Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T04:14:35.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2020

Boaventura de Sousa Santos
Boaventura de Sousa Santos
Affiliation:
Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Toward a New Legal Common Sense
Law, Globalization, and Emancipation
 , pp. 598 - 642
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Richard, Abel (ed.). 1982. The Politics of Informal Justice. 2 volumes. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard. 1974. “A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society.” Law and Society Review, 8: 217–347.Google Scholar
Ades, Alberto and di Tella, Rafael. 1997. “The New Economics of Corruption: a Survey and some new Results,” in Heywood (ed.) 80–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Max. 1922. Die Staatsauffassung des Marxismus. Vienna: Verlag der Wiener Volksbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Adler, Max. n.d. Zuchthaus und Fabrik. Leipsig: Ernst Oldenburg Verlag.Google Scholar
AFL-CIO 2000. Building Understanding, Creating Change. A Report on the AFL-CIO Forum on Immigrant Workers’ Rights. Washington, DC: AFL-CIO.Google Scholar
Aglietta, Michel. 1979. A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US experience. London: NLB.Google Scholar
Aguirre, Francisco B. 1980. Etnia y represión penal. Lima: CIPA.Google Scholar
Alliance for Justice. 2018. “Trump‘s Attacks on our Justice System.” President Trump, the Federal Judiciary and 115th Congress.Google Scholar
Al Faruqi, Isma’il R. 1983. “Islam and Human Rights.” The Islamic Quarterly, 27(1): 12–30.Google Scholar
Albrow, Martin and Elizabeth, King (eds.). 1990. Globalization, Knowledge and Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Alger, Chadwick. 1990. “Grass-Roots Perspectives on Global Policies for Development.” Journal of Peace Research, 27: 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allott, Philip. 1991. “The European Community Is Not the True European Community.” Yale Law Journal, 100: 2485–2500.Google Scholar
América Indígena, 1989. Mexico: Instituto Indigenista Interamericano.Google Scholar
América Indígena, 1990. Mexico: Instituto Indigenista Interamericano.Google Scholar
Ana, Maria. 1996. “Discurso inaugural de la mayor Ana María en el Encuentro Intercontinental ‘Por la humanidad y contra el neoliberalismo’.” Chiapas, 3: 102–103.Google Scholar
Anaya, S. James. 1996. Indigenous Peoples in International Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (ed.). 1986. The Rise of the Modern State. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Anner, M. 2000. ‘Local and Transnational Campaigns to End Sweatshop Practices’, in M. Gordon and L. Turner (eds.) Transnational Cooperation among Labour Unions, pp. 238–255. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar
An-na’im, Abdullahi A. 1990. Toward an Islamic Reformation. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
An-na’im, Abdullahi A. (ed.). 1992. Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives: A Quest for Consensus. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Anthony, Constance. 1991. “Africa’s Refugee Crisis: State Building in Historical Perspective.” International Migration Review, 25: 574–591.Google Scholar
Arjun, Appadurai. (ed.). 2001. Globalization. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1990. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global and Cultural Economy.” Public Culture, 2: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Araújo, Sara. 2012. “Toward an Ecology of Justices: An Urban and Rural Study of Mozambican Plurality” in Kyed et al. (eds.): 109–129.Google Scholar
Araújo, Sara. 2016. “O primado do direito e as exclusões abissais: reconstruir velhos conceitos, desafiar o cânone.” Sociologias, 18 (43): 88–115.Google Scholar
Arenas, Luis C. 1998. “La Justicia, el Sistema Político y los Derechos Humanos en Colombia” (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
Arenas, Luis C. 2001. “Poscriptum: sobre el caso U’wa,” in Santos and García-Villegas II: 143–157.Google Scholar
Arenas, Luis C. 2002. “A luta dos U’wa contra a exploração petrolífera no seu território: um estudo de caso de uma luta local que se globalizou,” in Santos (ed.) (2002c).Google Scholar
Arminjon, Pierre, Nolde, B, and Wolff, M. 1950. Traité de droit comparé. Paris: Librairie Generale de Droit et de Jurisprudence.Google Scholar
Arrighi, Giovanni. 1994. The Long Twentieth Century. Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Assies, W. J. and Hoekema, A. J. (eds.). 1994. Indigenous Peoples’ Experiences with Self-Government. Proceedings of the Seminar on Arrangements for Self-Determination by Indigenous Peoples within National States, 10 and 11 February, 1994, Law Faculty, University of Amsterdam. Copenhagen: IWGIA, doc. 76.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. 1968. Mimesis. The Representation of Reality in Western Literature Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Avci, Gamze and Christopher, McDonald. 2000. “Chipping Away at the Fortress: Unions, Immigration and the Transnational Labour Market.” International Migration, 38(2): 191–214.Google Scholar
Bach, Hanne. 1991. “Miskito Indians in Nicaragua – The First Ethnic Group to Obtain Autonomy in Central America?” Newsletter IWGIA, 3, November-December: 38–42.Google Scholar
Balibar, , Etienne and Immanuel Wallerstein. 1991. Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Ball, Terence, Farr, J, and Hanson, R (eds.). 1989. Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barrera, Anna. 2011. “Turning Legal Pluralism into State-Sanctioned Law: Assessing the Implications of the New Constitutions and Laws in Bolivia and Ecuador.” GIGA Working Papers, 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Michèle 1980. Women’s Oppression Today. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Barrow, Nita. 1985. “The Decade NGO Forum.” Africa Report, 30: 9–12.Google Scholar
Baslar, Kemal. 1998. The Concept of the Common Heritage of Humankind in International Law. The Hague: Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Basok, Tanya. 2000. “He Came, He Saw, He … Stayed. Guest Worker Programmes and the Issue of Non-Return.” International Migration, 38(2): 215–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bataillon, Claude et al. 1982. Indianidad, etnocidio, indigenismo in America Latina. Mexico City: Institute Indigenista Interamericano.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. 1981. Simulacres et simulations. Paris: Galilee.Google Scholar
Bauer, Joanne R. and Bell, Daniel A. (eds.). 1999. The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Otto. 1924. Die Nationalitätenfrage und die Sozialdemokratie. Vienna: Verlag der Wiener Volksbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1992. Intimations of Postmodermty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra. 1982. “Taking Suffering Seriously: Social Action Litigation in the Supreme Court of India.” International Commission of Jurists Review, 29: 37–49.Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra. 2002a. “Operation ‘Enduring Freedom’: Towards a New International Law and Order?.” Beyond Law, 25:1–15.Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra. 2002b. The Future of Human Rights. Delhi, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, Giddens, Anthony, and Lash, Scott. 1994. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1999. World Risk Society. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 2000. The Brave New World of Work. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Becker, David and Sklar, Richard. 1987. “Why Postimperialism?” in Becker et al.: 1–18.Google Scholar
Becker, David et al. 1987. Postimperialism: International Capitalism and Development in the Late Twentieth Century. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benda-Beckmann, Franz von. 1988. “Comment on Merry.” Law and Society Review, 22: 897–901.Google Scholar
Benda-Beckmann, Franz von. 1991. “Unterwerfung oder Distanz: Rechtssoziologie, Rechtsanthropologie und Rechtsplurahsmus aus rechtsanthropologischer Sicht.” Zettschrtft für Rechtssoziologie, 12: 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von and Turner, Bertram. 2018. “Legal Pluralism, Social Theory, and the State.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 50 (3): 255–274.Google Scholar
Bercusson, Brian. 1997. “Globalizing Labour Law: Transnational Private Regulation and Countervailing Actors in European Labour Law,” in Teubner (ed.): 133–178.Google Scholar
Berg, Robert. 1987. NGOs: New Force in Third World Development. Washington: Center for Advanced Study of International Development.Google Scholar
Berger, Adolf. 1953. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Bergesen, Albert (ed.). 1980. Studies of the Modern World-System. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bergesen, Albert and Dasser, Felix. 1990. “The ‘New’ Law Merchant and the ‘Old’: Sources, Content and Legitimacy,” in Carbonneau (ed.): 21–36.Google Scholar
Bergesen, Albert. 1988. “The Law of International Commercial Transactions.” Emory Journal of International Dispute Resolution, 2: 235–310.Google Scholar
Bergesen, Albert. 1990. “Turning World-System Theory on its Head,” in Featherstone (ed.): 67–81.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1976. Vico and Herder: Two Studies in the History of Ideas. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Berman, Harold and Dasser, Felix. 1990. “The ‘New’ Law Merchant and the ‘Old’: Sources, Content and Legitimacy,” in Carbonneau (ed.): 21–36Google Scholar
Berman, Harold. 1983. Law and Revolution. The Formation of Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Harold. 1988. “The Law of International Commercial Transactions.” Emory Journal of International Dispute Resolution, 2: 235–310.Google Scholar
Berman, Marshall. 1983. All That Is Solid Melts Into Air. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Berman, Nathaniel. 1999. “II. In the Wake of Empire.” American University International Law Review, 14: 1521–1554.Google Scholar
Bernal, Martin. 1987. Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization. Volume 1: The Fabrication of Ancient Greece, 1785–1885. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, S. K. 2002. Hawkers and the Urban Informal Sector—A Study of Street Vending in Seven Cities. Mumbai: NASVI. British Council India.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch: the Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Bilder, Richard et al. 1989. Legal Regimes for the Mining of Helium-3 from the Moon. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Space Automation and Robotics.Google Scholar
Billet, L. 1975. “Political Order and Economic Development: Reflections on Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations.” Political Studies, 23(4): 430–441.Google Scholar
Black, Richard, and Khalid, Koser (eds). 1999. The End of the Refugee Cycle? Refugee Repatriation and Reconstruction. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Blakemore, M. J. and Harley, J. B.. 1980. Cartographica. Special issue. 17: 4,1–120.Google Scholar
Blankenburg, Erhard. 1984. “The Poverty of Evolutionism. A Critique of Teubner’s Case for ‘Reflexive Law’.” Law and Society Review, 18: 273–289.Google Scholar
Blaser, Arthur. 1985. “Human Rights in the Third World and Development of International Nongovernmental Organizations,” in Shepherd, Jr. and Nanda (eds.): 273–285.Google Scholar
Blaser, Arthur. 1990. “The Common Heritage in Its Infinite Variety: Space Law and the Moon in the 1990’s.” The Journal of Law and Technology, 5: 79–99.Google Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas (ed.). 2001. The Legal Geographies Reader: Law, Power, and Space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. 1973. The Anxiety of Influence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bobbio, Norberto. 1942. La Consuetude Come Fatto Normativo. Padova: CEDAM.Google Scholar
Boeles, P. 1992. “Schengen and the Rule of Law,” in Meijers et al., 135–146.Google Scholar
Boer, Gérard de. 1992. “Trends in Refugee Policy and Cooperation in the European Community.” International Migration Review, 26: 668–675.Google Scholar
Boggs, S. W. 1947. “Cartohypnosis.” Scientific Monthly, 64: 469. Bogotá: Carlos Valencia Editors.Google Scholar
Bohannan, Paul. 1957. Justice and Judgment among the Tiv. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bolten, J. J. 1992. “From Schengen to Dublin: The New Frontiers of Refugee Law,” in Meijers et al.: 8–36.Google Scholar
Borges, Jorge Luis. 1970. Obras Completas. Buenos Aires: Emecé.Google Scholar
Borocz, Jozsef 1996. Leisure Migration: A Sociological Study on Tourism. Tarrytown: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Boserup, Esther. 1970. Women’s Role in Economic Development. London: Alien & Unwin.Google Scholar
Bosniak, Linda. 1991. “Human Rights, State Sovereignty and the Protection of Undocumented Migrants under the International Migrant Workers Convention.” International Migration Review, 25: 737–770.Google Scholar
Bottomore, Tom and Goode, P (eds.). 1978. Austro-Marxism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Boulding, Elise. 1991. “The Old and New Transnationalism: An Evolutionary Perspective.” Human Relations, 44: 789–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1980. Le sens pratique. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Bowen, Gordon. 1985. “The Political Economy of State Terrorism: Barrier to Human Rights in Guatemala,” in Shepherd, Jr. and Nanda (eds.): 83–123.Google Scholar
Boyer, Robert (ed.). 1986. Capitalismes fin de siècle. Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar
Boyer, Robert. 1990. The Regulation School: A Critical Introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, Hans-Jürgen. 1986. Justicia Popular: Nativos, Campesinos. Lima: Centro de Investigaciones Judiciales de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Republica.Google Scholar
Brasil, Wire. 2015. “Mani Pulite: Italy’s ‘Lava-Jato’.” Published August 7, 2015. Available on line: https://www.brasilwire.com/mani-pulite-italys-own-lava-jato/Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. 1979. Civilization matérielle, économie et capitalisme XVe–XVIIIe siècle. Vol. II. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Braverman, H. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Breckenridge, Carol, Pollock, Sheldon, Bhabha, Homi, and Chakrabarty, Dipesh (eds.). 2002. Cosmopolitanism. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenkert, George. 1992. “Can We Afford International Human Rights?” Journal of Business Ethics, 11:515–521.Google Scholar
Brenner, R. 1977. “The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism.” New Left Review, 104: 25–92.Google Scholar
Breton, Raymond. 1989. “The Vesting of Ethnic Interests in State Institutions,” in Frideres (ed.): 35–55.Google Scholar
Brockett, Charles. 1985. “The Right to Food and International Obligations: the Impact of U.S. Policy in Central America,” in Shepherd, Jr. and Nanda (eds.): 125–147.Google Scholar
Brolmann, Catherine, Lefeber, R, and Zieck, M (eds.). 1993. Peoples and Minorities in International Law. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter and Shue, Henry (eds.). 1981. Boundaries: National Autonomy and Its Limits. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brubaker, William R. (ed.). 1989. Immigration and the Politics of Citizenship in Europe and North America. Lanhan, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Brubaker, William R. 1989. “Introduction,” in Brubaker (ed.): 1–27.Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, Hauke. 1987. “Romanticism and Cultural Criticism.” Praxis International, 6: 397–415.Google Scholar
Brush, Stephen B. and Stablinsky, Doreen (eds.). 1996. Valuing Local Knowledge: Indigenous Peoples and Intellectual Property Rights. Washington, D.C: Island Press.Google Scholar
Brysk, Allison. 2000. From Tribal Village to Global Village. Indian Rights and International Relations in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Buckle, Stephen. 1991. Natural Law and the Theory of Property: Grotius to Hume. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Buergenthal, Thomas. 1991. “The CSCE Rights System.” George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, 25: 333–386.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin. 1988. The Civil Rights Society. The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Burawoy, Michael. 1979. Manufacturing Consent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burger, Julian. 1987. Report from the Frontier: The State of the World’s Indigenous People. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Burnett, Alan. 1985. “Propaganda Cartography,” in Pepper and Jenkins (eds.): 60–89.Google Scholar
Buttler, Judith and Scott, Joan (eds.). 1992. Feminists Theorize the Political. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buvollen, Hans Peter. 1989. “Regional Autonomy in Nicaragua. A New Approach to the Indigenous Question in Latin America.” Alternatives, 14: 123–182.Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline, Harrell, S, and Richman, P (eds.). 1986. Gender and Religion: On the Complexity of Symbols. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Teresa. 2000. City of Walls. Crime, Segregation and Citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Calejon, Cesar and Vizoni, Adriano. 2019. A Ascensão do bolsonarismo no Brasil do século XXI. São Paulo: Livraria da Lura.Google Scholar
Call, Charles. 1998. “Institutional Hearing within ICITAP,” in Oakley et al. (eds.)Google Scholar
Carbonneau, Thomas (ed.). 1990. Lex Mercatoria and Arbitration: A Discussion of the New Law Merchant. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Juris Publication, Inc.Google Scholar
Carbonnier, Jean. 1979. Sociologia Jurídica. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando H. and Faletto, Enzo. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, R. 1980. “Les choix du cartographe,” in Cartes et Figures de la Terre: 9–15.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 1998. “The Rule of Law Revival.” Foreign Affairs, 77(2): 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Lewis. 1976. Complete Works. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Carson, W. G. 1979. “The Conventionalization of Early Factory Crime.” International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 7: 37–60.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Horácio Martins de. 2002. “A emancipação do movimento no movimento de emancipação social continuada (resposta a Zander Navarro),” in Santos (ed.) (2002b): 233–260.Google Scholar
Cascio, Nina. 1990. “Human Rights in South and Southeast Asia: A Selective Bibliography,” in Welch, Jr. and Leary (eds.): 235–298.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio (ed.). 1979. UN Law Fundamental Rights: Two Topics in International Law. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Sijthoff & Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, Clapham, A, and Weiler, J (eds.). 1991. Human Rights and the European Community: Methods of Protection. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. 1979. “Political Self-Determination – Old Concepts and New Developments,” in Cassese (ed.): 137–173.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. 1991. Human Rights and the European Community: The Substantive Law. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1946. The Myth of the State. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Castles, S. et al. 1984. Here for Good: Western Europe’s New Ethnic Minorities. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Ceceña, Ana Esther. 1998. “De cómo se construye la esperanza.” Chiapas, 6: 135–147.Google Scholar
Ceceña, Ana Esther. 1999. “La resistencia como espacio de construcción del nuevo mundo.” Chiapas, 7: 93–114.Google Scholar
Ceceña, Ana Esther 2001. “Por la humanidad y contra el neoliberalismo. Líneas centrales del discurso zapatista.” Observatorio Social de América Latina, 3: 25–30.Google Scholar
Charny, David. 1991. “Competition among Jurisdictions in Formulating Corporate Law Rules: An American Perspective on the ‘Race to the Bottom’ in the European Communities.” Harvard International Law Journal, 32: 423–456.Google Scholar
Chase-Dunn, Christopher. 1991. Global Formation: Structures of the World-Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. 1984. “Gandhi and the Critique of Civil Society,” in Guha (ed.): 153–195.Google Scholar
Chekki, Dan. 1988. “Transnational Networks in Global Development: Canada and the Third World.” International Social Science Journal, 40(3): 383–397.Google Scholar
Chiba, Masaji. 1989. Legal Pluralism: Toward a General Theory through Japanese Legal Culture. Tokyo: Tokai University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Herman, Edward. 1979. The Political Economy of Human Rights. Vol. 1: The Washington Connection and Third World Fascism; Vol. 2: After the Cataclysm: Postwar Indochina and the Construction of Imperial Ideology. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Cifuentes, Jose Emilio. 1993. “El Procedimiento Penal y los Derechos Humanos de los Pueblos Indios en los Umbrales del Siglo XXI.” Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the ISA Research Committee on Sociology of Law. Oñati, July 5–9.Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew. 1991. Human Rights and the European Community: A Critical Overview. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Clark, John. 1990. Democratizing Development: the Role of Voluntary Associations. West Hartford: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Clegg, S. and Dunkerley, D. 1980. Organization, Class and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cobban, Alfred. 1964. Rousseau and the Modern State. 2nd edition. London: George Alien and Unwin.Google Scholar
Cochrane, Allan and Anderson, J. 1986. “States and Systems of States,” in J. Anderson (ed.): 211–229.Google Scholar
Cocks, Joan. 1989. The Oppositional Imagination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coelho, João Paulo Borges. 2002. “Estado, comunidades e calamidades naturais no Moçambique rural,” in Santos (ed.) (2002d).Google Scholar
Coello Martín, Carlos. 2009. “Aguafuertes sobre la invocación de los derechos históricos como cuestión política o puramente administrativa.” Revista Aragonesa de Administración Pública, 34: 127–226.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1978. Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defense. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Robin and Rai, S (eds.). 2000. Global Social Movements. London: The Athelone Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Robin. 1987. The New Helots. Migrants in the International Division of Labour. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Colletti, Lucio. 1974. From Rousseau to Lenin. Studies in Ideology and Society. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Collier, George. 1995. Structural Adjustment and New Regional Movements: the Zapatista Rebellion in Chiapas. Ethnic Conflict and Governance in Comparative Perspective. Latin American Program. Washington, DC: The Woodrow Wilson Center. Working Paper, 15.Google Scholar
Collier, George A. 1997. “Reaction and Retrenchment in the Highlands of Chiapas.” Journal of Latin American Anthropology, 3(1): 14–31.Google Scholar
Comaroff, Jean and Comaroff, John L. (eds.). 2001. Millenial Capitalism and the Culture of Neoliberalism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Compa, Lance and Diamond, Stephen (eds.). 1996. Human Rights, Labor Rights, and International Trade. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Congressional Research Service. 2019. Combating Corruption in Latin America: Congressional Considerations. In https://crsreports.congress.govR45733Google Scholar
Connell, R. W. 1987. Gender and Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Copeland, Emily. 1992. “Global Refugee Policy: An Agenda for the 1990s.” International Migration Review, 26: 992–999.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. 2000. Intellectual Property Rights, The WTO and developing countries: the TRIPS agreement and policy options. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Cowhey, Peter. 1990. “The International Telecommunications Regime: The Political Roots of High Technology Regimes” International Organization, 44(2): 169–199.Google Scholar
Crawford, James (ed.). 1992. The Rights of People. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Group, Crucible. 1994. People, Plants and Patents: the impact of property on trade, plant biodiversity, and rural society. Ottawa: IRDS.Google Scholar
Cunha, Manuela C. 1992. “Custom Is Not a Thing. It is a Path: Reflections on the Brazilian Indian Case,” in An-na’im (ed.): 276–294.Google Scholar
Dahl, T. S. and Snare, A, 1978. “The Coercion of Privacy,” in Smart and Smart (eds.): 8–26.Google Scholar
Daoyu, Li. 1992. “The Right to Development – An Inalienable Human Right.” Beijing Review, 35(51): 8–9.Google Scholar
Darian-Smith, Eve. 1998. “Power in Paradise: The Political Implications of Santos’s Utopia.” Law and Social Inquiry, 23: 81–120.Google Scholar
Darian-Smith, Eve and Fitzpatrick, Peter (eds.). 1999. Laws of the Potstcolonial. Ann Harbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
David, René and Brierly, J. 1978. Major Legal Systems in the World Today. London: Stevens and Sons.Google Scholar
David, René. 1950. Traité elementaire de droit civil comparé. Paris: Libraire Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence.Google Scholar
Davis, Martha. 1993. “Domestic Workers: out of the Shadows.” Human Rights, 20(2): 14–15, 28–29.Google Scholar
Debray, Regis. 1967. Strategy for Revolution. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Del Vecchio, G. 1957. Persona, estado y derecho. Madrid: Revista Occidente.Google Scholar
Delaney, David. 1991. “On the Boundedness of Law in a ‘Global’ World.” Paper presented at the Law and Society Association and ISA Research Committee on Sociology of Law Conference. Amsterdam, June.Google Scholar
Delgado, Gary. 1983. “Organizing Undocumented Workers.” Social Policy, 13: 6–29.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella and Meny, Yves. 1997. Democracy and Corruption in Europe. London: Printer.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella and Vannucci, Alberto. 1997. “The ‘Preverse Effects’ of Political Corruption,” in Heywood (ed.): 100–122.Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, Mireille. 2002. Towards a Truly Common Law: Europe as a Laboratory for Legal Pluralism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
d’Entreves, Passerin. 1972. Natural Law. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1984. Discurso do Método e as Paixões da Alma. Lisbon: Sá da Costa.Google Scholar
Deyo, Frederic (ed.). 1987. The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant. 1997. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves. 1990. “The Big Bang and the Law: The Internationahzation and Restructuration of the Legal Field,” in Featherstone (ed.): 279–293.Google Scholar
Diamond, Irene and Orenstein, G (eds.). 1990. Reweaving the Wood: the Emergence of Ecofeminism. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
Dias, João Paulo and Conceição, Gomes. 2018. “Judicial Reforms ‘Under Pressure’: The New Map/Organisation of the Portuguese Judicial System,” Utrecht Law Review, 14(1): 174–186.Google Scholar
Dicey, Albert Vern. 1948. Law and Public Opinion in England. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Diemer, Alwin et al. 1986. Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Dijk, Teun A. van. 1987. “Elite Discourse and Racism,” in Zavala, Dijk, and Diaz-Diocaretz (eds.): 81–122.Google Scholar
Dingwall, R. and Lewis, P (eds.). 1983. The Sociology of Professions. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. 1989. The Ethics of International Business. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 1984. “The ‘Right to Development’: How not to Link Rights and Development,” in Welch, Jr. and Meltzer (eds.): 261–283.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 1989. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 1992. “Human Rights in the New World Order.” World Policy Journal, 9: 249–277.Google Scholar
Donzelot, J. 1977. La police des families. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Drabek, Anne G. 1987. Development Alternatives: The Challenge for NGOs. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Draetta, Ugo, Lake, R, and Nanda, Ved. 1992. Breach and Adaptation of International Contracts. An Introduction to Lex Mercatoria. Salem, NH: Butterworth Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
Dubly, Alain and Granda, Alicia. 1995. “Los derechos indígenas en el Ecuador.” El Otro Derecho 18, Vol 6 (3),Bogotá: ILSA.Google Scholar
Dunne, Tim and Wheeler, Nicholas (eds.). 1999. Human rights in global politics.: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dupuy, René-Jean. 1974. The Law of the Sea. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1958. The Rules of Sociological Method. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1964. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dwyer, Kevin. 1991. Arab Voices. The Human Rights Debate in the Middle East. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Eder, Klaus. 1986. “Prozedurale Rationalität. Moderne Rechtsentwicklung jenseits von formaler Rationalisierung.” Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 7(1): 1–30.Google Scholar
Eder, Klaus. 1987. “Die Autoritat des Rechts. Erne soziale Kritik prozeduraler Rationalität.” Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 8(2): 193–230.Google Scholar
Edwards, P.K. and Scullion, Hugh. 1982. The Social Organization of Industrial. Conflict. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Eugen. 1936. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Elkins, Paul. 1992. A New World Order: Grassroots Movements for Global Change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellul, Jacques. 1965. The Technological Society. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1985. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1998. “Coming to Terms with the Past: A Framework for the Study of Justice in the Transition to Democracy” Archives Europeennes de Sociologie, 39:7–48.Google Scholar
Emmanuel, A. 1972. Unequal Exchange: a Study of the Imperialism of Trade. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. 1966. Herr Eugen Dühring’s revolution in science (Anti-Dühring). New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Epstein, A. L. (ed.). 1967. The Craft of Social Anthropology. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, D, and Skocpol, T (eds.). 1985. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1979. Dependent Development: the Alliance of Multinational, State and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1986. “State, Capital and the Transformation of Dependence: The Brazilian Computer Case.” World Development, 14: 791–808.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1992. “The State as Problem and Solution: Predation, Embedded Autonomy and Structural Change,” in Haggard and Kaufman (eds.): 139–181.Google Scholar
Ewald, Francois. 1986a. L’état providence. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Ewald, Francois. 1986b. “A Concept of Social Law,” in Teubner (ed.): 40–75.Google Scholar
Eze, Osita. 1984. Human Rights in Africa: Some Selected Problems. Lagos: Nigerian Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
Fabian, Johannes. 1983. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Richard, Falk, Kirn, S, and Mendlowitz, S (eds.). 1982. Toward a Just World Order. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Falk, Richard. 1981. Human Rights and State Sovereignty. New York: Holmes and Meier Publishers.Google Scholar
Falk, Richard. 1992a. “Cultural Foundations for the International Protection of Human Rights,” in An-na’im (ed.): 44–64.Google Scholar
Falk, Richard. 1992b. Explorations at the Edge of Time: The Prospects for World Order. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Fallers, Lloyd. 1969. Law without Precedent: Legal Ideas in Action in the Courts of Colonial Busoga. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
FAO. 2001. Food Insecurity: When People Live with Hunger and Starvation. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/y1500e/y1500e00.htm, accessed in June 2002.Google Scholar
Farjat, G. 1982. “Reflexions sur les codes de conduite privés,” in Fouchard (ed.): 47–66.Google Scholar
Featherstone, Mike (ed.). 1990. Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Febbrajo, Alberto. 1986. “The Rules of the Game in the Welfare State,” in Teubner (ed.): 128–150.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. 1990. Democracy, the Rule of Law and Judicial Review. Federal Law Review, 19(1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0067205X9001900101.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Paul and Anselm, J. 1989. Paul Johann Anselm Ritter von Feuerbachs Leben und Wirken. Published by Ludwig Feuerbach (1852). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Fine, B. et al. (eds.). 1979. Capitalism and the Rule of Law. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter. 1983. “Law, Plurality and Underdevelopment,” in Sugarman (ed.): 159–182.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2001. Modernism and the Grounds of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fontenau, G. 1992. “The Rights of Migrants, Refugees or Asylum Seekers under International Law.” International Migration, 30 (special issue): 57–66.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1976. La volonté de savoir. Paris: Gallmard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prision. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power and Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Fouchard, P. (ed.). 1982. Le droit des relations économiques internationales. Paris: LITEC.Google Scholar
Fourier, Charles. 1967. Théorie des quatre mouvements et des destinées générales. Paris: Jean-Jacques Pauvert, Editeur.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy and Nicholson, Linda. 1990. “Social Criticism without Philosophy: an Encounter between Feminism and Postmodernism,” in Nicholson (ed.): 19–38.Google Scholar
Frideres, James (ed.). 1989. Multiculturalism and Intergroup Relations. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeff. 1987. “International Capital and National Development: Comments on Postimperialism,” in Becker et al.: 179–191.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence. 1975. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Friedman, Neil. 1986. “A Human Rights Approach to the Labor Rights of Undocumented Workers.” California Law Review, 74: 1715–1745.Google Scholar
Fröbel, Folker, Heinrichs, J, and Kreye, O. 1980. The New International Division of Labor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frühling, Hugo. 1992. “Political Culture and Gross Human Rights Violations in Latin America,” in An-na’im (ed.): 253–275.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1981. “Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering and Indigenous Law.” Journal of Legal Pluralism, 19: 1–47.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1983. “Mega-law and Mega-lawyering in the Contemporary U.S.,” in Dingwall and Lewis (eds.): 152–176.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1991. Competing Equalities. Law and the Backward Classes in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1992. “Law Abounding: Legalization around the North Atlantic.” The Modern Law Review, 55(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo. 1970. Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Galtung, Johan. 1981. “Western Civilization: Anatomy and Pathology.” Alternatives, 7: 145–169.Google Scholar
Gamble, A. 1982. An Introduction To Modern Social and Political Thought. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
García-Villegas, Mauricio 1993. La Eficacia Simbolica del Derecho. Examen de Situationes Colombianas. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes.Google Scholar
García-Villegas, Mauricio and Rodríguez, César A (2001). “La Acción de Tutela en Colombia,” in Santos and García-Villegas (eds.): 423–454.Google Scholar
Gardner, James. 1980. Legal Imperialism. American Lawyers and Foreign Aid in Latin America. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Garst, Daniel. 1985. “Wallerstein and His Critics.” Theory and Society, 14: 469–495.Google Scholar
Garth, Bryant. 1995. “Access to Justice,” in Rowat, Malik, and Dakolias (eds.). Judicial Reform in Latin America and Caribbean. Proceedings of a World Bank Conference: 88–91.Google Scholar
Gebeye, Berihun Adugna. 2019. “The Janus face of legal pluralism for the rule of law promotion in sub-Saharan Africa.” Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue Canadienne des Etudes Africaines, 53(2): 337 353.Google Scholar
Gedicks, Al. 2001. Resource Rebels. Native Challenges to Mining and Oil Corporations. Cambridge: South End Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretative Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gereffi, Gary and Korzeniewicz, Miguel (eds.). 1994. Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport, Conn: Praeger.Google Scholar
Gessner, Volkmar and Schade, A. 1990. “Conflicts of Culture in Cross-Border Legal Relations: The Conception of a Research Topic in the Sociology of Law,” in Featherstone (ed.): 253–277.Google Scholar
Gessner, Volkmar. 1990. “Structure and Culture of Cross-Border Legal Relations.” Zentrum für Europäische Rechtspolitik, University of Bremen.Google Scholar
Ghai, Yash. 1993a. “Asian Perspectives on Human Rights.” Hong Kong: Law School, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Ghai, Yash. 1993b. “The Rule of Law and Capitalism Reflections on the Basic Law.” Paper presented at the Workshop on Globalization and the Future of Law in China. Madison: Global Studies Research Program, October 1 –2.Google Scholar
Ghai, Yash. 1993c. Ethnicity and Governance in Asia: A Report to the Ford Foundation. Draft. New York: Ford Foundation.Google Scholar
Ghai, Yash. 1999. “Rights, Social Justice and Globalization in East Asia,” in Bauer and Bell (eds.): 241–263.Google Scholar
Ghai, Yash (ed.). 2000a. Autonomy and Ethnicity: Negotiating Claims in Multi-ethnic States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ghai, Yash (ed.). 2000b. “Universalism and Relativism: Human Rights as a Framework for Negotiating Interethnic Differences,” Cardozo Law Review, 21: 1095–1140.Google Scholar
Ghai, Yash. 2001. Human Rights and Social Development: Toward Democratization and Social Justice. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1981. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1990. Sociology. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1991a. The Consequences of Modernity. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1991b. Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1998. The Third Way: the Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gilroy, Paul. 1993. The Black Atlantic. Modernity and Double Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gluckman, Max. 1955. The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Berthold. 1964. “Frontières du droit et lex mercatoria,” Archives de Philosophie du Droit, 9: 177–192.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Edward. 1988. “Gaia: Some Implications for Theoretical Ecology,” The Ecologist, 18(2–3): 64–74.Google Scholar
Golub, Stephen. 2000. “Battling Apartheid, Building a New South Africa,” in McClymont and Golub (eds.): 19–54.Google Scholar
Gordon, David M. 1988. “The Global Economy: New Edifice or Crumbling Foundations?” New Left Review, 168: 24–64.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda (ed.). 1991. Women, the State and Welfare. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda. 1990. Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right. Birth Control in America. Revised and updated. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gordon, Michael E. and Turner., Lowell (eds.). 2000. Transnational Cooperation among Labor Unions. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. (ed.). 1980. Centre and Periphery: Spatial Variation in Politics. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin. 1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Gregory, Derek and Urry, John (eds.). 1985. Social Relations and Spatial Structures. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, John. 1986. “What is Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism, 24: 1–56.Google Scholar
Grolin, Jesper. 1987. “The Question of Antarctica and the Problem of Sovereignty.” International Relations, 9: 39–55.Google Scholar
Gros, Christian. 2000. Políticas de Etnicidad: Identidad, Estado y Modernidad. Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. 1964. De Jure Belli ac Pacis Libri Tres Volume II. New York: Oceana Publications.Google Scholar
Anilema, Guamán, Nelly, María. 2015. Caso La Cocha II: Análisis de la problemática de la Justicia Indígena y Justicia Ordinaria en el contexto ecuatoriano, a partir de la Sentencia de la Corte Constitucional en la que establece límites a la justicia ancestral. Thesis. Universidad San Francisco De Quito, Colegio de Jurisprudencia.Google Scholar
Guevara-Gil, Armando. 1992. The Impact of Development Efforts on the Configuration and Enforcement of Fishing Rights in Lake Titicaca, Peru, 1930s-1990s. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Department of Anthropology.Google Scholar
Guha, Ranajit (ed.). 1984. Subaltern Studies III: Writings on South Asian History and Society. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guidieri, Remo and Pellizzi, Francesco. 1988. “Introduction: ‘Smoking Mirrors’ – Modern Polity and Ethnicity,” in Guidieri, Pellizzi, and Tambiah (eds.): 7–38.Google Scholar
Gulliver, Phillip 1969. “Introduction to Case Studies of Law in Non-Western Societies,” in Nader (ed.): 11–23.Google Scholar
Gurvitch, Georges. 1942. Sociology of Law. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, Francisco and Jaramillo, Ana Maria. 2002. “Pactos paradoxais,” in Santos (ed.) (2002c).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1978. Zur Rekonstruktion des historischen Materialismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1986. “Law as Medium and Law as Institution,” in Teubner (ed.): 203–220.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. “Wie ist Legitimität durch Legalität Möglich?” Kritische Justiz, 20: 1–16.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan and Simmons, B. A.. 1987. “Theories of International Regimes.” International Organization, 41: 491–549.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert. 1992. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Haken, Hermann. 1977. Synergetics: An Introduction. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Hakovirta, Harto. 1993. “The Global Refugee Problem: A Model and Its Application.” International Political Science Review, 14: 35–57.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart and Gleben, Bram (eds.). 1992. Formations of Modernity. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart and du Gay, Paul (eds.). 1996. Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1996. “Who Needs Identity?” In Hall and du Gay (eds.): 1–17.Google Scholar
Hammer, Thomas. 1989. “Comparing European and North American International Migration.” International Migration Review, 23: 631–637.Google Scholar
Hancher, Leigh and Moran, M (eds.). 1989. Capitalism, Culture and Economic Regulation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F. 1983. “The Discretionary Decision: Adversarial Advocacy – Reform or Reconstruction?” Conference on Reflexive Law and the Regulatory Crisis, Madison: Institute for Legal Studies.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F. 1992. “A Reply.” Law and Society Review, 26(4): 819–824.Google Scholar
Hannerz, Ulf. 1990. “Cosmopolitan and Local in World Culture,” in Featherstone (ed.): 237–251.Google Scholar
Harley, J. B. 1989. “Deconstructing the Map.” Cartographica, 26(2): 1–20.Google Scholar
Harley, J. B. 1990. “Cartography, Ethics and Social Theory.” Cartographica, 27(2): 1–23.Google Scholar
Hart, Herbert. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hartigan, Kevin. 1992. “Matching Humanitarian Norms with Cold Hard Interests: the Making of Refugee Policies in Mexico and Honduras, 1980–1989.” International Organization, 46: 709–730.Google Scholar
Hassan, Riffat. 1982. “On Human Rights and the Qur’anic Perspective.” Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 19(3): 51–65.Google Scholar
Hathaway, James. 1991. The Law of Refugee Status. Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Haveman, Paul. 2000. “Enmeshed in the Web? Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in the Network Society” in Cohen and Rai (eds.): 18–32.Google Scholar
Hay, Douglas et al. 1975. Albion’s Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth Century England. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. 1979. Law, Legislation and Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1981. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts oder Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft im Grundrisse. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Heintze, Hans-Joachim. 1992. “International Law and Indigenous Peoples.” Law and State, 45: 37–67.Google Scholar
Heisler, Martin. 1992. “Migration, International Relations and the New Europe: Theoretical Perspective from Institutional Political Sociology.” International Migration Review, 26: 596–622.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1993a. “Democracy: From City-States to a Cosmopolitan Order?” in Held (ed.): 13–52.Google Scholar
Held, David (ed.). 1993b. Prospects for Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, Agnès. 1976. The Theory of Need in Marx. London: Allison Busby.Google Scholar
Heller, Agnès. 1993. “A Theory of Needs Revisited.” Thesis Eleven, 35: 18–35.Google Scholar
Heller, Thomas. 1992. “A Retrospective on Law and Development.” Paper presented at the Asia Foundation Asian Law Conference. Chaing Mai, Thailand, August 31–September 4.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn. 1995. “The Spillover Effects of Privatization on Russian Legal Culture.” Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, 5(39): 40–64.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn. 1996. “Law and Development in Russia: A Misguided Enterprise?” Proceedings of the American Society of International Law, 90: 237–240Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn. 1997. “Legal Development in Post-Soviet Russia,” Post-Soviet Affairs,13: 231–256.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn. 1998. “Growing Pains: Balancing Justice and Efficiency in Russian Economic Courts,” Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, 12:301–331Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn. 1999. “Rewriting the Rules of the Game in Russia: The Neglected Issue of Demand for Law,” East European Constitutional Review, 8: 88–95.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn. 2001. “‘Demand’ for Law in Russia – a Mixed Picture,” East European Constitutional Review,10:72–76Google Scholar
Henrikson, A. 1975. “The Map as an ‘Idea’: The Role of Cartographic Imagery during the Second World War.” The American Cartographer, 2: 19–53.Google Scholar
Henrikson, A. 1980. “America’s Changing Place in the World: from ‘Periphery’ to ‘Centre’?” in Gottmann (ed.): 73–100.Google Scholar
Henry, Stuart and Milovanovic, D. 1993. “Back to Basics: A Postmodern Redefinition of Crime.” The Critical Criminologist, 5(2/3): 1–6.Google Scholar
Heywood, Paul (ed.). 1997. Political Corruption. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hilferding, Rudolf. 1981. Finance Capital: a Study of the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Marianne and Keller, E. F. (eds.). 1990. Conflicts in Feminism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert. 1977. The Passions and the Interests. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1946. Leviathan. Edited with an Introduction by Michael Oakeshott. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1975. The Age of Capital 1848–1875. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Hodgkiss, A., G. 1981. Understanding Maps. A Systematic History of Their Use and Development. Folkestone: Dawson.Google Scholar
Holloway, John and Peláez, E (eds.). 1998. Zapatista!: Reinventing Revolution in Mexico. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Holloway, John. 1998. “Dignity’s Revolt” in Holloway and Peláez (eds.): 159–198.Google Scholar
Hoogenboom, T. 1992. “Free Movement of Non-EC Nationals, Schengen and Beyond,” in Meijers et al.: 74–95.Google Scholar
Hooker, M. 1975. Legal Pluralism: An Introduction to Colonial and Neo-Colonial Laws. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hoon, Shim Jae. 1993. “Judging the Judges.” Far Eastern Economic Review, December 9: 28–30.Google Scholar
Howard, Rhoda. 1983. “The Full-Belly Thesis: Should Economic Rights Take Priority over Civil and Political Rights? Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa.” Human Rights Quarterly, 5: 467–490.Google Scholar
Howard, Rhoda. 1984. “Evaluating Human Rights in Africa: some Problems of Implicit Comparisons.” Human Rights Quarterly, 6: 160–179.Google Scholar
Howard, Rhonda. 1992. “Dignity, Community, and Human Rights,” in Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspective: A Request for Consensus, ed. Abdullah Ahmed An -Na’im. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press: 81–104.Google Scholar
Huet, Jérôme and Maisl, Herbert. 1989. Droit de l’informatique et des télécommunications. Paris: Litec.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 1996. “Small Hands of Slavery. Bonded Child Labor in India.” Human Rights Watch Children’s Rights Project, Human Rights Watch/Asia. Available at http://www.hrw.org/reports/1996/India3.htm, accessed in June 2002.Google Scholar
Humm, Maggie. 1990. The Dictionary of Feminist Theory. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Hungarian Helsinki Committee. 2018. Attacking the Last Line of Defence. Judicial Independence in Hungary in Jeopardy. Budapest: Hungarian Helsinki Committee – www.helsinki.hu.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan. 1978. The Sociological Movement in Law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan. 1993. Explorations of Law and Society. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunter, Allen and Trubek, Louise. 1992. NGO’s and Democralization. Research proposal. Madison: Global Studies Research Program.Google Scholar
Hunter, Allen. 1992. TANGO Bibliography. Madison: A. E. Havens Center for the Study of Social Structure and Social Change.Google Scholar
Hyndman, Patricia. 1992. “Cultural Legitimacy in the Formulation and Implementation of Human Rights Law and Policy in Australia,” in An-na’im (ed.): 295–338.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael. 1978. A Just Measure of Pain. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ihering, R. 1915. The Struggle for Law. 2nd edition. Chicago: Callaghan.Google Scholar
Inada, Kenneth K. 1990. “A Buddhist Response to the Nature of Human Rights,” in Welch, Jr. and Leary (eds.): 91–101.Google Scholar
Jackson, Jean E. and Warren, Kay B. 2005.“Indigenous Movements in Latin America, 1992-2004: Controversies, Ironies, New Directions,”Annual Review of Anthropology, 34: 549–573.Google Scholar
Jahangir, Asma. 1990. “Protection of Religious Minorities and Women: The Impact of Islamic Law in Pakistan,” in Welch, Jr. and Leary (eds.): 206–217.Google Scholar
James, William. 1969. The Writings of William James. A Comprehensive Edition. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. 1984. “Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism.” New Left Review, 146: 53–92.Google Scholar
Janis, Mark W. 1988. An Introduction to International Law. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Jankovic, I. 1977. “Labor Market and Imprisonment.” Crime and Social Justice, Fall-Winter: 17.Google Scholar
Jasentuliyana, N. 1990. “Space Commerce on a Global Scale.” The Journal of Law and Technology, 5: 1–8.Google Scholar
Jelin, Elizabeth and Eric, Hershberg. (eds.). 1996. Constructing Democracy: Human Rights, Citizenship, and Society in Latin America. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Jencks, Charles. 1987. Post-Modernism. The New Classicism in Art and Architecture. London: Academy Editions.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Rhys. 1984. “Divisions over the International Division of Labor.” Capital and Class, 22: 28–57.Google Scholar
Jervis, W. W. 1936. The World in Maps. A Study of Map Evolution. London: George Philip.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob 1990a. State Theory. Putting Capitalist States in their Place. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 1990b. “Regulation Theories in Retrospect and Prospect.” Economy and Society, 19: 153–216.Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian. 1991. “Market without a State.” Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans. 1985. Das Prinzip der Verantwortung. 5th edition. Frankfurt: Insel Verlag.Google Scholar
Jones, Carol. 1993. “The Globahzation of Rule of Law? Some Questions from Asia.” Paper presented at the Workshop on Globalization and the Future of Law in China. Madison: Global Studies Research Program, October 1 –2.Google Scholar
Joshi, Barbara. 1990. “Human Rights as Dynamic Process: The Case of India’s Untouchables,” in Welch, Jr. and Leary (eds.): 162–185.Google Scholar
Joyner, Christopher. 1986. “Legal Implications of the Concept of the Common Heritage of Humankind.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 35: 190–199.Google Scholar
Junqueira, Eliane and Rodrigues, Jose. 1992. “Pasargada revisitada.” Sociologia. Problemas e Práticas, 12: 9–17.Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul. 2000. The Cultural Study of Law: Reconstructing Legal Scholarship. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Philippe. 1982. “Droit international économique, droit du développement, lex mercatoria; concept unique ou pluralisme des ordres juridiques?” in P. Fouchard (ed.): 97–123.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Mary. 1999. “Transnational Civil Society,” in Dunne, and Wheeler, (eds.) Human Rights in Global Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 195–213.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst. 1957. The King’s Two Bodies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Hermann. 1958. The Definition of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keane, John. 1988a. Democracy and Civil Society. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Keane, John. 1988b. Civil Society and the State: New European Perspectives. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Keates, J. S. 1982. Understanding Maps. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. R. 1984. History, Law and the Human Sciences: Medieval and Renaissance Perspectives. London: Variorum Reprints.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. 1962. Teoria pura do direito. 2nd edition. Volume II. Coimbra: Amado.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. 1967. The Pure Theory of Law. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kendall, Laurel. 1985. Shamans, Housewives and Other Restless Spirits. Women in Korean Ritual Life. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David. 1988. “A New Stream of International Law Scholarship.” Wisconsin International Law Journal, 7: 1–49.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David. 1999. “Images of Religion in International Legal Theory,” in Janis, and Evans, (eds.): Religion and International Law. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff:145–153.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1997. A Critique of Adjudication. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Paul. 1993. Preparing for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert and Nye, Joseph. 1977. Power and Interdependence. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1985. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kimball, Lee. 1983. “The Law of the Sea – on the Shoals.” Environment, 25(9): 14–20, 41–44.Google Scholar
King, Anthony D. 1986. The Bungalow: the Production of a Global Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kiss, Alexandra. 1985. “The Common Heritage of Mankind: Utopia or Reality?” International Journal, 40: 423–441.Google Scholar
Kiss, Alexandra. 1989. Droit international de I’environment. Paris: Pedone.Google Scholar
Kitchin, William. 1995. “Legal Reform and the Expansion of Judicial Power in Russia,” in Tate and Vallinder (eds.): 441–459.Google Scholar
Klug, Heinz. 1996. Constitutionalism, Democratization and Constitution-making for a New South Africa. LL.M. dissertation. University of Wisconsin – Madison Law School.Google Scholar
Klug, Heinz. 2000a. Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism and South Africa’s Political Reconstruction. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klug, Heinz. 2000b. “Accidental Outcomes? The Contradictory Impact of Multiple Spheres of Politics on the Definition of Global Rules.” Paper presented at the Law and Society Association 2000 Annual Meeting, Miami.Google Scholar
Klug, Heinz. 2001a. “From Floor to Ceiling? South Africa, Brazil, and the Impact of the HIV/AIDS Crisis on the Interpretations of TRIPS.” Socio-Legal Newsletter, 34: 4–5.Google Scholar
Klug, Heinz. 2001b. “WTO Puts Public Health Before Patents – but … ” Socio-Legal Newsletter, 35: 14.Google Scholar
Klug, Heinz. 2002. “Access to Health care: Judging Implementation in the Context of AIDS.” South African Journal of Human Rights, 114–117.Google Scholar
Klug, Heinz, Sachs, Albie, and Madlingozi, Tshepo. Forthcoming. In Santos, Araújo, and Aragón (eds.), Decolonizing the State: Beyond False or Impossible Promises.Google Scholar
Koncewicz, Tomasz and Konopacka, Magdalena. 2018. “Poland. The State Of Liberal Democracy,” in Albert et al. (eds.): 225–229.Google Scholar
Konvitz, Josef. 1980. “Remplir la carte,” in Cartes et Figures de la Terre: 304–314.Google Scholar
Korten, David. 1990. Getting to the 21st Century: Voluntary Action and the Global Agenda. West Hartford: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 1985. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koser, Khalid. 2001. The Return and Reintegration of Rejected Asylum Seekers and Irregular Migrants. An Analysis of Government Assisted Return Programmes in Selected European Countries. London: International Organization for Migration.Google Scholar
Kothari, Ashish (1999). “Biodiversity and Intellectual Property Rights: Can the two Co-Exist?” Linkages 4(2). Available at http://www.iisd.ca/linkages/journal/kothari.html, accessd on June 6, 2002.Google Scholar
Kotz, David. 1990. “A Comparative Analysis of the Theory of Regulation and the Social Structure of Accumulation Theory.” Science and Society, 54: 5–28.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen (ed.). 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kuletz, Valerie. 1992. “Eco-Feminist Philosophy: Interview with Barbara Holland-Cunz.” Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 3(2): 63–78.Google Scholar
Kussbach, E. 1992. European challenge: East-West migration. International Migration Review 26: 646–667.Google Scholar
Kyler, et al. (eds.). 2012. The Dynamicas of Legal Pluralism in Mozambique. Maputo : Kapicua.Google Scholar
Lacoste, Yves. 1976. La Géographie, ça sert d’abord a faire la guerre. Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar
Lacoste, Yves. 1980. “Les objets géographiques,” in Cartes et Figures de la Terre: 16–23.Google Scholar
Lâm, Maivân. 1985. “The Imposition of Anglo-American Land Tenure Law on Hawaiians.” Journal of Legal Pluralism, 23: 103–128.Google Scholar
Lâm, Maivân. 1991. Indigenous Claims and the Re-Configuring of Self-Determination in International Law. Madison: Institute for Legal Studies.Google Scholar
Lanzerotti, Louis et al. 1993. Science and Stewardship in the Antarctic. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Larson, Jane E. 2002. “Informality, Illegality, and Inequality.”Yale Law and Policy Review, 20: 137–182.Google Scholar
Lash, Scott and Urry, John. 1987. The End of Organized Capitalism. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Leary, Virginia. 1990. “The Asian Region and the International Human Rights Movement,” in Welch, Jr. and Leary (eds.): 13–27.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Dominique 1976. Lysenko: histoire réelle d’une science prolétarienne. Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar
Leites, Justin. 1991. “Modernist Jurisprudence as a Vehicle for Gender Role Reform in the Islamic World.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 22: 251–330.Google Scholar
Lennox, Malissia. 1993. “Refugees, Racism, and Reparations: A Critique of the United States’ Haitian Immigration Policy.” Stanford Law Review, 45: 687–724.Google Scholar
Lessnoff, Michael (ed.). 1990. Social Contract Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lev, Daniel. 1990. “Human Rights NGOs in Indonesia and Malaysia,” in Welch, Jr. and Leary (eds.): 142–161.Google Scholar
Levi-Bruhl, Henri. 1971. Sociologie du droit. 4th edition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Sandra R. 2001. Narrow, But Not Straight: Professionalized Rights Strategies in the Chicago GLBT Movement. Thesis (MS) in Sociology, University of Wisconsin – Madison.Google Scholar
Lewellen, Ted C. 1985. “Structures of Terror: A System Analysis of Repression in El Salvador,” in Shepherd, Jr. and Nanda (eds.): 59–81.Google Scholar
Lindahl, Hans. 2019. “Inside and Outside Global Law.” Sydney Law Review, 41(1): 1–34.Google Scholar
Lindholm, Tore. 1992. “Prospects on the Cultural Legitimacy of Human Rights: The Cases of Liberalism and Marxism,” in An-na’im (ed.): 387–426.Google Scholar
Lipietz, Alain. 1989. Choisir I’audace. Une alternative pour le XXIe siècle. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Lippman, Matthew. 1985. “Multinational Corporations and Human Rights,” in Shepherd, Jr. and Nanda (eds.): 249–272.Google Scholar
Lipson, Charles. 1985. Standing Guard: Protecting Foreign Capital in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Little, Cheryl. 1993. “United States Haitian Policy: A History of Discrimination.” New York Law School Journal of Human Rights, 10: 269–323.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1952. The Second Treatise of Government. New York: The Liberal Arts Press.Google Scholar
Lodge, Juliet. 1989. The European Community and the Challenge of the Future. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Lohrmann, Reinhard. 2000. “Migrants, Refugees and Insecurity. Current Threats to Peace?” International Migration, 38(4): 3–22.Google Scholar
Lopes, João and Marcos, de Almeida. 2002. “‘O dorso da cidade’: os sem-terra e a concepção de uma outra cidade,” in Santos (ed.) (2002b): 288–326.Google Scholar
Lorenz, F.M. 1995. “Democratic Reform and the Rule of Law in Cambodia.” Washington State Bar News, February, 26–30.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin and Walker, Neil (eds.). 2008. The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. E. 1979. Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1972. Rechtssoziologie. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1979. Trust and Power: Two Works. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1984. Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeiner Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1986. “The Self-reproduction of Law and its Limits,” in Teubner, (ed.): 111–127.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1988a. “The Unity of the Legal System,” in Teubner (ed.): 12–35.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1988b. “Closure and Openness: On Reality in the World of Law,” in Teubner (ed.): 335–348.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. 1972. Studies in European Realism. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 1974. Power: a Radical View. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart. 1963. “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study.” American Sociological Review, 28: 55–66.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart. 1983. “Private Government.” Disputes Processing Research Program Working Papers, 6. University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart. 1987. “Images of Law in Everyday Life: the Lessons of School, Entertainment and Spectator Sports.” Law and Society Review, 21(2): 185–218.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Maduro, Luís Miguel. 1992. “An Institutional Comparative Approach to the Regulatory Problems in the European Community.” Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Mahnkopf, B. (ed.). 1988. Der gewendete Kapitalismus: kritische Beiträge zu einer Theorie der Regulation. Muenster: Westfälischer Dampfboot.Google Scholar
Mahnkopf, B. 1988. “Soziale Grenzen fordistischen Regulation,” in Mahnkopf (ed.): 99–143.Google Scholar
Maizels, Alfred. 1992. Commodities in Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mancini, Frederico. 1989. “The Making of a Constitution for Europe.” Common Market Law Review, 26: 595–614.Google Scholar
Manfrass, Klaus. 1992. “Europe: South-North or East-West Migration?” International Migration Review, 26: 388–400.Google Scholar
Marés, Carlos Frederico. 2000. O Renascer dos Povos Indígenas para o Direito. Curitiba: Juruá Editora.Google Scholar
Marques, Maria Manuel, L. 1987. “A Empresa, o espaço e o Direito.” Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 22: 69–82.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, David. 1989. “Effects of International Law on Migration Policy and Practice: the Uses of Hypocricy.” International Migration Review, 23: 547–578.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1963. The Poverty of Philosophy. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1970. Das Kapital, Volumes. I, II, III. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1973. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. 1967. Communist Manifesto. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Massell, Gregory. 1968. “Law as an Instrument of Revolutionary Change in a Traditional Milieu.” Law and Society Review, 2(2): 179–228.Google Scholar
Massey, Doreen. 1984. Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mayer, Ann Elizabeth. 1991. Islam and Human Rights: Tradition and Politics. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
M’Baye, Keba. 1991. “Droits de l’homme et pays en développement,” in Humanité et droit international: 211–222.Google Scholar
McChesney, Allan. 1992. “Aboriginal Communities, Aboriginal Rights in the Human Rights System in Canada,” in An-na’im (ed.): 221–252.Google Scholar
McClymont, Mary and Golub, Stephen (eds.). 2000. Many Roads to Justice. The Law-Related Work of Ford Foundation Grantees around the World. New York: The Ford Foundation.Google Scholar
McCormick, John. 1999. Supranational Challenges to the Rule of Law: The Case of the European Union. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McHaffie, Patrick et al. 1990. “Ethical Problems in Cartography.” Cartographica, 7: 3–13.Google Scholar
McMichael, Philip and Myhre, D. 1990. “Global Regulation vs. the Nation-State: Agro-Food Systems and the New Politics of Capital.” Review of Radical Political Economy, 22: 59–77.Google Scholar
Medina, Vicente. 1990. Social Contract Theories: Political Obligation or Anarchy? Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Meijers, H. et al. 1992. Schengen. Internationalization of Central Chapters of the Law on Aliens, Refugees, Privacy, Security and the Police. 2nd edition. Leiden: Stichting NJCM-Boekerij.Google Scholar
Mier, Brian. 2019. Voices of the Brazilian Left. San Francisco.Google Scholar
Minda, Gary. 1995. Dignity, Community, and Human Rights. New York: New York University PressGoogle Scholar
Mellor, Mary. 1992. “Eco-Feminism and Eco-Socialism: Dilemmas of Essentialism and Materialism.” Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 3(2): 43–62.Google Scholar
Melossi, D. 1978. “George Rusche and Otto Kirchheimer: Punishment and Social Justice.” Crime and Social Justice, Spring-Summer: 73–85.Google Scholar
Melossi, D. and Pavarini, M. 1981. The Prison and the Factory. Totowa: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Mendelson, Oliver and Baxi, Upendra (eds.). 1994. The Rights of Subordinate Peoples. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meneses, M. P. G. 2002. “‘Quando não há problemas, estamos de boa saúde, sem azar nem nada’: para uma concepção emancipatória da saúde e das medicinas,” in Santos (ed.) (2002d).Google Scholar
Meneses, Maria Paula, Marisa, Gonçalves, and Araújo, Sara. 2018. “‘Sé mak tesi lia?’ Interlegalidade e hibridismo dos sistemas de justiça em Timor-Leste.” Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UNTL, 1(1): 243–275.Google Scholar
Meneses, Maria Paula and Lopes, Júlio (eds.) (2012), O Direito por fora do Direito: as instâncias extra-judiciais de resolução de conflitos em Luanda. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally. 1988. “Legal Pluralism.” Law and Society Review, 22: 869–896.Google Scholar
Merryman, John. 1985. The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America. 2nd edition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Messick, Richard. 1999. “Judicial Reform: A Survey of Issues.” Paper presented to the Workshop on Judicial Reform. Oñati: International Institute of Sociology of Law.Google Scholar
Meyer, William. 1987. “Testing Theories of Cultural Imperialism: International Media and Domestic Impact.” International Interactions, 13: 353–374.Google Scholar
Mier, Brian and Hunt, Daniel. 2019. Year of Lead. Washington, Wall Street and the New Imperialism in Brazil. San Francisco: Blurb.Google Scholar
Mies, Maria and Shiva, Vandana. 1993. Ecofeminism. New Delhi: Kalhi for Women.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter. 2000. Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges and Border Thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter. 2002. “The Many Faces of Cosmo-Polis: Border Thinking and Critical Cosmopolitanism,” in Breckenridge, Pollock, Bhabha, and Chakrabarty (eds.): 157–187.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1921. Principles of Political Economy. London.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. et al. 1972. “Plans,” in Spradley (ed.): 52–64Google Scholar
Miller, Mike. 1992. “Citizen Groups: whom Do They Represent?” Social Policy, Spring: 54–59.Google Scholar
Minda, Gary (1995). Postmodern legal movements : law and jurisprudence at century's end. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Mitra, Kana. 1982. “Human Rights in Hinduism.” Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 19(3): 77–84.Google Scholar
Monmonier, Mark. 1981. Maps. Distortion and Meaning. Washington: Association of American Geographers.Google Scholar
Monmonier, Mark. 1991a. How to Lie with Maps. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Monmonier, Mark. 1991b. “Ethics and Map Design.” Cartographic Perspectives, 10: 3–8.Google Scholar
Monmonier, Mark. 1993. Mapping It Out: Expository Cartography for the Humanities and Social Sciences. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat, baron de. 1989. The Spirit of Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moody, Kim. 1998. Workers in a Lean World: Unions in the International Economy. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally F. 1978. Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1991. “Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community.” International Organization, 45:19–56.Google Scholar
Moro, Sergio Fernando. 2004. “Considerações Sobre A Operação Mani Pulite.” R. CEJ, 26: 56–62.Google Scholar
Moro, Sergio Fernando. 2018. “Preventing Systemic Corruption in Brazil.” Dædalus, the Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, 147(3): 157–168.Google Scholar
Moyo, Sam and Katerere, Yemi. 1991. NGOs in Transition: An Assessment of Regional NGOs in the Development Process. Harare: The Zimbabwe Energy Research Organization.Google Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter T. 1997. “‘Global Bukowina’ Examined: Viewing the Multinational Enterprise as a Transnational Law-making Community,” in Teubner (ed.): 79–108.Google Scholar
Muehrcke, P. C. 1986. Map Use. 2nd edition. Madison: JP Publications.Google Scholar
Munger, Frank. 1998. “Mapping Law and Society,” in Sarat, Constable, Engel, Hans, and Lawrence (eds.): 21–80.Google Scholar
Muracciole, D. 1980. “Le rond et le plat,” in Cartes et Figures de la Terre: 235–239.Google Scholar
Murphy, Craig and Tooze, R (eds.). 1991. The New International Political Economy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Mustill, Lord Justice. 1988. “The New Lex Mercatoria: The First Twenty-five Years.” Arbitration International, 4: 86–119.Google Scholar
Mutua, Makau. 2001. “Savages, Victims, and Saviors: The Metaphor of Human Rights.” Harvard International Law Journal, 42(1): 201–245.Google Scholar
Muzaffar, Chandra. 1990. “Ethnicity, Ethnic Conflict and Human Rights in Malaysia,” in Welch, Jr. and Leary (eds.): 107–141.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura (ed.). 1969. Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Nafziger, James and Bartel, Barry. 1991. “The Migrant Workers Convention: its Place in Human Rights Law.” International Migration Review, 25: 771–797.Google Scholar
Nanda, Ved, Scarritt, J, and Shepherd, G, Jr. (eds.). 1981. Global Human Rights: Public Policies, Comparative Measures and NGO Strategies. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Nanda, Ved. 1985. “Development and Human Rights: the Role of International Law and Organizations,” in Shepherd, Jr. and Nanda (eds.): 287–307.Google Scholar
Nandy, Ashis. 1987a. “Cultural Frames for Social Transformation: A Credo.” Alternatives XII: 113–123.Google Scholar
Nandy, Ashis. 1987b. Traditions, Tyranny and Utopias. Essays in the Politics of Awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nandy, Ashis. 1988. “The Politics of Secularism and the Recovery of Religious Tolerance.” Alternatives, XIII: 177–194.Google Scholar
Navarro, Zander. 2002. “‘Mobilização sem emancipação’ – as lutas sociais dos em-terra no Brasil,” in Santos (ed.) (2002b): 189–232.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 1996. “The Judges and Political Corruption in Italy.” Journal of Law and Society. 23(2): 95–112.Google Scholar
Nett, Roger. 1971. “The Civil Right We Are Not Ready For: the Right of Free Movement of People on the Face of the Earth.” Ethics, 81: 212–227.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Linda (ed.). 1990. Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Niessen, Jan. 1992. “European Community Legislation and Intergovernmental Cooperation on Migration.” International Migration Review, 26: 676–684.Google Scholar
Nino, Carlos S. 1993. “On the Exercise of Judicial Review in Argentina,” in Stotzky (ed.): 309–335.Google Scholar
Noel, A. 1987. “Accumulation, Regulation and Social Change: An Essay on French Political Economy.” International Organization, 41: 303–333.Google Scholar
Nordahl, Richard. 1992. “A Marxian Approach to Human Rights,” in An-na’im (ed.): 162–187.Google Scholar
Oakley, Robert, Dziedzic, M, and Goldberg, E (eds.) . 1998 Policing the New World Disorder: Peace Operations and Public Security. Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
Obiora, L. Amede. 1997. “Bridges and Barricades: Rethinking Polemics and Intransigence in the Campaign against Female Circumcision.” Case Western Reserve Law Review, 47: 275–378Google Scholar
O’Connor, James. 1988. “Capitalism, Nature and Socialism: A Theoretical Introduction.” Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 1(1): 3–14.Google Scholar
O’Connor, James. 1991a. “Socialism and Ecology.” Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 8: 1–12.Google Scholar
O’Connor, James. 1991b. “The Second Contradiction of Capitalism: Causes and Consequences.” CES/CNS Pamphlet, 1.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 1985. Disorganized Capitalism. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 1987. “The Utopia of the Zero-Option: Modernity and Modernization as Normative Political Criteria.” Praxis International, 7: 1–24.Google Scholar
Oladipo, Olusegun. 1989. “Towards a Philosophical Study of African Culture: A Critique of Traditionalism.” Quest, 3(2): 31–50.Google Scholar
Olaeghulom, F. Ugboaja. 1985. “Human Rights and the Refugee Situation in Africa,” in An-na’im (ed.): 197–229.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Luciano. 1989. “Derechos humanos y Marxismo. Breve ensayo para un nuevo paradigma.” El Otro Derecho, 4: 7–39.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter. 1971. Rhetoric, Romance, and Technology. Studies in the Interaction of Expression and Culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter. 1977. Interfaces of the Word: Studies in the Evolution of Consciousness and Culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Oommen, T. K. 1993. Race, Ethnicity and Class: An Analysis in Interrelations. Delhi: Center for the Study of Social Systems, Jawaharlal Nehru University.Google Scholar
Oomen, Barbara and Durmus, Elif. 2019. “Cities and plural understandings of human rights: agents, actors, arenas.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 51(2): 141–150.Google Scholar
Orlu Nmehielle, Vincent. 2001. The African Human Rights System. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Ortiz, Roxanne D. 1987. “Indigenous Rights and Regional Autonomy in Revolutionary Nicaragua.” Latin American Perspectives, 52: 43–66.Google Scholar
Oruka, H. Odera. 1990. “Cultural Fundamentals in Philosophy.” Quest, 4(2): 21–37.Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark J. 1995. “Dialogue with Dictators: Judicial Resistance in Argentina and Brazil.” Law and Social Inquiry, 20: 481–560.Google Scholar
Pacem in Maribus XX. 1992. Ocean Governance: A Model for Global Governance in the 21st Century. Malta: International Ocean Institute.Google Scholar
Panikkar, Raimundo. 1984. “Is the Notion of Human Rights a Western Concept?” Cahier, 81: 28–47.Google Scholar
Pantham, Thomas. 1988. “On Modernity, Rationality and Morality: Habermas and Gandhi.” The Indian Journal of Social Science, 1(2): 187–208.Google Scholar
Pardo, Arvid. 1968. “Whose Is The Bed of the Sea?” American Society, International Law Proceedings, 62: 216–229.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1971. The System of Modern Societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Pashukanis, Evgeny. 1978. Law and Marxism: A General Theory. London: Ink Links.Google Scholar
Pastor, Ricardo. 1998, “La Reforma de la Justicia Peruana,” paper presented to the Workshop of Judicial Reform. Oñati: International Institute of Sociology of Law.Google Scholar
Payoyo, Peter. 1997. Cries of the Sea: World Inequality, Sustainable Development and the Common Heritage of Humanity. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Peet, Richard and Thrift, N (eds.). 1989. New Models in Geography: the Political-Economy Perspective. London: Unwin-Hyman.Google Scholar
Peixoto, João. 2001. “Migration and Policies in the European Union: Highly Skilled Mobility, Free Movement of Labour and Recognition of Diplomas.” International Migration, 39(1): 33–61.Google Scholar
Pepper, David and Jenkins, Alan (eds.). 1985. The Geography of Peace and War. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim. 1969. The New Rhetoric: a Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Peters, Antoine. 1986. “Law as Critical Discussion,” in Teubner (ed.): 250–279.Google Scholar
Petras, Elizabeth. 1980. “The Role of National Boundaries in a Cross-National Labour Market.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 4: 157–195.Google Scholar
Picciotto, Sol. 1989. “Slicing a Shadow: Business Taxation in an International Framework,” in Hancher and Moran (eds.): 11–47.Google Scholar
Pierson, Christopher. 1991. Beyond the Welfare State: The New Political Economy of Welfare. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Pieterse, Jan N. 1989. Empire and Emancipation. Power and Liberation on a World Scale. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Piore, M. J. 1986. “The Shifting Grounds for Immigration.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 485: 23–33.Google Scholar
Piore, M. J. and Sabel, Charles. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 1992. “Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty.” Ethics, 103: 48–75.Google Scholar
Poggi, Gianfranco. 1978. The Development of the Modern State: A Sociological Introduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Pollis, Adamantia and Schwab, P (eds.). 1979. Human Rights. Cultural and Ideological Perspectives. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Pollis, Adamantia. 1982. “Liberal, Socialist and Third World Perspectives of Human Rights,” in Schwab and Pollis (eds.): 1–26.Google Scholar
Pomeranz, William. 1996. “Judicial Review and the Russian Constitutional Court: The Chechen Case.” Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Popkin, Margaret and Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. 1995. “Truth as Justice: Investigatory Commission in Latin America.” Law and Social Inquiry, 20: 79–115.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro. 1979. “Illegal Immigration and the International System.” Social Problems, 26: 425–438.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro and Walton, J. 1981. Labor, Class and the International System. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro and Jozsef, Böröcz. 1989. “Contemporary Immigration: Theoretical Perspectives on its Determinants and Modes of Incorporation.” International Migration Review, 23: 606–629.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro and Zhou, Min. 1992. “Gaining the Upper Hand: Economic Mobility among Immigrant and Domestic Minorities.” Ethnic and Racial Studies, 15: 491–522.Google Scholar
Posey, Darrell Addison (ed.). 1999. Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity. London: Intermediate Technology.Google Scholar
Pospisil, L. 1971. Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Potter, Michael A. 1989. “Human Rights in the Space Age: An International and Legal Political Analysis.” The Journal of Law and Technology, 4: 59–76.Google Scholar
Potter, Pitman. 1993. Popular Attitudes Toward Civil Obligations: Responses to Modernization among the Getihu in Shanghai. Paper presented at the Workshop on Globalization and the Future of Law in China. Madison: Global Studies Research Program, October 1–2.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, Nicos. 1978a. Political Power and Social Classes. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, Nicos. 1978b. State Power and Socialism. London: NLB.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. 1937. The Future of Common Law. Cambride, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. 1950. New Paths of the Law. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. 1959. Jurisprudence. St. Paul: West Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise. 1992. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Preuss, Ulrich. 1988. “Entwicklungsperspektiven der Rechtswissenschaft,” in Kritische Justiz, 21: 361–376.Google Scholar
Prieto, Esther. 1994. “Indigenous People in Paraguay,” in van Cott (ed.)Google Scholar
Prigogine, I. 1980. From Being to Becoming. San Francisco, CA W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I. and Isabelle Stengers. 1979. La nouvelle alliance: métamorphose de la science. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Prillaman, William. 2000. The Judiciary and Democratic Decay in Latin America. Westport, Conn: Praeger.Google Scholar
Procee, Herik. 1992. “Beyond Universalism and Relativism.” Quest, 6(1): 45–55.Google Scholar
Prothero, R. Mansell. 1990. “Labor Recruiting Organizations in the Developing World.” International Migration Review, 24: 221–228.Google Scholar
Purdy, Jedediah. 2014. “Neoliberal Constitutionalism: Lochnerism for a New Economy.” Law and Contemporary Problems, 77(4): 195–213.Google Scholar
Pureza, José Manuel. 1993. “Globalização e Direito internacional: da boa vizinhança ao Património Comum da Humanidade.” Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 36: 9–26.Google Scholar
Pureza, José Manuel. 1998a. O Património Comum da Humanidade. Rumo a um Direito Internacional da Solidariedade?. Porto: Afrontamento.Google Scholar
Pureza, José Manuel. 1998b. “Eternalizing Westphalia? International Law in a Period of Turbulence.” Nação e Defesa, 87: 31–48.Google Scholar
Quam, L. 1943. “The Use of Maps in Propaganda.” Journal of Geography, 42: 21–32.Google Scholar
Quraishi-Landes, Asifa. Forthcoming. “Healing a Wounded Islamic Constitutionalism: Sharia, Legal Pluralism, and Unlearning the Nation-State Paradigm,” in Santos, Araújo, and Aragón (eds.).Google Scholar
Racine, J. B. et al. 1982. “Escala e Acção. Contribuições para uma interpretação do mecanismo de escala na prática da geografia.” Revista Brasileira de Geografia, 45.Google Scholar
Ramose, Mogobe B. 1992. “African Democratic Traditions: Oneness, Consensus and Openness.” Quest, VI: 63–83.Google Scholar
Randeria, Shalini. 2002. “Pluralismo jurídico, soberania fracturada e direitos de cidadania diferenciais: instituições internacionais, movimentos sociais e o Estado pós-colonial na Índia,” in Santos (ed.) (2002c).Google Scholar
Ramírez, Tobón, William, . 1997. Urabá. Los inciertos confines de una crisis. Planeta.Google Scholar
Rao, Brinda. 1991. “Dominant Constructions of Women and Nature in Social Science Literature.” CES/CNS Pamphlet, 2.Google Scholar
Reich, Norbert. 1992. “Competition Between Legal Orders: A New Paradigm of EC Law?” Common Market Review, 29: 861–896.Google Scholar
Reitan, E. A. 1986. “Popular Cartography and British Imperialism: The Gentleman’s Magazine, 1739–1763.” Journal of Newspaper and Periodical History. II: 3, 2–3.Google Scholar
Renner, K. 1976. The Institutions of Private Law and their Social Functions. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Renou, L. 1968. Religions of Ancient India. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Renteln, Alison D. 1990. International Human Rights. Universalism Versus Relativism. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Report of the Working Group on Indigenous Populations on its Ninth Session UN Doc E/CN.4/Sub.2/1991/40.Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith. 2011. “Bring Back Bentham: ‘Open Courts’, ‘ Terror Trials’, and Public Sphere(s),” Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 5(1): 4–69.Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith and Greenhouse, Linda (eds.). 2014. “The Invention of Courts,” Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 9.Google Scholar
Riess, Joachim. 1991. “Das europäische Tele-Kommunications Recht: Recht zwischen Markt and Technik.” Computer und Recht, 9: 559–561.Google Scholar
Rivière, J. L. 1980. “Cartes polémiques,” in Cartes et Figures de la Terre: 351.Google Scholar
Robertson, Roland. 1990. “Mapping the Global Condition: Globalization as the Central Concept,” in Featherstone (ed.): 15–30.Google Scholar
Robinson, A. and Petchnik, B. 1976. The Nature of Maps: Essays toward Understanding Maps and Mapping. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Maria de Lurdes, Garoupa, Nuno, Magalhães, Pedro, Leitão, Alexandra, and Gomes, Conceição (eds.). 2017. 40 Anos de Políticas de Justiça em Portugal. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, César A. 2001a. “Globalization, Judicial Reform and the Rule of Law in Latin America: The Return of Law and Development.” Beyond Law, 7(23): 13–42.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, César A. 2001b. “La Justicia Civil,” in Santos and García-Villegas. Volume I: 547–614.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, César A. 2001c. “La Justicia Laboral,” in Santos and García-Villegas. Volume I: 615–682.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, César A. 2002. “À procura de alternativas econômicas em tempos de globalização: o caso das cooperativas de recicladores de lixo na Colômbia,” in Santos (ed.) (2002): 329–367.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Garavito, , Céśar, A. (2004). “Global Governance, Cross-Border Organizing and Labor Rights: Codes of Conduct and Anti-Sweatshop Struggles in Mexico and Guatemala.” Beyond Law 28: 23–48.Google Scholar
Rogers, R. 1992. “The Politics of Migration in the Contemporary World.” International Migration. Special issue, 30: 33–52.Google Scholar
Rojas, Fernando. 1986. “A Comparison of Change-Oriented Legal Services in Latin America with Legal Services in North America and Europe.” Institute for Legal Studies Working Papers. Series 1: 9.Google Scholar
Romein, Jan. 1978. The Watershed of Two Eras: Europe in 1900. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. 1981. La crise de I’état providence. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Andrew (ed.). 1997. No Sweat. Fashion, Free Trade and the Rights of Garment Workers. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1973. The Social Contract and Discourses. London: J. M. Dent and Sons.Google Scholar
Rowat, Malcom, Malik, Walled, and Maria, Dakolias. (eds.). 1995. Judicial Reform in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Rowat, Malcom. 1995. “Judicial Reform in Latin America and the Caribbean: Operational Implications for the Bank,” in Rowat, Malik, and Dakolias (eds.): 16–18.Google Scholar
Rubin, Barnett. 1990. “Human Rights in Mass-Based Ethnic Conflict: South Asian Examples of Dilemmas of Definition, Monitoring and Protection,” in Welch, Jr. and Leary (eds.): 186–205.Google Scholar
Rusche, G. and Kirchheimer, O. 1968. Punishment and Social Structure. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
Motta, Sá, Patto, Rodrigo. 2010. “Modernizing repression: USAID and the Brazilian police.” Revista Brasileira de História, 30 (59): 235–262.Google Scholar
Sachs, Jeffrey. 1998. Globalization and the Rule of Law. New Haven: Yale Law School.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. 1985. Orientalism. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Said, Edward 1993. “Nationalism, Human Rights and Interpretation.” Raritan, 12(3): 26–51.Google Scholar
Sajo, Andras. 1990. “New Legalism in East Central Europe: Law as an Instrument of Social Transformation.” Journal of Law and Society, 17: 329–344.Google Scholar
Salt, John. 1987. “Contemporary Trends in International Migration Study.” International Migration, 25: 241–250.Google Scholar
Salt, John. 1989. “A Comparative Overview of International Trends and Types, 1950–80.” International Migration Review, 23: 431–456.Google Scholar
Samuels, W. 1979. “The State Law and Economic Organization,” in Spitzer (ed.): 65–99.Google Scholar
Sánchez, Beatriz E. 2001. “El reto del multiculturalismo jurídico. La justicia de la sociedad mayor y la justicia indígena,” in Santos and García-Villegas. Volume II: 5–142.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1971. “Law Against Law.” Yale University, Program in Law and Modernization, Working Papers, 4.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1974. Law Against Law: Legal Reasoning in Pasargada Law. Cuernavaca: Centro Intercultural de Documentacion.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1977. “The Law of the Oppressed: The Construction and Reproduction of Legality in Pasargada.” Law and Society Review, 12: 5–125.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1979. “Popular Justice, Dual Power and Socialist Strategy,” in Fine et al. (eds.): 151–163.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1980a. “Law and Community: The Changing Nature of State Power in Late Capitalism.” International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 8: 379–397.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1980b. O discurso e o poder. Ensaio sobre a sociologia da retórica jurídica. Coimbra: Boletim da Faculdade de Direito.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1982a. “Law and Revolution in Portugal: The Experiences of Popular Justice after the 25th of April, 1974,” in Abel (ed.), Vol. 2, 251–280.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1982b. “O Estado, o Direito e a questão urbana.” Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 9: 9–86.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1983. “Os conflitos urbanos no Recife: O caso do Skylab.” Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 11: 9–59.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1984. A justiça popular em Cabo Verde. Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Sociais, Faculdade de Economia.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1985a. “Estado e sociedade na semiperiferia do sistema mundial: o caso português.” Análise Social, 87/88/89: 869–901.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1985b. “A crise do estado e a aliança povo/MFA em 1974–75,” in 25 de Abril-10 Anos Depois. Lisbon: Associação 25 de Abril.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1987. Um discurso sobre as ciências. Porto: Afrontamento.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1990a. “Review of Ball, 1985 and White, 1985.” History of the Human Sciences, 3(3): 467–474.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1990b. Introdução a uma ciência pós-moderna. 2nd edition. Porto: Afrontamento.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1990c. O estado e a sociedade em Portugal (1974–1988). Porto: Afrontamento.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1993. “O Estado, as relações salariais e o bem-estar social na semiperiferia: o caso português,” in Santos (ed.): 15–56.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1995. Toward a New Common Sense. Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1998a. “Oppositional Postmodernism and Globalizations.” Law and Social Inquiry, 23: 121–39.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1998b. Reinventar a democracia. Lisbon: Gradiva.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1998c. “The Fall of the Angelus Novus: Beyond the Modern Game of Roots and Options” Current Sociology, 46: 81–118.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2001a. “A Critique of the Lazy Reason: Against the Waste of Experience.” Paper presented at The Modern World-System in the Longue Durée – Conference to Celebrate the 25th Anniversary of the Fernand Braudel Center. Binghamton University, Nov. 2–3.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2001b. “Nuestra América: Reinventing a Subaltern Paradigm of Recognition and Redistribution” Theory, Culture and Society, 18: 185–217.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2001c. “Toward an Epistemology of Blindness: Why the New Forms of ‘Ceremonial Inadequacy’ Neither Regulate nor Emancipate” European Journal of Social Theory, 4: 251–294.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2002. “Orçamento distributivo em Porto Alegre: para uma democracia redistributiva,” in Santos (ed) (2002a): 455–597.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2007. “Beyond Abyssal Thinking: From Global Lines to Ecologies of Knowledges.” Review, XXX (1): 45–89.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2009. Sociología Jurídica Crítica. Para un nuevo sentido común en el derecho. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2012. “Direito e justiça num país libertado há pouco do colonialismo e ainda há menos da guerra civil, em transição democrática,” in Santos and Van-Dúnem (eds.): 23–83.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2014. Epistemologies of the South: justice against epistemicide. Boulder – London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2017. “The Resilience of Abyssal Exclusions in Our Societies: Toward a Post-Abyssal Law.” Tilburg Law Review, 22: 237–258.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2018. The End of the Cognitive Empire. The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (ed.). 1993. Portugal: um retrato singular. Porto: Afrontamento.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (ed.). 2002a. Democratizar a democracia. Os caminhos da democracia participativa. Rio de Janeiro: Record.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (ed.). 2002b. Produzir para viver. Os caminhos da produção não capitalista. Rio de Janeiro: Record.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (ed.). 2002c. Reconhecer para libertar. Os caminhos do cosmopolitismo multicultural. Rio de Janeiro: Record.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (ed.). 2002d. Semear outras soluções. Os caminhos da biodiversidade e dos conhecimentos rivais. Rio de Janeiro: Record.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (ed.). 2002e. Trabalhar o mundo. Os caminhos do novo internacionalismo operário. Rio de Janeiro: Record.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa, Marques, Maria Manuel L., Pedroso, João and Ferreira, Pedro. 1996. Os tribunais nas sociedades contemporâneas: o caso português. Porto: Afrontamento.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa and García-Villegas, Mauricio. 2001. El Caleidoscopio de las Justicias en Colombia. 2 volumes. Bogotá: Colciencias-Uniandes-CES-Universidad Nacional-Siglo del Hombre.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa and César, Rodríguez. (2002). “Introdução: para ampliar o cânone da produção,” in Santos (ed.) (2002b): 23–77.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa and João Carlos, Trindade. (2002). Conflito e Transformação Social: Uma Paisagem das Justiças em Moçambique. 2 volumes. Porto: Afrontamento.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa and Serra Van-Dúnem, José Octávio (eds.). 2012. Sociedade e Estado em construção: desafios do direito e da democracia em Angola. Luanda e justiça: pluralismo jurídico numa sociedade em transformação – Vol. I. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa, Araújo, Sara, and Aragón, Orlando (eds.). Forthcoming. Decolonizing the State: Beyond false or impossible promises. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. Forthcoming. “The Law of the Excluded: Indigenous Justice, Plurinationality, and Interculturality in Bolivia and Ecuador”, in Santos, Araújo, and Aragon (eds.) Decolonizing the State: Beyond false or impossible promises. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Santos, Laymert Garcia dos. 2002. “Predação high tech, biodiversidade e erosão cultural: o caso do Brasil,” in Santos (ed.) (2002d).Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, Constable, Marianne, Engel, David, Hans, Valerie, and Lawrence, Susan (eds.). 1998. Crossing Boundaries. Traditions and Transformations in Law and Society Research. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean Paul. 1976. Critique of Dialectical Reason. London: NLB.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 1991. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 1998. Globalization and its Discontents: Essays on the New Mobility of People and Money. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 1999. Guests and Aliens. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Satz, Debra. 1999. “Equality of What among Whom? Thoughts on Cosmopolitanism, Statism, and Nationalism,” in Shapiro, and Brilmayer, (eds.) Global Justice. New York: NYU Press. pp. 67–85.Google Scholar
Sbragia, Alberta M (ed.). 1991. Euro-Politics: Institution and Policymaking in the ‘New’ European Community. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich. 1967. On the Aesthetic Education of Man. Edited and translated by Wilkinson, E and Willoughby, L. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre. 1990. “Normative and Nowhere to Go.” Stanford Law Review, 43: 167–191.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre. 2002. “The Aesthetics of American Law.” Harvard Law Review, 115: 1049–1118.Google Scholar
Schmidhauser, John. 1992. “Legal Imperialism: Its Enduring Impact on Colonial and Post-Colonial Judicial Systems.” International Political Science Review, 13: 321–334.Google Scholar
Schulte, B. 1991. “Die Folgen der EC-Integration für die wohlfahrtsstaatlichen Regimes.” Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 37: 548–580.Google Scholar
Schwab, Peter and Pollis, A (eds.). 1982. Toward a Human Rights Framework. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Scull, Andrew T. 1977. Decarceration: Community Treatment and the Deviant-A Radical View. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Selby, M. 1989. “Human Rights and Undocumented Immigrant Workers in Japan.” Stanford Journal of International Law, 26(1): 325–369.Google Scholar
Selznick, P. 1969. Law, Society and Industrial Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian and Brilmayer, Lea (eds.). 1999. Global Justice. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. 1993. “The Globalization of Law.” Global Legal Studies Journal, 1(9): 37–64.Google Scholar
Sharabi, Hisham. 1992. “Modernity and Islamic Revival: The Critical Tasks of Arab Intellectuals.” Contention, 2(1): 127–147.Google Scholar
Shariati, Ah. 1982. “Reflection of a Concerned Muslim: On the Plight of Oppressed Peoples,” in Falk, Kim, and Mendlovitz (eds.): 18–24.Google Scholar
Shariati, Ah. 1986. What Is to Be Done: The Enlightened Thinkers and an Islamic Renaissance. Edited by Rajaee, Farhang. Houston: The Institute for Research and Islamic Studies.Google Scholar
Sharkey, M. 1984. “Cartography in Advertising.” The Cartographical Journal, 22: 148–50.Google Scholar
Shaw, T. M. 1990. “Popular Participation in Nongovernmental Structures in Africa: Implications for Democratic Development.” Africa Today, 37(3): 5–22.Google Scholar
Shepherd, George. Jr. 1985. “The Power System and Basic Human Rights: From Tribute to Self-Reliance,” in Shepherd, Jr. and Nanda (eds.): 13–25.Google Scholar
Jr, Shepherd. and Nanda, Ved (eds.). 1985. Human Rights and Third World Development. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Sheth, D. L. 1989. “Nation-Building in Multi-Ethnic Societies: The Experience of South Asia.” Alternatives, 14: 379–388.Google Scholar
Sheth, D. L. and Mahajan, G (eds.). 1999. Minorities, Identities and the Nation State. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shihata, Ibrahim F. J. 1995. “Legal Framework for Development: The World Bank’s Role in Legal and Judicial Reform,” in Rowat, Malik, and Dakolias (eds.): 13–15.Google Scholar
Shiva, Vandana. 1997. Biopiracy. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Shivji, Issa. 1989. The Concept of Human Rights in Africa. London: Codesria Book Series.Google Scholar
Shutkin, William A. 1991. “International Human Rights Law and the Earth: The Protection of Indigenous Peoples and the Environment.” Virginia Journal of International Law, 31: 448–511.Google Scholar
Sieder, Rachel (ed.). 2002. Multiculturalism in Latin America: Indigenous Rights, Diversity and Democracy. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1992. “The International Dimensions of Human Rights Policies and Practices in Latin America.” Paper presented at the SSRC workshop on Human Rights, Justice and Society in Latin America. Buenos Aires, 22–24 September.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1996. “The Emergence, Evolution, and Effectiveness of the Latin American Human Rights Network,” in Jelin and Hershberg (eds.): 59–84.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1955. Conflict. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Paul. 2002. “A recente ressurreição da economia solidária no Brasil,” in Santos (ed.) (2002b): 81–129.Google Scholar
Singh, Ajit. 1993. “The Lost Decade: The Economic Crisis of the Third World in the 1980s: How the North Caused the South’s Crisis.” Contention, 3: 137–169.Google Scholar
Siu-Kai, Lau and Hsin-Chi, Kuan. 1988. The Ethos of the Hong Kong Chinese. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1989. “The State,” in Ball, Farr, and Hanson (eds.): 90–131.Google Scholar
Sklair, Leslie. 1991. Sociology of the Global System. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Sklair, Leslie. 1998. “The Transnational Capitalist Class,” in Carrier, and Miller, (eds.). Virtualism: A New Political Economy. Oxford: BergGoogle Scholar
Sklair, Leslie. 2001. The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1977. “Wallerstein’s World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique.” American Journal of Sociology, 82: 1075–1090.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1985. “Bringing the State Back in: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research,” in Evans, Rueschemeyer, and Skocpol (eds.): 3–37.Google Scholar
Slater, David. 1991. “New Social Movements and Old Political Questions: Rethinking State-Society Relations in Latin American Development.” International Journal of Political Economy, 21: 32–65.Google Scholar
Smart, Carol and Smart, Barry (eds.). 1978. Women, Sexuality and Social Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1990. Towards a Global Culture? In M. Featherstone (ed.), Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity (pp. 170–191). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1937. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony. 1981. The Ethnic Revival in the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony. 1988. The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith-Rosenberg, C. 1985. Disorderly Conduct: Visions of Gender in Victorian America. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Snyder, Francis (ed.). 1996. Constitutional Dimensions of European Economic Integration. Cambridge: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Snyder, Francis. 1980. “Law and Development in the Light of Dependency Theory.” Law and Society Review, 14: 723–804.Google Scholar
Snyder, Francis. 1982. “The Failure of ‘Law and Development’.” Wisconsin Law Review, 3: 373–396.Google Scholar
Snyder, Francis. 1990. New Directions in European Community Law. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Sohn, Louis and Buergenthal, Thomas (eds.). 1992. The Movement of Persons Across Borders. Washington, DC: The American Society of International Law.Google Scholar
Hernando de, Soto . 1989 The Other Path.The Invisible Revolution in the Third World. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.Google Scholar
South-south Conference on the Rule of Law and Human Rights: Exchanging Experiences and Breaking New Paths. Proceedings. Lund, Sweden, 10–14th May 1993. Google Scholar
Speier, H. 1941. “Magic Geography.” Social Research, 8: 310–330.Google Scholar
Spitzer, S. (ed.). 1979. Research in Law and Sociology: A Research Annual. 2 volumes. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.Google Scholar
Spradley, J. P. (ed.). 1972. Culture and Cognition: Rules, Maps and Plans. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
Stallings, Barbara. 1992a. “International Influence on Economic Policy: Debt, Stabilization and Structural Reform,” in Haggard and Kaufman (eds.): 41–88.Google Scholar
Stallings, Barbara. 1992b. Sustainable Development with Equity in the 1990s. Policies and Alternatives. Madison: Global Studies Research Program.Google Scholar
Starr, June and Collier, Jane (eds.). 1989. History and Power in the Study of Law. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stavenhagen, Rodolfo. 1988. Derecho indígena y derechos humanos en America Latina. Mexico City: El Colégio de Mexico.Google Scholar
Stavenhagen, Rodolfo. 1990. The Ethnic Question. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Stavenhagen, Rodolfo. 1994. “Indigenous Rights: Some Conceptual Problems,” in Assies and Hoekema (eds.).Google Scholar
Stavenhagen, Rodolfo. 2002. “Indigenous Peoples and the State in Latin America” in Sieder (ed.): 20–37.Google Scholar
Stavenhagen, Rodolfo and Iturralde, Diego (eds.). 1990. Entre la ley y la costumbre. Mexico City: Instituto Indigenista Interamericano.Google Scholar
Stefanic, Jean. 1998. “Latino and Latina Critical Theory: An Annotated Bibliography.” La Raza Law Journal, 10: 1509–1584.Google Scholar
Stein, L. von. 1888. Handbuch der Verwaltungslehre. Stuttgart: J.C. Cotta.Google Scholar
Stephen, Lynn. 1997. “Redefined Nationalism in Building a Movement for Indigenous Autonomy in Southern Mexico.” Journal of Latin American Anthropology, 3(1): 72–101.Google Scholar
Stiles, Kendall. 2000. “Grassroots Empowerment: States, Non-State Actors and Global Policy Formation,” in Higgot, and Bieler, (eds.) Non-State Actors and Authority in the Global System. New York: Routledge: 32–48.Google Scholar
Stoecker, Christoph. 1990. “The Lex Mercatoria: To What Extent Does It Really Exist?” Journal of International Arbitration, 7: 101–125.Google Scholar
Stotzky, Irwin P. and Nino, Carlos S.. 1993. “The Difficulties of the Transition Process,” in Stotzky (ed.): 3–20.Google Scholar
Stotzky, Irwin P. (ed.). 1993. Transition to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang and Schmitter, Philippe. 1991. “From National Corporatism to Transnational Pluralism: Organized Interests in the Single European Market.” Politics and Society, 19: 133–164.Google Scholar
Sugarman, David (ed.). 1983. Legality, Ideology and the State. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sugarman, David and Teubner, Gunther (eds.). 1990. Regulating Corporate Groups in Europe. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verldganstalt.Google Scholar
Svensson, Tom. 1992. “Right to Self-Determination: A Basic Human Right Concerning Cultural Survival. The Case of the Sami and the Scandinavian State,” in An-na’im (ed.): 363–384.Google Scholar
Swart, A. H. J. 1992. “Police and Security in the Schengen Agreement and Schengen Convention,” in Meijers et al.: 96–109.Google Scholar
Swart, K. 1949. Sale of Offices in the Seventeenth Century. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Swenson, Geoffrey. 2018. “Legal Pluralism in Theory and Practice.” International Studies Review, 20: 438 462.Google Scholar
Swingewood, Alan. 1975. The Novel and Revolution. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian. 1993. “The Folly of the ‘Social Scientific’ Concept of Legal Pluralism.” Journal of Law and Society, 20: 192–217.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2000. “A Non-Essentialist Version of Legal Pluralism.” Journal of Law and Society, 27(2): 296–321.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2008. “Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global.” Sydney Law Review, 30: 375–411.Google Scholar
Tambiah, Stanley. 1989. “Ethnic Conflict in the World Today.” American Ethnologist, 16: 335–349.Google Scholar
Tate, Neal and Vallinder, Torbjörn (eds.). 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. 1972. Laissez Faire and State Intervention in Nineteenth Century Britain. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Teague, Paul. 1989. “Constitution or Regime? The Social Dimension to the 1992 Project.” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 27: 310–329.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. 1986. “After Legal Instrumentalism? Strategic Models of Post-Regulatory Law,” in Teubner (ed.): 299–325.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. 1987. “Juridification: Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions,” in Teubner (ed.): 3–48.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. 1988. “Evolution of Autopoietic Law,” in Teubner (ed.): 217–241.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. 1989. “How the Law Thinks: toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law.” Law and Society Review, 23: 728–757.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. 1991. “La théorie des systèmes autopoietiques.” M, Mensuel, Marxisme, Mouvement, 44 (February): 36–40.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. 1992. “The Two Faces of Janus: Rethinking Legal Pluralism.” Cardozo Law Review, 13:1443–1462.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. 1997. “‘Global Bukowina’: Legal Pluralism in the World Society,” in Teubner (ed.): 3–27.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (ed.). 1986. Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (ed.). 1987. Juridification of Social Spheres: A Comparative Analysis in Areas of Labor, Corporate, Antitrust and Social Welfare Law. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (ed.). 1988. Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (ed.). 1997. Global Law without a State. Aldershot: Darthmouth.Google Scholar
Thakur, Ramesh and Gold, Hyam. 1983. “The Antarctic Treaty Regime: Exclusive Preserve or Common Heritage.” Foreign Affairs Reports XXXII, 11–12:169–186.Google Scholar
Thapar, Romila. 1966. “The Hindu and Buddhist Traditions.” International Social Science Journal, 18(1): 31–40.Google Scholar
Therborn, Göran. 1992. “Routes To/Through Modernity.” Paper presented at the Theory, Culture and Society 10th Anniversary Conference. Seven Springs Mountain Resort, Pa, August 16–19.Google Scholar
Thomas, Cheryl A. 1995. “The Attempt to Institute Judicial Review in the Former USSR,” in Tate and Vallinder (eds.): 421–440.Google Scholar
Thomas, George et al. 1987. Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society and the Individual. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Thomas, Stephen. 1985. “Chinese Economic Development and Human Rights in the Post-Mao Era,” in Shepherd, Jr. and Nanda (eds.): 149–163.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1975. Whigs and Hunters. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Thompson, Kenneth (ed.). 1980. The Moral Imperatives of Human Rights. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Tibi, Bassam, 1993. The Challenge of Fundamentalism: Political Islam and the New World. Hoffmann und Campe.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 1991. “On the Fringes of the World Economy: A Feminist Perspective,” in Murphy and Tooze (ed.): 191–206.Google Scholar
Tie, Warwick. 1999. Legal Pluralism. Toward a Multicultural Conception of Law. Dartmouth: Aldershot.Google Scholar
Tigar, Michael and Levy, Madeleine. 1977. Law and the Rise of Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen. 1990. Cosmopolis. The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Trakman, Leon. 1983. The Law Merchant: The Evolution of Commercial Law. Littleton, CO: Fred Rothman & Co.Google Scholar
Trubek, David. 1985. Max Weber’s Tragic Modernism and the Study of Law in Society. Madison: Institute for Legal Studies.Google Scholar
Trubek, David and Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Scholars in Self-Estrangement: Some Reflections on the Crisis in Law and Development Studies in the United States.” Wisconsin Law Review: 1062–1102.Google Scholar
Trubek, David et al. 1993. “Global Restructuring and the Law: the Internationahzation of Legal Fields and the Creation of Transnational Arenas.” Global Studies Research Program Working Papers Series, 1.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1979. Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tully, James. 2007. “The Imperialism of Modern Constitutional Democracy,” in Loughlin and Walker (eds.): 315–358.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1993. “The Judiciary and Institutions of Judicial Review.” American University Journal of International Law and Policy, 8: 501–516.Google Scholar
Twining, William. 1990. Rethinking Evidence. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Twining, William. 2000. Globalisation and Legal Theory. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto M. 1996. What Should Legal Analysis Become? London: Verso.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto M. 1998. Democracy Realized. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto. 1987. False Necessity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uprimny, Rodrigo. 2001. “Las Transformaciones de la Administración de Justicia en Colombia,” in Santos and García-Villegas. Volume I: 261–315.Google Scholar
Uribe, Maria Teresa. 2002. “Emancipação social em um contexto de guerra prolongada: o caso da Comunidade de Paz de San José de Apartadó, Colombia,” in Santos (ed.) (2002a): 217–253.Google Scholar
USAID – United States Agency for International Development. 1994. Weighing in on the Scales of Justice: Strategic Approaches for Donor-Supported Rule of Law Programs. Washington, DC: USAID Program and Operations Assessment Report no. 7.Google Scholar
USAID. 1996. USAID’s Strategies for Sustainable Development: Building Democracy. Website release.Google Scholar
USAID. 2014. Analysis of USAID Anticorruption Programming Worldwide (2007–2013). Final report.Google Scholar
U.S. Government Accountability Office 1992. FOREIGN ASSISTANCE: Promising Approach to Judicial Reform in Colombia. NSIAD-92-269: Published: Sep 24, 1992. Publicly Released: Sep 24, 1992. Available at http://archive.gao.gov/d35t11/147587.pdf.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office. 1999. Foreign assistance. U.S. Rule of Law Assistance to Five Latin American Countries. Available at https://www.gao.gov/assets/230/228007.pdfGoogle Scholar
van Cott, Donna Lee. 2000. The Friendly Liquidation of the Past: The Politics of Diversity in Latin America. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar
van Cott, Donna Lee (ed.). 1994. Indigenous Peoples and Democracy in Latin America. New York: St. Martin’s Press and The Inter-American Dialogue.Google Scholar
van den Bergh, G. C. 1984. “What Law for Whose Development? Some Theoretical Reflections on Law and Development.” Contributions in Honour of J. G. Sauveplanne: 29–44.Google Scholar
van der Velden, Frans. 1984. “Uniform International Sales Law and the Battle of Forms,” in Contributions in Honour of J.G. Sauveplanne: 233–249.Google Scholar
van Onselen, Charles. 1976. Africa Mine Labour in Southern Rhodesia 1900–1933. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
van Parijs, Philippe. 1992. Arguing for Basic Income: Ethical Foundations for a Radical Reform. London: VersoGoogle Scholar
van Velsen. 1967. “The Extended-Case Method and Situational Analysis,” in Epstein (ed.): 129–149.Google Scholar
Vannucci, Alberto. 2009. “The Controversial Legacy of ‘Mani Pulite’: A Critical Analysis of Italian Corruption and Anti-Corruption Policies.” Bulletin of Italian Politics, 1(2): 233–264.Google Scholar
Varese, Stefano. 1982. “Restoring Multiplicity: Indianities and the Civilizing Project in Latin America.” Latin American Perspectives, 33: 29–41.Google Scholar
Verzelloni, Luca. 2019. Pratiche di sapere. I rituali dell’innovazione nella giustizia italiana. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista. 1953. Opere. Volume II: Principi di scienza nuova. Milan: Riccardi.Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista. 1961. The New Science of Giambattista Vico. Edited by Bergin and Fisch. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Vindal Ødegaard, Cecilie and Juan Javier Rivera, Andía (eds.). 2019. Indigenous Life Projects and Extractivism. Ethnographies from South America. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Viner, Jacob. 1927. “Adam Smith and Laissez Faire.” The Journal of Political Economy, 35: 198–232.Google Scholar
Visvanathan, Shiv. 1997. A Carnival of Science: Essays on Science, Technology and Development. Oxford; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, Lise. 1983. Marxism and the Oppression of Women: Toward a Unitary Theory. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Von Mehren, Arthur and Gordley, James. 1977. The Civil Law System: An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law. 2nd edition. Boston: Little Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Vroey, Michel de. 1984. “A Regulation Approach Interpretation of the Contemporary Crisis.” Capital and Class, 23: 45–66.Google Scholar
Wahl, François. 1980. “Le désir d’espace.” In Cartes et Figures de la terre, 41–46. Paris: Centre Georges Pompidou.Google Scholar
Wai, Robert. 2002. “Transnational Liftoff and Juridical Touchdown: The Regulatory Function of Private International Law in an Era of Globalization.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 40: 209–274.Google Scholar
Wallace, C.D. 1982. Legal Control of Multinational Enterprises. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1979. The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1984. The Politics of the World-Economy: The States, the Movements and the Civilizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1991a. Unthinking Social Science. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1991b. Geopolitics and Geoculture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1999. The end of the world as we know it : social science for the twenty-first century. Minneapolis, Minn.; London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Walton, John. 1985. “The Third ‘New’ International Division of Labor,” in Walton (ed.): 3–16.Google Scholar
Walton, John. (ed.). 1985. Capital and Labor in the Urbanized World. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1981. “The Distribution of Membership,” in Brown and Shue (eds.): 1–35.Google Scholar
Wamba dia Wamba, Ernest. 1991a. “Some Remarks on Culture Development and Revolution in Africa.” Journal of Historical Sociology, 4: 219–235.Google Scholar
Wamba dia Wamba, Ernest. 1991b. “Beyond Elite Politics of Democracy in Africa.” Quest, 6: 28–42.Google Scholar
Warde, Alan. 1997. Consumption, Food and Taste: Culinary Antinomies and Commodity Culture. London: Sage Knowledge.Google Scholar
Warzazi, H. 1986. Exploitation of Labour through Illicit and Clandestine Trafficking. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1948. From Max Weber. Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1954. Law in Economy and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. 2 volumes. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph. 1981. “The Community System: The Dual Character of Supranationahsm.” Yearbook of European Law, 1: 267–306.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph. 1991a. “The Transformation of Europe.” Yale Law Journal, 100: 2403–2483.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph. 1991b. “Problems of Legitimacy in Post-1992 Europe.” Aussenwirtschaft, 46: 411–437.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph. 1992. “Thou Shalt Not Oppress Strangers: On the Judicial Protection of the Human Rights of Non-EC Nationals – A Critique.” European Journal of International Law, 3: 65–91.Google Scholar
Weinreb, Lloyd. 1987. Natural Law and Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, E.B. 1989. “Climate change, intergenerational equity and international : An introductory note.” Climatic Change 15, 327–335.Google Scholar
Welch, Claude. Jr. 1990. “Global Change and Human Rights: Asian Perspectives in Comparative Context,” in Welch, Jr. and Leary (eds.): 3–12.Google Scholar
Welch, Claude. Jr. and Meltzer, Ronald (eds.). 1984. Human Rights and Development in Africa. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Welch, Claude. Jr. and Leary, Virginia (eds.). 1990. Asian Perspectives on Human Rights. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Westing, Arthur. 1992. “Environmental Refugees: A Growing Category of Displaced Persons.” Environmental Conservation, 19: 201–202.Google Scholar
White, Mary V. 1982. “The Common Heritage of Mankind: An Assessment.” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 14: 509–542.Google Scholar
Wieacker, Franz. 1967. Privatrechtsgeschichte der Neuzeit. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Wiethölter, Rudolf. 1986. “Materialization and Proceduralization in Modern Law,” in Teubner (ed.): 221–249.Google Scholar
Willke, H. 1986. Three Types of Legal Structure: The Conditional, the Purposive and the Relational Program In G. Teubner, Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State, pp. 280–298.Google Scholar
Williams, Sylvia M. 1981. “International Law Before and After the Moon Agreement.” International Relations, 7: 1168–1193.Google Scholar
Wilson, William J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged. The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Winckler, H. A. (ed.). 1974. Organizierter Kapitalismus: Voraussetzungen und Anfänge. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Winn, Jane K. 1993. “Relational Practices and the Marginalization of Law: A Study of the Informal Financial Practices of Small Businesses in Taiwan.” Paper presented at the Workshop on Globalization and the Future of Law in China. Madison: Global Studies Research Program, October 1–2.Google Scholar
Wöhleke, Manfred. 1992. “Umweltflüchtlinge.” Aussen Politik, 43: 287–296.Google Scholar
Wong, Siu-lun. 1985. “The Chinese Family Firm: A Model.” British Journal of Sociology, 36: 58–72.Google Scholar
Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 1996. Democracy Against Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Meiksins. 1981. “The Separation of the Economic and the Political in Capitalism.” New Left Review, 127: 66–95.Google Scholar
Woodward, David. 1985. ‘Reality, Symbolism, Time, and Space in Medieval World Maps’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Lxxv, pp. 510–21.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1996. The World Bank’s Partnership with Non-Governmental Organizations. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1997. World Development Report 1997. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik O. 1978. Class, Crisis and the State. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik O., Levine, A, and Sober, E. 1992. Reconstructing Marxism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Wright, Sanford. 1985. “The Political Economy of South Africa: An Analysis of Selected Economic Factors on U.S. Leverages,” in Shepherd, Jr. and Nanda (eds.): 231–245.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 1985. “State Structures and Ideological Outcomes.” American Sociological Review, 50: 799–821.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 1987. The Meaning of Moral Order. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris M. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zaffaroni, Eugenio R. 1997. “Globalización y Sistema Penal en America Latina: de la Seguridad Nacional a la Urbana.” Paper presented at the Summer Course on Globalization and Legal Cultures. Oñati: International Institute of Sociology of Law.Google Scholar
Zavala, Iris, van Dijk, Tuen, and Diaz-Diocaretz, Myriam (eds.). 1987. Approaches to Discourse, Poetics and Psychiatry. Amsterdam: Benjamin’s Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Zeidan, Shawky. 1985. “A Human Rights Settlement: the West Bank and Gaza,” in Shepherd, Jr. and Nanda (eds.): 165–195.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Maurice. 1988. The Civil Wars in Chile. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zieck, M.Y. A. 1992. ‘The Concept of “Generations” of Human Rights and the Right to Benefit from the Common Heritage of Mankind with Reference to Extraterrestrial Realms’, 25 VRÜ, pp. 161–198.Google Scholar
Zifzak, Spencer. 1996. “Hungary’s Remarkable, Radical, Constitutional Court.” Journal of Constitutional Law in Eastern and Central Europe, 3(1): 1–56.Google Scholar
Zion, James. 1992. “North American Indian Perspectives on Human Rights,” in An-na’im (ed.): 191–220.Google Scholar
Zolberg, Aristide. 1981. “Origins of the Modern World System: A Missing Link.” World Politics, 33: 253–281.Google Scholar
Zolberg, Aristide. 1989. “The Next Waves: Migration Theory for a Changing World.” International Migration Review, 23: 403–429.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, Peer. 2017. “The Rule of Law, Legal Pluralism, and Challenges to a Western-centric View: Some Very Preliminary Observations.” Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper Series, 193.Google Scholar
Zweigert, Konrad and Hein, Kötz. 1987. Introduction to Comparative Law. 2 volumes. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Boaventura de Sousa Santos, Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal
  • Book: Toward a New Legal Common Sense
  • Online publication: 08 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662427.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Boaventura de Sousa Santos, Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal
  • Book: Toward a New Legal Common Sense
  • Online publication: 08 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662427.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Boaventura de Sousa Santos, Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal
  • Book: Toward a New Legal Common Sense
  • Online publication: 08 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662427.013
Available formats
×