Scholar
Boethius, , Philosophiae Consolationis, ed. Bieler, L. (Turnhout, 1957).Google Scholar
“Capitula Pistensis,” ed. Boretius, A. and Krause, V., MGH Legum Sectio II 2.2 (Hanover, 1893), 302–10.Google Scholar
“Capitulare de Villis,” ed. Boretius, A., MGH Capitularia Regum Francorum 1 (Hanover, 1883).Google Scholar
Christian of Stavelot, Expositio super Librum Generationis, edHuygens, . C. (Turnhout, 2008).Google Scholar
Claudius of Turin, “Commentarii in Genesim,” ed. Migne, J., PL 50 (Paris, 1859), 893–1048.Google Scholar
Claudius of Turin “Epistolae,” ed. Dümmler, E., MGH Epistolae 4 (Berlin 1895), 586–613.Google Scholar
“Codicis Bernensis CCCLVIII Sylloga,” ed. von Winterfeld, P., MGH Poetae 4.1 (Berlin, 1899), 242–60.Google Scholar
“Concilium Aquisgranense,” ed. Werminghoff, A., MGH Legum Sectio III 2.1 (Hanover, 1906), 307–421.Google Scholar
“Concilium Cabillonense,” ed. Werminghoff, A., MGH Legum Sectio III 2.1 (Hanover, 1906), 273–85.Google Scholar
“Concilium Parisiense,” ed. Werminghoff, A., MGH Legum Sectio III 2.2 (Hanover, 1908), 473–551.Google Scholar
The Digest of Justinian, in Corpus Iuris Civilis 1, ed. Mommsen, T. and Krueger, P. (Berlin, 1954).Google Scholar
Dioscurides, , De Materia Medica, ed. Wellman, M. (Berlin, 1907).Google Scholar
Dungal, , “Dungali Scotti Epistulae,” ed. Dümmler, E, MGH Epistolae 4 (Berlin, 1895).Google Scholar
Dynamidia, ed. Mai, A., Classicorum Auctorum e Vaticanis Codicibus Editorum 7 (Rome, 1835).Google Scholar
Einhard, , “Passio Marcellini et Petri,” ed. Dümmler, E., MGH Poetae 2 (Berlin, 1884), 126–35Google Scholar
Ekkehard, IV, “Casus S. Galli,” ed. Pertz, G., MGH Scriptores 2 (Hanover 1829), XX.Google Scholar
Ermenrich of Ellwangen, “Ermenrici Elwangensis Epistola ad Grimaldum Abbatem,” ed. Dümmler, E., MGH Epistolae 3 (Berlin, 1899), 534–79.Google Scholar
Eriugena, , Periphyseon, ed. Jeauneau, E. (Turnhout, 2000).Google Scholar
Eugenius of Toledo, “Carmina,” ed. Vollmer, F., MGH Auctores Antiquissimi 14 (Berlin, 1905), 251–82.Google Scholar
Eusebius, , Die Kirchengeschichte, ed. Schwartz, E. and Mommsen, T. 2.2 (Berlin, 1999).Google Scholar
Eustathius, , Ancienne version latine des neufs homélies sur l’hexaéméron de Basile de Césarée, ed. Amand de Mendieta, E. and Rudberg, S. (Berlin, 1958).Google Scholar
“Exhortatio Poenitendi,” ed. Strecker, K., MGH Poetae 4.2 (Berlin, 1914),Google Scholar
Félire Óengusso Céli Dé, ed. Stokes, W. (London, 1905).Google Scholar
Flodoard of Reims, “De Triumphis Christi,” ed. Migne, J., PL 135 (Paris, 1879).Google Scholar
Galen, , “On the Powers of Foods,” tr. M. Grant, in Galen on Food and Diet (London, 2000), 68–190.Google Scholar
Geoponika, tr. Dalby, A. (Totnes, 2011).Google Scholar
Gregory of Tours, De Virtutibus Beati Martini Episcopi, ed. Krusch, B., in MGH Scriptores Rerum Merovingicarum 1.2 (Hanover, 1885), 585–661.Google Scholar
of Tours Historia Francorum, ed. Arndt, W., in MGH Scriptores Rerum Merovingicarum 1 (Hanover, 1885), 1–450.Google Scholar
Gregory the Great, Gregorii Magni Dialogi, ed. Moricca, U. (Rome, 1924).Google Scholar
Gregory the Great Moralia in Job, ed. Adriaen, M. (Turnhout, 1979–85).Google Scholar
Haimo of Auxerre, “Commentarius in Genesim,” ed. Migne, J., PL 131 (Paris, 1884), 51–134.Google Scholar
of Reims, Hincmar, “De Divortio Lotharii Regis,” ed. Böhringer, L., MGH Concilia 4.1 (Hanover, 1992), 107–261.Google Scholar
Historia Langobardorum Codicis Gothani, ed. Pertz, G., MGH Scriptores Rerum Langobardicarum (Hanover, 1878),Google Scholar
Maurus, Hrabanus, “Allegoriae in Universam Sacram Scripturam,” edMigne, . J., PL 112 (Paris, 1878), 850–1088.Google Scholar
Maurus, Hrabanus “Commentaria in Genesim,” ed. Migne, J., PL 107 (Paris, 1864), 443–670.Google Scholar
Maurus, Hrabanus “Commentariorum in Matthaeum Libri Octo,” ed. Migne, J., PL 107 (Paris, 1864), 727–1156.Google Scholar
Maurus, Hrabanus De Universo, ed. Migne, J., PL 111 (Paris, 1864), 9–613.Google Scholar
Maurus, Hrabanus “Glossa Ordinaria, Evangelium Secundum Lucam,” ed. Migne, J., PL 114 (Paris, 1879), 243–356.Google Scholar
Maurus, Hrabanus “Homeliae,” ed. Migne, J., PL 110 (Paris, 1864), 9–468.Google Scholar
Isidore of Seville, Etymologiae, ed. Lindsay, W. (Oxford, 1911).Google Scholar
Itala. Das neue Testament in altlateinischer Überlieferung 1, ed. Jülicher, A. (Berlin, 1938).Google Scholar
Der karolingische Reichskalender, ed. Borst, A., MGH Libri Memoriales 2.2 (Hanover, 2001).Google Scholar
Lex Salica, ed. Eckhardt, K., MGH Leges Nationum Germanicarum 4.2 (Hanover, 1969).Google Scholar
Liber Glossarum Digital, ed. Grondeux, A. and Cinato, F. (Paris, 2016), liber-glossarum.huma-num.fr/.Google Scholar
Nithard, , “Historiarum Libri IIII,” ed. Müller, E., MGH Scriptores Rerum Germanicarum in Usum Scholarum (Hanover, 1907).Google Scholar
Notker, , Gesta Karoli Magni, ed. Haefele, H., MGH Scriptores Rerum Germanicarum n.s. 12 (Berlin, 1959).Google Scholar
The Old English Boethius, ed. Irvine, S. and Godden, M. (Cambridge, MA, 2012).Google Scholar
Opus Caroli Regis Contra Synodum (Libri Carolini), ed. Freeman, A., MGH Concilia 2.1 (Hanover, 1998).Google Scholar
Radbertus, Paschasius, “Expositio in Mattheum,” ed. Migne, J., PL 120 (Paris, 1879), 37–994.Google Scholar
Dioscorides, Pedanius of Anazarbus, De Materia Medica, tr. L. Beck (Hildesheim, 2011).Google Scholar
Philargyrius, , Explanatio in Bucolica Vergilii, in Servii Grammatici qui Feruntur in Vergilii Carmina Commentarii 3.2, ed. Thilo, G. and Hagen, H. (Leipzig, 1902).Google Scholar
Pliny, , Naturalis Historia, ed. Mayhoff, C. (Stuttgart, 1967).Google Scholar
Saxo, Poeta, “Annales,” ed. von Winterfeld, P., MGH Poetae 4.1 (Hanover, 1899).Google Scholar
Prudentius, , Aurelii Prudentii Clementis Carmina, ed. M. Cunningham (Turnhout, 1966).Google Scholar
“Pseudoapulei Herbarius,” ed. Howald, E. and Sigerist, H., Corpus Medicorum Latinorum 4 (Leipzig, 1927),Google Scholar
The Reference Bible, ed. MacGinty, G. (Turnhout, 2000).Google Scholar
Remigius, , Expositio super Genesim 3.17, ed. Van Name, B. Edwards, (Turnhout, 1999).Google Scholar
Saeculi Noni Auctoris in Boetii Consolationem Philosophiae Commentarius, ed. Taite Silk, E. (Rome, 1935).Google Scholar
Scottus, Sedulius, “Carmina,” ed. Traube, L., MGH Poetae 3 (Berlin, 1886), 151–240.Google Scholar
Serenus, , Liber Medicinalis, ed. Pépin, R. (Paris, 1950).Google Scholar
Smaragdus of St.-Mihiel, “Collectiones in Epistolas et Evangelia,” ed. Migne, J., PL 102 (Paris, 1865), 15–552.Google Scholar
of St.-Mihiel “Epistula de Processione Spiritus Sancti,” ed. Willjung, H., in MGH Concilia 2, suppl. 2 (Hanover, 1998), 300–12.Google Scholar
of St.-Mihiel Expositio in Regulam S. Benedicti, ed. Spannagel, A and Englebert, P. (Siegburg, 1974).Google Scholar
Theodulf of Orléans, “Carmina,” ed. Dümmler, E., MGH Poetae 1 (Berlin, 1881), 437–581.Google Scholar
Theodulf of OrléansTheophrastus, , Enquiry into Plants, ed. Hort, A., 2 vols. (Cambridge, MA, 1916–26).Google Scholar
Theodulf of Orléans“Vita Dagoberti III Regis Francorum,” ed. Krusch, B., MGH Scriptores Rerum Merovingicarum 2 (Hanover, 1888), 511–24.Google Scholar
Theodulf of Orléans“Vita Sancti Coemgeni,” ed. Plummer, C., Vitae Sanctorum Hiberniae 1 (Oxford, 1910).Google Scholar
Strabo, Walafrid, “Carmina,” ed. Dümmler, E., MGH Poetae 2 (Berlin, 1884), 259–473.Google Scholar
Strabo, Walafrid “Glossa Ordinaria,” ed. Migne, J., PL 114 (Paris, 1879), 63–178.Google Scholar
Strabo, Walafrid “Liber Psalmorum,” ed. Migne, J., PL 113 (Paris, 1879), 842–1079.Google Scholar
Wandalbert of Prüm, “De mensium XII nominibus, signis, culturis,” ed. Dümmler, E., MGH Poetae 2 (Berlin, 1884), 604–16.Google Scholar
Wettinus, , “Vita Galli,” ed. Krusch, B., MGH Scriptores Rerum Merovingicarum 4 (Hanover, 1902).Google Scholar
Wigbod, , “Quaestiones in Octateuchum,” ed. Migne, J., PL 96 (Paris, 1862), 1102–68.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Adams, J. Bilingualism and the Latin Language (Cambridge, 2003).Google Scholar
Alexandre, M. Le commencement du livre de Genèse I–IV: la version grecque de la Septante et sa réception (Paris, 1988).Google Scholar
Allen, H. Mediterranean Ecogeography (Harlow, 2001).Google Scholar
Alto Bauer, F. “Die Bau- und Stiftungspolitik der Päpste Hadrian I. (772–795) und Leo III. (795–816),” in 799: Kunst und Kultur der Karolingerreich, ed. Stiegemann, C. and Wemhoff, M. (Mainz, 1999), 514–28.Google Scholar
Amar, Z. and Lev, E.. Arabian Drugs in Early Medieval Mediterranean Medicine (Edinburgh, 2017).Google Scholar
Anderson, P. and Sigaut, F.. “Reasons for Variability in Harvesting Techniques and Tools,” in Explaining and Exploring Diversity in Agricultural Technology, ed. van Gijn et al., A. (Oxford, 2014), 85–92.Google Scholar
André, J. Lexique des termes de botanique en Latin (Paris, 1950).Google Scholar
André, J. “Notes de lexicographie botanique,” Archivium Latinitatis Medii Aevi 23 (1953), 103–22.Google Scholar
Anker, P. Imperial Ecologies (Cambridge, MA, 2001).Google Scholar
Arthur, P., et al. “Roads to Recovery: An Investigation of Early Medieval Agricultural Strategies in Byzantine Italy in and around the Eighth Century,” Antiquity 86 (2012), 444–55.Google Scholar
Bakels, C. “Archaeobotanical Investigations in the Aisne Valley, Northern France, from the Neolithic to the Early Middle Ages,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 8 (1999), 71–7.Google Scholar
Bakels, C. “Crops Produced in the Southern Netherlands and Northern France during the Early Medieval Period,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 14 (2005), 394–99.Google Scholar
Bakels, C. “The Early History of the Cornflower (Centaurea cyanus) in the Netherlands,” Acta Palaeobotanica 52 (2012), 25–31.Google Scholar
Bakels, C. The Western European Loess Belt (Dordrecht, 2009).Google Scholar
Baker, H. “The Evolution of Weeds,” Annual Review of Ecological Systems 5 (1974), 1–24.Google Scholar
Beck, B. “Jardin monastique, jardin mystique,” Revue d’histoire de la pharmacie 88 (2000), 377–91.Google Scholar
Beinart, W. and Middleton, K.. “Plant Transfers in Historical Perspective.” Environment and History 10 (2004), 3–29.Google Scholar
Belser, J. Power, Ethics, and Ecology in Jewish Late Antiquity (Cambridge, 2015).Google Scholar
Belting, H. “Die beiden Palastaulen Leos III. im Lateran und die Enstehung einer päpstliche Programmkunst,” Frühmittelalterliche Studien 12 (1978), 55–83.Google Scholar
Belting, H. “Die Einhardsbogen,” Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte 36 (1973), 93–121.Google Scholar
Bennett, B. “A Global History of Species Introduction and Invasion,” Environments of Empire, ed. Kirchberger, U. and Bennett, B. (Chapel Hill, 2020), 224–45.Google Scholar
Bergmann, R. “Volkssprachige Wörter innerhalb lateinische Texte,” Die althochdeutsche und altsächsische Glossographie 1, ed. Bergmann, R. and Stricker, S. (Berlin, 2009), 938–44.Google Scholar
Bianchi, G. and Grassi, S.. “Sistemi di stoccaggio nelle campagne italiane (sec. VII–XIII),” in Horrea, Barns, and Silos: Storage and Incomes in Early Medieval Europe, ed. Vigil-Escalera Guirado, A. et al. (Bilbao, 2013), 77–102.Google Scholar
Birkhan, H. Pflanzen im Mittelalter (Vienna, 2012).Google Scholar
Bloor, D. “Durkheim and Mauss Revisited,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 13.4 (1982), 267–97.Google Scholar
Bloor, D. Knowledge and Social Imagery (London, 1976).Google Scholar
Bogaard, A., et al. “An Index of Weed Size for Assessing the Soil Productivity of Ancient Crops,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 7 (1998), 17–22.Google Scholar
Bolgia, C. “The Mosaics of Gregory IV at S. Marco, Rome,” Speculum 81 (2006), 1–34.Google Scholar
Bonin, T. “Le site de Chessy et l’occupation du sol en Île-de-France (VIe–Xe siècles),” Archéologie médiévale 29 (2000), 1–68.Google Scholar
Borst, A. Das Buch der Naturgeschichte: Plinius und seine Leser im Zeitalter des Pergaments (Heidelberg, 1994).Google Scholar
Borst, A. Die karolingische Kalenderreform (Hanover, 1998).Google Scholar
Borst, A. Der Streit um den karolingischen Kalender (Hanover, 2004).Google Scholar
Botkin, D. The Moon in the Nautilus Shell (Oxford, 2012).Google Scholar
Bowker, G. and Star, S., Sorting Things Out (Cambridge, MA, 1999).Google Scholar
Brombacher, C., et al. “Bronzezeitliche und mittelalterliche Pflanzenfunde aus dem Kloster St. Johann in Müstair,” in Müstair, Kloster St. Johann 4, ed. Sennhauser, H. (Zurich, 2007), 75–98.Google Scholar
Brown, P. Augustine of Hippo (Berkeley, 2000).Google Scholar
Bruand, O. Voyageurs et marchandises aux temps des Carolingiens (Brussels, 2002).Google Scholar
Brun, C. “Biodiversity Changes in Highly Anthropogenic Environments (Cultivated and Ruderal) since the Neolithic in Eastern France,” The Holocene 19.6 (2009), 861–71.Google Scholar
Buchet, L. “Apports de l’anthropologie en matière de démographie et de dynamique de l’occupation des sols dans l’occident des IVe–VIIIe sièces,” Antiquité tardive 20 (2012), 75–85.Google Scholar
Buonincontri, M. “Farming in a Rural Settlement in Central Italy,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 23 (2014), 775–88.Google Scholar
Buonincontri, M., et al. “Multiproxy Approach to the Study of Medieval Food Habits in Tuscany,” Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 9 (2017), 653–71.Google Scholar
Buonincontri, M., et al. “Shaping Mediterranean Landscapes,” The Holocene 30 (2020), 1420–37.Google Scholar
Burbank, J. and Cooper, F.. Empires in World History (Princeton, 2010).Google Scholar
Burrus, V. Ancient Christian Ecopoetics (Philadelphia, 2019).Google Scholar
Butzer, K. “The Classical Tradition of Agronomical Science,” in Science in Western and Eastern Civilization in Carolingian Times, ed. Butzer, P. and Lohrmann, D. (Basel, 1993), 539–96.Google Scholar
Cabrol, F. and Leclercq, H.. Dictionnaire d’archéologie chrétienne et de liturgie, 15 vols. (Paris, 1907–53).Google Scholar
Caillet, J. L’art carolingien (Paris, 2005).Google Scholar
Campbell, D. “The ‘Capitulare de Villis,’ the ‘Brevium Exempla,’ and the Carolingian Court at Aachen,” Early Medieval Europe 18 (2010), 243–64.Google Scholar
Campkin, B. “Placing ‘Matter Out of Place’,” Architectural Theory Review 18 (2013), 46–61.Google Scholar
Camporesi, P. Il pane selvaggio (Bologna, 1983).Google Scholar
Cândido, da Silva, M. “L’économie morale carolingienne,” Médiévales 66 (2014), 159–78.Google Scholar
Carozzi, C. “La vie de saint Dagobert de Stenay,” Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire 62 (1984), 225–58.Google Scholar
Castiglioni, E. and Rottoli, M.. “Nogara, l’abitato di Molino di Sotto,” Nogara, ed. Saggioro, F. (Rome, 2011), 123–57.Google Scholar
Castiglioni, E., et al. “I resti archeobotanici,” in Archeologia a Monte Barro 2, ed. Brogiolo, G. P. and Castelletti, L. (Lecco, 2001), 223–47.Google Scholar
Catizone, P. and Zanin, G.. Malerbologia (Bologna, 2001).Google Scholar
Censier, D., et al., “Indices de productions au sein d’une communauté religieuse carolingienne,” Archéologie médiévale 48 (2018), 101–28.Google Scholar
Chadwick, H. Augustine of Hippo. A Life (Oxford, 2009).Google Scholar
Chevalier, A., et al. “Factors and Issues in Plant Choice,” in Plants and People: Choices and Diversity through Time, ed. Chevalier et al., A. (Oxford, 2014), 3–13.Google Scholar
Christie, N. “Charlemagne and the Renewal of Rome,” in Charlemagne, Empire, and Society, ed. Story, J. (Manchester, 2005), 167–82.Google Scholar
Clark, G. “Paradise for Pagans?” in Paradise in Antiquity, ed. Bockmuehl, M. and Stroumsa, G. (Cambridge, 2010), 166–78.Google Scholar
Clayton, M. “Weeds, People, and Contested Places,” Environment and History 9 (2003), 301–31.Google Scholar
Coates, P. American Perceptions of Immigrant and Invasive Species (Berkeley, 2007).Google Scholar
Collins, M. Medieval Herbals: The Illustrative Tradition (London, 2000).Google Scholar
Comet, G. “Les céréales du bas-empire au Moyen Âge,” in The Making of Feudal Agricultures?, ed. Barceló, M. and Sigaut, F. (Leiden, 2004), 120–76.Google Scholar
Comet, G. Le paysan et son outil (Rome, 1992).Google Scholar
Contreni, J. “The Patristic Legacy to c. 1000,” in The New Cambridge History of the Bible 2, ed. Marsden, R. and Matter, E. A. (Cambridge, 2012), 505–35.Google Scholar
Corbin, A. La fraîcheur de l’herbe (Paris, 2018).Google Scholar
Costambeys, M., et al. The Carolingian World (Cambridge, 2011).Google Scholar
Cox Miller, P. “The Little Blue Flower is Red,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 8 (2000), 213–36.Google Scholar
Crabtree, P. “Agricultural Innovation and Socio-economic Change in Early Medieval Europe,” World Archaeology 42.1 (2010), 122–36.Google Scholar
Crabtree, P., P., et al., “Environmental Evidence from Early Medieval Antwerp,” Quaternary International 460 (2017), 108–23.Google Scholar
Cronon, W. Changes in the Land (New Haven, 1983).Google Scholar
Crosby, A. The Columbian Exchange (Westport, CT, 1972).Google Scholar
Crosby, A. “Ecological Imperialism,” Texas Quarterly 21 (1978), 103–17.Google Scholar
Crosby, A. Ecological Imperialism (Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar
David, J. L’outil (Turnhout, 1997).Google Scholar
Davis, J. Charlemagne’s Practice of Empire (Cambridge, 2015).Google Scholar
Davis, M., et al., “Don’t Judge Species on their Origins,” Nature 474 (June 9, 2011), 153–4.Google Scholar
de Jong, M. “Carolingian Political Discourse and the Biblical Past,” in The Resources of the Past in Early Medieval Europe, edGantner et al., . C. (Cambridge, 2015), 87–102.Google Scholar
de Jong, M. “The Empire as Ecclesia,” in The Uses of the Past in the Early Middle Ages, ed. Hen, Y. and Innes, M. (Cambridge, 2009), 191–226.Google Scholar
de Jong, M. The Penitential State (Cambridge, 2009).Google Scholar
Delatte, A. Herbarius (Brussels, 1961).Google Scholar
Deliyannis, D. Ravenna in late Antiquity (Cambridge, 2010).Google Scholar
Della Dora, V. Landscape, Nature, and the Sacred in Byzantium (Cambridge, 2016).Google Scholar
Delogu, P. “L’ambiente altomedievale come tema storiografico,” in Agricoltura e ambiente attraverso l’età romana e l’alto medioevo, ed. Nanni, P. (Florence, 2012), 67–108.Google Scholar
Delogu, P. “The Popes and Their Town in the Age of Charlemagne,” in Encounters, Excavations and Argosies, ed. Moreland, J. et al. (Oxford, 2017), 106–15.Google Scholar
Delogu, P. “Rome in the Ninth Century,” in Post-Roman Towns, Trade and Settlement in Europe and Byzantium 1, ed. Henning, J. (Berlin, 2007), 105–22.Google Scholar
Delumeau, J. “Que reste-t-il du paradis?,” Rivista di storia e letteratura religiosa 48 (2012), 221–48.Google Scholar
Dendle, P. “Plants in the Early Medieval Cosmos,” in Health and Healing from the Medieval Garden, ed. Dendle, P. and Touwaide, A. (Woodbridge, 2008), 47–60.Google Scholar
Depreux, P. “Ambitions et limites des réformes culturelles à l’époque carolingienne,” Revue historique 623 (2002), 721–53.Google Scholar
Devroey, J. “La céréaliculture dans le monde franc,” Settimane del CISAM 37 (Spoleto, 1990), 221–53.Google Scholar
Devroey, J. Économie rurale et société dans l’Europe franque (VIe–IXe siècles) (Paris, 2003).Google Scholar
Devroey, J. “Mise en valeur du sol et cycles de culture dans le système domanial (VIIIe–Xe siècle) entre Seine et Rhin,” in Cultures temporaires et féodalité, ed. Viader, R. and Rendu, C. (Toulouse, 2014), 33–57.Google Scholar
Devroey, J. La nature et le roi (Paris, 2019).Google Scholar
Devroey, J. “La politique annonaire carolingienne comme question économique, religieuse, et morale,” Settimane del CISAM 63 (Spoleto, 2016), 299–351.Google Scholar
Devroey, J. Puissants et misérables (Brussels, 2006).Google Scholar
Devroey, J. and Nissen, A., “Early Middle Ages, 500–1000,” in Struggling with the Environment: Land Use and Productivity, ed. Thoen, E. and Soens, T. (Turnhout, 2015), 11–68.Google Scholar
Dey, H. The Afterlife of the Roman City (Cambridge, 2015).Google Scholar
Dey, H. “Politics, Patronage and the Transmission of Construction Techniques in Early Medieval Rome, c. 650–750,” Papers of the British School at Rome 87 (2019), 177–205.Google Scholar
Di Palma, V. Wasteland: A History (New Haven, 2014).Google Scholar
Di Pasquale, G., et al., “Human-Derived Landscape Changes on the Northern Etruria Coast (Western Italy) between Roman Times and the Late Middle Ages,” The Holocene 24.11 (2014), 1491–1502.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. Purity and Danger (London, 1985).Google Scholar
Duby, G. Rural Economy and Country Life in the Medieval West (Columbia, SC, 1968).Google Scholar
Durand, A. “L’émergence d’outils empruntés aux sciences biologiques végétales en archéologie médiévale en France,” in Trente ans d’archéologie médiévale en France, ed. Chapelot, J. (Caen, 2010), 25–38.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É. and Mauss, M., “De quelques formes primitives de classification,” L’année sociologique 6 (1903), 1–72.Google Scholar
Dutton, P. Charlemagne’s Mustache and Other Cultural Clusters of a Dark Age (New York, 2004).Google Scholar
Egleston Robbins, F. The Hexaemeral Literature (Chicago, 1912).Google Scholar
Englisch, B. “Karolingische Reformkalender und die Fixierung des christlichen Zeitrechnung,” in Computus and its Cultural Context in the Latin West, ed. Warntjens, I. and Ó Cróinin, D. (Turnhout, 2010), 238–58.Google Scholar
Espinosa, A. “A New Classification of the Fundamental Elements of the Tar-Baby Story on the Basis of Two Hundred and Sixty-Seven Versions,” Journal of American Folklore 56 (1943), 31–7.Google Scholar
Etienne, D., et al. “Searching for Ancient Forests,” The Holocene 23.5 (2013), 678–91.Google Scholar
Etienne, D., et al. “Two Thousand Year Reconstruction of Livestock Production Intensity in France,” The Holocene 25.9 (2015), 1384–93.Google Scholar
Everett, N. The Alphabet of Galen (Toronto, 2012).Google Scholar
Everett, N. “The Manuscript Evidence for Pharmacy in the Early Middle Ages,” in Writing the Early Middle Ages, ed. Screen, E. and West, C. (Cambridge, 2018), 115–30.Google Scholar
Ferdière, A., et al. Histoire de l’agriculture en Gaule, 500 av. JC–1000 apr. JC (Paris, 2006).Google Scholar
Ferrero, A., and Casini, P., “Mezzi meccanici,” in Malerbologia, ed. Catizone, P. and Zanin, G. (Bologna, 2001), 251–62.Google Scholar
Fiege, M. “The Weedy West,” Western Historical Quarterly 36 (2005), 23–47.Google Scholar
Firbank, L. “Agrostemma Githago L.,” Journal of Ecology 76 (1988), 232–46.Google Scholar
Fleischer, J. “Living Rocks and Locus Amoenus: Architectural Representations of Paradise in Early Christianity,” in The Appearances of Medieval Rituals, ed. Petersen, N. Holger et al. (Turnhout, 2004), 149–71.Google Scholar
Flint, V. The Rise of Magic in Early Medieval Europe (Princeton, 1991).Google Scholar
Forni, G. “Innovazione e progresso nel mondo romano: il caso dell’agricoltura,” in Innovazione tecnica e progresso economico nel mondo romano, ed. Lo Cascio, E. (Bari, 2006), 145–79.Google Scholar
Fossier, R. Polyptyques et censiers (Turnhout, 1978).Google Scholar
Fourche, R. “Les nuisibles, symbole inamovible de l’utilitarianisme agricole?,” Sales bêtes! Mauvaises herbes!, ed. Luglia, R. (Rennes, 2017), 297–310.Google Scholar
Fox, M. “Alcuin the Exegete,” in The Study of the Bible in the Carolingian Era, ed. Chazelle, C. and Van Name, B. Edwards, (Turnhout, 2003), 39–51.Google Scholar
Foxhall, L., et al., “Human Ecology in the Classical Landscape,” in Classical Archaeology, ed. Alcock, S. and Osborne, R. (Oxford, 2012), 91–121.Google Scholar
Frawley, J. and McCalman, I., “Invasion Ecologies: The Nature/Culture Challenge,” in Rethinking Invasion Ecologies from the Environmental Humanities, ed. Frawley, J. and McCalman, I. (Abingdon, 2014), 3–14.Google Scholar
Fried, J. Charlemagne (Cambridge, MA, 2016).Google Scholar
Fried, J. “Karl der Grosse, Rom und Aachen,” in Von Kreuzburg nach München, ed. Hartmann, M. and Märtl, C. (Cologne, 2013), 99–157.Google Scholar
Frühe, U. Das Paradies ein Garten- der Garten ein Paradies (Frankfurt, 2002).Google Scholar
Galil, B., et al. “Mare Nostrum, Mare Quod Invaditur: The History of Bioinvasion in the Mediterranean Sea,” in Histories of Bioinvasion in the Mediterranean, ed. Queiroz, A. and Pooley, S. (Cham, 2018), 21–49.Google Scholar
Ganz, D. “Carolingian Bibles,” in The New Cambridge History of the Bible 2, ed. Marsden, R. and Matter, E. A. (Cambridge, 2012), 325–37.Google Scholar
Garipzanov, I. The Symbolic Language of Authority in the Carolingian World (Leiden, 2008).Google Scholar
Garrison, M. “The Franks as the New Israel?” in The Uses of the Past in the Early Middle Ages, ed. Hen, Y. and Innes, M. (Cambridge, 2000), 114–61.Google Scholar
Gatto, A., et al. “Population Structure of Cynara cardunculus Complex and the Origin of the Conspecific Crops Artichoke and Cardoon,” Annals of Botany 112 (2013), 855–65.Google Scholar
Gaulin, J. “Traditions et pratiques de la littérature agronomique pendant le haut Moyen Âge,” Settimane del CISAM 37 (Spoleto, 1990), 103–35.Google Scholar
Geary, P. “Ethnic Identity as a Situational Construct in the Early Middle Ages,” Mitteilungen der anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien 113 (1983), 15–26.Google Scholar
Géczi, J. The Rose and its Symbols in Mediterranean Antiquity (Veszprém, 2011).Google Scholar
Giertz, W. and Ristow, S., “Goldtessellae und Fensterglas,” Antike Welt 44.5 (2013), 59–66.Google Scholar
Giunta, D. “I mosaici dell’arco absidale della basilica dei SS. Nereo e Achilleo e l’eresia Adozianista del secolo VIII,” in Roma e l’età carolingia (Rome, 1976), 195–200.Google Scholar
Glacken, C. Traces on the Rhodian Shore (Berkeley, 1967).Google Scholar
Godinho, I. “Les definitions d’adventice et de mauvaise herbe,” Weed Research 24 (1984), 121–25.Google Scholar
Goodson, C. Cultivating the City in Early Medieval Italy (Cambridge, 2021).Google Scholar
Goodson, C. “Garden Cities in Early Medieval Italy,” in Italy and Medieval Europe, ed. Balzaretti, R. et al. (Oxford, 2018), 339–55.Google Scholar
Goodson, C. “Material Memory: Rebuilding the Basilica of S. Cecilia in Trastevere, Rome,” Early Medieval Europe 15 (2007), 2–34.Google Scholar
Goodson, C. The Rome of Paschal I (Cambridge, 2010).Google Scholar
Gorman, M. “The Commentary on Genesis of Angelomus of Turin and Biblical Studies under Lothar,” Studi medievali 40.2 (1999), 559–631.Google Scholar
Gorman, M. “The Commentary on Genesis of Claudius of Turin and Biblical Studies under Louis the Pious,” Speculum 72 (1997), 279–329.Google Scholar
Goullet, M. “L’imaginaire du jardin monastique,” Pris-Ma 26 (2010), 43–73.Google Scholar
Grainge, C. “Assarting and the Dynamics of Rhineland Economies in the Ninth Century,” Agricultural History Review 54 (2006), 1–23.Google Scholar
Gravel, M. Distances, rencontres, communications: réaliser l’empire sous Charlemagne et Louis le Pieux (Turnhout, 2012).Google Scholar
Greenblatt, S. Renaissance Self-Fashioning (Chicago, 1980).Google Scholar
Greenblatt, S. The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve (New York, 2017).Google Scholar
Grieco, A. “The Social Politics of Pre-Linnaean Botanical Classification,” I Tatti Studies 4 (1991), 131–49.Google Scholar
Griffin-Kremer, C. “Humble Plants,” in Plants and People: Choices and Diversity through Time, ed. Chevalier, A. et al. (Oxford, 2014), 270–5.Google Scholar
Gronau, K. Poseidonios und die jüdisch-christliche Genesisexegese (Leipzig, 1914).Google Scholar
Guilbert, P. “Étude des pollens prélevées dans les couches archéologiques de Villiers-le-Sec,” in Un village au temps de Charlemagne (Paris, 1988), 196–8.Google Scholar
Guizard-Duchamp, F. Les terres du sauvage dans le monde franc (IVe–IX siècle) (Rennes, 2009).Google Scholar
Gunderson, L., et al. “The Evolution of an Idea,” in Foundations of Ecological Resilience, ed. Gunderson, L. (Washington, DC, 2012), 423–44.Google Scholar
Gunther, R. The Greek Herbal of Dioscurides (Oxford, 1934).Google Scholar
Guthrie-Smith, H. Tutira: The Story of a New Zealand Sheep Station (Seattle, 1999).Google Scholar
Haas, J. Die Umweltkrise der 3. Jahrhundert n. Chr. im nordwesten des Imperium Romanum (Stuttgart, 2006).Google Scholar
Hall, M. “The Native, Naturalized, and Exotic,” Landscape Research 28 (2003), 5–9.Google Scholar
Halstead, P. Two Oxen Ahead (Chichester, 2014).Google Scholar
Hammer, C. Charlemagne’s Months and Their Bavarian Labors (Oxford, 1997).Google Scholar
Harlan, J. Crops and Man (Madison, 1992).Google Scholar
Hartmann, W. Die Synoden der Karolingerzeit im Frankreich und Italien (Paderborn, 1989).Google Scholar
Hartmann-Shenkman, A., et al. “Invading a New Niche,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 24 (2015), 9–18.Google Scholar
Head, L. Ingrained (Farnham, 2012).Google Scholar
Head, L. “Living in a Weedy Future,” in Rethinking Invasion Ecologies from the Environmental Humanities, ed. Frawley, J. and McCalman, I. (London, 2014), 87–99.Google Scholar
Heber-Suffrin, F. “L’acanthe dans le décor architectural carolingien,” in L’acanthe dans la sculpture monumentale de l’antiquité à la Renaissance (Paris, 1993), 189–210.Google Scholar
Henning, J. “Did the ‘Agricultural Revolution’ Go East with Carolingian Conquest?” in The Baiuvarii and Thuringii, ed. Fries-Knoblauch, J. et al. (Woodbridge, 2014), 331–59.Google Scholar
Henning, J. “Germanisch-romanisch Agrarkontinuität und -diskontinuität in nordalpinen Kontinentaleuropa,” in Akkulturation, ed. Hägermann, D. et al. (Berlin, 2004), 396–435.Google Scholar
Henning, J. “Revolution or Relapse?” in The Langobards before the Frankish Conquest, ed. Ausenda, G. et al. (San Marino, 2009), 149–64.Google Scholar
Henning, J. Südosteuropa zwischen Antike und Mittelalter (Berlin, 1987).Google Scholar
Henry, N. “The Lily and the Thorns: Augustine’s Refutation of the Donatist Exegesis of the Song of Songs,” Revue des études augustiniennes 42 (1996), 255–66.Google Scholar
Herbig, C. and Sirocko, F.. “Palaeobotanical Evidence of Agricultural Activities in the Eifel Region during the Holocene,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 22 (2013), 447–62.Google Scholar
Hillman, G. “Phytosociology and Ancient Weed Floras,” in Modeling Ecological Change, ed. Harris, D. and Thomas, K. (London, 1991), 27–40.Google Scholar
Hodges, R. Dark Age Economics (London, 2012).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, R. An Environmental History of Medieval Europe (Cambridge, 2014).Google Scholar
Holt, J. “Weeds,” in Encyclopedia of Biological Invasions, ed. Simberloff, D. and Remánek, M. (Berkeley, 2011), 692–8.Google Scholar
Holm, L. et al. World Weeds: Natural Histories and Distribution (New York, 1997).Google Scholar
Hondelmann, W. Die Kulturpflanzen der griechisch-römischen Welt (Berlin, 2002).Google Scholar
Horn, W. and Born, E.. The Plan of St. Gall 2 (Berkeley, 1979).Google Scholar
Hulme, P. et al. “Evidence of Bias and Error in Understanding Plant Invasion Impact,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 28.4 (2013), 212–18.Google Scholar
Innes, M. “Memory, Orality and Literacy in Early Medieval Society,” Past and Present 158 (1998), 3–35.Google Scholar
James, L. Mosaics in the Medieval World (Cambridge, 2017).Google Scholar
Jesset, S. “Les formes de l’exploitation rurale du IXe au IXe siècle,” in Lumières de l’an mil en Orléanais (Turnhout, 2004), 89–93.Google Scholar
Jones, G. “Weed Ecology as a Method for the Archaeobotanical Recognition of Crop Husbandry Practices,” Acta Archaeobotanica 42 (2002), 185–92.Google Scholar
Jones, G., et al. “Crops and Weeds,” Journal of Archaeological Science 37 (2010), 70–7.Google Scholar
Jones, M. “Dormancy and the Plough,” in From Foragers to Farmers, ed. Fairbairn, A. and Weiss, E. (Oxford, 2009), 58–63.Google Scholar
Jones, R. “Manure and the Medieval Social Order,” in Land and People, ed. Allen, M. et al. (Oxford, 2009), 215–25.Google Scholar
Jouffroy-Bapicot, I., et al. “7000 Years of Vegetation History and Landscape Changes in the Morvan Mountains (France),” The Holocene 23.12 (2013), 1888–1902.Google Scholar
Juster, A. Saint Aldhelm’s Riddles (Toronto, 2015).Google Scholar
Kahn, S. “‘Ego sum flos campi’: Die Blume als theologisches Konzept im Bild des Mittelalters,” Marburger Jahrbuch für Kunstwissenschaft 33 (2006), 29–57.Google Scholar
Karg, S. “Plant Diversity in the Late Medieval Cornfields of Northern Switzerland,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 4 (1995), 41–50.Google Scholar
Kästner, H. “Pseudo-Dioscurides De Herbis Femininis,” Hermes 3 (1896).Google Scholar
Kelly, F. Early Irish Farming (Dublin, 2000).Google Scholar
Keppels, J. Karl der Grosse: Heilkunde, Heilkräuter, Hospitalitas (Aachen, 2005).Google Scholar
Kershaw, P. Peaceful Kings: Peace, Power and the Early Medieval Political Imagination (Oxford, 2011).Google Scholar
Kessler, H. “‘Hic Homo Formatur’: The Genesis Frontispieces of the Carolingian Bibles,” Art Bulletin 53 (1971), 143–60.Google Scholar
Kessler, H. The Illustrated Bibles from Tours (Princeton, 1977).Google Scholar
King, L. “Some Early Forms of the Weed Concept,” Nature 179 (June 29, 1957), 1366.Google Scholar
King, L. Weeds of the World (New York, 1966).Google Scholar
Kingsbury, N. Hybrid (Chicago, 2009).Google Scholar
Kjaergaard, T. “A Plant that Changed the World,” Landscape Research 28 (2003), 41–9.Google Scholar
Knörzer, K. Geschichte der synanthropen Flora im Niederrheingebiet (Mainz, 2007).Google Scholar
Kramer, R. Rethinking Authority in the Carolingian Empire (Amsterdam, 2019).Google Scholar
Kreiner, J. Legions of Pigs in the Early Medieval West (New Haven, 2020).Google Scholar
Kreuz, A. “Frühgermanische Landwirtschaft und Ernährung,” in Germanen, ed. Uelsberg, G. and Wemhoff, M. (Berlin, 2020), 118–45.Google Scholar
Krüssmann, G. The Complete Book of Roses (Portland, OR, 1981).Google Scholar
Lancel, S. Saint Augustin (Paris, 1999).Google Scholar
Landgraf, E. “Ein frühmittelalterlicher Botanicus,” Kyklos 1 (1928), 114–46.Google Scholar
Lane Fox, R. Augustine: Conversion to Confessions (New York, 2015).Google Scholar
Lassère, J. Africa, quasi Roma (256 av. J-C–711 ap. J-C) (Paris, 2015).Google Scholar
Lauwers, M. “Le ‘travail’ sans la domination?” in Penser la paysannerie médiévale, un défi impossible?, ed. Dierkens, A. et al. (Paris, 2017), 303–32.Google Scholar
Le Floc’h, E. “Invasive Plants of the Mediterranean Basin,” in Biogeography of Mediterranean Invasions, ed. Groves, R. and di Castro, F. (Cambridge, 1991),Google Scholar
Leja, M. “The Sacred Art,” Viator 47 (2016), 1–34.Google Scholar
Leonti, M. et al. “Wild Gathered Food Plants in the European Mediterranean,” Economic Botany 60 (2006), 130–42.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. A Sand County Almanac (New York, 1949).Google Scholar
Leopold, A. “What Is a Weed?” in River of the Mother of God and Other Essays (Madison, 1992), 306–9.Google Scholar
Leroy Ladurie, E. Les paysans de Languedoc (Paris, 1966).Google Scholar
Livarda, A. “Spicing up Life in Northwestern Europe,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 20 (2011), 143–64.Google Scholar
Lodwick, L. “Arable Weed Seeds as Indicators of Cereal Provenance,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 27 (2018), 801–15.Google Scholar
Lohrmann, D. “Alkuins Korrespondenz mit Karl dem Grossen über Kalender und Astronomie,” in Science in Western and Eastern Civilization in Carolingian Times, ed. Butzer, P. and Lohrmann, D. (Basel, 1993), 79–114.Google Scholar
Longnon, A. Polyptyque de l’abbaye de Saint-Germain des Prés redigé aux temps de l’abbé Irminon 1 (Paris, 1895).Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea (Cambridge, MA, 1957).Google Scholar
Loveluck, C. Northwest Europe in the Early Middle Ages, c. ad 600–1150 (Cambridge, 2013).Google Scholar
Luchterhandt, M. “Rinascita a Roma, nell’Italia carolingia e meridionale,” Storia dell’architettura italiana 2, ed. de Blaauw, S. (Milan, 2010), 322–73.Google Scholar
Mabey, R. Weeds (London, 2012).Google Scholar
McClendon, C. The Origins of Medieval Architecture (New Haven, 2005).Google Scholar
MacCormack, S. The Shadows of Poetry (Berkeley, 1998).Google Scholar
McCormick, M. Origins of the European Economy: Communications and Commerce, ad 300–900 (Cambridge, 2002).Google Scholar
McGrade, M. “O Rex Mundi Triumphator,” Early Music History 17 (1998), 183–219.Google Scholar
McGregor, J. Back to the Garden (New Haven, 2015).Google Scholar
Mack, R. “The Commercial Seed Trade: An Early Dispenser of Weeds in the United States,” Economic Botany 55 (2001), 257–73.Google Scholar
McKerracher, M. Anglo-Saxon Crops and Weeds (Oxford, 2019).Google Scholar
McKerracher, M. “Bread and Surpluses,” Environmental Archaeology 21 (2016), 88–102.Google Scholar
Mackie, G. “Abstract and Vegetal Design in the San Zeno Chapel, Rome,” Papers of the British School at Rome 63 (1995), 159–82.Google Scholar
McKitterick, R. “Akkulturation and the Writing of History in the Early Middle Ages,” in Akkulturation, ed. Hägermann, D. et al. (Berlin, 2004), 381–95.Google Scholar
McKitterick, R. Charlemagne (Cambridge, 2008).Google Scholar
McNeill, J. “Europe’s Place in the Global History of Biological Exchange,” Landscape Research 28 (2003), 33–9.Google Scholar
McNeill, J. and Gamer, H., Medieval Handbooks of Penance (New York, 1990).Google Scholar
MacQueen, H. “Canon Law, Custom, and Legislation: Law in the Reign of Alexander II,” in The Reign of Alexander II, 1214–49, ed. Oram, R. (Leiden, 2005), 221–51.Google Scholar
Maggiulli, G. and Buffa Giolito, M.. L’altro Apuleio (Naples, 1996).Google Scholar
Maguire, H. Nectar and Illusion: Nature in Byzantine Art and Culture (Oxford, 2012).Google Scholar
Mane, P. Le travail à la campagne au Moyen Âge: étude iconographique (Paris, 2006).Google Scholar
Marder, M. The Philosopher’s Plant: An Intellectual Herbarium (New York, 2014).Google Scholar
Marsh, G. Man and Nature (New York, 1865).Google Scholar
Meens, R. “Politics, Mirrors for Princes and the Bible,” Early Medieval Europe 7 (1999), 345–57.Google Scholar
Mitterauer, M. Why Europe? The Medieval Origins of Its Special Path (Chicago, 2010).Google Scholar
Moe, D. and Fedele, F.. “Alpe Borghetto,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 28 (2019), 141–62.Google Scholar
Moesch, S. Augustine and the Art of Ruling in the Carolingian Imperial Period (London, 2020).Google Scholar
Montanari, M. L’alimentazione contadina nell’alto medioevo (Naples, 1979).Google Scholar
Mordek, H. “Karls des Grossen zweites Kapitular von Herstal und die Hungersnote der Jahre 778/779,” Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters 61 (2005), 1–52.Google Scholar
Moreland, J. “The Carolingian Empire,” in Empires, ed. Alcock, S. (Cambridge, 2002), 392–418.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Y. “L’assolement triennial au haut Moyen Âge,” in Économie rurale et économie urbaine au Moyen Âge, ed. Devroey, J. and Morimoto, Y. (Ghent, 1994), 91–125.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Y. “In ebdomada operatur, quicquid precipetur ei,” in Études sur l’économie rurale du haut Moyen Âge (Brussels, 2008), 381–96.Google Scholar
Murray, O. “The Idea of the Shepherd King from Cyrus to Charlemagne,” in Latin Poetry and the Classical Tradition, ed. Godman, P. and Murray, O. (Oxford, 1990), 1–15.Google Scholar
Musäus, I. Der Pandoramythos bei Hesiod und seine Rezeption bis Erasmus von Rotterdam (Göttingen, 2004).Google Scholar
Mütherich, F. “Die Erneurerung der Buchmalerei am Hof Karls des Grossen,” in 799: Kunst und Kultur der Karolingerzeit, ed. Stiegemann, C. and Wernhoff, M. (Mainz, 1999), 560–609.Google Scholar
Mütherich, F. and Gaehde, J.. Carolingian Painting (New York, 1976).Google Scholar
Neson, J. “History-Writing,” in Historiograhie im frühen Mittelalter, ed. Scharer, A. and Scheibelreiter, G. (Vienna, 1994), 435–42.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. “Charlemagne and Ravenna,” in Ravenna, ed. Herrin, J. and Nelson, J. (London, 2016), 239–52.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. “The Church and a Revaluation of Work in the Ninth Century?,” in The Use and Abuse of Time in Christian History, ed. Swanson, R. (Woodbridge, 2002), 35–43.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. King and Emperor (Berkeley, 2019).Google Scholar
Newfield, T. “The Contours, Frequency, and Causation of Subsistence Crises in Carolingian Europe (750–950),” in Crises alimentarias en la edad media, ed. I Monclús, P. Benito (Lleida, 2013), 117–72.Google Scholar
Niederer, M. Der St. Galler “Botanicus”: Ein frühmittlelaterliches Herbar (Bern, 2005).Google Scholar
Nilgen, U. “Apsismosaik von SS. Nereo ed Achilleo,” in 799: Kunst und Kultur der Karolingerreich, ed. Stiegemann, C. and Wemhoff, M. (Mainz, 1999), 638–40.Google Scholar
Nilgen, U. “Die römischen Apsisprogramme der karolingischen Epoche,” in 799: Kunst und Kultur der Karolingerreich, ed. Stiegemann, C. and Wemhoff, M. (Mainz, 1999), 542–50.Google Scholar
Nitz, H. “The Church as Colonist,” Journal of Historical Geography 9 (1983), 105–26.Google Scholar
Noble, T. Images, Iconoclasm, and the Carolingians (Philadelphia, 2009).Google Scholar
Oesterley, W. The Gospel Parables in the Light of Their Jewish Background (New York, 1936).Google Scholar
Olmstead, A. and Rhode, P.. Creating Abundance (Cambridge, 2008).Google Scholar
Osborne, J. Rome in the Eighth Century (Cambridge, 2020).Google Scholar
Palmer, J. “Calculating Time and the End of Time in the Carolingian World,” English Historical Review 126 (2011), 1307–31.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. “Climates of Crisis,” Viator 48 (2017), 1–20.Google Scholar
Pals, J. and van Geel, B.. “Rye Cultivation and the Presence of Cornflower,” Berichten van de Rijkdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek 26 (1976), 199–203.Google Scholar
Parolo, C. Immagini del tempo degli uomini, immagini del tempo degli dei (Oxford, 2017).Google Scholar
Paxton, F. “Curing Bodies, Curing Souls,” Journal of the History of Medicine 50 (1995), 230–52.Google Scholar
Pearce, F. The New Wild (London, 2015).Google Scholar
Pérez-Díaz, S., et al. “A Palaeoenvironmental and Palaeoeconomic Approach to the Early Middle Age Record from the Village of Gasleiz,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 24 (2015), 683–97.Google Scholar
Peytremann, E. Archéologie de l’habitat rural dans le nord de la France du IVe au XIIe siècle (Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 2003).Google Scholar
Peytremann, E. and Wiethold, S.. “L’apport de la carpologie à l’étude du site du premier Moyen Âge (VIe–XIIe siècle) de Sermersheim (Bas-Rhin),” in Des hommes aux champs, ed. Carpentier, V. and Marcigny, C. (Rennes, 2012), 195–212.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. “Runcina,” in Brill’s New Pauly 12 (Leiden, 2008), 781.Google Scholar
Piron, S. “Ève au fuseau, Adam jardinier,” in Adam: la nature humaine avant et après, ed. Rosier-Catach, I. and Bruguglia, G. (Paris, 2016), 283–323.Google Scholar
Pohle, F. Die Erforschung der karolingischen Pfalz Aachen (Darmstadt, 2015).Google Scholar
Poirier, N. “La dynamique du peuplement et des espaces agraires médiévaux en Berry,” Archéologie médiévale 40 (2010), 15–32.Google Scholar
Pollard, E. “Pliny’s ‘Natural History’ and the Flavian Templum Pacis,” Journal of World History 20 (2009), 309–38.Google Scholar
Ponta-Zitterer, B. “Blüten in der karolingischen Flechsteinkunst in Karantanien,” Carinthia I 207 (2017), 45–62.Google Scholar
Poque, S. Le langage symbolique dans la prédication d’Augustin d’Hippone 1 (Paris, 1984).Google Scholar
Postles, D. “Cleaning the Medieval Arable,” Agricultural History Review 37 (1989), 130–43.Google Scholar
Potter, J. The Rose (London, 2010).Google Scholar
Preiss, S., et al. “Approche des pratiques agricoles durant le haut Moyen Âge en Hesbaye,” in Plantes, produits végéteaux et ravageurs, ed. Dietsch-Sellami, M. et al. (Bordeaux, 2016), 155–82.Google Scholar
Probst, R. Wolladventivflora Mitteleuropas (Solothurn, 1949).Google Scholar
Querrien, A., et al. “Évolution et exploitation du paysage végétale au Moyen Âge,” in Trente ans d’archéologie médiévale en France, ed. Chapelot, J. (Caen, 2010), 39–54.Google Scholar
Quirós Castillo, J. “Agrarian Archaeology in Early Medieval Europe,” Quaternary International 346 (2014), 1–6.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S. et al. Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants (Hoboken, NJ, 2007).Google Scholar
Reigniez, P. “Histoire et techniques: l’outil agricole dans la periode du haut Moyen Âge,” in The Making of Feudal Agricultures?, ed. Barceló, M. and Sigaut, F. (Leiden, 2004), 33–120.Google Scholar
Reveal, J. “What’s in a Name? Identifying Plants in Pre-Linnaean Botanical Literature,” in Prospecting for Drugs in Ancient and Medieval European Texts, ed. Holland, B. (Amsterdam, 1996), 57–90.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. “Empires: A Problem of Comparative History,” Historical Research 79 (2006), 151–65.Google Scholar
Rhodes, J. and Davidson, C.. “The Garden of Paradise,” in The Iconography of Paradise, ed. Davidson, C. (Kalamazoo, 1994), 69–109.Google Scholar
Ribémont, B. Les origines des encyclopédies médiévales (Paris, 2001).Google Scholar
Riddle, J. “Theory and Practice in Medieval Medicine,” Viator 5 (1974), 157–84.Google Scholar
Rindos, D. The Origins of Agriculture (Orlando, FL, 1984).Google Scholar
Ristow, S. “Alte Grabungen, neue Erkentnisse,” in 814 Karl der Grosse 2014, ed. Wamers, E. (Regensburg, 2016), 23–45.Google Scholar
Ritvo, H. The Platypus and the Mermaid, and Other Figments of the Classifying Imagination (Cambridge, MA, 1997).Google Scholar
Roberts, E. “Boundary Clauses and the Use of the Vernacular in Eastern Frankish Charters, c. 750–c. 900,” Historical Research 91 (2018), 580–604.Google Scholar
Rollason, D. The Power of Place: Rulers and their Palaces, Landscapes, Cities and Holy Places (Princeton, 2016).Google Scholar
Ros, J., et al. “Archaeobotanical Contribution to the History of Farming Practices in Medieval Northern Catalonia (8th–14th c.),” in Archaeology and History of Peasantries 1, ed. Quiros, J. Castillo, (Bilbao, 2020), 163–82.Google Scholar
Rösch, M. “Evidence for Rare Crop Weeds of the Caucalidion Group in Southwestern Germany since the Bronze Age,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 27 (2018), 75–84.Google Scholar
Rösch, M. “The History of Cereals in the Territory of the Former Duchy of Swabia (Herzogtum Schwaben) from the Roman to the Postmedieval Period,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 1 (1991), 193–231.Google Scholar
Rösch, M. “The History of Crops and Weeds in South-Western Germany from the Neolithic Period to Modern Times,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 7 (1998), 109–25.Google Scholar
Rösch, M. and Lechterbeck, J.. “Seven Millennia of Human Impact Reflected in a High Resolution Pollen Profile from the Profundal Sediments of Litzelsee, Lake Constance Region, Germany,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 25 (2016), 339–58.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, S. “Forming the Saeculum: The Desacralization of Nature and the Ability to Understand it in Augustine’s Literal Commentary on Genesis,” Studies in Church History 46 (2010), 1–14.Google Scholar
Rothschild, N. “Sovereignty, Virtue, and Disaster Management,” Environmental History 17 (2012), 783–812.Google Scholar
Rottoli, M. “Crop Diversity between Central Europe and the Mediterranean,” in Plants and People: Choices and Diversity through Time, ed. Chevalier, A. et al. (Oxford, 2014), 75–81.Google Scholar
Rottoli, M. “Reflections on Early Medieval Resources in North Italy,” Quaternary International 346 (2014), 20–7.Google Scholar
Ruas, M. “Alimentation végétale, pratiques agricoles et environnement du VIIe au Xe siècle,” in Un village au temps de Charlemagne (Paris, 1988), 201–11.Google Scholar
Ruas, M. “Aspects of Early Medieval Farming from Sites in Mediterranean France,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 14 (2005), 405–15.Google Scholar
Ruas, M. “La parole des grains,” in Plantes exploitées, plantes cultivées, ed. Durand, A. (Aix, 2007), 149–70.Google Scholar
Ruas, M. “Les plantes consommées au Moyen Âge en France méridionale d’après les semences archéologiques,” Archéologie du Midi médiévale 15–16 (1998).Google Scholar
Ruas, M. “Prés, prairies, pâtures: éclairages archéobotaniques,” in Prés et pâtures en Europe occidentale, ed. Brumont, F. (Toulouse, 2008), 13–44.Google Scholar
Ruas, M. and Pradat, B.. “Les semences découvertes,” in Les habitats carolingiens de Montours et la Chapelle-Saint-Aubert, ed. Catteddu, I. (Paris, 2001), 65–79.Google Scholar
Ruas, M., et al. “Les avoines dans les productions agro-pastorales du nord-ouest de la France,” in Des hommes aux champs, ed. Carpentier, V. and Marcigny, C. (Rennes, 2012), 327–65.Google Scholar
Ruas, M., “Vestiges élucidés d’un parasite des céréales,” in Plantes, produits végétaux et ravageurs, ed. Dietsch-Sellami, M. et al. (Bordeaux, 2016), 43–64.Google Scholar
Russell, E. Evolutionary History (Cambridge, 2011).Google Scholar
Sadoks, J. Crop Protection in Medieval Agriculture (Leiden, 2013).Google Scholar
Sadori, L., et al. “Climate, Environment and Society in Southern Italy during the Last 2000 Years,” Quaternary Science Reviews 136 (2016), 173–88.Google Scholar
Salisbury, E. Weeds and Aliens (London, 1961).Google Scholar
Sallares, R. The Ecology of the Ancient Greek World (London, 1991).Google Scholar
Salvadori, F. “The Transition from Late Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages in Italy,” Quaternary International 499 (2019), 35–48.Google Scholar
Sattin, M. and Tei, F.. “Malerbe componente dannosa degli agroecosistemi,” in Malerbologia, ed. Catizone, P. and Zanin, G. (Bologna, 2001), 171–245.Google Scholar
Saulnier, M., et al. “A Study of Late Holocene Local Vegetation Dynamics and Responses to Land Use Changes in an Ancient Charcoal Making Woodland in the Central Pyrenees (Ariége, France), Using Pedoanthracology,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 29 (2020), 249–58.Google Scholar
Scafi, A. “Epilogue: A Heaven on Earth,” in Paradise in Antiquity, ed. Bockmuehl, M. and Stroumsa, G. (Cambridge, 2010), 210–20.Google Scholar
Scafi, A. Mapping Paradise (Chicago, 2005).Google Scholar
Schönle, A. “Garden of the Empire: Catherine’s Appropriation of the Crimea,” Slavic Review 60 (2001), 1–23.Google Scholar
Scott, J. Against the Grain (New Haven, 2017).Google Scholar
Seaton, B. “Towards a Semiotics of Literary Flower Personification,” Poetics Today 10 (1989), 679–701.Google Scholar
Secord, J. “Overcoming Environmental Determinism: Introduced Species, Hybrid Plants and Animals, and Transformed Landscapes in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds,” in The Routledge Handbook of Identity and the Environment in the Classical and Medieval Worlds, ed. Futo, R. Kennedy, M. Jones-Lewis, (London, 2016), 210–29.Google Scholar
Senda, T. and Tominaga, T.. “Genetic Diversity of Darnel (Lolium temulentum) in Malo, Ethiopia,” Economic Botany 58 (2004), 568–77.Google Scholar
Shaw, B., B. Bringing in the Sheaves (Toronto, 2013).Google Scholar
Shemesh, A. “‘A Wheat May Change into a Zunin and a Male Hyena into a Bat,’” Arquivio Maaravi 11 (2017), 2–13.Google Scholar
Shimahara, S. “Charlemagne, premier souverain chrétien commenditaire d’exegèse biblique?” in Charlemagne: les temps, les espaces, les hommes, ed. Grosse, R. and Sot, M. (Turnhout, 2018), 101–17.Google Scholar
Shimahara, S. Haymon d’Auxerre, exégète carolingien (Turnhout, 2013).Google Scholar
Sigaut, F. L’agriculture et le feu (Paris, 1975).Google Scholar
Sigaut, F. “Crops and Agricultural Development in Western Europe,” in Plants and People: Choices and Diversity through Time, ed. Chevalier, A. et al. (Oxford, 2014), 107–12.Google Scholar
Sigaut, F. “L’evolution des techniques,” in The Making of Feudal Agricultures?, ed. Barceló, M. and Sigaut, F. (Leiden, 2004), 1–31.Google Scholar
Sigaut, F. “Le labour, qu’est-ce que c’est?,” in Nous labourons (Nantes, 2007), 21–8.Google Scholar
Sigerist, H. “Zum Herbarius Pseudo-Apulei,” Sudhoffs Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin 23 (1930), 197–209.Google Scholar
Sillasoo, Ü. “Medieval Plant Depictions as a Source for Archaeobotanical Research,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 16 (2005), 61–70.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. Invasive Species: What Everyone Needs to Know (Oxford, 2013).Google Scholar
Smith, B. The Parables of the Synoptic Gospels (Cambridge, 1937).Google Scholar
Sonnante, G., et al. “The Domestication of Artichoke and Cardoon,” Annals of Botany 100 (2007), 1095–1100.Google Scholar
Springsfeld, K. “Karl der Grosse, Alkuin, und die Zeitrechnung,” Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 27 (2004), 53–66.Google Scholar
Squatriti, P. “Barbarizing the Belpaese,” in A Companion to Ostrogothic Italy, ed. Arnold, J. et al. (Leiden, 2016), 390–421.Google Scholar
Squatriti, P. “Good and Bad Plants in Merovingian Francia,” in The Oxford Companion to the Merovingian World, ed. Effros, B. and Moreira, I. (Oxford, 2019), 717–38.Google Scholar
Squatriti, P. “Of Seeds, Seasons, and Seas,” Journal of Economic History 74 (2014), 1205–20.Google Scholar
Squatriti, P. “The Vegetative Mediterranean,” in A Companion to Mediterranean History, ed. Horden, P. and Kinoshita, S. (Chichester, 2014), 26–42.Google Scholar
Stancliffe, C. “Red, White, and Blue Martyrdom,” in Ireland and Early Medieval Europe, ed. Whitelock, D. et al. (Cambridge, 1982), 21–46.Google Scholar
Starostine, D. “‘In die festivitatis,’” Early Medieval Europe 14 (2006), 465–86.Google Scholar
Steen Henriksen, P. “Rye Cultivation in the Danish Iron Age,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 12 (2003), 177–85.Google Scholar
Stone, R. “Kings Are Different,” in Le prince au miroir de la littérature politique de l’Antiquité aux Lumières, ed. Lachaud, F. and Scordia, L. (Mont-Saint-Aignan, 2007), 69–86.Google Scholar
Sullivan, R. “The Carolingian Age,” Speculum 64 (1989), 267–306.Google Scholar
Thomas, G., et al. “Technology, Ritual, and Anglo-Saxon Agriculture,” Antiquity 90 (2016), 742–58.Google Scholar
Thomas, H., et al. “Evolution, Physiology, and Phytochemistry of the Psychotoxic Arable Mimic Weed Darnel (Lolium temulentum L.),” Progress in Botany 72 (2011), 73–104.Google Scholar
Thomas, H., “Remembering Darnel,” Journal of Ethnobiology 36 (2016), 29–44.Google Scholar
Thunø, E. The Apse Mosaic in Early Medieval Rome (Cambridge, 2015).Google Scholar
Timmermann, J. “An Authority among Authorities,” Early Medieval Europe 28 (2020), 532–59.Google Scholar
Tobin, B. Colonizing Nature (Philadelphia, 2005).Google Scholar
Totelin, L. “Botanizing Rulers and their Herbal Subjects,” Phoenix 66 (2012), 122–44.Google Scholar
Toulemonde, F., et al. “A Brief History of Plants in North-Eastern France,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 30 (2021), 1–15.Google Scholar
Trumper, J. and Vigolo, M.. “Il perché della ‘malerbologia,’” in Malerbologia, ed. Catizone, P. and Zanin, G. (Bologna, 2001), 11–18.Google Scholar
Tsing, A. L. The Mushroom at the End of the World (Princeton, 2017).Google Scholar
Utro, U. “Una ‘falsa testimonianza,’” in Atti del IX colloquio dell’Associazione italiana per lo studio e la conservazione del mosaico (Ravenna, 2004), 507–18.Google Scholar
Vaccaro, E. Sites and Pots: Settlement and Economy in Southern Tuscany (Oxford, 2011).Google Scholar
van der Veen, M. “Archaeobotany, the Archaeology of Human–Plant Interactions,” in The Science of Roman History, ed. Scheidel, W. (Princeton, 2018), 53–92.Google Scholar
van der Veen, M. “The Materiality of Plants,” World Archaeology 46 (2014), 799–812.Google Scholar
van der Veen, M., et al. “New Food Plants in Roman Britain,” Environmental Archaeology 13 (2008), 11–36.Google Scholar
van Liere, F. An Introduction to the Medieval Bible (Cambridge, 2014).Google Scholar
van Zeist, W., et al. “Plant Husbandry and Vegetation of Early Medieval Douai,” Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 3 (1994), 191–218.Google Scholar
Verhulst, A. “The ‘Agricultural Revolution’ of the Middle Ages Reconsidered,” in Law, Custom, and the Social Fabric in Medieval Europe, ed. Bachrach, B. S and Nicholas, D. (Kalamazoo, 1990), 17–28.Google Scholar
Verhulst, A. The Carolingian Economy (Cambridge, 2002).Google Scholar
Verhulst, A. “Karolingische Agrarpolitik: Das Capitulare de Villis und die Hungersnote von 792–3 und 805–6,” Zeitschrift für Agrargeschichte und Agrarsoziologie 13 (1965), 175–89.Google Scholar
Vieyra-Odilon, L. and Vibrans, H.. “Weeds as Crops: The Value of Maize Field Weeds in the Valley of Toluca, Mexico,” Economic Botany 55 (2001), 426–43.Google Scholar
Walker, W. All the Plants of the Bible (New York, 1957).Google Scholar
Watson, A. Agricultural Innovation in the Early Islamic World (Cambridge, 2008).Google Scholar
Weber, E. Invasive Plant Species of the World (Wallingford, 2017).Google Scholar
Wehling, U. Die Mosaiken im Aachener Münster und ihre Vorstufen (Cologne, 1995).Google Scholar
Wickham, C. The Inheritance of Rome (London, 2009).Google Scholar
Willerding, U. Zur Geschichte der Unkräuter Mitteleuropas (Neumünster, 1986).Google Scholar
Wisskirchen, R. “Leo III und die Mosaikprogramme von S. Apollinare in Classe in Ravenna und SS. Nereo ed Achilleo in Rom,” Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 34 (1991), 139–51.Google Scholar
Wolff, A., et al. “In the Ruins,” Weed Science 70.2 (2022), 1–28.Google Scholar
Wozniak, T. Naturereignisse im frühen Mittelalter (Berlin, 2020).Google Scholar
Yi-Fu, H., et al. “Identification of Oxalic Acid and Tartaric Acid as Major Persistent Pain-inducing Toxins in the Stinging Hairs of the Nettle Urtica thumbergiana,” Annals of Botany 98 (2006), 57–66.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. Crop Protection in Medieval Agriculture (Leiden, 2013).Google Scholar
Zanin, G., et al. “Definizione e classificazione delle malerbe,” in Malerbologia, ed. Catizone, P. and Zanin, G. (Bologna, 2001), 23–52.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. Fundamentals of Weed Science (Amsterdam, 2013).Google Scholar
Ziska, L. and Dukes, J.. Weed Biology and Climate Change (Ames, IA, 2011).Google Scholar
Zohary, D. Plants of the Bible (Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar
Zug Tucci, H. “Le derrate agricole,” Settimane del CISAM 37 (1990), 884–902.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Paolo Squatriti, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Weeds and the Carolingians
  • Online publication: 02 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009072328.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Paolo Squatriti, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Weeds and the Carolingians
  • Online publication: 02 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009072328.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Paolo Squatriti, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Weeds and the Carolingians
  • Online publication: 02 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009072328.011
Available formats
×