Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T06:07:21.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

D. Weinstein
D. Weinstein
Affiliation:
Wake Forest University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Utilitarianism and the New Liberalism , pp. 204 - 214
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradley, F. H.Red Notebook, Related to ETR. In Bradley Collection, IIB2. Merton College, Oxford University.
Bradley, F. H.“Utility as (1) an End or (2) Standard of Morality,” Multi-Colored Notebook. In Bradley Collection, IA12. Merton College, Oxford University.
Bradley, F. H.“Whether Pleasure is Good and in What Sense – Is Pain Evil?,” Black Notebook, Related Chiefly to ES. In Bradley Collection, IB11. Merton College, Oxford University.
Green, T. H. “Lecture E. T. 78.” Unnumbered MSS. In T. H. Green Papers, Balliol College, Oxford University.
Green, T. H.“Note D on Pleasure and Kant's Moral Philosophy” in “Notes A–F.” Unnumbered MSS. In T. H. Green Papers, Balliol College, Oxford University.
Green, T. H.“Utility as a Principle of Art and Morality.” Unnumbered MSS. In T. H. Green Papers, Balliol College, Oxford University.
Allett, John (1981). The New Liberalism: The Political Economy of J. A. Hobson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia (1993). The Morality of Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1954). The Nicomachean Ethics, W. D. Ross (trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. (1946), Language, Truth and Logic. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah (1999). The Roots of Romanticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, Bernard (2001). The Philosophical Theory of the State, Gaus, Gerald F. and Sweet, William (eds.). South Bend, IN: St. Augustine's.Google Scholar
Boucher, David (1997). The British Idealists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, David and Vincent, Andrew (2001), British Idealism and Political Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1988). Ethical Studies (1927). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H.(1999). Red Notebook. In Collected Works of F. H. Bradley, Keene, Carol A. (ed.), Vol. iii. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Brink, David (2003). Perfectionism and the Common Good: Themes in the Philosophy of T. H. Green. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Peter (1978). Liberals and Social Democrats. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, P. F. (1996). Introduction. In Hobson, J. A., The Social Problem (1902). Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan (1979). Liberalism and Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crittenden, Jack (1992). Beyond Individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cummiskey, David (1996). Kantian Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, S. (2003). Consequentialism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sandra, Otter M. (1996). British Idealism and Social Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donner, Wendy (1992). The Liberal Self. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, John (1996). The History of Political Theory and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Fred (2004). Pleasure and The Good Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, Owen (1991). Varieties of Moral Personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Flew, Antony (1986). David Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franco, Paul (1999). Hegel's Philosophy of Freedom. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael (1986). Liberalism Divided. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeden, Michael(1978). The New Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael(1991). Rights. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael(1996). Ideologies and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gewirth, Alan (1998). Self-Fulfillment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, John (1989). Liberalisms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1997a). Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation (1886). In Collected Works of T. H. Green, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. ii. Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Green, T. H.(1997b). Prolegomena to Ethics (1883). In Collected Works of T. H. Green, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.). Vol. iv. Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Griffin, James (1986). Well-Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, F. P. (1944). The Neo-Idealist Political Theory. New York: King's Crown Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F (1952). Philosophy of Right (1821), T. M. Knox (trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1973). Democracy and Reaction (1904). New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1964). Liberalism (1911). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1968). Social Evolution and Political Theory (1911). Port Washington: Kennikat Press.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1912). The Labour Movement. London: T. Fisher Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1915). Mind in Evolution. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1918). The Metaphysical Theory of the State: A Criticism. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1919). Morals in Evolution. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1921). The Rational Good. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1949). The Elements of Social Justice (1922). London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1924). Social Development. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1927). Development and Purpose. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1966). Sociology and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. (1965). Imperialism (1902). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1996), The Social Problem (1902). Bristol, Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1974). The Crisis of Liberalism (1909), Clarke, P. F. (ed.). Brighton: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1914). Work and Wealth. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1921). Problems of a New World. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1926). Free-Thought in the Social Sciences. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1930). Wealth and Life. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1932). From Capitalism to Socialism. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. (1932).Poverty in Plenty: The Ethics of Income. New York: Macmillan.
Hobson, J. A.(1933). Rationalism and Humanism. London: Watts.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1937). Property and Improperty. London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1938). Confessions of an Economic Heretic. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1992). The Industrial System (1909), Cain, Peter (ed.). London: Routledge/Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1994). John Ruskin: Social Reformer. In William Smart and John Hobson, John Ruskin (1898), Cain, Peter (ed.). London: Routledge/Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Hooker, Brad (2000). Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule Consequentialist Theory of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1978). A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–40), Selby-Bigge, L. A., Rev. P. Nidditch (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurka, T. (1993). Perfectionism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. (1887). Hume. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Johnston, David (1994). The Idea of a Liberal Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1987). Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785), T. K. Abbott (trans.). Buffalo: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel(1991). The Metaphysics of Morals (1797), Gregor, Mary (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996). The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, W. D. (1934). Introduction to Green's Moral Philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
MacCunn, John (1907). Six Radical Thinkers. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1977), On Liberty (1859). In Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Robson, John M. (ed.), Vol. xviii. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1986). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen and Swift, Adam (1996). Liberals and Communitarians. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick (2000). Foundations of Hegel's Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Peter (1990). The Political Philosophy of the British Idealists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norman, Richard (1987). Free and Equal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Patten, Alan (1999). Hegel's Idea of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plamenatz, John (1968). Consent, Freedom and Political Obligation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ridley, Matt (1997). The Origins of Virtue. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Riley, Jonathan (1988). Liberal Utilitarianism: Social Choice Theory and J. S. Mill's Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G. Darwin and Hegel [1893]. In Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. ii. Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.Natural Rights [1895]. In The Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. iii. Bristol: Thoemmes.
Ritchie, D. G.(1998). The Principles of State Interference [1902]. In Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. i. Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Rosen, F. (2003). Classical Utilitarianism from Hume to Mill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. (1930). The Good and the Right. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1988.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John (1979). Unto This Last (1862) In The Genius of John Ruskin, Rosenburg, John D. (ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan (1995). John Dewey and the High Tide of American Liberalism. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. (1977). Sidgwick's Ethics and Victorian Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sher, George (1997). Beyond Neutrality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry (1902). Lectures on the Ethics of T. H. Green, Mr. Herbert Spencer and J. Martineau. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert (1970). Social Statics (1851). New York: Robert Schalkenbach Foundation.Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames (1991). Liberty, Equality and Fraternity (1874). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sumner, Wayne (1987). The Moral Foundations of Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skyrms, Brian (2004). The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. W. (1992). Men Versus the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Geoffrey (1987). The Moral Philosophy of T. H. Green. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, David (1998). Equal Freedom and Utility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiltshire, David (1978). The Social and Political Thought of Herbert Spencer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wollheim, Richard (1959). F. H. Bradley. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Allett, John (1994). “The Conservative Aspect of Hobson's New Liberalism.” In Reappraising J. A. Hobson, Freeden, Michael (ed.). London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Allett, John (1994).“The Moral Philosophy of J. A. Hobson.” In J. A. Hobson after Fifty Years, Pheby, John (ed.). New York: St. Martin's.CrossRef
Anderson, Elizabeth S. (1991). “John Stuart Mill and Experiments in Living.” Ethics, 102: 4–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, James Wood (1998). “Is it Rational to Maximize?” Utilitas, 10: 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Ernest (1929). “Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse 1864–1929.” Proceedings of the British Academy, 15: 536–54.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah (2002). “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Berlin, Four Essays on Liberty, Hardy, Henry (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, Bernard (1903). “Hedonism among the Idealists,” Mind, n.s., 12: 202–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, David (1997). “Introduction.” In Boucher, David (ed.), The British Idealists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1999). “Utility as (1) and End or (2) Standard of Morality.” In F. H. Bradley, Collected Works of F. H. Bradley, Keene, Carol A. (ed.), Vol. i. Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Brink, David (1992). “Mill's Deliberative Utilitarianism.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 21: 67–103.Google Scholar
Brink, David O. (2003). “Introduction.” In T. H. Green, Prolegomena to Ethics, Brink, David O. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caney, Simon (1992). “Liberalism and Communitarianism: A Misconceived Debate.” Political Studies, 40: 273–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (1996). “Reason, Humanity and the Moral Law.” In Korsgaard, Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Condren, Conal (1997). “Political Theory and the Problem of Anachronism.” In Political Theory, Vincent, Andrew (ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Roger. “Self-love and the General Interest: Hume on Impartiality.” Unpublished.
Cummiskey, David (1990). “Kantian Consequentialism.” Ethics, 100: 586–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John (1893). “Self-Realization as the Moral Ideal.” Philosophical Review, 2: 652–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry (1971). “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.” The Journal of Philosophy, 68: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry(1988). “Identification and Wholeheartedness.” In The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeden, Michael (1993). “A Non-Hypothetical Liberalism: The Utilitarian Communitarianism of J. A. Hobson.” Paper delivered at the 1993 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Freeden, Michael(1994). “J. A. Hobson as a Political Theorist.” In J. A. Hobson after Fifty Years, Pheby, John (ed.). New York: St. Martin's.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gewirth, Alan (1962). “Political Justice.” In Social Justice, Brandt, Richard B. (ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, Morris (1929). “The Contribution of Professor Hobhouse to Philosophy and Sociology.” Economica, November: 251–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsberg, Morris(1966). “Introduction.” In L. T. Hobhouse, Sociology and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1877). “Hedonism and Ultimate Good.” Mind, o.s., 2: 266–69. Reprinted in Collected Works of T. H. Green, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. iv. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Green, T. H.(1997). “On the Different Senses of ‘Freedom’ as Applied to Will and the Moral Progress of Man” (1886). In Collected Works of T. H. Green, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. ii. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1997).“Lecture on ‘Liberal Legislation and Freedom of Contract’” (1881). In Collected Works of T. H. Green, Nicholson, Peter (ed.), Vol. iii. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Green, T. H. (1997).“Lectures on the Philosophy of Kant” (1886). In Collected Works of T. H. Green, Nicholson, Peter (ed.), Vol. ii. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Green, T. H. (1997).“Notes on Moral Philosophy”. Collected Works of T. H. Green, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. v. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Green, T. H. (1997).“Utility as a Principle of Art and Morality.” Collected Works of T. H. Green, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. v. Bristol: Thoemmes.
Guttman, Amy (1992). “Communitarian Critics of Liberalism” (1985). In Communitarianism and Individualism, Avineri, Shlomo and de-Shalit, Avner (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2002). “Freedom as the Inner Value of the World.” In Kant on Freedom, Law and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2002).“Kantian Foundations of Liberalism.” In Guyer, Kant on Freedom, Law and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Guyer, Paul (2002).“Kant's Morality of Law and Morality of Freedom.” In Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Guyer, Paul (2002).“Nature, Freedom, and Happiness: The Third Proposition of Kant's Idea for a Universal History.” In Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Haakonssen, Knud (1993). “The Structure of Hume's Political Theory.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hume, Norton, David Fate (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M. (1993). “Could Kant Have Been a Utilitarian?” Utilitas, 5: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. Jr. (2002). “Happiness and Human Flourishing.” In Human Welfare and Moral Worth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1913). “The Historical Evolution of Property, in Fact and in Idea.” In Property, Its Duties and Rights, Gore, Charles (ed.). London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1931). “The Problem.” In L. T. Hobhouse, Hobson, J. A. and Ginsberg, Morris (eds.). London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1931).“About Happiness.” In L. T. Hobhouse, Hobson, J. A. and Ginsberg, Morris (eds.). London: George Allen and Unwin.
Hobhouse, L. T.(1966). “Industry and State” (1931). In Hobhouse, L. T., Sociology and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. “The Theory of the State.” Manchester Guardian, 23 November 1918.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1948). “Towards Social Equality” (1931). In Hobhouse Memorial Lectures: 1930–1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1992). “Human Cost and Utility” (1896). In Writings on Distribution and Welfare, Backhouse, Roger E. (ed.). London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. (1992).“How is Wealth to Be Valued?” (1912–13). Writings on Distribution and Welfare, Backhouse, Roger E. (ed.). London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.
Hobson, J. A. (1992).“Economic Art and Human Welfare” (1926). In Writings on Distribution and Welfare, Backhouse, Roger E. (ed.). London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.
Hume, David (1957). Appendix III, “Some Further Considerations with Regard to Justice,” An Inquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals (1751), Hendel, Charles W. (ed.). New York: Liberal Arts Press.Google Scholar
Hurka, Thomas (1993). Perfectionism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurka, Thomas(1995). “Indirect Perfectionism: Kymlicka on Liberal Neutrality.” The Journal of Political Philosophy, 3: 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will (1988). “Liberalism and Communitarianism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 18 (June): 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, David (1982). “Utility and Rights.” In Ethics, Economics and the Law, Nomos 24, Chapman, John W. and Pennock, J. Roland (eds.). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
MacCallum, Gerald C. (1967). “Negative and Positive Freedom,” Philosophical Review, 76: 312–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNiven, Don (1984). “Bradley's Critiques of Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics.” Idealist Studies, 14(1): 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, T. (1989–90). “The Politics of the Ineffable.” Philosophical Forum, 21: 146–68.Google Scholar
Martin, Rex (2001). “T. H. Green on Individual Rights and the Common Good.” In The New Liberalism, Simhony, Avital and Weinstein, D. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthew, H. C. G. (1990). “Hobson, Ruskin and Cobden.” In Reappraising J. A. Hobson, Freeden, Michael (ed.). London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, James (1996). “Introduction.” In J. A. Hobson, The Social Problem (1902). Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, D. (2001). “Recognising Rights: Social Recognition in T. H. Green's System of Rights,” Polity, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Peter P. (1985). “T. H. Green and State Action: Liquor Legislation.” History of Political Thought, 6: 517–50.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Peter P.(1998). “Introduction.” In The Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. i. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Panagakou, S. (2005). “Defending Bosanquet's Philosophical Theory of the State: A Reassessment of the ‘Bosanquet-Hobhouse Controversy.’ ” British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7: 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penelhum, Terence (1993). “Hume's Moral Psychology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hume, Norton, David Fate (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip (1993). “The Contribution of Analytical Political Philosophy.” In Goodin, Robert and Pettit, Philip (eds.), A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert (2000). “Hegel's Practical Philosophy: the Realization of Freedom.” In Ameriks, Karl (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railton, Peter (2002). “Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality” (1984). In Consequentialism, Darwall, Stephen (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph (1999). “When We Are Ourselves: The Active and the Passive.” In Engaging Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G. (1883). “The Rationality of History.” In Essays in Philosophical Criticism, Pringle-Pattison, Seth and Haldane, R. B. (eds.). London: Longmans, Green and Co. Also in D. G. Ritchie (1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Peter P. Nicholson (ed.), Vol. vi. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1893). “Bonar's ‘Philosophy and Political Economy’.” Economic Review, 3: 541–55. In D. G. Ritchie (1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Peter P. Nicholson (ed.), Vol. vi. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1893–94). “On the Meaning of the Term ‘Motive,’ and on the Ethical Significance of Motives.” International Journal of Ethics, 4: 89–104. In D. G. Ritchie (1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Peter P. Nicholson (ed.), Vol vi. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1998). “Locke's Theory of Property” (1893). In Ritchie, Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, vol. II, Darwin and Hegel, Nicholson, Peter (ed.). Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Ritchie, D. G.(1998). “Review of T. H. Huxley, Collected Essays, Vol. I” (1893–4). The International Journal of Ethics, 4: 531–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1894). “Symposium – Is Human Law the Basis of Morality, or Morality of Human Law?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Part ii: 124–29. In D. G. Ritchie (1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Peter P. Nicholson (ed.), Vol. vi. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1894–5). “Review of Benjamin Kidd, Social Evolution.” The International Journal of Ethics, 5: 107–20. In D. G. Ritchie (1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Peter P. Nicholson (ed.), Vol. vi. Bristol: Thoemmes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1895). “Free-Will and Responsibility.” International Journal of Ethics, 5: 409–31. In D. G. Ritchie (1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Peter P. Nicholson (ed.), Vol. iv. Bristol: Thoemmes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1895–6). “Has the Hereditability or Non-Hereditability of Acquired Characteristics Any Direct Bearing on Ethical Theory?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, iii: 144–8. In D. G. Ritchie (1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Peter P. Nicholson (ed.), Vol. vi. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1900). “Evolution and Democracy.” In Ethical Democracy: Essays in Dynamics, Coit, S. (ed.). London: G. Richards. In D. G. Ritchie (1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Peter P. Nicholson (ed.), Vol. vi. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1902). “Mr. Newman on ‘The Politics’ of Aristotle.” The Quarterly Review, 196: 128–51.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1998). “Moral Philosophy: On the Methods and Scope of Ethics” (1905). In Philosophical Studies, Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.). Vol. v. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G. (1998).“Law and Liberty: The Question of State Interference” (1902). In Studies in Political and Social Ethics, The Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. iv. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Ritchie, D. G. (1998).“Natural Selection and the History of Institutions” (1901). In Darwinism and Politics, The Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. i. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Ritchie, D. G. (1998).“Natural Selection and the Spiritual World” (1901). In Darwinism and Politics, The Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. i. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Ritchie, D. G. (1998).“Confessio Fidei” (1905). In Philosophical Studies, The Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. v. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Rorty, Richard (1991). “Freud and Moral Reflection.” In Essays on Heidegger and Others, Philosophical Papers, Vol. ii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, Michael (1984). “Morality and the Liberal Ideal.” The New Republic, 190, 18 (May 7, 1984): 15–17.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael (1984).“The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self.” Political Theory, 12, 1 (February, 1984): 81–96.CrossRef
Scarre, Geoffrey (1996). Utilitarianism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1982). “Rights and Agency.” Philosophy and Public Affairs. 11 (1, Winter): 3–39.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry (1884). “Green's Ethics.” Mind, o.s., 9: 169–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simhony, Avital (1989). “T. H. Green's Theory of the Morally Justified Society.” History of Political Thought, 10: 481–98.Google Scholar
Simhony, Avital(1991). “On Forcing Individual's to Be Free: T. H. Green's Liberal Theory of Positive Freedom.” Political Studies, 39: 303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simhony, Avital(1995). “Was T. H. Green a Utilitarian?” Utilitas, 7, 1: 121–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simhony, Avital and D. Weinstein (2001). “Introduction.” In Simhony, Avital and Weinstein, D. (eds.), The New Liberalism: Reconciling Liberty and Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simhony, Avital (2005). “A Liberalism of the Common Good: Some Recent Studies of T. H. Green's Moral and Political Theory.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7: 126–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skorupski, John (2006). “Green and the Idealist Conception of a Person's Good.” In Dimova-Cookson, Maria and Mander, William J. (eds.), T. H. Green: Ethics, Metaphysics, and Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Herbert (1978). “Justice” (1891). In The Principles of Ethics, Vol. ii. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert(1893). “The Inadequacy of ‘Natural Selection’.” The Contemporary Review, 43: 153–66.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E. (1925). “F. H. Bradley.” Mind, n.s., 34: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townshend, Jules (1994). “Hobson and the Socialist Tradition.” In J. A. Hobson after Fifty Years, Pheby, John (ed.). New York: St. Martin's.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1993). “The Contribution of History.” In Goodin, Robert and Pettit, Philip (eds.), A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tyler, Colin (1998). “The Evolution of the Epistemic Self.” Bradley Studies, 5: 175–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Colin (1998).“The Metaethics of Pleasure: Jeremy Bentham and his Idealist Critics.” Contemporary Political Studies 1998. A. Dobson and J. Stanyer (eds.), i: 261–8.
Walton, A. S. (1983). “Hegel, Utilitarianism and the Common Good.” Ethics, 93 (July): 753–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Gary (1982). “Free Agency.” In Free Will, Watson, Gary (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weiler, Peter (1972). “The New Liberalism of L. T. Hobhouse.” Victorian Studies, 16: 141–61.Google Scholar
Weinstein, D. (1991). “The Discourse of Freedom, Rights and Good in Nineteenth Century English Liberalism.” Utilitas, 3: 245–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, D.(2000). “Deductive Hedonism and the Anxiety of Influence.” Utilitas, 12, special symposium on Henry Sidgwick: 329–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, D.(2001). “The New Liberalism and the Rejection of Utilitarianism.” In The New Liberalism, Simhony, Avital and Weinstein, D. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, D.(2002). “Herbert Spencer.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, online hypertext: plato.stanford.edu
Weinstein, D.(2004). “English Political Theory in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.” In Handbook of Political Theory, Gaus, Gerald and Kukathas, Chandran (eds.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Weinstein, D.(2005). “British Idealism and the Refutation of Utilitarianism.” Conference on Idealism Today, Harris Manchester College, Oxford University: unpublished.
Weinstein, D.(2006). “Consequentialist Cosmopolitanism.” In Victorian Visions of Global Order, Bell, Duncan (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Weinstein, W. L. (1965). “The Concept of Liberty in Nineteenth Century English Political Thought,” Political Studies, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth (1993). “The Basic Context and Structure of Hegel's Philosophy of Right.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, Beiser, Frederick C. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollheim, Richard (1962). “Introduction.” In F. H. Bradley, Ethical Studies (1927), Wollheim, Richard (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin (1984). “The Moral Organism.” In Manser, Anthony and Stock, Guy (eds.), The Philosophy of F. H. Bradley. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H.Red Notebook, Related to ETR. In Bradley Collection, IIB2. Merton College, Oxford University.
Bradley, F. H.“Utility as (1) an End or (2) Standard of Morality,” Multi-Colored Notebook. In Bradley Collection, IA12. Merton College, Oxford University.
Bradley, F. H.“Whether Pleasure is Good and in What Sense – Is Pain Evil?,” Black Notebook, Related Chiefly to ES. In Bradley Collection, IB11. Merton College, Oxford University.
Green, T. H. “Lecture E. T. 78.” Unnumbered MSS. In T. H. Green Papers, Balliol College, Oxford University.
Green, T. H.“Note D on Pleasure and Kant's Moral Philosophy” in “Notes A–F.” Unnumbered MSS. In T. H. Green Papers, Balliol College, Oxford University.
Green, T. H.“Utility as a Principle of Art and Morality.” Unnumbered MSS. In T. H. Green Papers, Balliol College, Oxford University.
Allett, John (1981). The New Liberalism: The Political Economy of J. A. Hobson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia (1993). The Morality of Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1954). The Nicomachean Ethics, W. D. Ross (trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. (1946), Language, Truth and Logic. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah (1999). The Roots of Romanticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, Bernard (2001). The Philosophical Theory of the State, Gaus, Gerald F. and Sweet, William (eds.). South Bend, IN: St. Augustine's.Google Scholar
Boucher, David (1997). The British Idealists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, David and Vincent, Andrew (2001), British Idealism and Political Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1988). Ethical Studies (1927). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H.(1999). Red Notebook. In Collected Works of F. H. Bradley, Keene, Carol A. (ed.), Vol. iii. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Brink, David (2003). Perfectionism and the Common Good: Themes in the Philosophy of T. H. Green. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Peter (1978). Liberals and Social Democrats. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, P. F. (1996). Introduction. In Hobson, J. A., The Social Problem (1902). Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan (1979). Liberalism and Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crittenden, Jack (1992). Beyond Individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cummiskey, David (1996). Kantian Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, S. (2003). Consequentialism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sandra, Otter M. (1996). British Idealism and Social Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donner, Wendy (1992). The Liberal Self. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, John (1996). The History of Political Theory and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Fred (2004). Pleasure and The Good Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, Owen (1991). Varieties of Moral Personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Flew, Antony (1986). David Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franco, Paul (1999). Hegel's Philosophy of Freedom. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael (1986). Liberalism Divided. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeden, Michael(1978). The New Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael(1991). Rights. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael(1996). Ideologies and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gewirth, Alan (1998). Self-Fulfillment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, John (1989). Liberalisms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1997a). Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation (1886). In Collected Works of T. H. Green, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. ii. Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Green, T. H.(1997b). Prolegomena to Ethics (1883). In Collected Works of T. H. Green, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.). Vol. iv. Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Griffin, James (1986). Well-Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, F. P. (1944). The Neo-Idealist Political Theory. New York: King's Crown Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F (1952). Philosophy of Right (1821), T. M. Knox (trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1973). Democracy and Reaction (1904). New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1964). Liberalism (1911). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1968). Social Evolution and Political Theory (1911). Port Washington: Kennikat Press.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1912). The Labour Movement. London: T. Fisher Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1915). Mind in Evolution. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1918). The Metaphysical Theory of the State: A Criticism. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1919). Morals in Evolution. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1921). The Rational Good. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1949). The Elements of Social Justice (1922). London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1924). Social Development. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1927). Development and Purpose. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1966). Sociology and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. (1965). Imperialism (1902). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1996), The Social Problem (1902). Bristol, Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1974). The Crisis of Liberalism (1909), Clarke, P. F. (ed.). Brighton: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1914). Work and Wealth. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1921). Problems of a New World. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1926). Free-Thought in the Social Sciences. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1930). Wealth and Life. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1932). From Capitalism to Socialism. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. (1932).Poverty in Plenty: The Ethics of Income. New York: Macmillan.
Hobson, J. A.(1933). Rationalism and Humanism. London: Watts.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1937). Property and Improperty. London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1938). Confessions of an Economic Heretic. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1992). The Industrial System (1909), Cain, Peter (ed.). London: Routledge/Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1994). John Ruskin: Social Reformer. In William Smart and John Hobson, John Ruskin (1898), Cain, Peter (ed.). London: Routledge/Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Hooker, Brad (2000). Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule Consequentialist Theory of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1978). A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–40), Selby-Bigge, L. A., Rev. P. Nidditch (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurka, T. (1993). Perfectionism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. (1887). Hume. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Johnston, David (1994). The Idea of a Liberal Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1987). Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785), T. K. Abbott (trans.). Buffalo: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel(1991). The Metaphysics of Morals (1797), Gregor, Mary (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996). The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, W. D. (1934). Introduction to Green's Moral Philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
MacCunn, John (1907). Six Radical Thinkers. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1977), On Liberty (1859). In Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Robson, John M. (ed.), Vol. xviii. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1986). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen and Swift, Adam (1996). Liberals and Communitarians. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick (2000). Foundations of Hegel's Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Peter (1990). The Political Philosophy of the British Idealists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norman, Richard (1987). Free and Equal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Patten, Alan (1999). Hegel's Idea of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plamenatz, John (1968). Consent, Freedom and Political Obligation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ridley, Matt (1997). The Origins of Virtue. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Riley, Jonathan (1988). Liberal Utilitarianism: Social Choice Theory and J. S. Mill's Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G. Darwin and Hegel [1893]. In Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. ii. Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.Natural Rights [1895]. In The Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. iii. Bristol: Thoemmes.
Ritchie, D. G.(1998). The Principles of State Interference [1902]. In Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. i. Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Rosen, F. (2003). Classical Utilitarianism from Hume to Mill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. (1930). The Good and the Right. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1988.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John (1979). Unto This Last (1862) In The Genius of John Ruskin, Rosenburg, John D. (ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan (1995). John Dewey and the High Tide of American Liberalism. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. (1977). Sidgwick's Ethics and Victorian Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sher, George (1997). Beyond Neutrality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry (1902). Lectures on the Ethics of T. H. Green, Mr. Herbert Spencer and J. Martineau. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert (1970). Social Statics (1851). New York: Robert Schalkenbach Foundation.Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames (1991). Liberty, Equality and Fraternity (1874). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sumner, Wayne (1987). The Moral Foundations of Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skyrms, Brian (2004). The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. W. (1992). Men Versus the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Geoffrey (1987). The Moral Philosophy of T. H. Green. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, David (1998). Equal Freedom and Utility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiltshire, David (1978). The Social and Political Thought of Herbert Spencer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wollheim, Richard (1959). F. H. Bradley. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Allett, John (1994). “The Conservative Aspect of Hobson's New Liberalism.” In Reappraising J. A. Hobson, Freeden, Michael (ed.). London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Allett, John (1994).“The Moral Philosophy of J. A. Hobson.” In J. A. Hobson after Fifty Years, Pheby, John (ed.). New York: St. Martin's.CrossRef
Anderson, Elizabeth S. (1991). “John Stuart Mill and Experiments in Living.” Ethics, 102: 4–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, James Wood (1998). “Is it Rational to Maximize?” Utilitas, 10: 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Ernest (1929). “Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse 1864–1929.” Proceedings of the British Academy, 15: 536–54.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah (2002). “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Berlin, Four Essays on Liberty, Hardy, Henry (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, Bernard (1903). “Hedonism among the Idealists,” Mind, n.s., 12: 202–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, David (1997). “Introduction.” In Boucher, David (ed.), The British Idealists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1999). “Utility as (1) and End or (2) Standard of Morality.” In F. H. Bradley, Collected Works of F. H. Bradley, Keene, Carol A. (ed.), Vol. i. Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Brink, David (1992). “Mill's Deliberative Utilitarianism.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 21: 67–103.Google Scholar
Brink, David O. (2003). “Introduction.” In T. H. Green, Prolegomena to Ethics, Brink, David O. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caney, Simon (1992). “Liberalism and Communitarianism: A Misconceived Debate.” Political Studies, 40: 273–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (1996). “Reason, Humanity and the Moral Law.” In Korsgaard, Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Condren, Conal (1997). “Political Theory and the Problem of Anachronism.” In Political Theory, Vincent, Andrew (ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Roger. “Self-love and the General Interest: Hume on Impartiality.” Unpublished.
Cummiskey, David (1990). “Kantian Consequentialism.” Ethics, 100: 586–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John (1893). “Self-Realization as the Moral Ideal.” Philosophical Review, 2: 652–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry (1971). “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.” The Journal of Philosophy, 68: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry(1988). “Identification and Wholeheartedness.” In The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeden, Michael (1993). “A Non-Hypothetical Liberalism: The Utilitarian Communitarianism of J. A. Hobson.” Paper delivered at the 1993 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Freeden, Michael(1994). “J. A. Hobson as a Political Theorist.” In J. A. Hobson after Fifty Years, Pheby, John (ed.). New York: St. Martin's.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gewirth, Alan (1962). “Political Justice.” In Social Justice, Brandt, Richard B. (ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, Morris (1929). “The Contribution of Professor Hobhouse to Philosophy and Sociology.” Economica, November: 251–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsberg, Morris(1966). “Introduction.” In L. T. Hobhouse, Sociology and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1877). “Hedonism and Ultimate Good.” Mind, o.s., 2: 266–69. Reprinted in Collected Works of T. H. Green, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. iv. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Green, T. H.(1997). “On the Different Senses of ‘Freedom’ as Applied to Will and the Moral Progress of Man” (1886). In Collected Works of T. H. Green, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. ii. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1997).“Lecture on ‘Liberal Legislation and Freedom of Contract’” (1881). In Collected Works of T. H. Green, Nicholson, Peter (ed.), Vol. iii. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Green, T. H. (1997).“Lectures on the Philosophy of Kant” (1886). In Collected Works of T. H. Green, Nicholson, Peter (ed.), Vol. ii. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Green, T. H. (1997).“Notes on Moral Philosophy”. Collected Works of T. H. Green, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. v. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Green, T. H. (1997).“Utility as a Principle of Art and Morality.” Collected Works of T. H. Green, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. v. Bristol: Thoemmes.
Guttman, Amy (1992). “Communitarian Critics of Liberalism” (1985). In Communitarianism and Individualism, Avineri, Shlomo and de-Shalit, Avner (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2002). “Freedom as the Inner Value of the World.” In Kant on Freedom, Law and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2002).“Kantian Foundations of Liberalism.” In Guyer, Kant on Freedom, Law and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Guyer, Paul (2002).“Kant's Morality of Law and Morality of Freedom.” In Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Guyer, Paul (2002).“Nature, Freedom, and Happiness: The Third Proposition of Kant's Idea for a Universal History.” In Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Haakonssen, Knud (1993). “The Structure of Hume's Political Theory.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hume, Norton, David Fate (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M. (1993). “Could Kant Have Been a Utilitarian?” Utilitas, 5: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. Jr. (2002). “Happiness and Human Flourishing.” In Human Welfare and Moral Worth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1913). “The Historical Evolution of Property, in Fact and in Idea.” In Property, Its Duties and Rights, Gore, Charles (ed.). London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T.(1931). “The Problem.” In L. T. Hobhouse, Hobson, J. A. and Ginsberg, Morris (eds.). London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1931).“About Happiness.” In L. T. Hobhouse, Hobson, J. A. and Ginsberg, Morris (eds.). London: George Allen and Unwin.
Hobhouse, L. T.(1966). “Industry and State” (1931). In Hobhouse, L. T., Sociology and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. “The Theory of the State.” Manchester Guardian, 23 November 1918.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1948). “Towards Social Equality” (1931). In Hobhouse Memorial Lectures: 1930–1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A.(1992). “Human Cost and Utility” (1896). In Writings on Distribution and Welfare, Backhouse, Roger E. (ed.). London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. (1992).“How is Wealth to Be Valued?” (1912–13). Writings on Distribution and Welfare, Backhouse, Roger E. (ed.). London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.
Hobson, J. A. (1992).“Economic Art and Human Welfare” (1926). In Writings on Distribution and Welfare, Backhouse, Roger E. (ed.). London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.
Hume, David (1957). Appendix III, “Some Further Considerations with Regard to Justice,” An Inquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals (1751), Hendel, Charles W. (ed.). New York: Liberal Arts Press.Google Scholar
Hurka, Thomas (1993). Perfectionism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurka, Thomas(1995). “Indirect Perfectionism: Kymlicka on Liberal Neutrality.” The Journal of Political Philosophy, 3: 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will (1988). “Liberalism and Communitarianism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 18 (June): 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, David (1982). “Utility and Rights.” In Ethics, Economics and the Law, Nomos 24, Chapman, John W. and Pennock, J. Roland (eds.). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
MacCallum, Gerald C. (1967). “Negative and Positive Freedom,” Philosophical Review, 76: 312–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNiven, Don (1984). “Bradley's Critiques of Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics.” Idealist Studies, 14(1): 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, T. (1989–90). “The Politics of the Ineffable.” Philosophical Forum, 21: 146–68.Google Scholar
Martin, Rex (2001). “T. H. Green on Individual Rights and the Common Good.” In The New Liberalism, Simhony, Avital and Weinstein, D. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthew, H. C. G. (1990). “Hobson, Ruskin and Cobden.” In Reappraising J. A. Hobson, Freeden, Michael (ed.). London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, James (1996). “Introduction.” In J. A. Hobson, The Social Problem (1902). Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, D. (2001). “Recognising Rights: Social Recognition in T. H. Green's System of Rights,” Polity, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Peter P. (1985). “T. H. Green and State Action: Liquor Legislation.” History of Political Thought, 6: 517–50.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Peter P.(1998). “Introduction.” In The Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. i. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Panagakou, S. (2005). “Defending Bosanquet's Philosophical Theory of the State: A Reassessment of the ‘Bosanquet-Hobhouse Controversy.’ ” British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7: 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penelhum, Terence (1993). “Hume's Moral Psychology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hume, Norton, David Fate (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip (1993). “The Contribution of Analytical Political Philosophy.” In Goodin, Robert and Pettit, Philip (eds.), A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert (2000). “Hegel's Practical Philosophy: the Realization of Freedom.” In Ameriks, Karl (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railton, Peter (2002). “Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality” (1984). In Consequentialism, Darwall, Stephen (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph (1999). “When We Are Ourselves: The Active and the Passive.” In Engaging Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G. (1883). “The Rationality of History.” In Essays in Philosophical Criticism, Pringle-Pattison, Seth and Haldane, R. B. (eds.). London: Longmans, Green and Co. Also in D. G. Ritchie (1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Peter P. Nicholson (ed.), Vol. vi. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1893). “Bonar's ‘Philosophy and Political Economy’.” Economic Review, 3: 541–55. In D. G. Ritchie (1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Peter P. Nicholson (ed.), Vol. vi. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1893–94). “On the Meaning of the Term ‘Motive,’ and on the Ethical Significance of Motives.” International Journal of Ethics, 4: 89–104. In D. G. Ritchie (1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Peter P. Nicholson (ed.), Vol vi. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1998). “Locke's Theory of Property” (1893). In Ritchie, Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, vol. II, Darwin and Hegel, Nicholson, Peter (ed.). Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Ritchie, D. G.(1998). “Review of T. H. Huxley, Collected Essays, Vol. I” (1893–4). The International Journal of Ethics, 4: 531–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1894). “Symposium – Is Human Law the Basis of Morality, or Morality of Human Law?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Part ii: 124–29. In D. G. Ritchie (1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Peter P. Nicholson (ed.), Vol. vi. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1894–5). “Review of Benjamin Kidd, Social Evolution.” The International Journal of Ethics, 5: 107–20. In D. G. Ritchie (1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Peter P. Nicholson (ed.), Vol. vi. Bristol: Thoemmes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1895). “Free-Will and Responsibility.” International Journal of Ethics, 5: 409–31. In D. G. Ritchie (1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Peter P. Nicholson (ed.), Vol. iv. Bristol: Thoemmes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1895–6). “Has the Hereditability or Non-Hereditability of Acquired Characteristics Any Direct Bearing on Ethical Theory?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, iii: 144–8. In D. G. Ritchie (1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Peter P. Nicholson (ed.), Vol. vi. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1900). “Evolution and Democracy.” In Ethical Democracy: Essays in Dynamics, Coit, S. (ed.). London: G. Richards. In D. G. Ritchie (1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Peter P. Nicholson (ed.), Vol. vi. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1902). “Mr. Newman on ‘The Politics’ of Aristotle.” The Quarterly Review, 196: 128–51.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G.(1998). “Moral Philosophy: On the Methods and Scope of Ethics” (1905). In Philosophical Studies, Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.). Vol. v. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G. (1998).“Law and Liberty: The Question of State Interference” (1902). In Studies in Political and Social Ethics, The Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. iv. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Ritchie, D. G. (1998).“Natural Selection and the History of Institutions” (1901). In Darwinism and Politics, The Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. i. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Ritchie, D. G. (1998).“Natural Selection and the Spiritual World” (1901). In Darwinism and Politics, The Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. i. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Ritchie, D. G. (1998).“Confessio Fidei” (1905). In Philosophical Studies, The Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.), Vol. v. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Rorty, Richard (1991). “Freud and Moral Reflection.” In Essays on Heidegger and Others, Philosophical Papers, Vol. ii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, Michael (1984). “Morality and the Liberal Ideal.” The New Republic, 190, 18 (May 7, 1984): 15–17.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael (1984).“The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self.” Political Theory, 12, 1 (February, 1984): 81–96.CrossRef
Scarre, Geoffrey (1996). Utilitarianism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1982). “Rights and Agency.” Philosophy and Public Affairs. 11 (1, Winter): 3–39.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry (1884). “Green's Ethics.” Mind, o.s., 9: 169–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simhony, Avital (1989). “T. H. Green's Theory of the Morally Justified Society.” History of Political Thought, 10: 481–98.Google Scholar
Simhony, Avital(1991). “On Forcing Individual's to Be Free: T. H. Green's Liberal Theory of Positive Freedom.” Political Studies, 39: 303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simhony, Avital(1995). “Was T. H. Green a Utilitarian?” Utilitas, 7, 1: 121–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simhony, Avital and D. Weinstein (2001). “Introduction.” In Simhony, Avital and Weinstein, D. (eds.), The New Liberalism: Reconciling Liberty and Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simhony, Avital (2005). “A Liberalism of the Common Good: Some Recent Studies of T. H. Green's Moral and Political Theory.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7: 126–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skorupski, John (2006). “Green and the Idealist Conception of a Person's Good.” In Dimova-Cookson, Maria and Mander, William J. (eds.), T. H. Green: Ethics, Metaphysics, and Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Herbert (1978). “Justice” (1891). In The Principles of Ethics, Vol. ii. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert(1893). “The Inadequacy of ‘Natural Selection’.” The Contemporary Review, 43: 153–66.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E. (1925). “F. H. Bradley.” Mind, n.s., 34: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townshend, Jules (1994). “Hobson and the Socialist Tradition.” In J. A. Hobson after Fifty Years, Pheby, John (ed.). New York: St. Martin's.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1993). “The Contribution of History.” In Goodin, Robert and Pettit, Philip (eds.), A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tyler, Colin (1998). “The Evolution of the Epistemic Self.” Bradley Studies, 5: 175–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Colin (1998).“The Metaethics of Pleasure: Jeremy Bentham and his Idealist Critics.” Contemporary Political Studies 1998. A. Dobson and J. Stanyer (eds.), i: 261–8.
Walton, A. S. (1983). “Hegel, Utilitarianism and the Common Good.” Ethics, 93 (July): 753–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Gary (1982). “Free Agency.” In Free Will, Watson, Gary (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weiler, Peter (1972). “The New Liberalism of L. T. Hobhouse.” Victorian Studies, 16: 141–61.Google Scholar
Weinstein, D. (1991). “The Discourse of Freedom, Rights and Good in Nineteenth Century English Liberalism.” Utilitas, 3: 245–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, D.(2000). “Deductive Hedonism and the Anxiety of Influence.” Utilitas, 12, special symposium on Henry Sidgwick: 329–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, D.(2001). “The New Liberalism and the Rejection of Utilitarianism.” In The New Liberalism, Simhony, Avital and Weinstein, D. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, D.(2002). “Herbert Spencer.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, online hypertext: plato.stanford.edu
Weinstein, D.(2004). “English Political Theory in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.” In Handbook of Political Theory, Gaus, Gerald and Kukathas, Chandran (eds.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Weinstein, D.(2005). “British Idealism and the Refutation of Utilitarianism.” Conference on Idealism Today, Harris Manchester College, Oxford University: unpublished.
Weinstein, D.(2006). “Consequentialist Cosmopolitanism.” In Victorian Visions of Global Order, Bell, Duncan (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Weinstein, W. L. (1965). “The Concept of Liberty in Nineteenth Century English Political Thought,” Political Studies, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth (1993). “The Basic Context and Structure of Hegel's Philosophy of Right.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, Beiser, Frederick C. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollheim, Richard (1962). “Introduction.” In F. H. Bradley, Ethical Studies (1927), Wollheim, Richard (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin (1984). “The Moral Organism.” In Manser, Anthony and Stock, Guy (eds.), The Philosophy of F. H. Bradley. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works Cited
  • D. Weinstein, Wake Forest University, North Carolina
  • Book: Utilitarianism and the New Liberalism
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490781.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works Cited
  • D. Weinstein, Wake Forest University, North Carolina
  • Book: Utilitarianism and the New Liberalism
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490781.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works Cited
  • D. Weinstein, Wake Forest University, North Carolina
  • Book: Utilitarianism and the New Liberalism
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490781.009
Available formats
×